header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 310 - 310
1 Jul 2014
Kumar N Chen Y Ahmed Q Lee V Wong H
Full Access

Summary

This is the first ever study to report the successful elimination of malignant cells from salvaged blood obtained during metastatic spine tumour surgery using a leucocyte depletion filter.

Introduction

Catastrophic bleeding is a significant problem in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS). However, intaoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has traditionally been contraindicated in tumour surgery because of the theoretical concern of promoting tumour dissemination by re-infusing tumour cells into the circulation. Although IOCS has been extensively investigated in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers, to date, there is no prior report of the use of IOCS in MSTS. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate whether LDF can eliminate tumour cells from blood salvaged during MSTS.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 130 - 131
1 Mar 2008
Lee V Dunning C Jenkyn T
Full Access

Purpose: To develop a computerized inverse dynamic 3D model of the upper limb, focussing on the elbow.

Methods: Anatomic bony landmarks were identified in one cadaveric arm using an electromagnetic tracking device (Flock of Birds, Ascension Technologies, VT). The articular surfaces of the radiohumeral and ulnohumeral joints were digitized, thereby identifying the areas over which the contact forces could act. Attachment sites of the medial collateral (MCL) and lateral collateral (LCL) ligaments and the major muscles (BRA=brachialis, BIC=biceps, BRD=brachioradialis, TRI=triceps) were also digitized to create line-of-action vectors. These data were fed into custom-written software (MATLAB®, The MathWorks Inc., MA) that simulated flexion with gravity as external loading, and calculated the forces exerted by the joint structures. As an indeterminate system, computerized mathematical optimization solved for the internal loads using a cost function that minimized the sum of forces squared.

Results: Model outputs were comparable with results from previous muscle activity and cadaveric studies. Force ratios among the elbow’s prime movers at 30 degrees of flexion agreed quite closely with previous findings (Funk et al, 1987), with percent differences of 11% (BRA), −5% (BIC), −6% (BRD), and −1% (TRI). Overall, the brachialis force was the highest throughout flexion, being the prime mover, while extensor (triceps) activity remained quiet through mid-range. The magnitude of the radiohumeral contact force showed a decreasing pattern through the arc of flexion, similar to the trend found experimentally by others (Morrey et al, 1988). The results also demonstrated stabilizing forces supplied by the MCL, but not the LCL.

Conclusions: Current understanding of upper extremity loading is very limited. Creating an accurate computerized model of the elbow joint, would reduce the need for experimental testing with cadavers, which are always of limited availability. While stability of the elbow has been experimentally investigated, this model will be able to quantify the forces within the stabilizing structures. By establishing a normal baseline of these forces, surgical procedures and joint replacement designs can be validated. Thus, this model can provide a significant contribution to upper extremity biomechanics research and clinical treatments.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 85-B, Issue 1 | Pages 100 - 106
1 Jan 2003
Sundararaj GD Behera S Ravi V Venkatesh K Cherian VM Lee V

We present a prospective study of patients with tuberculosis of the dorsal, dorsolumbar and lumbar spine after combined anterior (radical debridement and anterior fusion) and posterior (instrumentation and fusion) surgery. The object was to study the progress of interbody union, the extent of correction of the kyphosis and its maintenance with early mobilisation, and the incidence of graft and implant-related problems. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score was used to assess the neurological status.

The mean preoperative vertebral loss was highest (0.96) in the dorsal spine. The maximum correction of the kyphosis in the dorsolumbar spine was 17.8°. Loss of correction was maximal in the lumbosacral spine at 13.7°. All patients had firm anterior fusion at a mean of five months. The incidence of infection was 3.9% and of graft-related problems 6.5%.

We conclude that adjuvant posterior stabilisation allows early mobilisation and rehabilitation. Graft-related problems were fewer and the progression and maintenance of correction of the kyphosis were better than with anterior surgery alone. There is no additional risk relating to the use of an implant either posteriorly or anteriorly even when large quantities of pus are present.