Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 90-B, Issue 3 | Pages 319 - 323
1 Mar 2008
Moonot P Singh PJ Cronin MD Kalairajah YE Kavanagh TG Field RE

Hip resurfacing is a bone-conserving procedure with respect to proximal femoral resection, but there is debate in the literature as to whether the same holds true for the acetabulum. We have investigated whether the Birmingham hip resurfacing conserves acetabular bone.

Between 1998 and 2005, 500 Birmingham hip resurfacings were performed by two surgeons. Between 1996 and 2005 they undertook 700 primary hip replacements, with an uncemented acetabular component. These patients formed the clinical material to compare acetabular component sizing. The Birmingham hip resurfacing group comprised 350 hips in men and 150 hips in women. The uncemented total hip replacement group comprised 236 hips in men and 464 hips in women. Age- and gender-matched analysis of a cohort of patients for the sizes of the acetabular components required for the two types of replacement was also undertaken. Additionally, an analysis of the sizes of the components used by each surgeon was performed.

For age-matched women, the mean outside diameter of the Birmingham hip resurfacing acetabular components was 2.03 mm less than that of the acetabular components in the uncemented total hip replacements (p < 0.0001). In similarly matched men there was no significant difference (p = 0.77). A significant difference was also found between the size of acetabular components used by the two surgeons for Birmingham hip resurfacing for both men (p = 0.0015) and women (p = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was found between the size of acetabular components used by the two surgeons for uncemented total hip replacement in either men or women (p = 0.06 and p = 0.14, respectively). This suggests that variations in acetabular preparation also influence acetabular component size in hip resurfacing.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 3 | Pages 402 - 404
1 Mar 2006
Boardman DR Middleton FR Kavanagh TG

As metal-on-metal arthroplasty becomes more widespread, concerns are being raised about the potential dangers of metal particulate debris. We present the case of a benign psoas mass secondary to the presence of such particles. The mass was excised and the hip resurfacing subsequently revised to a total hip replacement.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 76 - 76
1 Jan 2004
Field RE Kavanagh TG Singh PJ
Full Access

Aim: Hip resurfacing is a bone conserving procedure with respect to proximal femoral resection. For previous generations of conservative hip replacement, preservation of the natural femoral head diameter necessitated additional sacrifice of acetabular bone in order to accommodate a sufficiently thick polyethylene acetabular component. We have investigated whether the BHR offers a bone conserving procedure with respect to the acetabular bone stock.

Method: We reviewed 284 Birmingham resurfacing hip replacements (BHR), and 479, primary hip replacements, in which an uncemented acetabular component (THUA) was used. The BHR and THUA group had mean age at surgery of 55 and 65 years respectively. In 32 BHR’s and 21 THUA, pre-operative templating measurements were available for subsequent comparison with size of component implanted.

Results: Comparison of component sizes, for both implant types, confirmed bi-modal distribution according to patient gender. BHR cups, implanted by the first author, in females, were significantly smaller than those implanted, by the same author, in THUA,(p< 0.0001). Pre-operative templating overestimated component size for all groups but the difference was only significant in male BHR cases;(p=0.03). BHR cups implanted by the first author were significantly smaller than the second author, for both male (p= 0.0001) and female patients;(p< 0.001).

Conclusion: In females, BHR is bone a conserving procedure for femoral and acetabular components. In males, the procedure is not bone sacrificing when compared to THUA. Pre-operative templating can overestimate size of acetabular component that will be used for men. A significant difference was found between size of acetabular components used by two surgeons for BHR.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 81-B, Issue 4 | Pages 663 - 666
1 Jul 1999
Sawant MR Bendall SP Kavanagh TG Citron ND

In two years we treated four women with ununited stress fractures of their proximal tibial diaphyses. They all had arthritis and valgus deformity. The stress fractures had been treated elsewhere by non-operative means in three patients and by open reduction and internal fixation in one, but had failed to unite. After treatment with a modular total knee prosthesis with a long tibial stem extension, all the fractures united.

A modular total knee prosthesis is suitable for the rare and difficult problem of ununited tibial stress fractures in patients with deformed arthritic knees since it corrects the deformity and the adverse biomechanics at the fracture site, stabilises the fracture and treats the arthritis.