Cauda equina syndrome (CES) leads to nerve compression in the lumbar spine, and requires immediate treatment to prevent permanent neurological dysfunction, including urinary/anorectal incontinence. The consequences for the patient are significant as, in the decade to 2018, CES has cost the NHS £186,134,049. No study has reported patients’ experiences of being managed with suspected CES in an emergency department (ED), and this study explores patients’ experiences and how the NHS can optimise care for patients experiencing this condition. In this qualitative secondary analysis, 14 participants (aged 23–63 years) with suspected CES were purposively sampled from 4 EDs in England. Online, semi-structed interviews were undertaken (in 2021, during the pandemic), and were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were managed using a Framework approach and analysed thematically. Three themes were identified: quality of care; environmental factors; and expectations. The quality of care included managing uncertainty, the importance of communication, appropriate assessment and follow-up care. Environmental factors, including the chairs, waiting times and the busy nature of the ED, negatively impacted patients’ experiences. Furthermore, an expectation gap was identified, as most individuals came to the ED expecting to receive a scan, an accurate diagnosis and a cure. Despite frustrations, patients expressed gratitude towards the ED staff.Purpose and background
Methods and Results
The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) tool designed to assess artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is the minimum cut-off value that corresponds to a patient’s satisfactory state-of-health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been previously demonstrated, the PASS has yet to be clearly defined. This study aims to define the PASS of the FJS-12 following primary THA. We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary elective THA from 2019 to 2020, and answered both the FJS-12 and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) questionnaires one-year postoperatively. HOOS, JR score was used as the anchor to estimate the PASS of FJS-12. Two statistical methods were employed: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point, which maximized the Youden index; and 75th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the HOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value.Aims
Methods
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a durable procedure which allows most patients to achieve a satisfactory functional level, but there can be instability under stressful conditions. Instability is one cause of early revision, often due to misalignment or inadequate ligament balancing. Persistent instability may cause elevated polyethylene wear. Lower levels of instability may cause patient discomfort with certain stressful activities. Hence quantifying instability may have an important role in the functional evaluation of TKA. Several previous studies showed that accelerometers have advantages in kinematic studies including low cost, ease of application, and application to any activity. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the use of an accelerometer attached to the anterior of the tibia, as an evaluation of knee stability of TKA patients. It was postulated that accelerations between TKAs and normal controls will be different, which could indicate abnormal TKA kinematics involving instability, especially for high intensity activities. We tested 38 TKA knees in 27 patients, in the age range of 50–80 years, with a minimum follow up of 6 months; and 25 knees in 16 shoulder patients, who had no known knee pathology as age-matched controls. A tri-axial accelerometer was firmly attached to the anterior proximal tibia to measure 3-axis accelerations with a sample rate of 100 Hz. Four activities were tested; Starting with the test leg, walk 3 steps then come to a sudden stop Take one step forward with the non-tested leg and make a tight 90∗∗∗∗∗ turn towards the non- tested knee direction Sit down for 3–4 seconds then stand back up Step up on a 7″ inches high box with the test leg, followed by the non-test leg. Then step down from the box with the test leg, followed by the non-test leg. During the activities, the patients responded to a questionnaire on instability and pain for each activity. For each test at the time of foot impact, there was a high/low peak acceleration, the peak-to-valley being taken as the indicator. The mean total magnitude of the acceleration was compared between the TKA and control groups in the anterior-posterior direction using the Student's t-test. Statistical significance was at p-value < 0.05.INTRODUCTION
METHODS & MATERIALS
