Ankle fractures are one of the most common bony injuries presenting to the trauma surgeon. The more severe ones result in disruption of the tibiofibular syndesmosis and hence worse outcome. The outcome depends on accurate reduction of syndesmosis. The two main options in managing these injuries are syndesmotic screws or tightrope. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of complications between these two techniques and their radiographic results.

Retrospective data from 62 patients between September 2009 and March 2011 who had fixation of syndesmosis was obtained from theatre logbooks. 46 patients had syndesmotic screws inserted while 16 had tightrope. The average age was comparable in both groups (51 years v/s 41). 25 of the 46 syndesmotic screws inserted were removed. No tightropes had to be removed for any reason. 2 patients with syndesmotic screws had wound complications while 1 patient which tightrope insertion had a persistent diastasis.

There were no differences in radiological outcome between the two groups with regards to reduction of syndesmosis (measured by talofibular clear space minus medial clear space) (p-value 0.283). The difference between the talocrural angles was also of no significance (p-value 0.344). Our results indicate that tightropes achieve radiologically similar reduction of syndesmosis as screws without any significant difference in complications. The need for a second operation is significantly lower with tightrope fixation.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare two methods of femoral fixation for four strand Hamstring (4SH) primary ACL reconstruction: namely a recently introduced suspensory fixation using absorbable polylactic acid cross pins versus our traditional method of anchor fixation.

Method: Forty-five consecutive patients, who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction using 4SH graft and the suspensory femoral fixation were prospectively evaluated by an independent observer. IKDC scores were recorded and laxity was assessed using cruciometer. These results were compared with a similar well-matched cohort of patients whose femoral fixation was with an anchor. Tibial fixation in both the groups was similar.

Results: No significant difference was noted between the two groups on comparison of IKDC scores or cruciometer readings at a minimum one-year follow-up.

Conclusions: This suspensory method of femoral fixation for a four-strand hamstring graft provided a secure fixation with satisfactory early clinical results. As this method of fixation is a new technique, further follow-up is needed for long-term validation.

Introduction: Number of patients needing revision ACL surgery has increased more than 10 fold. Results of revision surgery are traditionally thought to be inferior to primary reconstruction. Aim of this paper is to describe results of revision surgery using a two-stage technique and compare it with results of primary ACL reconstruction. Materials and Methods: We studied 44 consecutive patients with revision ACL surgery. They had 10 ACL reconstruction elsewhere using autologous (34) or prosthetic ligament (10). Rrevision surgery was two staged. First of debridement and bone grafting and second stage after 3 mths of meniscal and chondral work along with ACL reconstruction using autograft. We compared this group with a similar cohort of patients with primary ACL surgery. Conclusions: A two-stage revision technique for revision ACL surgery allows accurate assessment & opportunity for the bone graft to heal to provide good bed for graft fixation at the time of second procedure.