Purpose: The indication to perform a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) versus a hemiarthroplasty is guided by a patient’s intended level of activity after surgery. It is unclear what activities patients actually perform following shoulder replacement, therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the self-reported activities of patients following either a TSA or hemiarthroplasty.

Method: Two groups of 75 patients each, following TSA or hemiarthroplasty, were matched for a variety of demographic variables. A mailed activity questionnaire asked patients to report their level of pain, motion, strength, and a choice of 70 different activities. Reported activities were classified as high (i.e. tennis) or low (i.e. fishing) demand, and categorized as household (i.e. cooking), yard work (i.e. gardening), sporting (i.e. golf), or musical (i.e. piano).

Results: Ninety-six (64%) patients completed the survey, 50 in the TSA group (27F:19M, avg. 53.2 yrs), and 46 in the HA group (29F:21M, avg. 53.5 yrs). Pain was not different between groups (3.6/10 TSA: 3.9/10 HA), yet a significant difference was reported in forward flexion (145° TSA: 120° HA, P< .002) and strength (6.3/10 TSA: 5.3/10 HA, P< .01). Across all categories whether it be high or low demand, the TSA group (10.4 activities/person) reported more activities compared with the hemiarthroplasty group (8.6 activities/person).

Conclusion: The conventional understanding that a hemiarthroplasty provides the possibility for more activity following surgery is not supported by our data. Patients following a TSA reported better motion and strength and were more active than the hemiarthroplasty group.

Introduction: The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) recommends use of the IKDC score to document subjective, objective and functional ACL outcome. To further improve knowledge concerning patient QOL after ACL reconstruction, an additional specific QOL questionnaire was developed. Using a combination of univariate and multivariate analysis the patient factors and surgical factors that influenced QOL 5- years after ACL reconstruction were determined.

Materials: 500 patients operated on for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction at our institution between 1997 and 2001 were prospectively enrolled. Patient psychosocial profile, sport expectations, knee exam, type of graft, associated lesion, type of anesthesia, complications, IKDC, KT 2000 at 6 moths, 1 year and 2 years were recorded. At five years, patients were asked to complete a 5-subscale validated QOL questionnaire for ACL deficiency. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the factors influencing 5-year QOL.

Results: 203 patients completed the 5-years QOL questionnaire. Responders did not statistically differ from non responders. Patient subjective factors such as: patient expectations, pre-operative symptoms, work-school concerns, recreations concerns, social and psycho-social concerns were significantly (p< 0.05) and independently associated with the five-year QOL results. Objective factors such as meniscus tears and results of the KT 2000 (p< 0.05) were the two surgical factors correlated with 5-year QOL.

Discussion: In this large prospective study, most of the factors influencing the 5-year QOL results after ACL reconstruction were related to patient expectations, psycho-social, symptoms and work-sport concerns. The presence of a meniscus tear and greater KT 2000 laxity also contributed to poorer 5-year QOL results.