header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 49 - 49
4 Apr 2023
Zelmer A Gunn N Nelson R Richter K Atkins G
Full Access

Staphylococcus aureus (SA), the predominant pathogen in human osteomyelitis, is known to persist by forming intracellular reservoirs, including in bone cells (Schwarz et al., 2019, Yang et al., 2018, Krauss et al., 2019, Gao et al., 2020, Bosse et al., 2005), promoting decreased antibiotic susceptibility. However, there are no evidence-based treatment guidelines for intracellular SA infections in osteomyelitis. We sought to address this by systematically reviewing the literature and, testing a selection of antibiotic treatments in a clinically relevant in vitro assay.

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the current evidence for the efficacy of antibiotics against intracellular SA infections relevant to osteomyelitis. For the antibiotics identified as potentially useful, we determined their minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against 11 clinical osteomyelitis SA- isolates. We selected those for further testing reported able to reach a higher concentration in the bone than the identified MIC against the majority of strains. Thus, rifampicin, oxacillin, linezolid, levofloxacin, oritavancin and doxycycline were tested in human SaOS-2-osteocyte infection models (Gunn et al., 2021) of acute (1d) or chronic (14d) infection to clear intracellular SA. Antibiotics were tested at 1x/4x/10x the MIC for the duration of 1d or 7d in each model.

A systematic review found that osteoblasts and macrophages have mostly been used to test immediate short-term activity against intracellular SA, with a high variability in methodology. However, some extant evidence supports that rifampicin, oritravancin, linezolid, moxifloxacin and oxacillin may be effective intracellular treatments. While studies are ongoing, in vitro testing in a clinically relevant model suggests that rifampicin, oxacillin and doxycycline could be effectively used to treat osteomyelitic intracellular SA infections. Importantly, these have lower MICs against multiple clinical isolates than their respective clinically-achievable bone concentrations.

The combined approach of a systematic review and disease-relevant in vitro screening will potentially inform as to the best approach for treating osteomyelitis where intracellular SA infection is confirmed or suspected.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 288 - 288
1 Jul 2014
Kogawa M Khalid K Wijenayaka A Ormsby R Findlay D Atkins G
Full Access

Introduction

Sclerostin has been implicated in mechanotransduction in bone and recent data show a lack of response to loading in the sclerostin transgenic mouse. Sclerostin, the protein product of the SOST gene, is an attractive therapeutic target for low bone mass conditions, including osteoporosis. It is expressed exclusively by mature osteocytes in bone and we have shown that sclerostin targets pre-osteocytes/osteocytes to regulate bone mineralization and osteoclast activity, as well as inducing catabolic gene expression in osteocytes themselves and promoting osteocyte-mediated bone loss (osteocytic osteolysis). The aim of this study was to examine the direct effects of sclerostin on anabolic responses to loading in bone ex vivo.

Methods

10 × 5mm bovine sternum trabecular bone cores were perfused with osteogenic media at 37°C for up to 3 weeks in individual bone culture chambers. The cores were divided into 3 groups; a) mechanically loaded (300 cycles, 4000 μstrain, 1 Hz/day), b) identical loading regime with continuous perfusion of 50 ng/ml recombinant human sclerostin and c) unloaded controls. Loading was accomplished using a second-generation Zetos™ bone loading system. Daily measurements of bone stiffness (Young's modulus), media pH and ionic calcium concentrations were made. Histomorphometric assessment, including fluorochrome labelling analysis, was made of resin-embedded, non-decalcified samples at the end of the experiment. Gene expression in the bovine bone was examined by real-time RT-PCR.