The aim of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the use of guided growth for correcting rotational deformities of long bones. Guided growth is routinely used to correct angular deformities in long bones in children. It has also been proven to be a viable method to correct rotational deformities, but the concept is not yet fully examined. Databases searched include Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar.

All identified citations were uploaded into Rayyan.ai and screened by at least two reviewers. The search resulted in 3569 hits. 14 studies were included: 1 review, 3 clinical trials and 10 pre-clinical trials. Clinical trials: a total of 21 children (32 femurs and 5 tibiae) were included. Surgical methods were 2 canulated screws connected by cable, PediPlates obliquely oriented, and separated Hinge Plates connected by FiberTape. Rotation was achieved in all but 1 child. Adverse effects reported include limb length discrepancy (LLD), knee stiffness and rebound of rotation after removal of tethers. 2 pre-clinical studies were ex-vivo studies, 1 using 8-plates on Sawbones and 1 using a novel z-shaped plates on human cadaver femurs. There were 5 lapine studies (2 using femoral plates, 2 using tibial plates and 1 using an external device on tibia), 1 ovine (external device on tibia), 1 bovine (screws and cable on metacarp) and a case-report on a dog that had an external device spanning from femur to tibia. Rotation was achieved in all studies. Adverse effects reported include implant extrusions, LLD, articular deformities, joint stiffness and rebound. All included studies conclude that guided growth is a viable treatment for rotational deformities of long bones, but there is great variation in models and surgical methods used, and in reported adverse effects.

The concept of guided growth was proposed by Andry in 1741. In the last decades the concept has been widely used as implants has been introduced that can modulate the growth of the bone and pediatric longitudinal and angular deformities is widely treated by this technique. However, there is there is a huge variation in techniques and implants used and high-quality clinical trials is still lacking. Recently implants correcting rotational bony deformities have been proposed and clinical case series have been published.

The current status of guided growth will be presented in this narrative review and preliminary experiences with rotational guided growth will be shared. Is guided growth to be considered a safe treatment at this time point?

The use of retrograde femoral intramedullary nails in children for deformity correction is controversial. It is unknown if the injury to the central part of the growth plate results in premature bony union, leading to limb deformities or discrepancies. The aim of this study was to assess physeal healing and bone growth after insertion of a retrograde femoral nail thorough the centre of the physis in a skeletally immature experimental porcine model. Eleven immature pigs were included in the study. One leg was randomised for operation with a retrograde femoral nail (diameter 10.7 mm), whilst the non-operated contralateral remained as control. All nails were inserted centrally in coronal and sagittal plane under fluoroscopic guidance, and the nails spanned the physis. The nails were removed at 8 weeks. Both femora in all animals underwent MRI at baseline (pre-operatively), 8 weeks (after nail removal) and 16 weeks (before euthanasia). Femoral bone length was measured at 5 sites (anterior, posterior, central, lateral and medial) using 3d T1-weighted MRI. Growth was calculated after 8 weeks (growth with nail) and 16 weeks (growth without nail). Physeal cross-sectional area and percentage violated by the nail was determined on MRI. Operated side was compared to non-operated. Corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. No differences in axial growth were observed between operated and non-operated sides. Mean growth difference was 0,61 mm [−0,78;2,01] whilst the nail was inserted into the bone and 0,72 mm [−1,04;1,65] after nail removal. No signs of angular bone deformities were found when comparing operated side to non-operated side. No premature bony healing at the physis occurred. Histology confirmed fibrous healing. Mean physeal violation was 5.72% [5.51; 5.93] by the femoral nail. The insertion of a retrograde femoral nail through the centre of an open physis might be a safe procedure with no subsequent growth arrest. However, experiments assessing the long term physeal healing and growth are needed.