Aims. To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data and patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), between 2008 and 2019. Postoperative sRDH was identified from clinical notes and the centre’s MRI database, with all imaging providers in the region checked for missing events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate five-year sRDH incidence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent variables predictive of sRDH, with any variable not significant at the p < 0.1 level removed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Complete baseline data capture was available for 733 of 754 (97.2%) consecutive patients. Median follow-up time for censored patients was 2.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0 to 5.0). sRDH occurred in 63 patients at a median 0.8 years (IQR 0.5 to 1.7) after surgery. The five-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for sRDH was 12.1% (95% CI 9.5 to 15.4), sRDH reoperation was 7.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2), and any-procedure reoperation was 14.1% (95% CI 11.1 to 17.5). Current smoker (HR 2.12 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.56)) and higher preoperative ODI (HR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.03)) were independent risk factors associated with sRDH. Current smoker (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.12 to 4.09)) was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. Conclusion. This is one of the largest series to date which has identified current smoker and higher preoperative disability as independent risk factors for sRDH. Current smoker was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. These findings are important for spinal surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in risk assessment, consenting patients, and perioperative management. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):315–322

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of cervical disc herniation influences the severity of symptoms at the time of presentation, and the outcome after surgical treatment. Methods. The type and extent of disc herniation at the time of presentation in 108 patients who underwent anterior discectomy for cervical radiculopathy were analyzed on MRI, using a four-point scale. These were dichotomized into disc bulge and disc herniation groups. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the neck and arm at baseline and two years postoperatively. The perceived recovery was also assessed at this time. Results. At baseline, 46 patients had a disc bulge and 62 had a herniation. There was no significant difference in the mean NDI and SF-36 between the two groups at baseline. Those in the disc bulge group had a mean NDI of 44.6 (SD 15.2) compared with 43.8 (SD 16.0) in the herniation group (p = 0.799), and a mean SF-36 of 59.2 (SD 6.9) compared with 59.4 (SD 7.7) (p = 0.895). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of disabling arm pain in the disc bulge and herniation groups (84% vs 73%; p = 0.163), and no significant difference in the incidence of disabling neck pain in the two groups (70.5% (n = 31) vs 63% (n = 39); p = 0.491). At two years after surgery, no significant difference was found in any of the clinical parameters between the two groups. Conclusion. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the type and extent of disc herniation measured on MRI prior to surgery correlated neither to the severity of the symptoms at presentation, nor to clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1242–1248

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation. Patients and Methods. A cohort of 102 patients was prospectively followed, after an epidural steroid injection for radicular symptoms due to lumbar disc herniation, in 57 patients, and cervical disc herniation, in 45 patients. Those patients with persistent pain who requested a second injection were prospectively followed for one year. Radicular and local pain were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional outcome with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPAD), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12). Results. A second injection was performed in 17 patients (29.8%) with lumbar herniation and seven (15.6%) with cervical herniation at a mean of 65.3 days . (sd. 46.5) and 47 days . (sd. 37.2), respectively, after the initial injection. All but one patient, who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, responded satisfactorily with a mean VAS for leg pain of 8.8 mm . (sd. 10.3) and a mean VAS for arm pain of 6.3 mm . (. sd. 9) one year after the second injection, respectively. Similarly, functional outcome and HRQoL were improved significantly from the baseline scores: mean ODI, 12.3 (. sd. 12.4; p < 0.001); mean NPAD, 19.3 (. sd. 24.3; p = 0.041); mean SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) in lumbar herniation, 46.8 (. sd. 7.7; p < 0.001); mean SF-12 PCS in cervical herniation, 43 (. sd. 6.8; p = 0.103). Conclusion. Repeat steroid injections are a justifiable form of treatment in symptomatic patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation whose symptoms are not satisfactorily relieved after the first injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1364–71

Multiple thoracic disc herniations are rare and there are few reports in the literature. Between December 1998 and July 2002, we operated on 12 patients with multiple thoracic disc herniations. All underwent an anterior decompression and fusion through a transthoracic approach. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Frankel neurological classification and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Under the Frankel classification, two patients improved by two grades (C to E), one patient improved by one grade (C to D), while nine patients who had been classified as grade D did not change. The JOA scores improved significantly after surgery with a mean recovery rate of 44.8% ± 24.5%. Overall, clinical outcomes were excellent in two patients, good in two, fair in six and unchanged in two. Our results indicate that anterior decompression and fusion for multiple thoracic disc herniations through a transthoracic approach can provide satisfactory results

Objective: To asses the outcome of hermivertebrectomy and fusion for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation. Design: A retrospective case analysis. Subjects: Between 1993 and 1999, ten patients (M5, F5) were treated surgically for thoracic disc herniation by the two senior authors (JKW & SHM). The average age of patients at presentation was 5Oyears (range 32–77years). Two patients had two level disc herniations (total 12 disc herniation). The most common sites of disc herniation were at T10/11(4 patients). Duration of diffuse mid thoracic hock pain in eight patients varied from one week to six months. The initial neurological evaluation demonstrated weakness and spasticity of varying grades in eight patients, of which five had paraplegia and three had monoparesis. Sensory changes below the level of the lesion were found in eight patients. Sphincter dysfunction was noted in seven patients. Hemivertebrectomy followed by discectomy and fusion was carried out in all patients. Instrumentation with cages was performed in eight patients and only bone grafting in two patients. Spinal cord monitoring was used in all cases. Outcome Measures: The average follow up was 24 months (range 13–36 months). Pre-operative and postoperative neurological grading was done using MRC grading for motor and sensory deficit. Asymptomatic patients with full activity were regarded as a successful outcome. Results: Three patients had excellent, three had good, three had fair and one had poor outcome. Seven out of eight patients with cages had radiological fusion. The cage stabilises the segment and maintains the spinal height till bony fusion takes place. One patient with hone graft alone had recurrence of symptoms and had a re-surgery with a poor outcome. Six patients had residual back pain of varying degrees. One patient had atelectasis, which recovered within two days of surgery. One patient had suffered from complete paraplegia immediately after surgery detected by SSEPs. She underwent a MRI scan within the hour and was reoperated. She had complete corpectomy and instrumented fusion. At two years she was walking with a support. Conclusion: Exposure of the norrnal tissue above and below herniated disc by hemivertebrectomy facilitates the safe removal of the disc and reduces the risk of further neurological damage. Cages were found to have advantages over autogenous strut only grafts. However, persistent back pain in some cases remains an unsolved problem

Introduction and Aims: Recurrent disc herniation or sciatica is one of the major complications of discectomy, often leading to a cascade of surgical procedures of increasing magnitude, but decreasing surgical outcome. We undertook a study to see if prolapsed disc fragment type can predict the possibility of recurrence of disc herniation or sciatica. Method: We looked at the records of patients who had a discectomy operation during a 10-year period from 1992–2002. We excluded from the study patients who had a concomitant fusion operation, patients with multiple level disc operations and those who have diabetes. We went through the operation records, looking for the type of the disc fragment, i.e. whether it was contained, extruded or sequestrated disc. In the follow-up notes we recorded the patients that complained of leg pain, starting three months after the operation and continuing despite treatment. We recorded the length of follow-up. Results: Sixty-five patients were entered for the study. There were 31 males and 34 females. The age range at surgery was 16–61 years (average 42.1 year). The follow-up ranged from 18 months to 10 years (average 30 months). We divided the patients into two groups. Group A, those patients with recurrent leg pain; and group B, those patients with no leg pain. There were 18 patients in group A – they were all subjected to further examination with MRI scan. In five of the patients, the scan showed recurrence of disc herniation. It was an ipsilateral reherniation in four patients and contralateral in one patient. Eight of these 18 patients required repeat surgery. In the five patients with reherniation (7.69% of whole series), the repeat surgery was a discectomy. In another three patients the surgery was a wide decompression and fusion. On further analysing the pathology found at the initial discectomy, in the group A patients, six (33%) had extruded discs and 12 (66%) had contained discs. In group B, 34 (72%) had extruded discs and 13 (27%) had contained discs. The statistical significance in this small series is debatable. Conclusion: Patients with extruded discs do much better than those with contained discs. Recurrent disc herniation is more common in contained discs and less common in extruded discs. If we could select pre-operatively those patients with contained disc herniations, we could elect to persist with conservative treatment for longer in this group

Aims. The presence of facet tropism has been correlated with an elevated susceptibility to lumbar disc pathology. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of facet tropism on chronic lumbosacral discogenic pain through the analysis of clinical data and finite element modelling (FEM). Methods. Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data, with a specific focus on the spinal units displaying facet tropism, utilizing FEM analysis for motion simulation. We studied 318 intervertebral levels in 156 patients who had undergone provocation discography. Significant predictors of clinical findings were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Loading conditions were applied in FEM simulations to mimic biomechanical effects on intervertebral discs, focusing on maximal displacement and intradiscal pressures, gauged through alterations in disc morphology and physical stress. Results. A total of 144 discs were categorized as ‘positive’ and 174 discs as ‘negative’ by the results of provocation discography. The presence of defined facet tropism (OR 3.451, 95% CI 1.944 to 6.126) and higher Adams classification (OR 2.172, 95% CI 1.523 to 3.097) were important predictive parameters for discography-‘positive’ discs. FEM simulations showcased uneven stress distribution and significant disc displacement in tropism-affected discs, where loading exacerbated stress on facets with greater angles. During varied positions, notably increased stress and displacement were observed in discs with tropism compared to those with normal facet structure. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that facet tropism can contribute to disc herniation and changes in intradiscal pressure, potentially exacerbating disc degeneration due to altered force distribution and increased mechanical stress. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(9):452–461

Background: Many studies have examined magnetic resonance images (MRI) with a view to the anatomy and signaling properties of the intervertebral disc and adjacent tissues in asymptomatic populations. In this study we have examined MRIs of a discrete population of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic disc herniations. Methods: Sixty patients (aged 23–66 years, mean 41.5±8.4) had sagittal T1 and T2- weighted turbo spin echo imaging of the lumbar spine prior to surgery. One disc was herniated at L2-3, 3 at L3-4, 22 at L4-5 and 31 at L5-S1; 3 patients had herniations at both L4-5 and L5-S1. The images were scored for disc narrowing and signal, degree of anterior and posterior bulging and herniation, and assessed for Modic I and II endplate changes and fatty degeneration within the vertebrae. These were carried out for each of 6 discs (T12-S1) for all patients (ie 360 discs and 720 endplates). Results: There were trends of increasing disc narrowing, disc bulging and fatty degeneration with increasing age in these patients. 83% of patients had disc bulging, 53% had endplate irregularities and 44% had fatty degeneration. There was a significant correlation between patient weight and fatty degeneration. 7.5% of vertebrae (in 22% of patients) demonstrated Modic I changes whilst Modic II changes were seen in 14% of vertebrae (40% of patients). This is considerably higher than the incidence reported in asymptomatic individuals where Modic I changes were seen in 0.7% of vertebrae (3% of individuals) and Modic II changes in 1.9% of vertebrae (10% of individuals). Conclusion: There is a higher incidence of Modic I and II changes in disc herniation patients than in asymptomatic individuals

Studies on recurrent disc herniation quote rates of recurrence without regard to the times of recurrence and the influence of longer follow-up. Our objective was to assess the use of survival analysis to measure the rate of revision after lumbar microdiscectomy. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the hospital records of 993 patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy over a period of ten years. After calculating the overall rate of revision for the mean length of follow-up, we carried out a survival analysis using the life-table method. During the study period 49 patients had a revision microdiscectomy. This gave an overall rate of revision of 4.9% at a mean follow-up of 5.25 years. Using survival analysis, the rate of revision was 7.9% at a follow-up of ten years when the number at risk was 84. Survival analysis gives a more accurate estimation of the true rate of recurrence for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. The method allows better comparison between different interventions for disc herniation

Background: The dermatomal drawings used in clinical practice are based on questionable experiments performed in the 1930s. Though widely used in the clinical practice to identify the level of nerve root irritation, this may not be a reliable practise. Purpose: To identify the pain distribution and overlap of single level L4, L5 and S1nerve root irritation. Methods: 187 patients with radicular pain to or below the knee made a precise drawing of their pain distribution and then underwent a MRI scan. Only patients identified as having a single level disc herniation were included in this study. Using computer software, the pain distribution of all people who had the same level nerve root irritation was made by layering their pain drawings. The darkest parts of these compound drawings was where most patients experienced pain. Results: 89 patients were excluded due to tumour, depression or disc lesions on several levels. 98 patients with single level disc herniation were included. There was wide overlap in the pain from each nerve root level, and these areas were much wider than shown on dermatome charts. In general, L4 nerve root pain tended to be anterior on the leg, L5 and S1 nerve root pain was on the posterior leg, with L5 root pain tending to be more lateral. Conclusion: Pain distribution from the L4, L5, S1 nerve roots is not concordant with the sensory distribution of common dermatome charts. This might be due to the methods by which these dermatomes were constructed, or because sciatica is a complex pain experience

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to compare the appearance of the spine in 20 adolescents with proven symptomatic intervertebral disc herniations with that in 20 asymptomatic patients who acted as controls. Abnormality in the signal from the nucleus pulposus of one or more discs was present in all patients, while only four of the 20 controls had any abnormal signals. In all the patients the symptomatic disc produced an abnormal signal and in most a herniated fragment of the nucleus pulposus was identified. Fifteen of the 20 patients had multiple-disc abnormality: six had three abnormal discs and nine had two. This suggests there was an underlying diathesis in patients who later developed disc herniation

The purpose of this study was to highlight uncommon and confusing clinical problem of unilateral prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) producing contralateral symptoms based on case reports and literature review. Four cases of patients with disc prolapse contralateral to the symptomatic limb are presented. Two patients had cervical disc herniations, and one patient had a lumbar disc prolapse. All three patients had resolution of their contralateral radicular pain following discectomy. Few reports have been published of patients with unilateral sciatica following contralateral lumbar disc herniation. The authors described the unique features of their patients’ anatomy and related this to their respective pathology. Coexistence of lumbar spondylosis and lateral recess stenosis, as well as the unique features of the attachments of the dural sac and nerve root sleeves to the surrounding osseous structures serve to provide an explanation for contralateral symptoms. The cervical spine is quite different from the lumbar spine. Here the spinal cord rather than the more flexible cauda equina fills most of the spinal canal. A number of reports can be found describing Brown-Sequard syndrome as a consequence of cervical disc herniation. The two cases presented are in our opinion also the consequence of direct pressure on the spinal cord. We suggest that pressure on the ascending spinothalamic tracts leads to contralateral pain without other neurological symptoms

The aim of this study was to assess whether the pro-lapsed disc fragment type was predictive of recurrent disc herniation or sciatica after discectomy. The records of 39 patients treated by lumbar discectomy only were reviewed. Within two months of surgery, the type of disc fragment prolapse and state of the annulus were assessed on CT scans or MRI. Patients who presented later with recurrent sciatica or disc prolapse were reviewed with MRI. All other patients were contacted and asked whether they had had recurrent sciatica or had undergone repeat surgery elsewhere. The follow-up period was three years. The results suggest that patients in whom discs required annulotomy at surgery had poorer results than those with extrusion through an annular fissure. The degree of annular competence can be used to assess the risk of recurrence of herniation or sciatica

Introduction: The purpose of this case report is to highlight an unusual presentation of a well-described but rare condition (idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis) in association with a commonly presenting problem (far-lateral disc herniation). Methods: Retrospective case report and review of the literature. Results: A 46-year-old Caucasian male presented with right L5 radiculopathy secondary to a far-lateral lumbosacral disc protrusion, confirmed on MRI scanning. Treatment consisted of a right L5 foraminal steroid injection with a 50% improvement in symptoms. This was soon followed by symptoms of spinal stenosis, and repeat MRI showed worsening of idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis seen on the initial scan. Over this period the patient had been unable to exercise regularly and had gained 10 kg of weight. Nonoperative treatment, including a supervised Xenical weight-reduction program (which was unsuccessful), failed to alleviate his symptoms so operative decompression was performed, with satisfactory resolution of the stenotic symptoms. Discussion: Spinal epidural lipomatosis may be idiopathic or secondary to excess steroids (endogenous or exogenous). It affects either the thoracic or lumbar spine. Treatment options are withdrawal of exogenous steroids, weight reduction or decompressive surgery. In this case, disability associated with a far-lateral disc herniation resulted in weight gain, and subsequent stenotic symptoms from previously asymptomatic lumbar idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis

Thirteen patients with symptomatic disc herniation in the cervical spine were treated with percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD). Patients included 10 males and 3 females with a mean age of 41.4 (range, 24–60) years old. Preoperative symptom was divided into 2 types; myelopathy in 8 and radiculopathy in 5 patients. The level of the treated disc, which was diagnosed from the provoked cervicobrachial neuralgia during discography, distributed to C4/5 in 1, C5/6 in 8, C6/7 in 4 patients. The Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) was percutaneously irradiated to the involved disc through a needle of 1.5 mm with a mean energy of 600 joules. Clinical evaluations were assessed with modified Macnab`s criteria at a mean follow-up period of 3 years (range, 0.5–5.7 years) excluding one patient who received open surgery 3 weeks after PLDD. Six patients (46.2%) showed good to excellent results without any significant complications. Four patients of 7 with unsuccessful results received a subsequent open surgery. There was no significant difference between successful and unsuccessful group in gender, disc level, preoperative duration of symptoms, positive provocation during discography, and the total amount of irradiated energy. Patients with successful results tended to be younger with a mean age of 35.7 years compared to those with unsuccessful results with a mean of 46.3 (p=0.053). Clinical outcome in two patients with radiculopathy were judged as excellent. Although postoperative MRI revealed few morphological changes on the disc in 2–3 weeks after PLDD, MRI at the final follow-up showed remarkable decrease of signal intensity in the disc. On postoperative radiographs, the disc height and the range of motion during flexion to extension in the treated discs significantly decreased, indicating the acceleration of disc degeneration and the resultant stabilization of the segment

Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of Adcon-L in re-discectomy and/or surgical neurolysis compared to autologous fat graft. Methods: A total of 50 patients with recurrent disc herniation (n=30) and/or epidural þbrosis (n=20) were included. All had failed in conservative treatment and suffered from predominantly radicular pain. MRI scans proofed the re-herniation (same segment, same side) and/or epidural þbrosis. Standard preoperative and follow-up examinations were carried out. Follow-up examination was performed by an independend investigator. Data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. Result: The clinical outcome showed no statistically difference between both groups one year after revision surgery. Conclusion: Due to our results, and as we know that the rate of clinically relevant cerebrospinal ßuid leakage is increased after the application of Adcon-L, we prefer the use of autologous graft as an antiadhesive in revision surgery of the spinal canal

Introduction: Discectomy for herniation of the nucleus pulposus is an effective procedure when conservative treatment has failed. However, a number of patients rapidly progress to symptomatic instability after discectomy. Those most likely to develop instability have central and multi-regional herniations. Therefore, primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be a better option than discectomy alone in this group. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive group of such patients treated in one centre by PLIF, but recognises that newer technologies may make such destructive spinal surgery unnecessary in the future. Methods: Between June 1997 and December 2000, PLIF for central disc herniation presenting with acute, subacute and chronic back and leg pain, with or without neurological loss, using Diapason pedicle screw instrumentation and Ogival PEEK (Polyether-ether-ketone) Interbody Fusion cages was performed on 41 patients. Eight patients presented acutely with cauda equina symptoms and 33 patients had sub-acute or chronic symptoms. Formal clinic follow-up was continued for at least two years post-surgery and the final outcome at 2 to 5 years after operation was assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Two independent orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiological evidence of fusion on X-rays taken at least two years after surgery. Results: 39 of the 41 patients completed the LBOS questionnaire (95%). One patient had died from an unrelated cause and the other could not be contacted having moved away. 34 (87%) of these had an excellent or good outcome according to the LBOS criteria. However, every patient who returned the questionnaire stated that they would undergo the operation again if guaranteed the same surgical result and all would recommend it to a friend for similar trouble. Four patients (9.7%) were dissatisfied with the process of care they experienced. Analysis of radiographs taken between two and four years post-operatively revealed that spinal fusion (as defined by the Brantigan and Steffee criteria) was present in 38 cases (92.7%). None of the patients with a non-union radiologically had a poor outcome. Conclusions: Post-discectomy instability causing disabling low back and leg pain is more likely to occur in patients with an incompetent annulus than those with a largely intact annulus. The patients in this series all had good evidence on MRI of complete (pan-annular) failure. The decision to perform an acute single level PLIF was taken after discussion with the patients, presenting them with the option of having only a central discectomy and a later fusion if needed or of dealing with the problem at one operation. The outcomes described in this study show that this condition is a good indication for PLIF. However, newer technologies such as disc arthroplasty may be a better option for this group of patients in the future

INTRODUCTION: Discectomy for herniation of the nucleus pulposus is an effective procedure when conservative treatment has failed. However, a number of patients rapidly progress to symptomatic instability after discectomy. Those most likely to develop instability have central and multi-regional herniations. Therefore, primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be a better option than discectomy alone in this group. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive group of such patients treated in one centre by PLIF, but recognises that newer technologies may make such destructive spinal surgery unnecessary in the future. METHODS: Between June 1997 and December 2000, PLIF for central disc herniation presenting with acute, sub-acute and chronic back and leg pain, with or without neurological loss, using Diapason pedicle screw instrumentation and Ogival PEEK (Poly-ether-ether-ketone) Interbody Fusion cages was performed on 41 patients. Eight patients presented acutely with cauda equina symptoms and 33 patients had sub-acute or chronic symptoms. Formal clinic follow-up was continued for at least two years post-surgery and the final outcome at two to five years after operation was assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Two independent orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiological evidence of fusion on X-rays taken at least two years after surgery. RESULTS: 39 of the 41 patients completed the LBOS questionnaire (95%). One patient had died from an unrelated cause and the other could not be contacted having moved away. 34 (87%) of these had an excellent or good outcome according to the LBOS criteria. However, every patient who returned the questionnaire stated that they would undergo the operation again if guaranteed the same surgical result and all would recommend it to a friend for similar trouble. Four patients (9.7%) were dissatisfied with the process of care they experienced. Analysis of radiographs taken between two and four years post-operatively revealed that spinal fusion (as defined by the Brantigan and Steffee criteria) was present in 38 cases (92.7%). None of the patients with a non-union radiologically had a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Post-discectomy instability causing disabling low back and leg pain is more likely to occur in patients with an incompetent annulus than those with a largely intact annulus. The patients in this series all had good evidence on MRI of complete (pan-annular) failure. The decision to perform an acute single level PLIF was taken after discussion with the patients, presenting them with the option of having only a central discectomy and a later fusion if needed or of dealing with the problem at one operation. The outcomes described in this study show that this condition is a good indication for PLIF. However, newer technologies such as disc arthroplasty may be a better option for this group of patients in the future

Introduction Symptomatic Thoracic disc prolapse (TDH) is a rare condition, with approximately 1 case per million population presenting per year. There are not many Spinal surgeons with a significant experience in the management of these lesions which necessitate a familiarity with the anatomy of the thorax and thoracic spinal cord. TDH is often diagnosed on modern imaging, but the indications for surgery in asymptomatic cases or in patients with spinal pain only, remain undefined. The natural history of TDH is not known and there is a poor correlation between the radiological and clinical presentation. The advent of newer minimally invasive endoscopic techniques for TDH may have reduced the incidence of open procedures for this condition, but may lead to an increase in operations performed for TDH, especially in cases where the surgical indications remain uncertain. In a small country like New Zealand it is especially difficult to build up a large series and to become very familiar with what remains a difficult operation

Methods The Neurosurgical experience with this condition in Auckland over the last ten years was reviewed. Clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, surgical management and patient outcome were analyzed.

Results Twenty-one patients were treated over the last 10 years. All had symptomatic TDH. Most operations were performed by the senior author. Patient age varied between 30 and 80, with mean age 50.8 years. There was a slight female preponderance (n=14). Most patients were of European ethnicity. Most patients had spinal cord or nerve root dysfunction, but local pain and sensation change were also noted. MRI was the mainstay in diagnosis, and CT scan was often also used. Surgical exposure was aimed at avoiding spinal cord manipulation and will be discussed. The surgical approach was via thoracotomy in most cases, costotransversectomy, pediculectomy and laminectomy. One case was treated conservatively. There was one case of postoperative paraplegia which will be discussed. There were no other permanent major neurological complications. Patient outcomes will be discussed in detail. Patients with motor weakness showed post operative improvement or full recovery. Pain and sensory loss symptoms were less likely to resolve. Complications that warrant discussion included temporary cranial nerve palsy, thoracic empyema, and long-term opioid addiction for pain.

Discussion Over the past 10 years, a reasonable number of patients with TDH have been treated surgically without major incident. The surgical management of this condition remains a challenge. Younger spinal surgeons may not have the training to deal with these cases, which should be addressed. Endoscopic treatment has a steep learning curve, and may not be well suited to larger symptomatic TDH.

We describe a rare herniation of the disc at the C2/C3 level in a 73-year-old woman. It caused hemicompression of the spinal cord and led to the Brown-Sequard syndrome. The condition was diagnosed clinically and by MRI six months after onset. Discectomy and fusion gave complete neurological resolution.