The obesity crisis in the United States has caused a significant increase of hip arthritis. Surgical complication rates are higher in this population and guidelines are being used to select patients who are acceptable candidates for surgical intervention. This retrospective study evaluated the complication rates for obese patients undergoing total hip replacement compared to non-obese patients as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Additionally, we compared complication rates of the direct anterior approach (ATHA) versus the posterior approach (PTHA) in a consecutive group of patients using similar protocols. This study is an IRB approved retrospective review of 210 patients undergoing ATHA and 201 patients undergoing PTHA during the same time period by 2 experienced, high-volume total joint surgeons. Non-obese patients were compared to obese patients using WHO body mass index (BMI) classification. Minor and major complications were reviewed as well as surgical time, length of stay, disposition, and short-term outcome measures (including pain scores, narcotic use, and assistive device use).BACKGROUND
METHODS
The direct anterior (DA) approach for total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated successful short term outcomes. However, debate remains about which patients are candidates fo this approach. To our knowledge, there are no studies which specifically investigate short-term outcomes in obese versus non-obese patients undergoing THA through a DA approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complication rates and short term outcomes of obese, pre-obese, and normal BMI patients undergoing THA through DA approach. A retrospective review of 151 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral THA through a DA approach for osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis was performed after IRB approval. Forty patients had a normal BMI, 54 were pre-obese, and 57 were obese by WHO classification (37 class I obese, 12 class II obese, and 8 class III obese). Electronic and paper charts were reviewed to determine differences in surgical time, length of stay, disposition, wound and major complications, and short term outcome measures.Introduction
Methods
Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) remains a widely used therapeutic intervention in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is mounting evidence that tranexamic acid (TXA), a powerful antifibinolytic, can significantly reduce perioperative blood loss with a concomitant lower ABT rate. In May 2012, TXA intravenous infusion was introduced as standard therapy in all patients undergoing major hip and knee arthroplasty. The TXA protocol included infusing 1 gm prior to incision and 1 gm after lowering the tourniquet. Nadir hemoglobin (Hb) level has been shown to be the single most important predictor of ABT in patients undergoing TKA. It is often used as the main trigger for ABT and in research trials examining restrictive transfusion trials. There is a paucity of information regarding the impact of TXA on Hb levels in patients undergoing primary TKA. The purpose of this retrospective study was to examine the impact of TXA on hemoglobin levels in primary TKA patients. Patients undergoing primary single, or bilateral, TKA from a single orthopedic surgeon from the years 2009–2010 before TXA infusion (n=78) were compared to patients undergoing the same operation after TXA was introduced as a therapeutic intervention (n=97). TKA is a very standardized operation that has stayed consistent over the convening years in terms of surgical technique and intra-operative management. The following Hb values were selected for analysis between the two groups: pre-surgical Hb value, immediate post-operative Hb, nadir Hb, and discharge Hb. Paired t-test was used for analysis with p-value set at 0.05. Additional data analysis included: length of stay (LOS) and rate of ABT.Introduction
Methods
The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has shown to improve multiple early outcome measures. However, criticisms suggest improved results may be due to selection bias and protocol changes. This study compares mini-incision posterior approach to direct anterior approach performed by one surgeon, controlling for influences other than the surgical approach itself. An IRB approved retrospective review was conducted on 150 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty patients; the first 50 from mini-incision posterior approach, followed by 50 during the learning curve for direct anterior approach, and 50 subsequent cases when the approach was routine. Peri-operative protocols were alike for all groups. Data collection included patient demographics, anesthesia, operative times, discharge disposition, length of stay, VAS pain scores, progression from assistive devices, and narcotic use at follow-up of two and six weeks. Statistical methods included Wilcoxon rank sum, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, fisher exact and t-tests. P-value of <.05 was considered significant.Introduction:
Methods:
