To evaluate career length after surgical treatment of combined ACL + medial collateral ligament (MCL) and ACL +posterolateral corner (PLC) surgeries in all elite athletes. Secondly, in a subgroup of male professional footballers to determine career length and competition level after ACL+MCL or ACL+PLC reconstructions and compare this to a cohort who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) alone. A consecutive cohort of elite athletes undergoing combined ACL+MCL surgery and combined ACL+PLC surgery between February 2001 and October 2019 were analysed. A subgroup of male footballers from this population was compared to a previously identified cohort of male, professional footballers having had primary ACL reconstruction without other ligament surgery. A minimum 2-years follow-up was required. Outcome measures were career length and competition level.Introduction
Methods
To determine if elite athletes can return to professional sport after MCL or posterolateral (PLC) reconstruction using LARS ligaments. The secondary aims are to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of LARS by reporting sport longevity, subsequent surgeries, and complications. A retrospective review of all extra-articular knee ligament reconstructions, utilising a LARS synthetic ligament, by 3 sports knee surgeons between 2013 and 2020 was undertaken. All elite athletes aged over 16 years and a minimum of 2 years post reconstruction were included. No LARS were used for ACL reconstructions, and they were excluded if a LARS ligament was used for a PCL reconstruction. Return to play (RTP) was defined as competing at professional level or national/ international level in amateur sport.Introduction
Methods
Austin Moore cervicocephalic prostheses have been a therapeutical option for femoral neck fractures in patients with a reduced general condition for many years. Since treatments other than total hip arthroplasties have also been included in National arthroplasty registers during the last decade, adequate reference data for comparative analyses have recently become available. Based on a standardised methodology, a comprehensive literature analysis of clinical literature and register reports was conducted. On the one hand, the datasets were examined with regard to validity and the occurrence of possible bias factors, on the other hand, the objective was to compile a summary of the data available. The main criterion is the indicator of Revision Rate. The definitions used with respect to revisions and the methodology of calculations are in line with the usual standards of international arthroplasty registers.Introduction
Materials and Methods
