Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery.

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 – 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique.

This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis.

Open debridement and Outerbridge and Kashiwagi debridement arthroplasty (OK procedure) are common surgical treatments for elbow arthritis. However, the literature contains little information on the long-term survivorship of these procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the survivorship after elbow debridement techniques until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and revision surgery.

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open elbow surgical debridement (open debridement, OK procedure) between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with primary elbow osteoarthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, or inflammatory arthritis. A total of 320 patients had primary surgery including open debridement (n=142) and OK procedure (n=178), and of these 33 patients required a secondary revision surgery (open debridement, n=14 and OK procedure, n=19). The average follow-up time was 11.5 years (5.5 - 21.5 years). Survivorship was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Log Rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used assess the likelihood of conversion to total elbow arthroplasty or revision surgery while adjusting for covariates (age, gender, diagnosis). Significance was set p<0.05.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed open debridement was 100.00% at 1 year, 99.25% at 5 years, and 98.49% at 10 years and for OK procedure 100.00% at 1 year, 98.80% at 5 years, 97.97% at 10 years (p=0.87) for conversion to total elbow arthroplasty. There was no difference in survivorship between procedures after adjusting for significant covariates with the cox proportional hazard model. The rate of revision for open debridement and OK procedure was similar at 11.31% rand 11.48% after 10 years respectively. There were higher rates of revision surgery in patients with open debridement (hazard ratio, 4.84 CI 1.29 - 18.17, p = 0.019) compared to OK procedure after adjusting for covariates. We also performed a stratified analysis with radiographic severity as an effect modifier and showed grade 3 arthritis did better with the OK procedure compared to open debridement for survivorship until revision surgery (p=0.05). However, this difference was not found for grade 1 or grade 2 arthritis. This may suggest that performing the OK procedure for more severe grade 3 arthritis could decrease reoperation rates. Further investigations are needed to better understand the indications for each surgical technique.

This study is the largest cohort of open debridement and OK procedure with long term follow-up. We showed that open elbow debridement and the OK procedure have excellent survivorship until conversion to total elbow arthroplasty and are viable options in the treatment of primary elbow osteoarthritis and post traumatic cases. The OK procedure also has lower rates of revision surgery than open debridement, especially with more severe radiographic arthritis.

Several studies have highlighted the relationship between anterior cruciate (ACL) injury and knee geometry particularly tibial slope (TS). However, clinical data are inconsistent, whether the lateral or medial or slopes have a different influence on ACL injury. Our goal was to assess whether the medial, lateral slopes are associated with ACL injury and whether meniscus geometry is associated with ACL injury. In addition, we sought to determine if lateral meniscal height could serve as a simple surrogate measurement for ACL injury risk.

A case-controlled study compared 68 patients with an ACL injury and 68 matched nested controls. Radiological analysis of MRI measured the anterior-posterior distance of the medial and lateral plateaus, the tibial slope of both plateaus and meniscus geometry. Groups were compared using a Mann-Whitney test and α < 0 .05.

The lateral tibial plateau slope was significantly higher in the ACL injured group (6.92 degrees ±5.8) versus the control group 2.68 ±5.26 (p 0.0001). In addition, the lateral meniscal slope was significantly steeper with (ACL injuries: −1 ±4.7 versus −4.73 ±4.4 (p 0.0001) in the control group. The ACL Injured group had a significantly lower lateral meniscal height 0.76 cm ±0.09, compared to the control group that has 0.88 cm ±0.12 (p 0.0001). The Lateral meniscal height had a sensitivity of 76.47% and specificity 75% for predicting ACL injury using a cut off of

Patients with ACL-injury had significantly higher lateral tibial plateau slope. Lateral meniscus height was found to be an easy measurement to make on MRI with a high specificity for predicting ACL injury. Lateral tibial slope and meniscal Geometry can be used to identify patients with high risk of an ACL injury, that might benefit from further surgery to optimize rotational stability in high-risk patients.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are frequent among athletes and a leading cause of time away from competition. Stability of the knee involves the ACL for limiting anterior tibial translation and the ALL (anterolateral ligament) to restrain internal rotation of the tibia. Present indications for treatment with a combined ACL-ALL reconstruction remain unclear and mostly subjective. We mathematically modeled the tibial plateau geometry to try and identify patients at risk of ACL injury, and develop an objective trigger point for the decision to proceed with additional surgery to optimize rotational stability in these higher risk patients. We hypothesized that an increased convexity and steepness of the posterior aspect of the lateral plateau would subject knees to higher rotational torques leading to potentially a higher risk of ACL injury.

The study design was a case-control study involving ACL reconstruction cases (n=68) and matched controls (n=68) between 2008–2015 at our institution. We used a two-dimensional approach, evaluating sagittal MRI images of the knee to model the posterior convexity of the lateral tibial plateau. Points were selected along the articular surface, and a least-squares regression was used to curve-fit a power function (y = a xn). In the equation, larger coefficient a and n represented steeper slopes. The cases and controls were compared using a Mann-Whitney-U test, and the statistical significance was set at α < 0.05. A subgroup analysis for females and males was also performed for the curve-fit coefficients.

We observed a significant difference in the tibial surface geometry between our ACL reconstruction cases and matched controls (Figure 1). The modeled power equation for our ACL cases had larger coefficients compared to controls for all groups. For all pooled subjects, coefficient a (ACL recon cases = 0.90 vs controls = 0.68, p < 0.0001) and coefficient n (ACL recon cases = 0.34 vs controls = 0.30, p = 0.07) (Table 1). For the statistically significant coefficient a, we found it had a sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 77.5% for the statistically significant coefficient a, we found it had a sensitivity of 78.9% and specificity of 77.5% for predicting injury, using a cut off coefficient of a = 0.78. The odds ratio was 12.6 [5.5 – 29].

The posterolateral cartilaginous slope of the tibial plateau was mathematically modeled in patients with ACL injury. Patients with ACL injury demonstrated abnormally steep and fast slopes compared to controls that may play predispose to ACL injury by increasing anterior translation forces and internal rotation torques sustained by their knee joint. A steeper slope may also explain high-grade pivot shifts on physical exam that are thought to be a relative indication for adding an associated ALL reconstruction. Our findings are promising for adding more objectivity to surgical decision-making, especially with identifying high-risk patients that may be candidates for combined ACL-ALL reconstructions.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Anterior shoulder instability is associated with osseous defects of the glenoid and/or humeral head (Hill-Sachs lesions). These defects can contribute to the pathology of instability by engaging together. There is a need to continue to develop methods to preoperatively identify engaging Hill-Sachs lesions for determining appropriate surgical management.

The objective was to created a working moveable 3D CT model that allows the user to move the shoulder joint into various positions to assess the relationship between the Hill-Sachs lesion and the anterior glenoid rim. This technique was applied to a cohort series of 14 patients with recurrent anterior dislocation: 4 patients had undergone osteoarticular allografting of Hill-Sachs lesions and 10 control patients had undergone CT scanning to quantify bone loss but had no treatment to address bony pathology. A biomechanical analysis was performed to rotate each 3D model using local coordinate systems through a functional range using an open-source 3D animation program, Blender (Amsterdam, Netherlands). A Hill-Sachs lesion was considered “dynamically” engaging if the angle between the lesion's long axis and anterior glenoid was parallel.

In the classical vulnerable position of the shoulder (abduction=90, external rotation=0–135), none of the Hill-Sachs lesions aligned with the anterior glenoid in any of our patients (Figure 1). Therefore, we considered there to be a “low risk” of engagement in these critical positions, as the non-parallel orientation represents a lack of true articular arc mismatch and is unlikely to produce joint instability. We then expanded our search and simulated shoulder positions throughout a physiological range of motion for all groups and found that 100% of the allograft patients and 70% of the controls had positions producing alignment and were “high risk” of engagement (p = 0.18) (Table 1). We also found that the allograft group had a greater number of positions that would engage (mean 4 ± 1 positions of engagement) compared to our controls (mean 2 ± 2 positions of engagement, p = 0.06).

We developed a 3D animated paradigm to dynamically and non-invasively visualize a patient's anatomy and determine the clinical significance of a Hill-Sachs lesion using open source software and CT images. The technique demonstrated in this series of patients showed multiple shoulder positions that align the Hill-Sachs and glenoid axes that do not necessarily meet the traditional definition of engagement. Identifying all shoulder positions at risk of “engaging”, in a broader physiological range, may have critical implications towards selecting the appropriate surgical management of bony defects. We do not claim to doubt the classic conceptual definition of engagement, but we merely introduce a technique that accounts for the dynamic component of shoulder motion, and in doing so, avoid limitations of a static criteria assumed traditional definition (like size and location of lesion). Further investigations are planned and will help to further validate the clinical utility of this method.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.