Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the extent to which patient demographics, clinical presentation, and blood parameters vary in Kingella kingae septic arthritis when compared with those of other organisms, and whether this difference needs to be considered when assessing children in whom a diagnosis of septic arthritis is suspected.

We present a review of litigation claims relating to foot and ankle surgery in the NHS in England during the 17-year period between 1995 and 2012.

A freedom of information request was made to obtain data from the NHS litigation authority (NHSLA) relating to orthopaedic claims, and the foot and ankle claims were reviewed.

During this period of time, a total of 10 273 orthopaedic claims were made, of which 1294 (12.6%) were related to the foot and ankle. 1036 were closed, which comprised of 1104 specific complaints. Analysis was performed using the complaints as the denominator. The cost of settling these claims was more than £36 million.

There were 372 complaints (33.7%) involving the ankle, of which 273 (73.4%) were related to trauma. Conditions affecting the first ray accounted for 236 (21.4%), of which 232 (98.3%) concerned elective practice. Overall, claims due to diagnostic errors accounted for 210 (19.0%) complaints, 208 (18.8%) from alleged incompetent surgery and 149 (13.5%) from alleged mismanagement.

Our findings show that the incorrect, delayed or missed diagnosis of conditions affecting the foot and ankle is a key area for improvement, especially in trauma practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1510–14.

We present a review of claims made to the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) by patients with conditions affecting the shoulder and elbow, and identify areas of dissatisfaction and potential improvement. Between 1995 and 2012, the NHSLA recorded 811 claims related to the shoulder and elbow, 581 of which were settled. This comprised 364 shoulder (64%), and 217 elbow (36%) claims. A total of £18.2 million was paid out in settled claims. Overall diagnosis, mismanagement and intra-operative nerve injury were the most common reasons for litigation. The highest cost paid out resulted from claims dealing with incorrect, missed or delayed diagnosis, with just under £6 million paid out overall. Fractures and dislocations around the shoulder and elbow were common injuries in this category. All 11 claims following wrong-site surgery that were settled led to successful payouts.

This study highlights the diagnoses and procedures that need to be treated with particular vigilance. Having an awareness of the areas that lead to litigation in shoulder and elbow surgery will help to reduce inadvertent risks to patients and prevent dissatisfaction and possible litigation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:574–9.

A 15 year prospective, observational cohort study was undertaken to assess selective screening of DDH in males and females referred with risk factors only.

Individuals born breech or with evidence of a strong family history for DDH were the ‘risk factors’ studied. All were clinically examined and sonographically screened by one Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic surgeon. Irreducible hip dislocation rate was the primary outcome measure.

From a cohort of 64670 live births, 2,984 neonates/infants, 46.1 per 1000 live births [95% CI 44.6 to 47.8 per 1000 live births] were referred and sonographically screened with ‘pure’ risk factors of breech presentation and/or family history, with clinical stability. 1360 were male, of which 4 were identified as having ‘pathological’ DDH; an incidence of 1 in 333 of those males referred [95 CI 0.001, 0.008]. 1624 were female, of which 45 were identified as having ‘pathological’ DDH; an incidence of 1 in 36 of those females referred [95% CI 0.021, 0.037]. There was a significant difference in the number of female individuals sonographically diagnosed as having ‘pathological’ DDH compared to males (p<0.001). Four individuals were diagnosed with irreducible hip dislocation, 0.06 per 1000 live births [95% CI 0.24, 0.159 per 1000 live births]. All were in females. Additionally, there were 2 female individuals; both with family history of DDH (1^st cousin splinted and sister splinted, respectively) as a risk factor, referred late.

Our study suggests that there is a significant difference between the incidence of female and male individuals diagnosed with ‘pathological’ DDH, in those referred purely with risk factors (breech and family history). These findings question the current screening policy for ultrasound examination of males with risk factors in the absence of clinical instability, and may influence future DDH screening programme policy.

Level of evidence: II