Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 46 - 46
19 Aug 2024
Rilby K van Veghel MHW van Steenbergen LN Lewis P Mohaddes M Kärrholm J Schreurs W Hannink G
Full Access

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) may have bone sparing properties, which could be advantageous in a younger population with high risk of future revision surgery. We used data from the AOANJRR, LROI and SAR to compare survival rates of primary THA, stems used in the first-time revision procedures as well as the overall survival of first-time revisions between a cohort of short-stem and standard-stem THA.

Short-stem THAs (designed as a short stem with mainly metaphyseal fixation) between 2007 and 2021 were identified (n=16,258). A propensity score matched cohort (1:2) with standard THAs in each register was identified (n=32,515). The cohorts were merged into a research dataset. Overall survival at 12 years follow-up was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Stem revisions (short-stem THA n=239, standard-stem THA n=352) were identified. The type of revision stem was classified as standard (<160 mm) or long (>160 mm). The survival rate of all first-time revisions in the two groups was calculated using any type of revision as outcome.

The 12 year- overall survival rate (all revisions, all causes) for primary short-stem THAs was 95.3% (CI 94.5–95.9%), which was comparable to 95.2% (CI 94.7–95.7%) for standard-stem THAs. In the short-stem THA group, a standard stem (<160 mm) was more often (59%) used in the first-time revision than in the standard-stem group (47%, p=0.004). The overall survival of the first-time revisions did not differ between cases primarily operated with a short or a standard stem.

In our multi-national register study, the overall survival rate of short stems was similar to that of standard stems. In short stem revisions there was a higher likelihood of using a standard-length stem for the revision compared with first-time revisions of standard stems. This finding might indicate bone-sparing properties with short-stemmed THAs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 71 - 71
24 Nov 2023
Heesterbeek P Pruijn N Boks S van Bokhoven S Dorrestijn O Schreurs W Telgt D
Full Access

Aim

Diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infections (PSI) is difficult as they are mostly caused by low-virulent bacteria and patients do not show typical infection signs, such as elevated blood markers, wound leakage, or red and swollen skin. Ultrasound-guided biopsies for culture may therefore be an alternative for mini-open biopsies as less costly and invasive method. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value and reliability of ultrasound-guided biopsies for cultures alone and in combination polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and/or synovial markers for preoperative diagnosis of PSI in patients undergoing revision shoulder surgery.

Method

A prospective explorative diagnostic cohort study was performed including patients undergoing revision shoulder replacement surgery. A shoulder puncture was taken preoperatively before incision to collect synovial fluid for interleukin-6 (IL-6), calprotectin, WBC, polymorphonuclear cells determination. Prior to revision surgery, six ultrasound-guided synovial tissue biopsies were collected for culture and two additional for PCR analysis. Six routine care tissue biopsies were taken during revision surgery and served as reference standard.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV; primary outcome measure), and accuracy were calculated for ultrasound-guided biopsies, and synovial markers, and combinations of these.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 427 - 427
1 Sep 2012
Moojen DJ Van Hellemondt G Vogely C Burger B Walenkamp G Tulp N Schreurs W De Meulemeester F Schot C Fujishiro T Schouls L Bauer T Dhert W
Full Access

Background

Both from experimental studies and the large arthroplasty registries there is evidence that bacteria are more often involved in implant loosening then is currently reported. To further elucidate this potential problem, the current study investigated the hypothesis that many total hip arthroplasty revisions, classified as aseptic, are in fact low-grade infections missed with routine diagnostics.

Methods

In 7 Dutch hospitals, 176 patients with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening of their total hip arthroplasty were enrolled. From each patient, the preoperative history was obtained. During surgery, between 14 and 20 tissue samples were obtained for routine culture, pathology analysis and broad range 16S rRNA PCR with reverse line blot hybridization (PCR-RLB). Samples were taken from the (neo-) capsule and acetabular and femoral interface tissue. Cultures were performed locally according to similar protocols. One specialized pathologist, blinded for all other results, analyzed all pathology samples. The PCR-RLB analysis was performed centrally, using a technique previously validated for orthopedic use. Patients were classified as not infected, suspect for infection or infected, according to strict, predefined criteria. Each patient had a follow-up visit after 1 year.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XL | Pages 166 - 166
1 Sep 2012
Schreurs W
Full Access

Background

Because of the long life expectancy of young total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and the limited durability of prosthetic implants in young patients, surgeon's always must take into account that the primary THA will be revised in the future. Therefore, not only the survival of the primary total hip in young patients is important, but we would also like to accentuate the revisability of a primary THA in this specific and high demanding patient population.

Methods

Based on our philosophy, we always use cemented hip in young patients, if needed with acetabular bone impaction grafting. 343 consecutive cemented THA in 270 patients under the age of 50 years were evaluated, all implanted between 1988 and 2006. We also assessed the results of the revised THA (n=53) within the same population. Clinical, radiographical and survival of primary and revision THA were evaluated.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 513 - 513
1 Oct 2010
De Kam D Egmond N Gardeniers J Schreurs W
Full Access

Introduction: Loosening of acetabular components often lead to excessive bone defects. Managing severe acetabular bone loss in revision arthroplasty is a serious or sometimes even an impossible challenge. Several authors even have published disappointing results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long term clinical and radiographic results of acetabular reconstruction with the use of bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup in cases with very large acetabular defects.

Methods: In this historical prospective study, 27 hips (25 patients) with large acetabular defects (AAOS type III and IV, Paprosky type 2B to 3B) were reviewed. In all cases an extensive reconstruction with the use of bone impaction grafting and a large rim wire mesh (Stryker Howmedica, Newbury, UK) was performed. All patients have had a six week bed rest period or 3 weeks of bed rest with 3 weeks of non-weight bearing mobilization. No patient was lost to follow-up. Three patients died during follow-up, the cause of death was in all cases not related to the surgery. All medical files and radiographs were analyzed.

Results: After a mean follow-up of 8.8 years (range 4 to 14.1), 3 hips needed repeat revision and another 2 hips were considered radiographic loose. Reasons for repeat revision were: septic loosening after 4.7 years, aseptic/traumatic loosening after 5.8 years and a broken-out reconstruction after 5 weeks because lack of compliance of the patient.

Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a ten-year survival rate of 87% (95%C.I. 73.1–100%) with end point acetabular revision for any reason and 95% (95%C.I. 86.2–100%) with end point acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening. The mean preoperative HHS was 55 points and improved to 72 points postoperative.

Conclusion: Acetabular reconstruction using impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup can produce favorable long-term results in patients with massive acetabular bone-stock defects. It is the only revision technique which restores massive acetabular bone stock loss. However, in these extensive defects it is a technical demanding procedure and should only be used by surgeons with extensive experience with this technique.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 76 - 76
1 Mar 2009
van der Heide H van der Kraan P Rijnberg W Buma P Schreurs W
Full Access

Introduction : The reason why heterotopic ossification develops after total hip arthroplasty is still not known, but it is assumed that inflammatory reaction is the major driving force. In literature little is known about the cytokine levels at the site of surgery, most measurements are done in serum. This study was conducted to investigate if the levels of different pro- en anti-inflammatory cytokines are measurable in drainage fluid and, when measurable, whether we can find a difference in cytokine concentration between one and six hours postoperatively.

Materials and methods: Samples from the drainage system in 30 consecutive patients undergoing primairy total hip replacement were collected at one and six hours after closure of the wound. GM-CSF, G-CSF, IFN-γ, TNF, MCP-1, IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13 and MIP-1beta levels were measured in the drainage fluids.

Results: Measurable levels of all cytokines studied were found, except for IL-17. A significant elevation of almost all cytokines was observed between the sample after one hour and six hours postoperatively. The elevation was significant for all cytokines except IL-10 and MIP-1b. We found a strong correlation between the different pro-inflammatory cytokines. Levels are much higher than previously shown levels in serum. When computing the IL-6 to IL-10 ratio, this ratio increased from 304 (SD 256) to 12357 (SD 6788) (p< 0,000), which shows an increased predominance of the pro-inflammatory interleukines when comparing the measurements after one and six hours respectively.

Conclusion: Detectable levels of numerous cytokines can be measured in drainage fluid post-operatively. The levels of most cytokines in drainage fluid are higher in samples taken six hours after surgery as compared to samples taken after one hour. Further studies are needed to detect the relation between these cytokine concentrations and the heterotopic bone formation.