Traumatic disruption of the pelvic ring has a high risk of mortality. These injuries are predominantly due to high-energy, blunt trauma and severe associated injuries are prevalent, increasing management complexity. This population-based study investigated predictors of mortality following severe pelvic ring fractures managed in an organised trauma system.

Cases aged greater than 15 years from 1st July 2001 to 30th June 2008 were extracted from the population-based state-wide Victorian State Trauma Registry for analysis. Patient demographic, pre-hospital and admission characteristics were considered as potential predictors of mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of mortality with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated.

There were 348 cases over the 8-year period. The mortality rate was 19%. Patients aged greater than 65 years were at higher odds of mortality (AOR 7.6, 95% CI: 2.8, 20.4) than patients aged 15–34 years. Patients hypotensive at the scene (AOR 5.5, 95% CI: 2.3, 13.2), and on arrival at the definitive hospital of care (AOR 3.7, 955 CI: 1.7, 8.0), were more likely to die than patients without hypotension. The presence of a severe chest injury was associated with an increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3, 6.1), while patients injured in intentional events were also more likely to die than patients involved in unintentional events (AOR 4.9, 95% CI: 1.6, 15.6). There was no association between the hospital of definitive management and mortality after adjustment for other variables, despite differences in the protocols for managing these patients at the major trauma services (Level 1 trauma centres).

The findings highlight the importance of the need for effective control of haemodynamic instability for reducing the risk of mortality. As most patients survive these injuries, further research should focus on long term morbidity and the impact of different treatment approaches.

Osteochondral fracture of the femoral head is an uncommon injury with a high potential for a poor functional outcome. Management is often challenging with limited options. We present two cases in which osteochondral fractures of the femoral head were treated with partial resurfacing using the HemiCAP System (Arthrosuface, Franklin MA, USA).

The Orthopaedic Unit at The Alfred has been using an external fixator in a novel configuration for protecting lower limb wounds after free flap surgery (sometimes even in the absence of a concomitant bony injury). This soft-tissue frame allows the limb to be elevated without contact so that there is no pressure on the flap and its pedicle. Thus, optimising the arteriovenous circulation. We report our initial experience with these soft tissue frames.

The soft tissue frame is not necessarily applied for definitive fracture care, but constructed or modified to optimise elevation of the leg, remove direct pressure from the soft tissues, and stabilise the muscles adjacent to the flap. All ankle-spanning frames held the foot in a plantargrade position to optimise blood flow and recovery (prevent equinus), and minimise intra-compartmental pressure.

During 2007, the Plastic Surgery Unit performed 23 free flaps to the lower limbs of 22 patients. Five of these patients had a soft-tissue frame constructed. One patient had a frame applied purely to manage the soft tissue injury, and the other four, who required an external fixator for a bony injury, had their frame modified. Four of the five patients study patients were injured in motor vehicle accidents and one was injured in a simple fall. All five free flaps survived and none required any further surgery. No patients suffered complications (such as bleeding, pin-track infections, or osteomyelitis) related to the soft tissue frame.

We strongly recommend considering an external fixator in a modified configuration after lower limb free flap surgery. Constructing a soft tissue frame has no added risks if the fixator is already required. In the case where there is no bony injury, a soft tissue frame has the benefits of providing optimal flap conditions and maintaining anatomical joint alignment. However, this must be balanced against the small risk associated with the insertion of pins (such as infection) and the need for an extra procedure to remove the frame. As always, treatment must be tailored to the individual patient.

Introduction: Unilateral posterior Pelvic Ring injuries but especially bilateral sacral fractures or bilateral sacroiliac joint (SI) ruptures as well as lumbosacral dislocations and fracture dislocations remains a significant surgical challenge.^1,2,3 despite advances in surgical techniques. Although the true incidence of these fractures are unknown, 30% are identified late.⁴

The treatment of those fractures varies from conservative treatment, posterior plate fixation, anterior plating as well as percutaneous and open Sacroiliac (SI) joint screws.

However, screw pull-outs and loss of fixation in those methods are well described In the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne (Australia) a Level 1 Trauma Center a series of 14 patients were treated from 10/2006 to date with a multiaxial spinal system.

Methods: Patients with posterior pelvic injuries separation were identified prospectively since October 2006. Data was extracted from the trauma registry database and medical record and diagnostic imaging. Since Ocober 2006, 10 patients with bilateral posterior pelvic ring injuries and 4 with unilateral injuries were identified for fixation.

Technique: The patients were put supine and a incision medial/distalto the posterior iliac spine was made. The placement for the incision gives the surgeon the opportunity to estend the approach to an open reduction of the sacral fracture or SI Joint disruption if a closed reduction cannot be achieved.

A pedicel screw from a multiaxial spinal system (Xia, Stryker or Pangea, Synthes) is placed percutaneously in the posterior iliac crest on both sides and the reduction is performed with the screws attached to the screw handles and with Image Intensifier.

After the reduction the multiaxial screwheads are bent and transfixed with a bar which is tunneled epifacial.

All patients underwent a multislice pelvic and lumbar spine CT and these patients were assessed clinically for neurovascular symptoms and stability. The follow-up included clinical assessment and CT imaging.

Results: Since October 2006 14 patients (10 male, 4 female) with an average age of 32.4 years (range: 20–44 years, median 33 years) and an average ISS (Injury Severity Score) of 37 (range: 14–66, median 34). The mechanism of injury for these patients included: pedestrians versus car; motorcylce; paragliding and motor car collision. All patients had associated anterior pelvic ring injuries which were internally fixed in all but one case.

The follow up time was one to 18 month. The patients were assessed clinically and with CT imaging. No complications or loss of fixation have been observed in this patient group in this short follow up time.

Discussion: The fixation system is highly versaitle and the whole posterior iliac crest can be used for fixation. The posterior instrumentation provides also a good control of the reduction of anterior pelvic ring fractures which should be fixed when associated. In all cases but 3 the nature of the comminuted sacral fractures did not allow the use of SI-Joint screws or anterior SI-Joint plating.

The construct provides initial stability and allows mobilization of the patient. It can be used in cases with sacral comminution and may offer advantages over posterior plate fixation, by reducing complications with prominent metalware.

Pelvic fractures in multi-trauma patients are an indicator of severe trauma and often require advanced wound management of pelvic, abdominal or extremity injuries. Poor wound management may result infected pelvic hardware, necessitating revision surgery. We propose that TNP is a safe method of wound management and report our experience.

In 2006 91 multi-trauma patients required pelvic/ace-tabular fixation at The Alfred, either internal or external. Of those, 23 needed TNP for wound care of pelvic, abdominal or extremity injuries. Indications for TNP included Morel-Lavelle lesions, concomitant bladder disruption with anterior wounds, severe edema preventing any wound closure, extremity open fractures/degloving/fasciotomies and post-op infections.

The average age of the group was 33, the average injury severity score was 36, 5 were female, 18 were male. There was one pelvic wound infection that resolved with TNP and local wound care. Two unsalvageable limbs (one transhumeral, one transfemoral) required amputation after TNP, all others were either closed primarily or with a flap and skin graft. There was one death in the group from unrelated causes. Pelvic scores, SF-12, visual analog pain scores and sexual dysfunction rates are being gathered and will be reported.

Topical negative pressure is a safe and effective method of managing complex wounds in multi-trauma patients with pelvic injuries.