Hamstring tendons (HT) represent a widely used autograft for ACL reconstruction. Harvesting, processing and pretensioning procedures together with the time out of the joint could theoretically hamper tendon cells (TCs) viability. The authors hypothesize that HT cells are not impaired at the end of the surgical procedures and their tenogenic phenotype may be strongly improved by exposure to PEMF. Remnants of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were collected at the end of the surgical procedures before skin closure from 15 healthy donors who underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons. To isolate TCs, the tendon was minced and digested with 0.3 % type I collagenase and the nucleated cells were plated at a density 5x10E3 cells/cm2 and cultured in chamber slides in differentiation medium composed of DMEM + 5ng/ml basic fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF) for 7, 14, 21 days The following cell cultures were set up: TCs cultured with differentiation medium + exposure to PEMF 8 h/day (PEMF generator system IGEA, intensity of magnetic field = 1.5 mT, frequency = 75 Hz) TCs cultured with differentiation medium without exposure to PEMF At day 0, day 7, day 14 and day 21, immunofluorescence analysis was performed to evaluate the expression of collagen type I, collagen type VI, scleraxis and PCNA (proliferative marker) Subsequently, tendon explant cultures were set up to verify, at day 21, explant viability and the expression of collagen type I, collagen type VI, beta-catenin and PCNASummary:
Methods
Menisci are crucial structures for knee homeostasis: they provide increase of congruence between the articular surfaces of the distal femur and tibial plateau, bear loading, shock absorption, lubrication, and proprioception. After a meniscal lesion, the golden rule, now, is to save as much meniscus as possible: only the meniscus tissue which is identified as unrepairable should be excised and meniscal sutures find more and more indications. Several different methods have been proposed to improve meniscal healing. They include very basic techniques, such as needling, abrasion, trephination and gluing, or more complex methods, such as synovial flaps, meniscal wrapping, or the application of fibrin clots. Basic research of meniscal substitutes has also become very active in the last decades. The features needed for a meniscal scaffold are: promotion of cell migration, it should be biomimetic and biocompatible, it should resist forces applied and transmitted by the knee, it should slowly biodegrade and should be easy to handle and implant. Several materials have been tested, that can be divided into synthetic and biological. The first have the advantage to be manufactured with the desired shapes and sizes and with precise porosity dimension and biomechanical characteristics. To date, the most common polymers are polylactic acid (PGA); poly-(L)-lactic acid (PLLA); poly- (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA); polyurethane (PU); polyester carbon and polycaprolactone (PCL). The possible complications, more common in synthetic than natural polymers are poor cell adhesion and the possibility of developing a foreign body reaction or aseptic inflammation, leading to alter the joint architecture and consequently to worsen the functional outcomes. The biological materials that have been used over time are the periosteal tissue, the perichondrium, the small intestine submucosa (SIS), acellular porcine meniscal tissue, bacterial cellulose. Although these have a very high biocompatibility, some components are not suitable for tissue engineering as their conformation and mechanical properties cannot be modified. Collagen or proteoglycans are excellent candidates for meniscal engineering, as they maintain a high biocompatibility, they allow for the modification of the porosity texture and size and the adaptation to the patient meniscus shape. On the other hand, they have poor biomechanical characteristics and a more rapid degradation rate, compared to others, which could interfere with the complete replacement by the host tissue. An interesting alternative is represented by hydrogel scaffolds. Their semi-liquid nature allows for the generation of scaffolds with very precise geometries obtained from diagnostic images (i.e. MRI). Promising results have been reported with alginate and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Furthermore, hydrogel scaffolds can be enriched with growth factors, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC). In recent years, several researchers have developed meniscal scaffolds combining different biomaterials, to optimize the mechanical and biological characteristics of each polymer. For example, biological polymers such as chitosan, collagen and gelatin allow for excellent cellular interactions, on the contrary synthetic polymers guarantee better biomechanical properties and greater reliability in the degradation time. Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a very interesting method for meniscus repair because it allows for a patient-specific customization of the scaffolds. The optimal scaffold should be characterized by many biophysical and biochemical properties as well as bioactivity to ensure an ECM-like microenvironment for cell survival and differentiation and restoration of the anatomical and mechanical properties of the native meniscus. The new technological advances in recent years, such as 3D bioprinting and mesenchymal stem cells management will probably lead to an acceleration in the design, development, and validation of new and effective meniscal substitutes.
In the last decades, significant effort has been attempted to salvage the meniscus following injury. Basic science approaches to meniscus repair include procedures for both meniscus regeneration and meniscus healing. Regeneration of meniscal tissue focuses on filling a defect with reparative tissue, which resembles the native structure and function of the meniscus. Procedures for meniscus healing, on the other hand, aim to accomplish adhesion between the margins of a meniscal lesion, with no attempt to regenerate or replace meniscal tissue. Regeneration studies of tissue to fill a defect in the meniscus have shown interesting results, but complete restoration of the native meniscus has not yet been accomplished. Healing of a meniscal lesion has been investigated in different models although none has demonstrated reproducible healing. Therefore, different paths of investigation must be undertaken, and one of these may be the cell-therapy / tissue engineering approach. In a study from our group, we showed the capacity of chondrocyte-seeded cartilaginous scaffold to repair a bucket-handle lesion of the knee meniscus orthotopically in a large animal study. Following studies were done in order to test the potential of other scaffolds and different cell sources for the repair of the meniscal tissue. We have also evaluated the role of hypoxia in meniscal development in vitro as basis for future research in this field, as hypoxia could be be considered as a promoter for meniscal cells maturation, and opens considerably opportunities in the field of meniscus tissue engineering.
Hypoxia enhances chondrocyte phenotype of cells migrating from cartilage fragments, thus supporting the use of chondral fragment as a potential cell source for one-stage cartilage repair Minced cartilage fragments are a viable cell source for one stage cartilage repair, as shown in both in preclinical and clinical studies. However, the joint microenvironment, in which the repair process takes place, is hypoxic and no evidences are present in literature regarding the behaviour of cartilage fragments in a hypoxic environment. Aim of the study is to verify if hypoxia could influence chondrocyte outgrowth from cartilage fragments into a Hyaluronic-Acid/fibrin scaffold and evaluate its effects on migrating chondrocyte behaviour, compared to normoxic condition. This could be significant in the perspective of a wide clinical application of human chondral fragments for single stage repair.Summary Statement
Introduction
