The optimal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) remains controversial. The operative treatment group has better anatomical recovery, functional outcome scores and less pain than non operative treatment patients, but it may lead to a higher incidence of complications, such as delayed wound healing and surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to analyze the prophylactic effect using a biphasic bone substitute (BS) eluting antibiotic on calcaneal implant-related infections. We conducted a retrospective non-randomized review of all patients with DIACF (type Sanders 2, 3, 4) from 2009 to 2017; 103 calcaneal fractures of 90 patients (13 bilaterally) were treated with plates. All cases received the same systemic antibiotic prophylaxis; BS was used on more complex cases with large bone defect and BS was added with antibiotic on higher risk patients. We collected data including complications: major (deep infections, osteomyelitis) and minor complications (wound dehiscence, superficial infection). We considered the absence of deep infections after 6 months. We compared statistically the outcomes of 3 operative groups: the first was treated with plates only (A), the second with plates and BS (B) and the third with plates added with BS eluting antibiotic (vancomicine or gentamicine) (C).Aim
Methods
