Different techniques for fixation of lateral malleolus have been described. We report our results of using fibula rod for unstable ankle fractures in level one major trauma centre. We reviewed the results of 40 ankle fractures (14 open and 26 closed) with significant soft tissue injuries and open fractures that were treated with a fibula rod between 2012 and 2015. The median age of patients was 60 (17–98 years).Introduction
Methods
Recent published studies have examined the normal dimensions of the syndesmosis on CT. However, previous anatomical studies have shown variations of the articulating facets within the tibialae fibularis and may contribute to the false appearance of increased spacing within the syndesmosis. In this study, we measured and compared anterior and posterior distances of the distal tibiofibular(DTF) syndesmosis on MRI and CT imaging. We identified adult patients who had had both a CT scan and an MRI scan of their ipsilateral ankle to investigate symptoms Introduction:
Methods:
Pyrexia in the post-operative setting has often been associated with a possible systemic or wound infection. We assessed whether there is any justification for our concern regarding post-operative pyrexia following hip arthroplasty and subsequent deep prosthetic infection. We undertook an assessment of the clinical outcome of 97 sequential patients who underwent 103 primary hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis replacements. Daily temperature and systemic complications in the post-operative period were recorded. Clinical outcome was measured using an Oxford hip questionnaire. Patients had a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (range 3.5–7.2years) We reviewed the postoperative temperature records of 80 patients who had undergone primary total hip replacement. Thirty-one patients had required revision surgery at a mean time interval of 37.2 months (range 5–74 months) for confirmed deep prosthetic infection. The remaining Forty-nine patients were asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 31.5 months. Study 1 Post-operative pyrexia of 38 degrees Celsius was present in 51% of patients undergoing primary hip replacement in the first post-operative week but in 21.1% no etiological cause could be identified. Clinical outcome measured by an Oxford hip questionnaire was not influenced by the post-operative temperature pattern. Study 2 The mean peak temperature on the first post-operative day was significantly lower in patients with deep prosthetic infection then patients with a clinically normal outcome (p=0.01). Post-operative pyrexia is clearly not uncommon following primary arthroplasty and its presence should not be regarded as detrimental. Pyrexia in the postoperative setting is a component of the acute phase response to trauma and study 2 demonstrates patients who develop a low-grade infection following arthroplasty may have a diminished febrile response to surgical trauma which may be an indirect representation of a diminished immune response to surgical trauma or infection
Cross match practice for patients with femoral neck fractures continue to cause concern due to a failure of compliance to the existing protocols. We addressed this issue by conducting a number of studies over three years and we report the summation of the studies and demonstrate the reasons for the poor compliance. We provide a simple and effective protocol that has helped reduce preoperative cross matching of femoral neck fractures from 71% to 16.7% two years after its introduction.
Retrospective review of the cross-match practice for 240 femoral neck fractures and reviewed the changes in pre-operative and post-operative haemoglobin levels and association with surgical procedure.
Postal questionnaire of 129 anaesthetic and orthopaedic trainees assessing the perceived cross-match requirements of patients with femoral neck fractures based on preoperative haemoglobin values between 8–13g/dl. In addition reviewed the source of trainees perceptions and practice Study 3 Review of the efficiency of the cross-match protocol two years after its introduction Results
71% patients with femoral neck fractures were cross-matched at admission but only 29% of the patients were subsequently transfused. From the 384 units of blood ordered at admission 230 were returned unused. Inter-trochanteric fractures had a mean blood loss of 3.1g/dl (range 1.5–7.2g/dl) following surgery in comparison to a mean loss of 1.7g/dl (0.9–3.4g/dl) for patients with displaced subcapital fractures
Orthopaedic trainees at all levels of training requested more blood then their anaesthetic counterparts for patients with femoral neck fractures. There was misconceptions regarding blood loss following surgery amongst all trainees and only 14.3% trainees used existing literature to guide their cross-match practice where as 53.4% devised protocols based on their own or colleagues’ experience.
Cross-match protocol was working effectively. Only 16.7% of the patients with femoral neck fractures were cross-matched on admission. Conclusion Cross-match recommendations fail to influence trainees. In order to address this we produced a protocol that does not rely on orthopaedic trainees. The haematology MLSO provides the appropriate amount of preoperative blood for the patient based on our finding of blood loss of different fracture patterns and the patients’ preoperative haemoglobin level. Our results show our protocol is still effective two years following its introduction despite numerous changes in trainees during this period.
