Preclinical testing of implants considers THR patients a homogenous group; in reality, patients are heterogeneous and previous large cohort studies have explored stratification and identified that THR patients function differently [1]. The wide- spread failure of the ASR hip highlighted the potential importance of patient characteristics [2], and a more robust pre- clinical testing procedure may have improved prediction of outcome. Therefore this study aimed to identify differences in hip contact force (HCF) in THR patients stratified by their functional ability. 133 THR patients, >12 months post-surgery, underwent 3D kinematic (Vicon, UK) and kinetic (AMTI, USA) analysis whilst walking at self-selected speed. HCF's, normalized by body weight, were computed through multibody modeling (AnyBody Technology, Denmark) during gait and a mean for each patient was calculated from three to five walking trials. Patients were stratified into three functionality groups by distribution around the mean gait speed for the full cohort of 1.1m/s. The low functioning group (LF) comprised cases with a gait speed ≤0.93 m/s (i.e. 1.1m/s ≤1SD), the mid functioning group (MF) comprised cases with a gait speed between 0.94 m/s and 1.25 m/s (cohort mean ± 1SD), while the high functioning group (HF) included cases walking ≥1.26 m/s. Differences between groups were analyzed using one- dimensional statistical parametric mapping [3]. Linear regression was used to test for significant differences across groups. The test statistic SPM{t} was evaluated at each point in the normalized time series, and a critical threshold corresponding to an error rate of α= 0.05 was calculated based on random field theory. Supra-threshold clusters with their associated p-values were then identified.Introduction
Methods
Total hip replacement (THR) patients are often considered a homogenous group whereas in reality, patients are heterogeneous. Variation in revision rates between patient groups suggest that implants are exposed to different environmental conditions in different patients [1]. Previous reports suggest that for every unit increase of BMI, there is a 2% increased risk of revision of a THR [2]. The aim of this study was to better understand the effect of patient-specific characteristics such as BMI on hip motions and to explore the possible impact on wear. 137 THR patients, at least 12 months post-surgery, underwent 3D kinematic (Vicon, Oxford, UK) and kinetic (AMTI, USA) analysis whilst walking at self-selected walking speed. 3D kinematic data were then mapped onto a modelled femoral cup at 20 pre-determined points to create pathways for femoral head contact, which were then quantified by deriving the aspect ratio (AR). Patients were stratified into three groups determined by BMI scores; healthy weight (BMI ≤25 kg/m2) (n=34); overweight (BMI >25kg/m2 to ≤ 30 kg/m2) (n=66) and obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2) (n=37). Comparisons were made using 95% confidence intervals (CI) and one way ANOVAs.Introduction
Methods
One of the known mechanisms which could contribute to the failure of total hip replacements (THR) is edge contact. Failures associated with edge contact include rim damage and lysis due to altered loading and torques. Recent study on four THR patients showed that the inclusion of pelvic motions in a contact model increased the risk of edge contact in some patients. The aim of current study was to determine whether pelvic motions have the same effect on contact location for a larger patient cohort and determine the contribution of each of the pelvic rotations to this effect. Gait data was acquired from five male and five female unilateral THR patients using a ten camera Vicon system (Oxford Metrics, UK) interfaced with twin force plates (AMTI) and using a CAST marker set. All patients had good surgical outcomes, confirmed by patient-reported outcomes and were considered well-functioning, based on elective walking speed. Joint contact forces and pelvic motions were obtained from the AnyBody modelling system (AnyBody Technologies, DK). Only gait cycle regions with available force plate data were considered. A finite element model of a 32mm head on a featureless hemispherical polyethylene cup, 0.5mm radial clearance, was used to obtain the contact area from the contact force. A bespoke computational tool was used to analyse patients' gait profiles with and without pelvic motions. The risk of edge contact was measured as a “centre proximity angle” between the cup pole and centre of the contact area, and “edge proximity angle” between the cup pole and the furthest contact area point away from the pole. Pelvic tilt, drop and internal-external rotation were considered one at a time and in combinations.Introduction
Methods
