Introduction: The successful outcome from metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is partly dependent on the restoration of the natural biomechanics of the hip joint. Valid measurement of the geometry of the reconstructed hip is challenging using plain radiographs. CT is more accurate and precise yet rarely used to assess hip geometry. Our aims were 1) to quantify the agreement between radiographic and CT measurement of horizontal femoral offset (HFO); 2) to determine the relationship between HFO and patient gender and size; and 3) To compare HFO of the reconstructed hip to the contralateral hip.

Method: We used plain radiograph and CT data from 42 patients (23 male and 19 female) from a consecutive series with unilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. We measured HFO of both hips (component and contralateral) using plain radiographs (with PACS) and CT (with Robin 3D software). Pelvic width and radial head sizes were measured on CT. Measurements were made in triplicate by 2 observers.

We graded the contralateral hip for severity of joint space narrowing on plain radiographs.

Results: There was considerable disagreement between CT and plain radiographs for HFO. HFO was statistically different between genders (p=0.0004). HFO correlated with femoral head radius (0.57, p=0.0002), but not patient size (for height (0.29, p=0.13), or pelvic width (0.25, p=0.11). There was a wide range of HFO of the contralateral hips that was comparable to the reconstructed hip.

Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first study to show the importance of measuring HFO using CT. HFO was found to be correlated to gender and femoral head radius, but not with any other parameters of patient size. The wide range of offset was considerably greater than is available from current total hip replacement designs. Hip resurfacing may overcome this.