A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare the outcome of treatment of unstable fractures of the proximal part of the femur with either a sliding hip screw or a short proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA-XS, Synthes).

Eighty one patients (April 2007 – May 2008) presenting with unstable fracture of the proximal part of the femur were randomized, at the time of admission, to fixation with use of either a short proximal femoral nail antirotation (n=42) or a sliding hip screw (n= 39). The primary outcome measure was reoperation within the first postoperative year and mortality at the end of one year. Operative time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, and any intra-operative complication were recorded for each patient. Follow-up was undertaken at 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months and yearly thereafter. Plain AP and lateral radiographs were obtained at all visits. All changes in the position of the implant, complications, or fixation failure were recorded. Hip range of motion, pain about the hip and the thigh, walking ability score and return to work status were used to compare the outcomes.

There was no significant difference between 1 year mortality rates for the two groups. Mean Operative time was significantly less in PFNA group (Mean 25 min, range 19 – 56 min) than DHS group (Mean 38 min, range 28 – 70 min). Patients treated with a PFNA experienced a shorter fluoroscopy time and less blood loss. 6 patients in DHS group had implant failure as compared to none in PFNA group. The functional outcome was also better in PFNA group.

When compared to DHS, PFNA-XS provides better functional outcome for unstable trochanteric fractures with less operative time, less blood loss and less complications, however one year mortality rate remains the same.

Introduction

Scaphoid nonunions remain controversial with regard to optimal management. The objective of this article is to compare our clinical experience in the treatment of patients with scaphoid nonunion using distal radius non vascularised bone graft with that of iliac crest bone graft.

Adequate exposure is a prerequisite for treatment of distal humeral fractures. In this study, we compared the clinico-radiological and functional outcome of TRAP approach with that of olecranon osteotomy for distal humerus fractures.

27 patients with distal humerus fractures were randomized into 2 groups: Group 1 (n=14, TRAP approach), Group 2 (n=13, Olecranon osteotomy). All patients were operated with bi-columnar fixation. All patients were mobilized from day 2. Follow-up evaluation was done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months.

All patients achieved union. The mean surgical time was higher in group 1 (120 min) as compared to group 2 (100 min). The final ROM was higher in group 1 (1160) as compared to group 2 (850). Two patients in group 2 needed posterior release. 5 patients in group 2 had hardware complications related to olecranon osteotomy and needed removal. Two patients in Group 1 had transient ulnar nerve paraesthesias. There was no difference in triceps power in both groups.

Our results demonstrate that TRAP approach is extensile and safe enough in treating these complex fractures with better final ROM and fewer complications.

Introduction

Adequate exposure is a prerequisite for treatment of distal humeral fractures. In this study, we compared the clinico-radiological and functional outcome of TRAP approach with that of olecranon osteotomy for distal humerus fractures.

Introduction

Locking plates have been especially useful in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures. This study aimed to investigate the role of locking plate in femoral fractures in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Introduction

Transscaphoid perilunate dislocation is a rare injury and therefore it is easily missed at the initial treatment. Once ignored, an alternative treatment such as proximal row carpectomy is indicated, but surgical outcome is not as good as that of an early reduction. Also late reduction (> 3 months) is not possible and needs extensive dissection. We present an alternative technique of staged reduction with better outcome.

Introduction: Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath is a solitary benign soft tissue tumor of the limb. We present our prospective experience of 106 cases, over a period of 22 years to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic radiotherapy in postoperative period. We also present a classification system to help in selecting patients for postoperative radiotherapy

Material & Methods: Between 1986 and 2008, we treated 106 patients with giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath of the hand. There were 77 females and 29 males with a mean age of 31.2 years. All patients presented with gradually progressive swelling. Pain was present in 3 cases. All patients were investigated preoperatively with plain X-rays. MRI was done in 36 cases. A preoperative diagnosis of giant cell tumour of the tendon sheath was made in 98 patients preoperatively. Rest 8 patients were diagnoses on histo- pathological examination.

We developed a classification system to identify the patients for risk of recurrence and consequently selection of patients for postoperative radiotherapy. Group 1(a) and 2(a) were identifies as low risk groups and comprised of 56 patients.

Results: None of the patient in this group received postoperative radiotherapy and no patient had recurrence among them. All other patients (50 patients) were considered to be high risk and given postoperative radiotherapy. Among them 4 had recurrence. A total recurrence rate of 3.7% was found in our study, which is favourably comparable to reported incidences of between 25% to 45%.

Conclusion: In our series, we gave radiotherapy to only high risk patients and had a recurrence rate of only 3.7%. Even in high risk group alone, to whom postoperative radiotherapy was given, recurrence rate was 8%. This indicate the role of radiotherapy as well as importance of our classification system to identify the patients for high risk of recurrence

The rate of nonunion of shaft of humerus ranges from 0 to 15%. The management of this problem becomes difficult when it is complicated by osteoprosis, bone defects and previous surgeries. We treated 24 such cases. There were sixteen males and 8 females. Age ranged from 28 to 65 years and averaged 46 years. Ten fractures were in the middle third and 14 were at the junction of middle and lower thirds. The average duration of nonunion was 8 months. Eight cases were previously treated with plating, 4 were treated with intramedullary nail and 2 with external fixator. Ten cases were treated with slab or cast. All cases were treated with removal of old metalwork (if any), open reduction, placement of fibula autograft in the medullary canal of humerus, plating and cancellous onlay grafting. The length of the fibula autograft in the humerus exceeded the plate length over each fragment. Anterior approach was used in 22 cases. In 2 cases posterior approach was used because of a previously posterior placed plate. U-slab was given in the postoperative period. It was discarded when there was clinical and radiological evidence of union. Physiotherapy was given to all patients after union. 22 humeri united and 2 failed to unite. 21 patients could carry out their daily activities and return to their profession. There was no postoperative radial nerve palsy. 1 case had fibula donor site pain. The follow-up period was 12 to 26 months and averaged 20 months.

Conclusion: This method is a very useful way to manage difficult nonunions of shaft of humerus. We conclude that anterior approach to shaft of humerus is easy and physiological; intramedullary fibula helps to improve the screw purchase, abolishes the stress risers, acts as internal splint, substitutes for absent cortex and provides bone graft.