Hip arthroplasty does not always restore normal anatomy. This is due to inaccurate surgery or lack of stem sizes. We evaluated the aptitude of four total hip arthroplasty systems to restore an anatomical and medialized hip rotation centre. Using 3D templating software in 49 CT scans of non-deformed femora, we virtually implanted: 1) small uncemented calcar-guided stems with two offset options (Optimys, Mathys), 2) uncemented straight stems with two offset options (Summit, DePuy Synthes), 3) cemented undersized stems (Exeter philosophy) with three offset options (CPT, ZimmerBiomet), and 4) cemented line-to-line stems (Kerboul philosophy) with proportional offsets (Centris, Mathys). We measured the distance between the templated and the anatomical and 5 mm medialized hip rotation centre.Aims
Methods
Although total hip arthroplasty is a very successful operation, complications such as: dislocation, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture do occur. These aspects have been studied in large populations for traditional stem designs, but not for more recent short stems. The design rationale of short stems is to preserve bone stock, without compromising stability. However, due to their smaller bone contact area, high peak stresses and areas of stress shielding could appear in the proximal femur, especially in the presence of atypical bone geometries. In order to evaluate this aspect, we quantified the stress distribution in atypical proximal femurs implanted with a commercially available calcar guided short stem. Geometrical shape variations in neck-shaft angle (NSA), neck-length (NL) and anteversion (AV), were determined three-dimensionally in the Mimics Innovation Suite (Materialise N.V., Leuven, Belgium) from a CT dataset of 96 segmented femurs. For each shape variation, the femurs that had the two lowest, two average and two highest values were included (18 femurs). Using scripting functionality in Mimics, CAD design files of the calcar guided Optimys short stem (Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland) were automatically sized and aligned to restore the anatomical hip rotation center. Stem size and position were manually corrected by an orthopedic surgeon before finite element (FE) models were constructed using a non-manifold assembly approach (Figure 1). Material properties were estimated from the CT dataset and loads representing walking and stair climbing were applied [1]. Stress-shielding was evaluated by the change in average strain energy density pre- and post-operatively in three different regions (calcar, midstem, tip) each being subdivided in four quarters (medial, lateral, anterior, posterior) (Figure 2).Introduction
Methods
Accurate placement of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components is critical for obtaining good long-term clinical outcome. Several contemporary CT- or MRI-based technologies allow surgeons to pre-plan TKA and translate that planning into the operating room. To evaluate TKA component placement, post-operative CT or MRI scans allow comprehensive 3D measurements. However, these are expensive and difficult to obtain in large numbers, and yield an additional radiation dose to the patient (in case of CT). A potential solution to overcome these hurdles exists in using 2D/3D registration techniques. In this technique, a new tool (the X-ray Module, Mimics®, Materialise NV) is used to align one or more post-operative X-rays with the preoperative CT- or MRI-based 3D planning (Figure 1). The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of this 2D/3D registration technique for determining 3D position of TKA implant components postoperatively. A TKA was performed in six human cadaver legs. A CT scan was acquired preoperatively and the bones were segmented using Mimics® to obtain 3D bone models. Post-operatively, a high-resolution CT scan with minimization of metal scatters was acquired and bones and implant components were segmented in Mimics® to obtain the ground truth for their relative position. To apply the novel X-ray based post-op analysis, conventional anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained. The accuracy of the X-ray tool was determined by calculating the angles (varus/valgus, flexion/extension, external/internal rotations) and the distances (anterior/posterior, proximal/distal, medial/lateral) between the centers of gravity of the implants from the X-ray based method and the CT-based ground truth in the anatomical coordinate system of the bone. X-ray based alignment was assessed by an orthopedic surgeon (3 repetitions) and Bland-Altman plots were created to visualize the differences between the ground truth and the X-ray based assessment of the implant position.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Natural population variation in femoral morphology results in a large range of offsets, anteversion angles and lengths. During total hip arthroplasty, accurate restoration of hip biomechanics is essential to achieve good functional results. One option is to restore the anatomic hip rotation center. Alternatively, medializing the rotation center and compensating by increasing the femoral offset, reduces acetabular contact forces and increases the abductor lever arm. We investigated the ability of two cemented stem systems to restore hip biomechanics in an anatomic and medialized way. We compared an undersized “Exeter-type” of stem with three offset options and 18 sizes (CPT, Zimmer), to a line-to-line “Kerboul-type” of stem with proportional offset and 12 sizes (Centris, Mathys). Thirty CT scans of whole femora were segmented and the hip rotation center, proximal femoral axis and femoral length were determined with Mimics and 3-matic (Materialise). Using scripting functionality in the software, CAD design files of both stems were automatically sized and aligned along the proximal femoral axis to restore an anatomical and a 5 mm medialized hip rotation center. Stem size and position could be fine-tuned manually. The maximum distances between the prosthetic (PRC), the anatomic (ARC) and the medialized hip rotation center (MRC) were calculated (Fig. 1). Variations in femoral offset (ΔFO), anteroposterior (ΔAP) and proximodistal distance (ΔPD) were analyzed. Finally, the number of cases where the hip rotation center could be restored within 5 mm was reported.Introduction
Methods
Malposition of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is associated with higher strain patterns and can result in component loosening. Glenoid hardware placement and optimal size remain challenging due to the difficult joint exposure and visualization of anatomical reference landmarks during the procedure. Therefore, understanding both normal and variant patterns of glenoid anatomy is imperative for success in TSA. To better understand individual variations in glenoid morphology, this study aimed to compare the glenoid anatomy in a cohort of male and female patients from the United States (US) and Australia (AUS). Computed tomography (CT) data were analyzed from 41 male and 35 female shoulders; 39 of which were from a US population and 37 from an AUS population. These data were used to create statistical shape models (SSM) representing the average and ±1 standard deviations of the first mode of variation of each group (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). All measurements were performed with 3-matic computer assisted design software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). On each model, glenoid height was measured as the distance from the most superior to the most inferior point on the glenoid face. Glenoid width was measured as the distance from the most anterior to the most posterior point on the glenoid face. Surface area was measured as the concave surface of the glenoid face (Figure 1). Glenoid vault depth was measured in the midsection of the glenoid face.Background
Methods
