Metal on metal hip resurfacing (MMHR) has been advocated for the younger patient for several reasons including for the preservation of bone stock and ease of revision to total hip replacement (THR), thus ‘buying an additional operation’ for the patient. This rationale however assumes a good functional outcome after the revision to a THR and that the results of the ‘revision primary’ will not be compromised by the resurfacing which preceded it. We present our data on a consecutive series of 68 revised MMHRs. Between September 1997 and September 2009, 927 consecutive patients underwent a hip resurfacing procedure performed by one of three senior surgeons at our institution. The Cormet resurfacing system was used for all patients. Sixty-eight of these patients had their resurfacing revised. Oxford hip score (OHS) obtained at a minimum of 12 months follow-up was used as the primary outcome measure.Introduction
Methods
