header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXVI | Pages 67 - 67
1 Jun 2012
Khan AL Oliver WM Fender D Gibson MJ
Full Access

Aim

To identify patterns in referral and the management pathway of patients with primary bone tumours of the spine referred to the Orthopaedic Spine Unit in order to recommend ways to improve the service.

Methods and Results

A retrospective notes and imaging review to evaluate the referral pathway undertaken by patients ending up in the orthopaedic spine unit over a 5 year period according to the recommendations for primary bone tumours. Significant events leading to potential improvement in outcomes were assessed. Recommendations for improvements are suggested. None of the 38 patients evaluated were referred within two weeks of presentation, and only 6 were referred directly to the bone tumour service. Almost half (15/32) of the patients who had an indirect referral pathway had a prior intervention. Five of these had non-surgical, while 10 had surgical interventions outside the tumour centre before their referral. Of these, seven had malignant tumours.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 125 - 125
1 Apr 2012
Oliver W Khan A Fender D Gibson M
Full Access

Patients with peripheral primary bone tumours are often identified and referred at an early stage to a regional tumour service according to established guidelines. In patients with primary bone tumours of the spine, however, the definitive management or outcome of such patients is being prejudiced by preliminary intervention from non-specialist services prior to their referral.

Objective: To audit the standards of management of patients with primary bone tumours of the spine referred to a regional tumour service.

Retrospective review of case notes and radiology.

Subjects: Patients with primary bone tumour of the spine managed at the Orthopaedic Spine Unit with the Regional Bone Tumour Service in Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust.

Referral to tumour service, prior intervention, operative treatment, survival, factors affecting definitive management

31 of 39 (16 benign, 23 malignant) patients were initially referred from primary care to services other than the regional tumour service, most commonly neurosurgery (11/39) and paediatric oncology (4/39). Seven of 39 of these patients had undergone interventions prior to their referral to the tumour service, which may have negatively impacted their definitive management or curative surgery.

These tumours present complex issues regarding their definitive management to optimise outcome. Closer links between departments are required to enable the multidisciplinary management of primary bone tumours of the spine. Prior surgical intervention may compromise cure. Those involved in their management should be encouraged to liaise with their regional bone tumour service to improve outcome.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_X | Pages 118 - 118
1 Apr 2012
Sharma H Duggan A Nazir S Andrews J Fender D Sanderson P Gibson M
Full Access

Following the implementation of the Ionising Radiations (Medical Exposure) Regulations Act 2000 and recommendation from International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), the establishment of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for all radiological examinations became mandatory. There are no recommended or published standards or national dosage guidelines in the UK of diagnostic reference levels available for fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and therapeutic spinal procedures. The aim of this study is to establish reference dose area product (DAP) levels for the diagnostic spinal procedures requiring fluoroscopy as a basis for setting DRLs.

All patient data consisted of diagnostic spinal procedures done in 2009 at Newcastle General Hospital under care of 4 spinal surgeons. Radiation data were collected on specific type of the procedure, DAP and screening time. Nerve root blocks, facet joint blocks and facet joint rhizolysis were included for data collection and analysis for this study. The third-quartile values were used to establish the DRLs.

There were 387 nerve root blocks with a mean exposure per injection 171.3 cGycm2 (range, 3.0 to 2029.1; third quartile 209.4). Facet joint injections were 669 at a mean radiation dose 41.3 cGycm2 (range, 1.9 to 541.0; third quartile 48.9). In a total 430 facet joint rhizolysis, the mean exposure was 44.4 cGycm2 (range, 7.7 to 154.5; third quartile 58.4). The mean screening times were 36.7s (range, 0.4-281s; third quartile 41s) for nerve root blocks, mean 11.2s (range, 1.8-37s, third quartile 13.3s) for single facet joint block and mean 14.6s (range, 0.1-162s, third quartile 15.1s) for single facet rhizolysis.

We found the third-quartile values for setting DRLs for single level nerve root block, single facet joint block and single facet joint rhizolysis to be 209.4, 48.9 and 58.4 cGycm2 respectively. We recommend that all spinal units in the UK should establish their own local DRLs to help in establishing national dosage guidelines for fluoroscopy-guided diagnostic and also therapeutic spinal procedures.