header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 127 - 127
1 Jun 2012
Lazennec JY Boyer P Ducat A Rangel A Gozalbes V Catonne Y
Full Access

Introduction

The ceramic-on-ceramic strategy in acetabular revision faces potential limitations due to the femoral stem, as the implantation of ceramic ball head on a previously used taper is not recommended. Delta (r) ball heads with titanium sleeves have been proposed to avoid femoral revision. The study reports a minimum 3 years follow-up experience using this strategy.

Materials and Methods

This series report 42 revisions (16 metal-on-metal and 26 PE THA) in 39 patients (mean age 59.2 years, mean BMI 25). The 12-14, 5°46 sleeves were used in 24 cases and 10-12, 6° in 18 cases. (32mm ball head in 26 cases and 36 mm in 16 cases). Titanium serum level has been studied to detect the potential release from the sleeve-taper interface.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 126 - 126
1 Jun 2012
Lazennec JY Ducat A Rangel A Gozalbes V Catonne Y
Full Access

Introduction

Wear performances and fracture toughness of the alumina-matrix composite (AMC) Biolox-delta(r) are pointed out in the literature. This study is a prospective monocentric evaluation of 32 and 36 mm AMC/AMC bearing surfaces.

Material and methods

141 THA were included prospectively since 2006 in 127 patients. (62 females, 65 males, mean age 62, 2 years, mean BMI 25, 5). 134 cases were primary implantations. Mean follow-up is 40.9 months (29.8-53.4). In all patients we used the same cementless stem and cup.

Clinical and radiological data were evaluated with a special attention for ceramic fracture and squeaking.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 399 - 399
1 Nov 2011
Lazennec J Ducat A Sarialli H Catonne Y
Full Access

Introduction: Wear performances and fracture toughness of the alumina-matrix composite (AMC) Biolox-delta® are pointed out in the literature. Clinical and radiological studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of AMC/AMC bearing surfaces. The aim of this study is the prospective evaluation of complications and risk factors in patients implanted with AMC liners and 32–36 mm AMC femoral heads.

Methods: 323 consecutive patients were included prospectively since 2006.

243 were implanted for primary surgery with 32 or 36 mm ball heads for a 10–12, 6° tapers.

In 80 cases, we used 32 and 36 mm Delta® sleeved heads (M,L,XL) for the adaptation on 12–14,5°43 tapers or 10–12, 6° tapers (acetabular revisions in absence of stem exchange, or to increase the lenght of the femoral neck and the offset) All the clinical and radiological files were evaluated at a minimum 2 years follow-up with a special attention for the fracture risk and squeaking. Radiological data were analysed using Dicomesure® software.

Results: We did not face any significant problem in this series. No fracture occurred. No abnormal wear or implants migration could be detected. We did not observe squeaking phenomenons. 2 THP were revised for septic complications ; the retrivials were analysed for transformation studies(Xray diffraction method XRD). The phase transformation tetragonal to monoclinic was mild, in accordance with previous experimental data.

Conclusion: The limitation of this study is its short follow-up; nevertheless the clinical results are in accordance with the previously published experimental data.