METHODS

Two clinically successful Zimmer Biomet revision TKA designs were selected; NexGen LCCK with metal reinforcement and all-poly Vanguard SSK. The largest sizes were selected. FEA models consisted of the polyethylene articular surface and a CoCr femoral component; LCCK also included a CoCr metal reinforcement in the spine. A 7° and 0° tibial slope, as well as 3° and 0.7° femoral hyperextension, were used for the LCCK and SSK, respectively. A posteriorly directed load was applied to the spine through the femoral component (Figure 1). The base of the articular surface was constrained. The articular surfaces for both designs are made from different polyethylene materials. However, for the purpose of this study, to isolate the effect of material differences on stresses, both were modeled using conventional GUR1050 nonlinear polyethylene material properties. Femoral component and metal reinforcement were modeled using linear elastic CoCr properties. Additionally, the LCCK was reanalyzed by replacing the metal reinforcement component with polyethylene material, in order to isolate the effect of metal reinforcement for an otherwise equivalent design. Frictional sliding contact was modeled between the spine and femoral/metal reinforcement components. Nonlinear static analyses were performed using Ansys version 17 software and peak von mises stresses in the spine were compared.

METHODS

FEA models were created to simulate a fixation experiment inspired by ASTM F2028-14. The rTSA configurations used here have a superior and an inferior PS. The assemblies were virtually implanted into a synthetic bone block as per surgical technique. Sliding contacts were defined to model the interface between screw threads-bone, and between baseplate-bone.

To determine the screw preload experimentally, the 48mm screw (n=5) was inserted through a hole in a metal plate, which rested on top of a Futek washer load cell, placed on top of the foam block with a predrilled pilot hole (Figure 1). The screw was inserted using a torque driver until the average human factors torque for the screw driver handle was reached. The resulting axial compressive load due to screw insertion was measured by the washer load cell.

Two step analyses were performed using Ansys version 17.2 for 18mm and 48mm PS, where 756N axial and shear loads were applied sequentially. The model with the 48mm PS was then analyzed in a four step analysis; preload inferior and superior screws, followed by applying the axial and shear loads (Figure 2). Peak overall micromotion including tangential and normal components at the baseplate-bone interface was compared for all three models.

METHODS

A bone filler tibial augment is shown in Figure 1. A test construct for tibial augments (half-block each for medial and lateral sides) is shown in Figure 2, along with compatible rTKA components. An additional void in the bone was filled using bone cement. Loading was applied through the tibiofemoral contact patches created on polyethylene tibial insert. Loading was used for two activities of daily living; walking and deep knee bend [2–3]. During walking, the tibiofemoral contact patch on the anterior tibial post gets loaded due to femoral hyperextension with 1.2xbody weight (BW), whereas the medial and lateral condyles get loaded with 3xBW compressive load. For deep knee bend, only the condyles get loaded with 4.34xBW. Compared to walking, 45% higher compressive load magnitude in deep knee bend located further posterior was anticipated to create a larger bending moment and induce higher stress on the half augments. A finite element analysis (FEA) was performed by modeling this test construct with a medium size tibial augment. All components were modeled using linear elastic material properties. All interfaces, including the augment-bone interface (representing full bony ingrowth construct) were modeled using bonded contact. The inferior surface of the bone analogue was constrained. Linear static analyses were performed and peak von mises stress predicted in the tibial augments was compared between activities.

Methods

FEA with Ansys ver. 16 was used to simulate a fixation experiment. Baseplates of two different sizes (25mm and 28mm diameter), each with a central screw and four peripheral screws, were virtually implanted in a synthetic bone block. Each baseplate was analyzed using 1.5mm and 3.5mm superior-inferior (SI) offsets of the glenosphere center, as well as using four (‘4S’) and two (‘2S’) peripheral screws. A clinically relevant loading of 756N was applied in compression as well as in inferior-to-superior shear direction through the glenosphere (Figure 1A, 1B).

Screw-bone block interactions were modeled in three different ways: (1) Threads were defeatured from the peripheral screws, which were bonded to the bone block (b-nt); (2) Threads were modeled, while still assuming bonded contact (b-t); (3) Threads were modeled, with frictional contact between threads-bone block (f-t). Micromotion results (Figure 1C) from all 24 simulations (3 screw-bone interactions × 2 baseplate diameters × 2 SI offsets × 2 screw configurations) were compared.

Methods

Finite element analysis was performed to evaluate von Mises stress in 3 porous implant designs: 1) a CPTi foot and ankle implant (Fig 1) 2) a similar Ta implant (wedge angle = 5°) and 3) a similar Ta implant with an increased wedge angle of 20°. Properties were assigned per reported material and density specifications. Clinically relevant axial compressive load of 2.5X BW (2154 N) was applied through fixtures which conform to ASTM F2077–11.

Compressive yield and fatigue strength was evaluated per ASTM F2077–11 to compare CPTi performance in design 1 to the Ta performance of design 3.