Methods

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) database, patients who underwent common orthopaedic surgery procedures from 1 January to 31 December 2021 were extracted. Patient preoperative COVID-19 status, demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Propensity score matching was conducted between COVID-19-positive and -negative patients. Multivariable regression was then performed to identify both patient and provider risk factors independently associated with the occurrence of 30-day postoperative adverse events.

Method

Thirty-six ankles with greater than 10 degrees of varus alignment were compared to thirty-six ankles which were matched for implant type, age, gender, and year of surgery. Patients completed preoperative and yearly postoperative functional outcome scores including the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scores, the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and the Short Form-36 Standard Version 2.0 Health Survey. Weightbearing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were obtained and reviewed by four examiners (AC, AQ, TD, TT) and measurements were taken of the degree of coronal plane deformity.

Method

This study is a prospective, multicentre comparison study of patients two to eight years post-TAA. A cohort of 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis was identified from the prospective national database of TAAs (RA group). Matched controls were identified in the database using age, type of prosthesis, and follow-up time as matching criteria (OA group). The following data was collected: demographic information, previous and additional surgeries at the time of TAA and major and minor complications including revisions. Generic and disease specific, validated outcome scores collected include the Short-Form 36 (SF36) and Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS).

Method

We identified 43 obese patients (46 ankles) (BMI > 30kg/m2), using a prospectively collected database of total ankle arthroplasties. Inclusion criteria included: (a) Post-traumatic or inflammatory arthritis; (b) Minimum two-year follow-up, (c) Coronal plane deformity less than 10 degrees. Exclusion criteria: (a) Co-morbidity affecting physical function; (b) Recent total joint arthroplasty.

American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS) and SF-36 questionnaires were used preoperatively and at latest follow-up. Revision was defined as any intervention requiring replacement of part or whole of the prosthesis.

A control group of non-obese individuals (BMI 18.5–29.9kg/m2) was devised matching for age within 10 years, gender, diagnosis, implant and length of follow-up (within 1 year). From the original group of 46 ankles, we matched 28 ankles, thereby constructing two groups for comparison (matched obesity and control).

Method

The senior authors implanted 86 consecutive Mobility prostheses. The underlying diagnosis was primary OA in 24 ankles, secondary OA in 47 ankles and inflammatory arthritis in 15 ankles. There were 41 males (Mean age 67 / Range 51–87) and 44 females (Mean age 60 / Range 29–72). The mean BMI was 28 (Range 22–36) for males, and 28 (Range 20–39) for females. Previous ankle operations were performed in 24 patients, 22 of which were for fracture fixation.

Ankles were classified according to the COFAS end-stage ankle arthritis classification system. Coronal plane deformity was quantified pre-operatively. Clinical outcome was assessed using the AOFAS hindfoot score. Radiological assessment was performed from weight-bearing radiographs, documenting post-operative alignment, osseous integration, edge-loading and heterotopic bone formation. The mean follow-up time was 40 months (Range 30–60).

Survival analysis was calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Failure was defined as exchange of any component of the TAR, arthrodesis or amputation.