The purpose of this study is to evaluate the early outcomes with the use of a smartphone-based exercise and educational platform after primary total hip arthroplasty compared to a standard of care control group. A multicenter prospective randomized control trial was conducted evaluating the use of the mymobility smartphone-based care platform for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients randomized to the control group (198 patients) received the respective institution's standard of care. Those randomized to mymobility treatment group (167 patients) were provided an Apple Watch and mymobility smartphone application. The application provides pre and postoperative educational content, video directed exercise programs as well as tracks the patient's activity. Patients in the treatment group were not initially prescribed physical therapy, but could be if their surgeon deemed it necessary. Early outcomes assessed included 90-day hip range of motion, HOOS JR scores, 30-day single leg stance (SLS) and time up and go (TUG) test. We also evaluated PT utilization, THA complications associated with readmissions, ER visits not associated with readmissions, urgent care (non standard of care) visits, and physician office visits. Outcome scores include HOOS-Jr, EQ-5D-5L, single stance (SLS), Timed up and go (TUG). Satisfaction scores for the procedure and the mymobility study group were also recorded.Background
Methods
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues moving to the outpatient arena, and may be feasible for some conversion and revision scenarios. Controversy surrounds appropriate patient selection. The purpose of this study is to report complications associated with outpatient revision and conversion THA, and to determine if comorbidities are associated with complications or overnight stay. From June 2013 through March 2018, 43 patients (44 hips) underwent conversion (n=12) or revision (n=32) THA at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. Mean patient age was 58.4 years, and 52% of patients were male. Conversion procedures were for failed resurfacing in two, failed hemiarthroplasty in one, and failed fracture fixation with retained hardware in 9. Revision procedures involved head only in one, head and liner in 20, cup and head in 7, stem only in 2, and stem and liner in 2. Forty-four (93%) were discharged same day without incident, none required transfer to acute facility, and 3 required overnight stay with 2 of these for convenience and only one for a medical reason, urinary retention. Three patients with early superficial infection were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. There were no major complications, readmissions, or subsequent surgeries within 90 days. One or more major comorbidities were present in 17 patients (39%) including 1 valvular disease, 8 arrhythmia, 2 thromboembolism history, 3 obstructive sleep apnea, 6 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2 asthma, 4 frequent urination, and 1 renal disease. The single patient who stayed overnight for a medical reason had no major medical comorbidities. Outpatient arthroplasty, including revision THA in some scenarios, is safe for many patients. Presence of medical comorbidities was not associated with risk of complications. The paradigm change of patient education, medical optimization, and a multimodal program to mitigate risk of blood loss and reduce need for narcotics facilitates performing arthroplasty safely in an outpatient setting.
