Previously, radiostereometric analysis following hip revision performed using impacted morsellised allograft bone and a cemented Exeter stem has shown continuous subsidence of the stem for up to five years. It is not known whether the subsidence continues thereafter. In our study, 17 of 25 consecutive osteo-arthritic patients with aseptically loose stems who underwent first-time revision using impacted morsellised allograft bone and a cemented Exeter stem were followed by yearly radiostereometric examinations for nine years. The mean subsidence at six weeks was 1.1 mm (0.1 to 2.3), from six weeks to one year 1.3 mm (0 to 2.6), from one to five years 0.7 mm (0 to 2.0), and from five to nine years 0.7 mm (0.1 to 3.1). That from six weeks to nine years was 2.7 mm (0 to 6.4) (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 3.5). The Charnley pain score significantly improved after revision, and was maintained at nine years, but walking ability deteriorated slightly as follow-up extended. Of the eight patients who were not followed for nine years, two had early subsidence exceeding 11 mm.

Our findings show that in osteo-arthritic patients who undergo revision for aseptic loosening of the stem using impacted morsellised allograft bone and a cemented Exeter stem, migration of the stem continues over nine years at a slower rate after the first year, but without clinical deterioration or radiological loosening.

Purpose: The purpose was to investigate the relationship between distal radius fracture malunion and arm-related disability.

Methods: This prospective population-based cohort study included 143 patients above 18 years with acute distal radius fracture treated at one emergency hospital with either closed reduction and cast (55 patients) or with closed reduction and external and/or percutaneous pin fixation (88 patients). The patients were evaluated with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire at baseline (inquiring about disabilities before fracture) and at 6, 12 and 24 months after the fracture. The 12-month follow-up also included the SF-12 health status questionnaire as well as clinical and radiographic examination. The patients were classified according to the degree of malunion (defined as dorsal tilt > 10 degrees or ulnar variance > 0 mm) into three groups; no malunion, malunion involving either dorsal tilt or ulnar variance, and malunion involving both dorsal tilt and ulnar variance. A Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between the 1-year DASH score (≥ 15 or < 15) and malunion adjusting for age, sex, fracture AO type, and treatment method and the relative risk (RR) of obtaining the higher DASH score was calculated. The number needed to harm (NNH) associated with malunion was calculated.

Results: The mean DASH score at 1 year after fracture was about 10 points worse with each degree of increased malunion. The degree of malunion also correlated with SF-12 score, grip strength and supination. The regression analysis showed significantly higher disability with each degree of malunion compared to no malunion; for malunion involving either dorsal tilt or ulnar variance the RR was 2.4 (95% CI 1.0–5.7; p=0.038), and for malunion involving both dorsal tilt and ulnar variance the RR was 3.2 (95% CI 1.4–7.5; p=0.007). The NNH was 2.5 (95% CI 1.8–5.4).

Conclusion: Malunion after distal radius fracture was associated with higher arm-related disability.

Introduction The aim of this study was to describe the migration pattern of the Exeter stem after revision with morsellised allograft bone and cement, to evaluate if restricted weight bearing had any influence on migration, and to measure, before and after revision, the quality of life comparing it to primary cemented hip arthroplasties.

Methods Forty-one consecutive stem revisions were followed by radiostereometry (RSA, 1. Selvik 1989). The accuracy of the RSA set-up was between 0.3 mm and 0.7 mm. The surgical procedure described by the Exeter group (2. Gie 1993) was used. All were first time revisions for aseptic loosening and all patients had had their primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Bone stock deficiency was classified according to Gustilo and Pasternak. Sixteen were type I, 20 type II, five type III but none was classified as type IV. The Nottingham Health Profile was used to measure quality of life before and after revision.

Results All stems migrated distally and most of them also migrated medially or laterally and posteriorly. Migration was still observed in one third of stems between 1.5 and two year follow-ups. At two years stem subsidence averaged 2.5 mm, medial or lateral migration averaged 1.2 mm and posterior migration averaged 2.9 mm. No correlation to the pre-operative bone stock deficiency was observed. Between two and five years only marginal migration occurred in 12 of the 15 stems followed for five years. No differences in the migration pattern were detected when free weight bearing was allowed immediately after revision in hips without intra-operative skeletal complications compared to when restricted weight bearing was practiced. Most migration occurs within the first two weeks after surgery. NHP scales for pain, physical mobility, sleep and energy scales improved significantly. NHP scores were in all six scales comparable to those of primary arthroplasties. No rerevision was performed and no stem had radiographic sings of loosening.

Conclusions Most migration occurred early after revision and decreased gradually. Marginal migration after two years does not deteriorate the results during the first five years after surgery. Quality of life (patient outcome) after revision with impacted morsellised allograft bone and cement was comparable to that of primary arthroplasties.

In relation to the conduct of this study, one or more of the authors is in receipt of a research grant from a non-commercial source.