Forefoot involvement in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is extremely common and the majority of the patients with RA have active foot symptoms and signs of the disease. This rertospective study was undertaken to assess the outcomes and complications in the surgery of the forefoot RA.

Seventeen patients (27 feet) with RA underwent surgical correction for the forefoot deformities. Antero-posterior and lateral weight bearing radiographs of all feet were taken preoperatively. The forefoot deformities seen with RA varied and included hallux valgus with subluxed metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint in 23 feet, hallux valgus with dislocation of the MTP in 4, hammer or claw toes in 12 and 8 feet respectively. In addition, all 27 feet presented with variable levels of intermetatarsal deviations or widening. All the patients with hallux valgus underwent first MTP joint arthrodesis with various techniques. Deformities of the lesser toes were treated in all but 3 cases with resection arthroplasty, while the remaining 3 feet received a Weil osteotomy. Postoperatively the toes and the MTP joints were stabilised with K-wires for 6–8 weeks.

All patients have been studied for a minimum follow up of 9 months. Twenty six patients were satisfied by the outcome of the surgical treatment. Only one patient complained of persistent metatarsalgia postoperatively. The surgical complications included 2 cases of delayed union, 5 cases of delayed wound healing, 2 cases of wound infection, and 4 cases of plantar callosity. Overall, 4 patients required reoperation.

Even though complications occur in patients with RA who undergo surgical correction of the forefoot deformities, most of these complications can be treated successfully. Thus, the overall outcome of the surgical treatment is good leading to satisfactory correction of the forefoot deformities and to pain elimination

Hinged external fixators of the elbow joint can be a valuable tool in managing complicated trauma associated with instability, instability after contracture release, and distraction interposition arthroplasty or distraction arthroplasty alone. This retrospective study focuses on the performance of the device in acute and chronic elbow instability associated with complex injuries around the elbow.

Thirteen hinged external fixators were applied in 13 patients with an average age of 46 years. All fixators were applied for various types of fractures around the elbow joint associated with elbow dislocation. In 12 patients prior to the application of the fixator, a formal open reduction and internal fixation was performed so as to neutralise the whole construct and permit early mobilisation of the joint. In one patient with a minimally displaced fracture which required no internal fixation the fixator was used to permit early mobilisation. A circular multiplanar frame was used in 4 patients and a unilateral one in the rest of them.

Eight out of 13 patients with fracture-dislocation had an uneventful outcome. Three patients required a revision surgery to correct a fracture malalignment and a subluxation of the joint. The results were evaluated according to the Mayo Elbow Performance score. Complications included 4 cases of pin tract infection and 2 of transient ulnar neuritis.

Despite the complexity of its application and the complications that may follow such device, an articulating external fixator can be a valuable tool in treating complex elbow instability.

Anterior elbow dislocations often occur as a fracture-dislocation in which the distal humerus is driven through the olecranon, causing either a simple oblique fracture of the olecranon or a complex, comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. The purpose of this study was to characterise the morphology and to evaluate the surgical treatment of this injury.

Thirteen patients (8 women and 5 men) with a mean age of 42 years were included in this study. Four patients had a simple, oblique fracture of the olecranon and 9 a complex, comminuted fracture of the proximal ulna. Six patients had an associated fracture of the coronoid process which was detached as a large fragment and 7 an additional fracture of the radial head. In all cases the collateral ligaments were found intact. All fractures were treated by open reduction and internal fixation through a midline dorsal approach. Simple fractures of the olecranon were treated with tension-band wiring while comminuted fractures were fixed with a plate and screws. Fractures of the coronoid process were stabilised by interfragmentary screws or small plates. The concomitant radial head fractures were treated by excision of small fragments, internal fixation or radial head replacement.

The average follow up was 71 months. According to the functional scale of Broberg and Morrey, the results were excellent in 8 patients, good in 2, and poor in 3. Mild arthritis was observed in one patient.

Transolecranon fracture –dislocation of the elbow is often misidentified as an anterior Monteggia lesion or a simple fracture of the olecranon. Differential diagnosis between these lesions is imperative. Consequently, anatomical restoration of the trochlear notch in cases of transolecranon fracture –dislocations can be achieved leading to good long-term results.