header advert
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 25 - 25
7 Aug 2023
Ali A Ahmed I Shearman A McCulloch R
Full Access

Abstract

Introduction

Patients presenting with loosening or a fracture between ipsilateral hip and knee replacements provide a unique reconstructive challenge. We present mid-term results of the cement-over megaprosthesis (COM) when managing these complex cases. A COM is cement-linked to the stem of a well-fixed existing implant. We report the largest series to date and show that this may be preferable to total femoral replacement in a cohort of patients who often have significant co-morbidities.

Methodology

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing COM between 2002–2022 was performed. Primary outcomes were defined as implant survival, displayed with survival analysis. Secondary outcomes included mortality and surgical complications. Functional outcomes included Visual Analogue Score (VAS), EuroQol-5D-3L and Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) score at one year post operatively.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 87 - 87
7 Aug 2023
Ahmed I Dhaif F Khatri C Parsons N Hutchinson C Staniszewska S Price A Metcalfe A
Full Access

Abstract

Background

Meniscal tears affect 222 per 100,000 of the population and can be managed non-operatively or operatively with an arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), meniscal repair or meniscal transplantation. The purpose of this review is to summarise the outcomes following treatment with a meniscal tear and explore correlations between outcomes.

Methodology

A systematic review was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify prospective studies describing the outcomes of patients with a meniscal tear. Comparisons were made of outcomes between APM and non-operative groups. Outcomes were graphically presented over time for all treatment interventions. Pearson's correlations were calculated between outcome timepoints.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 88 - 88
7 Aug 2023
Ahmed I Dhaif F Khatri C Parsons N Hutchinson C Price A Staniszewska S Metcalfe A
Full Access

Abstract

Introduction

Recent research has questioned the role of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear leading to the development of treatment recommendations for these patients. There is a clear need to understand patient perceptions of living with a meniscal tear in order to plan future research and treatment guidelines.

Aims

To explore the experiences and expectations of treatment of young patients with a meniscal tear of the knee


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 89 - 89
7 Aug 2023
Ahmed I Dhaif F Bowes M Parsons N Hutchinson C Staniszewska S Price A Metcalfe A
Full Access

Abstract

Introduction

Previous research has demonstrated no clinically significant benefit of arthroscopic meniscectomy in patients with a meniscal tear, however, patients included in these studies would not meet current treatment recommendations. Prior to further randomised controlled trials (RCTs) research is needed to understand a younger population in more detail.

Aim

To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with a meniscal tear and explore any association between baseline characteristics and outcome.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 5 | Pages 830 - 839
1 May 2021
Ahmed I Chawla A Underwood M Price AJ Metcalfe A Hutchinson CE Warwick J Seers K Parsons H Wall PDH

Aims

Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and trial registries up to 26 March 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Outcomes included: pain, function, serious adverse events (SAEs), blood loss, implant stability, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 337 - 343
1 Mar 2017
Ahmed I Salmon L Roe J Pinczewski L

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical and radiological outcome of patients who suffer recurrent injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after reconstruction and require revision surgery.

Patients and Methods

From a consecutive series of 200 patients who underwent primary reconstruction following rupture of the ACL, we identified 36 who sustained a further rupture, 29 of whom underwent revision surgery. Patients were reviewed prospectively at one, two, seven, 15 and about 20 years after their original surgery. Primary outcome measures were the number of further ruptures, the posterior tibial slope (PTS), and functional and radiological outcomes. These were compared with a gender and age matched cohort of patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction only.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 1 | Pages 58 - 64
1 Jan 2016
Ahmed I Salmon LJ Waller A Watanabe H Roe JP Pinczewski LA

Aims

Oxidised zirconium was introduced as a material for femoral components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as an attempt to reduce polyethylene wear. However, the long-term survival of this component is not known.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database to assess the ten year survival and clinical and radiological outcomes of an oxidised zirconium total knee arthroplasty with the Genesis II prosthesis.

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and a patient satisfaction scale were used to assess outcome.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXIX | Pages 55 - 55
1 Jul 2012
Ahmed I Maheshwari R Walmsley P Brenkel I
Full Access

Introduction

Revision knee arthroplasty is an increasingly common procedure and can be challenging in the presence of bone defects, ligament instability and soft-tissue deficiencies. Current treatment options in addressing tibial and femoral bone loss in the revision setting include cement, morselised or structural allograft, metal wedges and augments and custom or hinge prosthesis. The aim of this study is to describe our early experience using unique femoral and tibial metaphyseal sleeves as an alternate for dealing with significant tibial and femoral bone loss.

Methods

Porous stepped metaphyseal sleeves were implanted during twenty revision total knee replacements in eleven men and nine women who had an average age of 73.3 years at the time of the procedure. The indications included aseptic loosening in nineteen cases and second stage reimplantation in one case. Bone defects in tibia and femur were classified intra operatively according to AORI classification. All patients were prospectively followed clinically and radiographically for a mean follow up of sixteen months (range 12-26 months).