Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 8 - 8
11 Apr 2023
Piet J Vancleef S Mielke F Van Nuffel M Orozco G Korhonen R Lories R Aerts P Van Wassenbergh S Jonkers I
Full Access

Altered mechanical loading is a widely suggested, but poorly understood potential cause of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. In rodents, osteoarthritis is induced following destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM). This study estimates knee kinematics and contact forces in rats with DMM to gain better insight into the specific mechanisms underlying disease development in this widely-used model.

Unilateral knee surgery was performed in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=5 with DMM, n=5 with sham surgery). Radio-opaque beads were implanted on their femur and tibia. 8 weeks following knee surgery, rat gait was recorded using the 3D²YMOX setup (Sanctorum et al. 2019, simultaneous acquisition of biplanar XRay videos and ground reaction forces).

10 trials (1 per rat) were calibrated and processed in XMALab (Knörlein et al. 2016). Hindlimb bony landmarks were labeled on the XRay videos using transfer learning (Deeplabcut, Mathis et al. 2019; Laurence-Chasen et al. 2020).

A generic OpenSim musculoskeletal model of the rat hindlimb (Johnson et al. 2008) was adapted to include a 3-degree-of-freedom knee. Inverse kinematics, inverse dynamics, static optimization of muscle forces, and joint reaction analysis were performed.

In rats with DMM, knee adduction was lower compared to sham surgery. Ground reaction forces were less variable with DMM, resulting in less variability in joint external moments. The mediolateral ground reaction force was lower, resulting in lower hip adduction moment, thus less force was produced by the rectus femoris. Rats with DMM tended to break rather than propel, resulting in lower hip flexion moment, thus less force was produced by the semimembranosus. These results are consistent with lower knee contact forces in the anteroposterior and axial directions.

These preliminary data indicate no overloading of the knee joint in rats with DMM, compared with sham surgery. We are currently expanding our workflow to finite element analysis, to examine mechanical cues in the cartilage of these rats (Fig1G).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Dec 2019
de Vor L Van Kessel K De Haas C Aerts P Viveen M Boel E Fluit A van Dijk B Vogely C van der Wal B van Strijp J Weinans H Rooijakkers S
Full Access

Aim

“Implant associated Staphylococcus aureus or S. epidermidis infections are often difficult to treat due to the formation of biofilms on prosthetic material. Biofilms are bacterial communities adhered to a surface with a self-made extracellular polymeric substance that surrounds resident bacteria. In contrast to planktonic bacteria, bacteria in a biofilm are in an adherent, dormant state and are insensitive to most antibiotics. In addition, bacteria in a biofilm are protected from phagocytic cells of the immune system. Therefore, complete surgical removal and replacement of the prosthetic implant is often necessary to treat this type of infections. Neutrophils play a crucial role in clearing bacterial pathogens. They recognize planktonic bacteria via immunoglobulin (Ig) and complement opsonisation. In this project, we aim to evaluate the role of IgG and complement in the recognition and clearance of staphylococcal biofilms by human neutrophils. Furthermore, we evaluate if monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting biofilm structures can enhance recognition and clearance of staphylococcal biofilms by the human immune system.”

Method

“We produced a set of 20 recombinant mAbs specific for staphylococcal antigens. Using flow cytometry and ELISA-based methods we determined the binding of these mAbs to planktonic staphylococci and in vitro staphylococcal biofilms. Following incubation with IgG/IgM depleted human serum we determined whether mAbs can react with the human complement system after binding to biofilm. Confocal microscopy was used to visualize the location of antibody binding in the biofilm 3D structure.”