Aims. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the rate of conversion to surgical release after a steroid injection in patients with a trigger finger, and to analyze which patient- and trigger finger-related factors affect the outcome of an injection. Methods. The medical records of 500 patients (754 fingers) treated for one or more trigger fingers with a steroid injection or with surgical release, between 1 January 2016 and 1 April 2020 with a follow-up of 12 months, were analyzed. Conversion to surgical release was recorded as an unsuccessful treatment after an injection. The effect of patient- and trigger finger-related characteristics on the outcome of an injection was assessed using stepwise manual backward multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results. Treatment with an injection was unsuccessful in 230 fingers (37.9%). Female sex (odds ratio (OR) 1.87 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 2.88)), Quinnell stage IV (OR 16.01 (95% CI 1.66 to 154.0)), heavy physical work (OR 1.60 (95% CI 0.96 to 2.67)), a third steroid injection (OR 2.02 (95% CI 1.06 to 3.88)), and having carpal tunnel syndrome (OR 1.59 (95% CI 0.98 to 2.59)) were associated with a higher risk of conversion to surgical release. In contrast, an older age (OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99)), smoking (OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.64)), and polypharmacy (OR 0.39, CI 0.12 to 1.12) were associated with a lower risk of conversion. The regression model predicted 15.6% of the variance found for the outcome of the injection treatment (R. 2. > 0.25). Conclusion. Factors associated with a worse outcome following a steroid injection were identified and should be considered when choosing the treatment of a trigger finger. In women with a trigger finger, the choice of treatment should take into account whether there are also one or more patient- or trigger-related factors that increase the risk of conversion to surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1142–1147

Aims. Steroid injections are used for subacromial pain syndrome and can be administered via the anterolateral or posterior approach to the subacromial space. It is not currently known which approach is superior in terms of improving clinical symptoms and function. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the clinical effectiveness of a steroid injection given via the anterolateral or the posterior approach to the subacromial space. Methods. The Subacromial Approach Injection Trial (SAInT) study is a single-centre, parallel, two-arm RCT. Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 basis to a subacromial steroid injection via either the anterolateral or the posterior approach to the subacromial space. Participants in both trial arms will then receive physiotherapy as standard of care for subacromial pain syndrome. The primary analysis will compare the change in Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at three months after injection. Secondary outcomes include the change in OSS at six and 12 months, as well as the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain), Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH), and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (RAND) at three months, six months, and one year after injection. Assessment of pain experienced during the injection will also be determined. A minimum of 86 patients will be recruited to obtain an 80% power to detect a minimally important difference of six points on the OSS change between the groups at three months after injection. Conclusion. The results of this trial will demonstrate if there is a difference in shoulder pain and function after a subacromial space steroid injection between the anterolateral versus posterior approach in patients with subacromial pain syndrome. This will help to guide treatment for patients with subacromial pain syndrome. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(9):729–735

Lumbar steroid injection can be endorsed as a treatment component for lumbrosacral radicular pain syndrome resulting from disc herniation. The facet joint steroid injection seems to be beneficial for patients with chronic backache due to the facet joint arthritis and in the lumbar Spondylosis. We did a retrospective review of 31 patients whom we treated between 2004 and 2005 with follow up of 6 months to 24 months. There were 19 females and 12 males, aged between 29–81 years. Five patients had previous surgery for simple discectomy to posterior spinal fusion. Four patients had multiple disc prolapse at 3–4 levels, 2 patients had a severe lumbar spondylosis and spinal stenosis. The remaining 20 patients had a single level disc prolapse. All these patients were given caudal and facet joint blocks. The pre and post steroid injection Oswestry score was done. After steroid injection the Oswestry score improved by 30%. Majority of the patients had pain relief for 2–18 months. The pain relief was much better in the non operative group with single level disc pro-lapse and those patients with lumbar spondylosis. In patients with chronic back pain there is an inflammatory basis for pain generation. Lumbar steroid injection seems to be beneficial in patients with disc prolapse and lumbar spondylosis. In the literature various randomized trials have been done and their results are controversial. Our study showed definitive improvement in terms of pain and function of our patient

We have assessed whether an epidural steroid injection is effective in the treatment of symptoms due to compression of a nerve root in the lumbar spine by carrying out a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in which patients received either an epidural steroid injection or an intramuscular injection of local anaesthetic and steroid. We assessed a total of 93 patients according to the Oxford pain chart and the Oswestry disability index and followed up for a minimum of two years. All the patients had been categorised as potential candidates for surgery. There was a significant reduction in pain early on in those having an epidural steroid injection but no difference in the long term between the two groups. The rate of subsequent operation in the groups was similar

Aims. Cervical radiculopathy is a significant cause of pain and morbidity. For patients with severe and poorly controlled symptoms who may not be candidates for surgical management, treatment with transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESI) has gained widespread acceptance. However, a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting their use balanced against perceived high risks of the procedure potentially undermines the confidence of clinicians who use the technique. We undertook a systematic review of the available literature regarding CTFESI to assess the clinical efficacy and complication rates of the procedure. Methods. OVID, MEDLINE, and Embase database searches were performed independently by two authors who subsequently completed title, abstract, and full-text screening for inclusion against set criteria. Clinical outcomes and complication data were extracted, and a narrative synthesis presented. Results. Six studies (three randomized controlled trials and three non-randomized observational studies; 443 patients) were included in the final review. The aggregate data support the efficacy of CTFESI in excess of the likely minimal clinically important difference. No major complications were described. Conclusion. There is increasing evidence supporting the efficacy of CTFESI. Concerns regarding the occurrence of catastrophic complications, widely shared in the case report and anecdotal literature, were not found when reviewing the best available evidence. However, the strength of these findings remains limited by the lack of highly powered high-level studies and the heterogeneity of the studies available. Further high-quality studies are recommended to address the issues of efficacy and safety with CTFESI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):567–574

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation. Patients and Methods. A cohort of 102 patients was prospectively followed, after an epidural steroid injection for radicular symptoms due to lumbar disc herniation, in 57 patients, and cervical disc herniation, in 45 patients. Those patients with persistent pain who requested a second injection were prospectively followed for one year. Radicular and local pain were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional outcome with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPAD), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12). Results. A second injection was performed in 17 patients (29.8%) with lumbar herniation and seven (15.6%) with cervical herniation at a mean of 65.3 days . (sd. 46.5) and 47 days . (sd. 37.2), respectively, after the initial injection. All but one patient, who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, responded satisfactorily with a mean VAS for leg pain of 8.8 mm . (sd. 10.3) and a mean VAS for arm pain of 6.3 mm . (. sd. 9) one year after the second injection, respectively. Similarly, functional outcome and HRQoL were improved significantly from the baseline scores: mean ODI, 12.3 (. sd. 12.4; p < 0.001); mean NPAD, 19.3 (. sd. 24.3; p = 0.041); mean SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) in lumbar herniation, 46.8 (. sd. 7.7; p < 0.001); mean SF-12 PCS in cervical herniation, 43 (. sd. 6.8; p = 0.103). Conclusion. Repeat steroid injections are a justifiable form of treatment in symptomatic patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation whose symptoms are not satisfactorily relieved after the first injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1364–71

To compare the efficacy of local steroid injection with surgical decompression in treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in terms of frequency of pain. This randomized controlled study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics for a duration of 01 year, i.e. from 20th April 2016 to 19th April 2017. 130 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome with moderate (Grade 2) and severe (Grade 3) pain were included. Lottery method was used to allocate the patients randomly into two groups. Group A contained 65 patients who were subjected to surgical decompression and 65 patients were in Group B who were injected with local steroid injection. Complete history was obtained from all patients. All the surgical decompressions through mini incision technique and injections procedures were performed. Information were recorded in a pre designed Performa. Efficacy was observed significantly high in group B as compared to group A (87.7% vs. 72.3%, p=0.028). Carpal Tunnel syndrome symptoms were alleviated with surgical decompression as well as local steroid injection at a follow up done after 1 month. However the steroid injections seem to have greater efficacy than surgical decompression, hence we suggest it for routine treatment of all patients with CTS. For any reader queries, please contact . virgo_r24@hotmail.com

Introduction: Epidural steroid injection is commonly used for treatment of sciatica. Traditionally these have been administered through a needle inserted in the posterior mid line via an interlaminar (IL) route. However, in recent years the transforaminal (TF) route of administration has become popular. Potential advantages of the TF route include greater accuracy of injection (with radiological confirmation) and placement of the needle tip closer to the point at which the nerve is compressed. Methods: Consecutive patients from the practices of 2 surgeons that use an IL technique were compared with those from the practices of 2 other surgeons that use a TF technique. Inclusion criteria were leg pain accompanied by a radiological diagnosis of nerve root compression. Both patients with disc prolapse and spinal stenosis were included. Treatment outcome was measured using the Roland-Morris (RM) Score, the Sciatica Frequency and Bothersome Index (SFBI) and the Euroqol (EQ-5D) questionnaire obtained at recruitment and three months after the epidural steroid injection. A global assessment (GA) of outcome; where patients were asked whether they were. much better,. better,. un changed or. worse after treatment; was obtained at 3 months. Patients were also asked the duration of any relief obtained. Statistical methods utilized included the two tailed t-test, the Wilcoxon Rank Sum test, Odds ratio (OR) and the Chi Squared Test. Results: 39 patients received an interlaminar epidural steroid injection and 25 received a transforaminal epidural steroid injection (total 64 patients). Follow-up was achieved for 36/39 (92.3%) and 25 (100%) patients respectively. The median pre-test RM score was 11 (range 3–11) for both groups. Post test RM score was 12(6–16) for the IL group and 3 (6–10.5) for the TF group (p=0.01). Median pre-test SFBI was 25 (0–46) and 26 (4–46) for the IL and TF groups respectively. Post test SFBI was 22 (0–46) and 18 (0–41) for the IL and TF groups respectively (p=0.003). Median pre- test EQ-5D was 0.54 for both groups (range 0.06–0.72 for the IL group and 0.08–0.72 for the TF group). Post test EQ-5D was 0.55 (0.06–1) for the IL group and 0.66 (0.06–1) (p=0.21). According to their GA, 11.1% felt much better, 33.3% felt better and 55.6% felt unchanged at 3 months in the IL group. 64% felt much better, 34% better and 12% felt unchanged in the transforaminal group. The proportion of patients having relief for 3 months or more after the injections was 3/36 (8.3%) for the IL group and 10/25 (40%) for the TF group. The transforaminal injection was 7 times more likely to result in pain relief at 3 months. (OR 7.3 95% CI 1.5 – 45.8, p=0.003). Discussion: Epidural steroid injection by the transforaminal route is more effective then by the interlaminar route in the short term relief of sciatica

There has never been a study of whether intra-articular steroid injections of arthritic hips can alter the outcomes of subsequent arthritis management, particularly total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study forty patients with a history of steroid injection of the hip and subsequent THA are examined retrospectively for infections, revisions, and prospectively-gathered hip scores, as compared to matched non-steroid controls. The steroid group had an increased incidence of pain, infectious workup under usual care, and two revisions for deep infection within three years. We suggest that steroid injections of hips should be avoided in patients who are candidates for THA. Despite the lack of demonstrated efficacy of intra-articular steroid injections for hip arthritis, the procedure is often utilized for diagnostic differentiation from spine pain, and attempted therapeutic management of painful hip arthritis. However, in the era of total hip arthroplasty (THA) the safety of this practice must be evaluated in the context of whether the injections pose any potential for complicating subsequent surgery, particularly with regard to infection. In this study, forty patients who underwent THA and had a history of previous steroid injection were compared retrospectively to forty carefully-matched patients who underwent THA in the same time period but had no history of prior steroid injection. Outcome measures included whether there was a septic workup under usual care, and this occurred in 20% of steroid patients within the first thirty-six months post-THA, as opposed to 0% in the controls. Furthermore, in a detailed analysis of Harris and Oxford scores, there was in the steroid group a higher incidence of night pain, increased severity of pain, and reduced function with activities of daily living at one year. There were two revisions for deep infection in the steroid group, and one revision for dislocation in each of the steroid and control groups. Pending the completion of the study, we provisionally suggest that steroid injection of hips may be ill-advised in a patient who will be a candidate for THA in the future. This suggestion is based primarily on the incidence of pain and infectious complications in the first postoperative year. Funding Dr Kaspar holds academic research grants from McMaster University and from The Physicians’ Services Incorporated (PSI) Foundation, the latter of which was used to finance this study and the continuation thereof. There are no commercial grants or conflicts of interest

Introduction: Intra-articular steroid injection has long been used to treat osteoarthritis of the knee and hip by orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists and general practitioners. Recent literature has shown conflicting results with regard to its safety. We aimed to investigate whether a relationship exists between preoperative intra-articular steroid injection and postoperative infection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients and Methods: We reviewed the records of all patients having TKA between April 2005 and April 2007 in University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool. The operations were carried out by 6 consultants. Exclusion criteria for analysis were: previous knee infection, revision knee surgery, fracture around the knee, skin disorders, diabetes, blood transfusion, rheumatoid arthritis and immunosuppressive medication. Eligible patients were divided into two groups: group I had received intra-articular steroid injection (each subject receiving 1–3 (mean 1.6) injections between 1–12 (mean 5) months before TKA); group II had received no injection. Mean follow-up was 17 months. Results: 425 patients had TKA, of which 361 met our criteria. 121 patients in group I and 240 patients in group II. No-one in group I developed acute infection. In group II, 7 patients developed acute infection (5 superficial and 2 deep) between 1 and 6 weeks (mean 3.7 weeks) post-operatively. There were no late infections. The difference in infection rate between groups I and II was not statistically significant (P=0.1, Fisher’s exact test). Conclusion: We found no evidence that intra-articular steroid injection prior to TKA increased the incidence of postoperative infection

Introduction Cortisone injection for radicular leg pain may be useful in treating patients with lumbar foraminal pathology based on accurate CT/MRI diagnosis and operator-controlled biplanar fluoroscopy in an angiography suite. Methods Patient details were collected from operative records and angiography suite records. Demographic data, diagnosis and level of injection were recorded. Low Back Outcome Scores were collected prospectively for most patients. Patients were telephoned and then posted a questionnaire including the LBOS. Taranaki Ethics Committee approval was obtained. Patients were excluded from further analysis, following a single fluoroscopically-controlled foraminal injection of 80 mg triamcinolone for radiculopathy, if further injection or surgery was required. Results Between 1995 and 2004, 58 patients, all with CT or MRI diagnosis, underwent lumbar foraminal steroid injection. Thirty-seven had disc protrusion (64%) and twenty-one had stenosis (36%). Eighteen (31%) required further intervention (six: repeat injection, 3: discectomy, 8: decompression), in eleven patients with stenosis (52%) and seven patients with disc protrusion (19%). Forty patients had no further intervention. Thirty-two patients (80%) completed follow-up questionnaires, one patient had died, one was lost to follow-up, and six patients declined to complete the questionnaires despite being contacted. The average LBOS for the thirty-two patients who completed the questionnaires was 41.8 (±17.5). Twenty-three patients with pre-treatment LBOS improved on average from 25.1 (±13.5) to 45.9 (±16.1) following injection (p=0.050). The eight patients with stenosis improved on average 24.9 points from 28.8 (±12.3) to 41.6 (±15.9). This is not statistically significant (p=0.95). The fifteen patients with disc protrusion improved significantly from 23.2 (±14.1) to 48.1 (±16.3) at follow-up (p< 0.01). This difference in improvement between the two groups was significant (p=0.016). Discussion Weiner and Fraser (Weiner BK, et al; J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997) recommended foraminal steroid injection as the primary treatment for foraminal or extraforaminal disc protrusions, describing 79% patients having long term pain relief with an average follow-up LBOS score of 54 out of a possible 75 points. This present study reports 81% of patients with disc protrusions not requiring further treatment, with an overall average improvement in the follow-up LBOS score to 48. However the results in patients with foraminal stenosis were significantly less satisfactory

Aims. Using a systematic review, we investigated whether there is an increased risk of post-operative infection in patients who have received an intra-articular corticosteroid injection to the hip for osteoarthritis prior to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods. Studies dealing with an intra-articular corticosteroid injection to the hip and infection following subsequent THA were identified from databases for the period between 1990 to 2013. Retrieved articles were independently assessed for their methodological quality. Results. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Two recommended against a steroid injection prior to THA and seven found no risk with an injection. No prospective controlled trials were identified. Most studies were retrospective. Lack of information about the methodology was a consistent flaw. Conclusions. The literature in this area is scarce and the evidence is weak. Most studies were retrospective, and confounding factors were poorly defined or not addressed. There is thus currently insufficient evidence to conclude that an intra-articular corticosteroid injection administered prior to THA increases the rate of infection. High quality, multicentre randomised trials are needed to address this issue. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1027–35

Background. Guidelines recommend epidural steroid injections (ESI) for treating severe disc-related sciatica based on trial data showing modest reductions in leg pain, disability and surgery avoidance. Despite their widespread use, there is no clear evidence about which patients are more likely to benefit from ESI. The aim of this study was to generate consensus on potential predictors of outcome following ESI for disc-related sciatica to include in data collection in a future cohort study. Methods. A list of potential predictors of outcome following ESI was generated from existing literature and a consensus meeting with seven experts. Items were subsequently presented in a two-round on-line modified Delphi study to generate consensus among experts on which items are agreed as potential predictors of outcome from ESI (consensus defined as 70% agreement with ranking of remaining items). Results. An initial list of 53 items was generated and 90 experts were invited from seven countries to participate in the on-line Delphi study. Response rates were 48% (n=44) and 73% (n=33) for round 1 and 2 respectively. Twenty-eight additional items suggested by participants in round 1 were included in round 2. Of the 81 items, 14 reached consensus; across domains of medication use, previous surgery, pain intensity, psychosocial factors, imaging findings and type of injection. Highest ranked of remaining items included work-related and clinical assessment items. Conclusion. Based on expert consensus, items that can be routinely collected in clinical practice were identified as potential predictors of outcomes following ESI. These will be tested in a future multicentre cohort study. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This study is supported by Health Education England and the National Institute for Health Research (HEE/ NIHR ICA Programme Clinical Lectureship, Dr Siobhan Stynes, NIHR300441). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care

In this study, 40 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and had a history of previous steroid injections were compared retrospectively with 40 carefully matched patients who underwent THA in the same period but had never received steroid injections. The development of sepsis under standard care was one of the outcome measures. This occurred in 20% of steroid patients within the first 36 months after THA, compared to 0% in the control group. Further, in a detailed analysis of Harris and Oxford scores, patients treated with steroid had a higher incidence of night pain, more severe pain, and greater loss of function in activities of daily living at one year. There were two revisions for deep infection in the steroid and control groups. Based on the incidence of pain and infectious complications in the first postoperative year, and pending completion of the study, we provisionally suggest that steroid injection of hips may be ill advised in patients who are likely candidates for future THA

Background. Clinical guidelines recommend epidural steroid injection (ESI) as a treatment option for severe disc-related sciatica, but there is considerable uncertainty about its effectiveness. Currently, we know very little about factors that might be associated with good or poor outcomes from ESI. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and appraise the evidence investigating prognostic factors associated with outcomes following ESI for patients with imaging confirmed disc-related sciatica. Methods. The search strategy involved the electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and reference lists of eligible studies. Selected papers were quality appraised independently by two reviewers using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Between study heterogeneity precluded statistical pooling of results. Results. 2726 citations were identified; 11 studies were eligible. Overall study quality was low with all judged to have moderate or high risk of bias. Forty-five prognostic factors were identified but were measured inconsistently. The most commonly assessed prognostic factors were related to pain and function (n=7 studies), imaging features (n=6 studies), health and lifestyle (n=5 studies), patient demographics (n=4 studies) and clinical assessment findings (n=4 studies). No prognostic factor was found to be consistently associated with outcomes following ESI. Most studies found no association or results that conflicted with other studies. Conclusions. There is little, and low quality, evidence to guide practice in terms of factors that predict outcomes in patients following ESI for disc-related sciatica. The results can help inform some of the decisions about potential prognostic factors that should be assessed in future well-designed prospective cohort studies. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: This study is supported by Health Education England and the National Institute for Health Research (HEE/ NIHR ICA Programme Clinical Lectureship, Dr Siobhan Stynes, NIHR300441). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care

The effectiveness of steroid injection in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) has been questioned. We prospectively evaluated the outcome of 20 consecutive patients (25 shoulders) with clinical and radiological evidence of primary ACJ arthritis after steroid injections. All patients were evaluated using the Constant score after a minimum of 12 months follow up. Only patients with a negative provocative test after injection of 2ml of depomedrone and lignocaine were included in the study. Eleven females (14 shoulders) and 9 males (11 shoulders) were included. The average age was 53.9 years. The mean preinjection score was 61.6 points (SD 13.12) and at 6 months this improved to 81 points, mean difference of 19.36 (CI = 14.19 – 24.53), p< 0.01, which was highly statistically significant. There was further improvement at 12 months, on the 6 month score, mean 88.4 points, mean difference of 7.4 (CI = 3.55 – 11.25), p = 0.001 which was also statistically significant. In addition, the younger the patient, the greater the improvement in the objective score which measures the range of movement and power (r = −0.47; p = 0.01). We conclude that local steroid injection is an effective method of treatment for primary isolated acromioclavicular arthritis and improvement continues for at least 12 months, but may require more than one injection

Study Design: A consecutive retrospective cohort including all patients treated by a single consultant spinal surgeon (BJCF) with targeted foraminal epidural steroid injection (FESI) for radicular pain. Objective: To assess the efficacy of targeted foraminal epidural steroid injection (FESI) for radicular pain in preventing surgical intervention. Summary of Background Data: 90% of sciatica resolves within 90 days. Beyond this period, decompresssive surgery for pain relief maybe considered. Open surgery however carries attendant risk including nerve root injury, dural laceration, cauda equina syndrome, deep infection, recurrent disc prolapse, epidural fibrosis and post-discectomy lumbar instability. Peri-radicular infiltration of local anaesthetic and steroid has been shown to reduce pain, at least in the short term. We were interested in whether FESI could obviate the need for surgery in refractory cases of nerve root pain. Methods: 83 consecutive patients (45 female, 38 male) with a mean age of 51 years (range 24 to 87) presenting between November 2000 and February 2003 with radicular pain were treated with targeted FESI. 55 patients had a principal diagnosis of disc prolapse, 20 had lateral canal stenosis and 8 had degenerative spondylolisthesis. Fourteen had previous surgery and 38 had previous caudal or lumbar epidural injections. Outcome Measures: Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Score and disability by the Oswestry Disability Index. The product-limit method of Kaplan Meier was used to assess the time to further procedure or the date of last review. Results: 21 of 83 patients (25.3%) underwent an open procedure (discectomy/decompression) within the designated time period (median 20 months). Median time to open procedure was 6.5 months (mean 8.2 months). Repeat FESI was required in 16 patients (19.2%). The remaining 46 (55.4%) patients avoided any further procedure at a median of 20 months (range 13 to 36). No complications resulted from these procedures. Conclusions: Targeted foraminal epidural steroid injection can resolve radicular pain caused by varying pathologies. Surgical procedures (decompression/discectomy) can be avoided in 74.7% of cases up to a median of 20 months thereby avoiding unnecessary surgical risk

To investigate the clinical effectiveness and complications of caudal epidural steroid injections in the treatment of sciatica in patients with an MRI proven sacral tarlov cyst. A Prospective case control study. All patients with corresponding radicular pain received a course of three caudal epidural steroid injections, two weeks apart and patients were reviewed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year interval in a dedicated epidural follow up clinic. Data including demographics, MRI results, diagnosis and complications were documented. Outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), the visual analogue score (VAS) and the hospital anxiety and depression (HADS) score. Overall patient satisfaction was recorded on a scale of 0-10. 38 patients with a sacral tarlov cyst were compared to a matched control group. In the sacral cyst group, mean VAS for axial pain reduced from 5.859 to 2.59 at three months (p<0.001). VAS for limb pain reduced from 6.23 to 2.53(<0.005). Mean ODI reduced from 45.49 at first visit to 21.98 at 3 months. Mean HADS also improved from 17 to 7. There was no statistical difference between the two groups. BMI did not affect the outcome in either group. Based on our study, we conclude that presence of a sacral tarlov cyst is not a contraindication to caudal epidural steroid injection, as comparable significant improvement in both axial and limb pain in the short and intermediate periods was achieved without any major complications

Autologous injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) stimulates healing process in degenerated tendons. The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcome of lateral epicondylitis treated with PRP and steroid injection. Tennis elbow patients who failed conservative medical therapy were included and were allocated randomly steroid group (n=70) and PRP group (n=63). Data were collected before procedure, at 4, 8, 12 weeks, 1 year and 2 years after procedure. The main outcome measures were visual analogue score, Mayo elbow performance score, DASH score and hand grip strength. Successful treatment was defined as more than a 25% reduction in visual analogue score or DASH score and more than 75 score in Mayo elbow performance score. We observed that 35 of the 70 patients (50%) in corticosteroid group and 47 of the 63 patients (75%) in PRP group were successful, which was significantly different (p<.001), according to DASH score 37 of the 70 patients (53%) and 47 of the 63 patients (75%) in the PRP group were successful which was also significantly different (P = .005), Mayo elbow performance score was successful in 36 of the 70 patients (51%) in corticosteroid group and 49 of the 63 patients (78%) in PRP group. The improvement in hand grip strength of hand from 24.7kg (mean) 26kg in corticosteroid group and 23.5kg (mean) to 32.9kg (mean) in PRP group. PRP injection for chronic lateral epicondylitis reduces pain, improve functionality and hand grip strength when compared to steroid injection

Background. Clinical guidelines recommend epidural steroid injection (ESI) for severe sciatica but there is uncertainty of effectiveness. The POiSE study aims to identify factors, routinely collected in clinical practice that predict outcome in patients who have ESI. This presentation describes characteristics and early clinical outcomes of POiSE participants. Methods. Prospective cohort study in 19 NHS spinal services in England, inviting patients with sciatica listed for an ESI. Participant baseline characteristics and 6-week follow-up outcomes are presented. Outcomes include pain intensity (0–10 NRS), disability (Oswestry Disability Index 0–100) and global change in symptoms. Results. Over 24 months, 693 patients were invited to participate and 353 (51%) completed baseline questionnaires. Mean (SD) age 49.0 years (14.4), 60% female, and 46% (n=101) of those in work had certified time-off for sciatica. Mean pain intensity was 7.2 (2.0) and 6.2 (2.7) for leg and back pain respectively and mean disability (ODI) was 46.5 (18). 60% (n=210) had leg pain for >6 months. Average confidence at baseline (0 to 10) that the ESI would help symptoms was 5.7 (2.4). Of 217 patients reaching 6-week follow-up, mean leg and back pain intensity is 5.0 (2.8) and 4.9 (2.9) respectively and ODI 36.6 (20.4), with 57% reporting improvement (completely recovered/much better/better). Follow-up data collection at 6, 12 and 24-weeks post-ESI is ongoing. Conclusion. Interim analysis shows only just over half of patients are reporting improvement at 6 weeks post ESI. The POiSE cohort study will help better identify the patients with sciatica who are most likely to benefit from this treatment. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. This study is supported by Health Education England and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (HEE/ NIHR ICA Programme Clinical Lectureship, Dr Siobhan Stynes, NIHR300441). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care

Aim. The purpose of the study was to assess the safety of Intra-articular steroid hip injections (IASHI), prior to ipsilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA). Method. We investigated whether there was an excess of infection in such a group 7–10 years after total hip arthroplasty. A database of 49 patients who had undergone IASHI followed by ipsilateral THA was reviewed. Results. The mean length of time between injection and arthroplasty was 12.1 months (5.1–19 months). We found 7 major complications. Ten patients died with no further hip surgery at a mean of 28 months from surgery; 3 were lost to follow-up. The remaining group (36) were contacted by telephone at a mean of 97.8 (85–117) months from their surgery. No objective signs of joint infection were found. Conclusion. We believe our results show that ipsilateral steroid injection does not confer an increased risk of complications following subsequent THA, over an extended follow up

Background: Caudal extradural steroid injection is an alternative method of treating patients with chronic low back pain and sciatica. Aim: The purpose of our study is determining the effectiveness of the caudal extradural steroid injection in patients with severe chronic low back pain and sciatica. Patients – Methods: A total of 158 patients with severe and chronic low back pain and sciatica participated in the study, aged 23–78 years old. 86 patients were men and 72 women. Patients were divided into two groups according to the injected drug. Group 1 or the injected group (n=91) received a caudal extradural injection (CEI) that consists of 12 to 15 ml of 2% xylocaine together with 1 ml of Betamethasone Dipropionate and Betamethasone phosphate. Group 2 or the placebo group (n=52), received a caudal extradural injection that consists of 6–8 ml of 2% xylocaine mixed with 6–8 ml of water for injection. The mean duration of symptoms was comparable between the two groups. In order to estimate the degree of recovery from symptoms, all patients answered a specific questionnaire. The Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire (ODI) was answered by all patients on the first day of clinical examination, and on different follow-up periods after caudal injection. The straight leg-raising test was evaluated in all patients at the same follow – up periods. Results: Recovery from symptoms and a decrease in the O.D.I score after the CEI was observed in both groups. However the mean ODI score of the injected group was statistically significant lower than this of control group for a period until one month after the injection (p < 0,001, Wilkoxon Signed Ranks test). Also the mean improvement time of positive SLR test in the injected group was statistically significant lower than this of control group (log rank test, p = 0,019). Conclusions: The caudal extradural steroid injection is a reasonable non-surgical therapeutic option among patients with severe chronic low back pain and sciatica. It offers pain relief to patients who do not respond to prolonged conservative therapy, or who refuse surgery. It can easily be performed in the outpatient clinic

To assess whether epidural steroid injection [ESI] is effective in the treatment of nerve root pathology caused by compression in the lumbar spine secondary to either spinal stenosis or disc prolapse, we carried out a prospective randomised controlled trial; patients were randomised either to ESI or Intramuscular steroid injection, with minimum two year follow-up. Ninety two patients with symptoms, signs and radiological findings consistent with lumbar nerve root compression suitable for surgical decompression. The main outcome measures were the Oxford Pain Chart over the first month, Oswestry Disability Index, and the need for surgery. There was a significant reduction in pain early on after ESI compared with controls [p=< 0.004] between 10 and 35 days. There was no difference in the long term between the two groups and the rate of surgery in the two groups was not significantly different. Indeed the rate of surgery was higher in the ESI group than the control group [41% vs.31%] but this was not significant. A second ESI did not change the likelihood that surgery would be required. Conclusion: ESI is effective for early pain relief for lumbar nerve root compression. However it does not change the natural history of the condition and does not reduce the ultimate need for surgery. It is probably effect to “buy time” in acute sciatica until improvement occurs naturally

Injection of corticosteroids into the digital flexor tendon sheath is an accepted and effective treatment for stenosing tenosynovitis. However, despite long historical experience with this procedure, there remains no guide in the literature as to the optimal dose of steroid. Furthermore, the accuracy of these injections has not been well established. Using a prospective, randomized, blinded design, this study compares the outcomes of high (20 mg) and low (10 mg) dose depomedrol injection. Furthermore, the accuracy of tendon sheath injections was assessed radiographically. The findings demonstrate increased effectiveness of the higher steroid dose and a significant learning curve associated with intra-thecal injections. Injection of corticosteroids into the digital flexor tendon sheath is an accepted and effective treatment for stenosing tenosynovitis (trigger finger). However, despite long historical experience with this procedure, there remains no guide in the literature as to the safe and effective dose of steroid to be administered. Furthermore, the accuracy of digital tendon sheath injections has not been well established. One study has suggested that steroid injected outside the tendon sheath was as effective as intra-thecal injection and may result in reduced complications of infection and tendon rupture. Using a prospective, blinded design, patients were randomized to receive either high (20 mg) or low (10 mg) dose depomedrol injection. The accuracy of the steroid injections was determined radiographically using non-ionic radio-opaque dye. Outcome measures included pain, tenderness, presence of a palpable nodule, triggering, and limitation of activities (work, hobbies, ADLs). Complications such as pain, stiffness, bruising, thinning of the fat or skin, infection and tendon rupture were also recorded. Higher dose depomedrol (20 mg) was found to be more effective for relieving pain and triggering than lower dose depomedrol (10 mg). No increase in complication rate was encountered. Stenosing tenosynovitis in diabetic patients was markedly less responsive to treatment. Injection accuracy was found to increase with clinical experience from approximately 50% for beginners to over 90% for experienced hand surgeons. At the time of submission of this abstract, patient numbers (currently forty-one participants) do not allow analysis regarding the effect of injection accuracy on clinical outcome

Objective: To report a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the therapeutic efficacy of intradiscal steroid injection for the treatment of discogenic back pain after two years. Introduction: Discography remains the main method to assess whether a degenerate disc is the source of back pain. The treatment of such discogenic pain is difficult. There is only one previous RCT of the use intradiscal steroids, but with a short follow-up. Patients and Methods: 120 consecutive patients with positive discography were randomised intra-operatively to receive an intradiscal injection of saline or 40mgs Depomedrone. Outcome was assessed using a back pain questionnaire at six weeks, three and six months, and at two years. Pain (using a visual analogue score), disability (the Oswestry Disability Index), and psychological status (DRAM score) were measured. The results were correlated with Modic changes and high intensity zones on MRI scan. Results: An initial improvement of back pain in the steroid group is not maintained at two years, with no statistical difference between the two groups. Correlation of the results with the MRI findings will be presented. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the need for long-term follow-up of such intradiscal therapeutic methods of treating discogenic pain

We present a unique prospective study which estimates the median sustained stage related improvement in pain and hand function predicting symptomatic relief period with high accuracy with a single steroid injection. Patients were grouped into stages, I to IV according to the Eaton and Glickel radiological criteria. The steroid injection contained 40mg triamcelone and 1% lido-caine. The response was assessed by DASH and a visual analogue score before and at six-week interval. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate median length of sustained improvement by grade of disease, with 95% confidence interval. All the patients were injected by an upperlimb physiotherapist (DD). Post injection review was carried out by an independent observer(MK). Forty patients were studied: 33 females and 7 males. The age ranged from 53 to 81 years, (mean 65years). No patient was lost to follow-up. Mean duration of symptoms were 36 months. Six patients has stage I disease(15%), eighteen patients had stage II disease (45%), ten patients had stage III disease (25%) and six patients has stage IV disease (15%). Pain score ranged from 4 to 9 on visual analogue score. Reduction in pain visual analogue score was noticed in all but 3 patients. With the exception of Grade III patients, DASH scores decreased significantly at 6 weeks (Grade I 14.9, Grade II 19.3, Grade III 6.2 and Grade IV 10.0.). With the exception of Grade IV patients, pain scores decreased significantly at 6 weeks. In Grade II patients, over half had sustained symptomatic relief at 6 months. So on average, we can expect grade I patients to sustain symptomatic relief for an average of 17 weeks. The true average is likely to be between 13 and 21 weeks. For grade II patients, most will still have improved at 6 months. Grade III and IV patients have an identical prognosis of 4 weeks, though the true prognosis may be between 2 and 6 weeks. In conclusion it is possible to predict the period of symptomatic improvement in each of the four disease stages. This allows the treating clinician to discuss the outcome of treatment with reasonable accuracy

The aim was to investigate whether or not the pre-operative injection of cortico-steroids into the knee influences the infection rate of a subsequent total knee replacement. This was a case controlled study, in which it was calculated that 152 controls and 38 infected cases would give sufficient power to the study. The infection group had to have had a delay in wound healing or have had a revision for infection. A total of 32.8% had had an injection at some time pre-operatively. The average number of injections was 2.23, with a range of 1–15. 37% were performed by a G.P., 35% by an orthopaedic surgeon, and 22% by a rheumatologist.79% had the injection within 12 months of surgery. The rate of injection was the same in the two groups. There was no significant difference in the infection rate between the two groups (OR 1.38; 95%CI 0.55–3.31). Despite recent literature indicating that there is a 10% increase in infection in patients having steroid injections into the hip prior to THR this study does not confirm this risk in patients undergoing TKR

Introduction: The treatment with epidural steroids and local anaesthetic for radicular pain arising from nerve root compression is a commonly utilised and recognised treatment. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of CT-guided injection of epidural steroids without anaesthetic for radicular pain but without clinical neurology in the presence of a degenerative of lytic spondylolisthesis and concomitant foraminal narrowing. Method: The study subjects, 21 in total, were selected over a 1-year period by the surgeon. All patients had either degenerative or lytic spondylolisthesis as determined by CT, MRI and plain film and were suffering from radicular pain – sharp, shooting and burning in the L5 or S1 dermatome. For inclusion, there had to be no associated evidence of nerve root compression. All patients completed, prior to epidural therapy, a pain diagram, visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain severity on a scale of 1 to 10 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The MRI and clinical pain picture were correlated. The level of the spondylolithesis was determined. Highly selective CT-guided epidural steroid injection was then carried out at the level of spondylolithesis by an experienced interventional radiologist. The pain diagram, VAS of pain severity and ODI were all completed again by the subjects themselves or by telephone at 1 and 3 months after injection in the presence of an independent assessor (nurse) and then reviewed and discussed with the treating doctor. All subjects were also asked to complete a functional questionnaire. Results: One month after injection 86% of those treated had greater than 50% radicular pain relief and from this group 72% had radicular pain reduction of greater than 80%. All had improvement in function. All of the above, confirmed that their quality of life had certainly improved. Three months after injection 76% of those treated still had a reduction in their radicular pain of greater than 50% (92% of these still had pain reduction of over 80%). Again all reported continued functional improvement. Discussion: Despite the small sample size, this study highlights the short-term Benefit of CT-guided steroid epidural injections with symptomatic lumbosacral spondylolisthesis and spondylolysis with radicular pain. Pain can be relieved without anaesthesia. The mechanisms of pain relief are speculative

Over 5 years we gave 84 patients epidural cortisone (80 mg depomedrol and local anaesthesia) for back and/or leg pain due to degenerative disease of the spine. The mean age of the 35 men and 49 women was 65.2 years (37 to 86). All patients had back pain and 77% had neurogenic leg pain. Spinal radiographs demonstrated degenerative changes, including intervertebral disc space narrowing and/or facet joint arthritis, in 84%. MRI, performed in 80 patients (95%), confirmed degenerative disease of the lumbar spine and demonstrated neural compression in 78 of the 80 (97%). Five patients received a second epidural injection and one a third. Complete resolution of back and/or leg pain occurred in 32 patients (38%), and 34 (40%) had relief for between 1 and 12 months. There was no change in the symptoms of 18 patients (21%). Surgery was undertaken in 17 patients (20%), with seven undergoing spinal decompression alone and 10 decompression and a fusion. After surgery, four of the seven patients who did not have a fusion still had back pain. All 10 of the patients who underwent decompression and fusion had a good outcome. One patient developed an epidural haematoma following the epidural injection. Epidural steroid injection had a favourable outcome in 78% of our patients, with a low incidence of complications. Patients who failed to respond to the epidural injection did poorly with spinal decompression alone

Introduction. Tennis and Golfers elbows (TE, GE) are difficult conditions to treat. Ultrasound guided steroid injection (UGSI) is one of the treatment modalities in treating refractory TE and GE. We present our clinical experience and short to mid-term results of patients with TE and GE treated with UGSI. Methods. Patients with persistent TE and GE treated with UGSI (Marcaine and kenalog) at a tertiary centre between 2007 and 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow up was 4 months (Range 2–21 months). Patients were assessed for pain relief, recurrence of symptoms and surgical release. Results. USGI was performed on 181 elbows (144 patients). There were 68 male and 76 female patients. Mean age 49.5 years (range 17–82). At the time of UGSI, chronic features of TE were established in 144 elbows and signs of GE were identified in 37 elbows. At the review clinic, 155 (86%) elbows were reported to be completely pain free, 10 (5%) elbows experienced no improvement and 16 (9%) elbows encountered residual symptoms. However, a total of 98 (54%) elbows experienced recurrence of symptoms. For TE, symptoms recurred in 74/144 (51%) elbows at a mean interval of 5.8 months (95% CI: 4.6 to 6.9 months). For GE, symptoms recurred in 24/37 (64%) elbows at a mean interval of 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.4 to 5.0 months). Repeat USGI was performed in 24 elbows, of which 20 elbows were associated with further recurrence. Fifty seven (50%) elbows underwent surgical release (45 TE and 12 GE). Discussion. USGI appears to be a beneficial short term measure in controlling the symptoms of TE and GE. However, recurrence or failure to improve occurred in 68% of elbows. Repeat USGI is associated with high failure rate (83%) and surgical option should be explored in these refractory conditions

Aims

Frozen shoulder is a common, painful condition that results in impairment of function. Corticosteroid injections are commonly used for frozen shoulder and can be given as glenohumeral joint (GHJ) injection or suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). Both injection types have been shown to significantly improve shoulder pain and range of motion. It is not currently known which is superior in terms of relieving patients’ symptoms. This is the protocol for a randomized clinical trial to investigate the clinical effectiveness of corticosteroid injection given as either a GHJ injection or SSNB.

Aims. Intra-articular (IA) injection may be used when treating hip osteoarthritis (OA). Common injections include steroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), local anaesthetic, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Network meta-analysis allows for comparisons between two or more treatment groups and uses direct and indirect comparisons between interventions. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of various IA injections used in the management of hip OA with a follow-up of up to six months. Methods. This systematic review and network meta-analysis used a Bayesian random-effects model to evaluate the direct and indirect comparisons among all treatment options. PubMed, Web of Science, Clinicaltrial.gov, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to February 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluate the efficacy of HA, PRP, local anaesthetic, steroid, steroid+anaesthetic, HA+PRP, and physiological saline injection as a placebo, for patients with hip OA were included. Results. In this meta-analysis of 16 RCTs with a total of 1,735 participants, steroid injection was found to be significantly more effective than placebo injection on reported pain at three months, but no significant difference was observed at six months. Furthermore, steroid injection was considerably more effective than placebo injection for functional outcomes at three months, while the combination of HA+PRP injection was substantially more effective at six months. Conclusion. Evidence suggests that steroid injection is more effective than saline injection for the treatment of hip joint pain, and restoration of functional outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(6):532–539

We have performed a prospective double-blind, randomised controlled trial over two years to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intra-operative peri-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients undergoing medial unicondylar knee replacement. We randomised 90 patients into two equal groups. The study group received an injection of triamcinolone acetonide, bupivacaine, and epinephrine into the peri-articular tissues at the end of the operation. The control group received the same injection mixture but without the addition of triamcinolone. The peri-operative analgesic regimen was standardised.

The study group reported a significant reduction in pain (p = 0.014 at 12 hours, p = 0.031 at 18 hours and p = 0.031 at 24 hours) and had a better range of movement (p = 0.023 at three months). There was no significant difference in the rate of infection and no incidence of tendon rupture in either group.

The addition of corticosteroid to the peri-articular injection after unicondylar knee replacement had both immediate and short-term benefits in terms of relief from pain, and rehabilitation with no increased risk of infection.

Image-guided intra-articular hip injection of local-anaesthetic and steroid is commonly used in the management of hip pain. It can be used as a diagnostic and/or therapeutic tool and is of low cost (£75). The aim of this study was to assess how often a hip injection has a therapeutic effect.

This is a retrospective, consecutive, case series of intra-articular hip injections performed in a tertiary referral hospital over a 2-year period (2013–4). Patients were identified from the radiology department's prospectively entered database. Clinical information, reason for injection and subsequent management was obtained from hospital records. All patients prospectively reported their pain levels in a numeric pain scale diary (out of 10) at various time points; pre-, immediately post-, 1st day-, 2nd day- and 2 weeks- post-injection. Only patients with complete pain scores at all time points were included (n=200, of the 250 injections performed over study period, 80%).

The majority of injections were performed for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment (82%). The pain was significantly reduced from a pre-injection score of 7.5 (SD:2) to 5.0 (SD:3) immediately post-injection(p<0.001); only 24 (11%) reported any worsening of pain immediately post-injection. Pain significantly reduced further to 3.8(SD:3) at 2-weeks post-injection (p<0.001). 50% of patients had at least a 3 point drop in reported pain. No improvement was seen in 18 patients and 10 (5%) reported worse pain at 2-weeks compared to pre-injection. Of the OA cohort, 10% have required repeat injections, 45% required no further intervention and 45% underwent or are due for hip replacement. No immediate complications occurred.

Intra-articular hip injection reduced pain in 86% of cases and has delayed any further surgical treatment for at least 2 years in over 50% of OA cases. It is hence a cost-effective treatment modality. Further work is necessary to describe factors predicting response.

Aims. Osteoarthritis (OA) affecting the thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) is a common painful condition. In this study, we aimed to explore clinicians’ approach to management with a particular focus on the role of specific interventions that will inform the design of future clinical trials. Methods. We interviewed a purposive sample of 24 clinicians, consisting of 12 surgeons and 12 therapists (four occupational therapists and eight physiotherapists) who managed patients with CMCJ OA. This is a qualitative study using semi-structured, online interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results. A total of 14 themes were developed, six of which were developed relating to the clinical management of CMCJ OA: 1) A flexible ‘ladder’ approach starting with conservative treatment first; 2) The malleable role of steroid injection; 3) Surgery as an invasive and risky last resort; 4) A shared and collaborative approach; 5) Treating the whole person; and 6) Severity of life impact influences treatment. The remaining eight themes were developed relating to clinical trial barriers and facilitators: 1) We need to embrace uncertainty; 2) You are not losing out by taking part; 3) It is difficult to be neutral about certain treatments; 4) Difficult to recruit to ‘no treatment’ ; 5) Difficult to recruit to a trial comparing no surgery to surgery; 6) Patients are keen to participate in research; 7) Burden on staff and participants; and 8) A enthusiasm for a variety of potential trial arms. Conclusion. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of how clinicians manage thumb CMCJ OA in their practice settings. Our study also provides useful insights informing the design of randomized clinical trials involving steroid injections and surgery in people with thumb CMCJ OA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):321–331

Purpose: Intra-articular (IA) steroid injections have been widely used by orthopedic surgeons as symptomatic relief for severe hip OA, and with the addition of local anesthetic, they can be used to differentiate pain from the hip, knee and lumbar spine. This technique has come under some question as of late however due to inconsistencies in the literature. It has been reported that there is an association between infection post Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and prior IA steroid injections (Kaspar & de Beer, 2005). Additionally, the incidence of infections has been noted to particularly rise when the injections occur within six weeks of the operation (McIntosh et al, 2006). This study was used to analyze the risk of intra-articular steroid injections with respect to infection following THA. Method: We retrospectively reviewed 96 hips of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty between 2001 and 2007 by one surgeon. Matched cohorts of 48 hips were established: one group in which patients received an injection prior to THA and one in which patients did not. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V14. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral fracture or surgery, malignancy and immunosuppression. Results: There was no significant difference found between groups and there was no correlation found with regards to time of injection prior to surgery and infection. Within the injected group, two patients developed a UTI while one other had a pulmonary embolism. There were zero infections with regards to the hip, and there were no dislocations or revisions. The non-injected group included one patient who developed cholelethiasis, another patient with Norfolk virus and one patient with a superficial infection which was contributed to a dental procedure. There were no dislocations or revisions. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the administration of intra-articular steroid prior to THA does not increase risk of infection, and therefore our study does not find such an injection to be a contra-indicator

The June 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Proximal humerus fractures: what does the literature say now?; Infection risk of steroid injections and subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Surgical versus non-surgical management of humeral shaft fractures; Core outcome set needed for elbow arthroplasty; Minimally invasive approaches to locating radial nerve in the posterior humeral approach; Predictors of bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability; Does the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises improve rotator cuff-related shoulder pain?; Terminology and diagnostic criteria used in patients with subacromial pain syndrome

The August 2023 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Changes in paraspinal muscles correspond to the severity of degeneration in patients with lumbar stenosis; Steroid injections are not effective in the prevention of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy; A higher screw density is associated with fewer mechanical complications after surgery for adult spinal deformity; Methylprednisolone following minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a large prospective single-institution study; Occupancy rate of pedicle screw below 80% is a risk factor for upper instrumented vertebral fracture following adult spinal deformity surgery; Deterioration after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: an observational study from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network

The February 2023 Wrist & Hand Roundup. 360. looks at: ‘Self-care’ protocol for minimally displaced distal radius fractures; Treatment strategies for acute Seymour fractures in children and adolescents: including crushed open fractures; Routinely collected outcomes of proximal row carpectomy; Moving minor hand surgeries in the office-based procedure room: a population-based trend analysis; A comparison between robotic-assisted scaphoid screw fixation and a freehand technique for acute scaphoid fracture: a randomized, controlled trial; Factors associated with conversion to surgical release after a steroid injection in patients with a trigger finger; Two modern total wrist arthroplasties: a randomized comparison; Triangular fibrocartilage complex suture repair reliable even in ulnar styloid nonunion

Introduction. Epidural steroid injection is an established treatment modality for intervertebral disc prolapse. It is a low-risk alternative to surgical intervention in some patients for whom noninvasive treatment has failed. Caudal epidural steroid injection is one of the most widely used methods for pain relief. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of same dose in different volume of caudal epidural steroid injection in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease. Material/Methods. Prospective study was conducted during 2007 to 2009. 100 Patients were randomized in to two groups, of which 50 % (group A) received 4 ml of steroid with isotonic saline and remaining 50 % (group B) received 12 ml. Injection was given in prone position through a 22-G needle in to the epidural space through the sacral hiatus. The average follow-up was 18 months. Outcomes scores included the SF-36, Oswestry disability index and pain VAS and were recorded in the pre and post injection periods. Results. In group A, 18 patients had significant pain relief and 32 had no relief during the early period. Whereas in group B, 22 had significant pain relief and 28 had no relief. The quality of pain relief of 50% or greater was considered as significant. Follow up after 1 year does not show much difference. Group B had significant decrease in symptoms in the initial post injection period (P<0.05). Conclusions. The volume of steroid solution in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease is significant in the early post injection period only

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty is a painful operation. Peri-articular local anesthetic injections reduce post-operative pain and assist recovery. It is inconclusive whether intra-operative injections of peri-articular corticosteroids are of benefit. Clinical Question: In patients with osteoarthritis who are undergoing TKA, does the addition of high or low dose corticosteroid to peri-articular injections of local anesthetic and adrenaline improve post-operative pain and range of motion?

Introduction

The conservative management of Sub-Acromial Impingement Syndrome (SAIS) of the shoulder includes both physiotherapy treatment and subacromial injection with local anaesthetic and steroids. The outcome from injection treatment has rarely been evaluated scientifically.

Subacromial corticosteroid injection has been shown to be effective in treating impingement syndrome. The exact mechanism of action is not clear but it may be due to its anti-inflammatory properties. However, there are potential side effects of steroid injection including tendon weakening, dermal atrophy and infection. NSAIDs may offer similar anti-inflammatory properties but without the side effects of corticosteroids. Tenoxicam is a long-acting water soluble NSAID and is available without irritant preservatives. Studies have shown that peri-articular Tenocixam injection was useful in treating painful shoulders and local tolerability was good. The aim of this study is to carry out a blinded ran-domised controlled study comparing subacromial Tenoxicam injection (NSAID) against methylprednisolone (steroid) injection in patients with clinical subacromial impingement syndrome. The study protocol was approved by local research ethics committee. Patients over 18 with a clinical diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome were considered eligible to this study. Patients with other known causes of shoulder pain, contraindication or sensitivity to NSAID and pregnant patients were excluded. Three functional outcome measures were used – Constant-Murley Shoulder Score, DASH and the Oxford Shoulder Score. The patients completed all three outcome measures before and 2, 4 and 6 weeks after the subacromial injection. Simple randomisation method was used and blinded to both researcher and the patient. 58 patients randomised into two groups were reviewed at the end of six weeks. Patients treated with subacromial steroid injection had a much better outcome compared to patients treated with subacromial tenoxicam injection and this difference was highly significant (p< .003). In conclusion, patients with subacromial impingement syndrome have a better clinical outcome when treated with subacromial steroid injection than NSAID injection

Introduction and Aims: Intra-articular steroid hip injection (IASHI) has been extensively administered for painful hip arthritis since the 1950s, but with advances in medical and surgical management, its role is less certain today. There is very little published data on the utility or prescribing patterns of IASHI. Method: A questionnaire seeking expert opinions on IASHI was developed and distributed to practising Ontario-based members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Initial phone calls identified those who perform hip replacements, and subsequent faxed forms had a 73% response rate (99 surgeons). We systematically describe the current practices and expert opinions of 99 hip surgeons, on the use of IASHI, focusing on indications, current usage, and complications. Results: Only 56% of surgeons felt that IASHI was actually useful therapeutically, though four in five surgeons cited the usefulness of hip injection for differentiating hip-spine co-morbidity in diagnostically challenging patients. Therapeutic benefit from IASHI was perceived to be poor, with 72% of surgeons estimating that between zero and 60% of their patients achieved any benefit at all from the injections, with duration of benefit uniformly estimated as being between zero and six months. Infection rates were considered to be less than 2% by most surgeons. One quarter of the surgeons felt that IASHI accelerates arthritis progression, most of whom had stated that it would be no great loss if IASHI was no longer available. Nineteen percent of the surgeons believed that there may be increased infection rate of THA after IASHI, and this was associated with lower numbers of IASHI ordered per year, compared to those who did not feel that infection rates would increase. The opinions of this large group of experts is consistent with efficacy studies, and forms a context for our ongoing studies of infected hip arthroplasty post-IASHI. Conclusion: Opinions were mixed, with substantial numbers of surgeons stating that the procedure is not therapeutically helpful, may accelerate arthritis progression, or may increase infections after subsequent total hip arthroplasty. This information provides a systematic collection of expert opinions, as well as a context for forthcoming studies on effectiveness and complications

Aims

To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of adalimumab compared with standard care alone for the treatment of early-stage Dupuytren’s disease (DD) and the value of further research from an NHS perspective.

Introduction

It is not uncommon to encounter patients with atypical hip or lower extremity pain, ill-defined clinico-radiological features and concomitant hip and lumbar spine arthritis. It has been hypothesized that an anaesthetic hip arthrogram can help identify the source of pain in these cases. The purpose of this study is to analyze our experience with this technique in order to verify its accuracy.

Aims. This systematic review places a recently completed multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT), UK FROST, in the context of existing randomized evidence for the management of primary frozen shoulder. UK FROST compared the effectiveness of pre-specified physiotherapy techniques with a steroid injection (PTSI), manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) with a steroid injection, and arthroscopic capsular release (ACR). This review updates a 2012 review focusing on the effectiveness of MUA, ACR, hydrodilatation, and PTSI. Methods. MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro, Science Citation Index, Clinicaltrials.gov, CENTRAL, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry were searched up to December 2018. Reference lists of included studies were screened. No language restrictions applied. Eligible studies were RCTs comparing the effectiveness of MUA, ACR, PTSI, and hydrodilatation against each other, or supportive care or no treatment, for the management of primary frozen shoulder. Results. Nine RCTs were included. The primary outcome of patient-reported shoulder function at long-term follow-up (> 6 months and ≤ 12 months) was reported for five treatment comparisons across four studies. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were: ACR versus MUA: 0.21 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.42), ACR versus supportive care: -0.13 (95% CI -1.10 to 0.83), and ACR versus PTSI: 0.33 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.59) and 0.25 (95% CI -0.34 to 0.85), all favouring ACR; MUA versus supportive care: 0 (95% CI -0.44 to 0.44) not favouring either; and MUA versus PTSI: 0.12 (95% CI -0.14 to 0.37) favouring MUA. None of these differences met the threshold of clinical significance agreed for the UK FROST and most confidence intervals included zero. Conclusion. The findings from a recent multicentre RCT provided the strongest evidence that, when compared with each other, neither PTSI, MUA, nor ACR are clinically superior. Evidence from smaller RCTs did not change this conclusion. The effectiveness of hydrodilatation based on four RCTs was inconclusive and there remains an evidence gap. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):773–784

Aims. Iliopsoas pathology is a relatively uncommon cause of pain following total hip arthroplasty (THA), typically presenting with symptoms of groin pain on active flexion and/or extension of the hip. A variety of conservative and surgical treatment options have been reported. In this retrospective cohort study, we report the incidence of iliopsoas pathology and treatment outcomes. Methods. A retrospective review of 1,000 patients who underwent THA over a five-year period was conducted, to determine the incidence of patients diagnosed with iliopsoas pathology. Outcome following non-surgical and surgical management was assessed. Results. In all, 24 patients were diagnosed as having developed symptomatic iliopsoas pathology giving an incidence of 2.4%. While the mean age for receiving a THA was 65 years, the mean age for developing iliopsoas pathology was 54 years (28 to 67). Younger patients and those receiving THA for conditions other than primary osteoarthritis were at a higher risk of developing this complication. Ultrasound-guided steroid injection/physiotherapy resulted in complete resolution of symptoms in 61% of cases, partial resolution in 13%, and no benefit in 26%. Eight out of 24 patients (who initially responded to injection) subsequently underwent surgical intervention including tenotomy (n = 7) and revision of the acetabular component (n = 1). Conclusion. This is the largest case series to estimate the incidence of iliopsoas pathology to date. There is a higher incidence of this condition in younger patients, possibly due to the differing surgical indications. Arthoplasty for Perthes' disease or developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) often results in leg length and horizontal offset being increased. This, in turn, may increase tension on the iliopsoas tendon, possibly resulting in a higher risk of psoas irritation. Image-guided steroid injection is a low-risk, relatively effective treatment. In refractory cases, tendon release may be considered. Patients should be counselled of the risk of persisting groin pain when undergoing THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):305–308

The April 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy; Spine surgical site infections: a single debridement is not enough; Lenke type 5, anterior, or posterior: systematic review and meta-analysis; Epidural steroid injections and postoperative infection in lumbar decompression or fusion; Noninferiority of posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy; Identifying delays to surgical treatment for metastatic disease; Cervical disc replacement and adjacent segment disease: the NECK trial; Predicting complication in adult spine deformity surgery

Following arthroscopic arthrolysis for frozen shoulder, steroid injections may become necessary to improve ongoing pain and facilitate stretching exercises. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of steroid injections needed post-arthroscopic arthrolysis of frozen shoulder. Case series review carried out in a District General Hospital in UK. 30 consecutive patients who had arthroscopic arthrolysis under the care of the senior author were included. Patients’ records were analysed to identify the number of steroid injections administered post-operatively. 11 males and 19 females were examined, aged 46–83 years old (mean 56.1). 7 patients were diabetic. 10 patients (33.3%) received steroid injections post-operatively, with 8 of them receiving the injection within the first 6 post-operative months. The average post-operative time of steroid injection was 9.8 months. There was no association between diabetes and administration of a post-operative steroid injection P>0.01. Following arthroscopic arthrolysis a substantial proportion of patients may require one or more steroid injections to help pain and facilitate stretching exercises and physiotherapy. This study showed that 1 in 3 frozen shoulders treated with arthroscopic arthrolysis may need a subsequent steroid injection in the first year post surgery. Patients should be counselled preoperatively with regards to that, and be warned that arthroscopic arthrolysis is only the first step in the treatment pathway leading to recovery. Blackpool Victoria Hospital Orthopaedic Department

The October 2023 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: Cutting through surgical smoke: the science of cleaner air in spinal operations; Unlocking success: key factors in thoracic spine decompression and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Deep learning algorithm for identifying cervical cord compression due to degenerative canal stenosis on radiography; Surgeon experience influences robotics learning curve for minimally invasive lumbar fusion; Decision-making algorithm for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4/L5; Response to preoperative steroid injections predicts surgical outcomes in patients undergoing fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis

Intra-articular injections of steroid into the hip are used for a variety of reasons in current orthopaedic practice. Recently their safety prior to ipsilateral total hip replacement has been called into question owing to concerns about deep joint infection. We undertook a retrospective analysis of all patients who had undergone local anaesthetic and steroid injections followed by ipsilateral total hip replacement over a five-year period. Members of the surgical team, using a lateral approach to the hip, performed all the injections in the operating theatre using a strict aseptic technique. The mean time between injection and total hip replacement was 18 months (4 to 50). The mean follow-up after hip replacement was 25.8 months (9 to 78), during which time no case of deep joint sepsis was found. In our series, ipsilateral local anaesthetic and steroid injections have not conferred an increased risk of infection in total hip replacement. We believe that the practice of intra-articular local anaesthetic and steroid injections to the hip followed by total hip replacement is safer than previously reported

Aims. A pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial, UK FROzen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), was conducted in the UK NHS comparing the cost-effectiveness of commonly used treatments for adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care. Methods. A cost utility analysis from the NHS perspective was performed. Differences between manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic capsular release (ACR), and early structured physiotherapy plus steroid injection (ESP) in costs (2018 GBP price base) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at one year were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the treatments using regression methods. Results. ACR was £1,734 more costly than ESP ((95% confidence intervals (CIs) £1,529 to £1,938)) and £1,457 more costly than MUA (95% CI £1,283 to £1,632). MUA was £276 (95% CI £66 to £487) more expensive than ESP. Overall, ACR had worse QALYs compared with MUA (-0.0293; 95% CI -0.0616 to 0.0030) and MUA had better QALYs compared with ESP (0.0396; 95% CI -0.0008 to 0.0800). At a £20,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, MUA had the highest probability of being cost-effective (0.8632) then ESP (0.1366) and ACR (0.0002). The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion. While ESP was less costly, MUA was the most cost-effective option. ACR was not cost-effective. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):685–695

Background. Steroid injections can be used safely to treat trigger fingers. We aimed to determine the accuracy of referring General Practitioner (GP) diagnoses of trigger finger made to an upper limb surgeon. We also aimed to determine the efficacy of a serial two steroid injection then surgery technique in the management of trigger fingers. Methods. Data was collected prospectively from a “one-stop” trigger finger clinic (based in a district general hospital). 200 trigger fingers identified from September 2005 to November 2008, giving a minimum 1 year follow-up. Data was analysed for correct referring diagnosis, resolution/recurrence rate following injection and the effect of age, injector grade, diabetes on the rate of recurrence. Results. GP diagnoses were correct in 94% of referrals. Recurrence free resolution after one steroid injection was achieved in 74% of cases, rising to 84% after a second injection. The grade of injector did not influence the rate of resolution (p=0.967) or recurrence (p=0.818). Age was the only statistically significant factor, with recurrences being 8.3 years younger (95% CI 4.1–12.6 yrs; p=0.0002). 15% required surgical release after failure of two steroid injections. Conclusions. Steroid injection for trigger finger is a safe, easily performed technique that can give recurrence free resolution in up to 84% using a serial two steroid injection technique. This is an easily acquired technique that has obvious potential to be performed in the primary care setting, thus reducing the burden on hospital based specialist upper limb services, as only 15% required surgical intervention

To assess the incidence of infection in cases of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with prior steroid injection into the knee joint. Steroid injection into the arthritic joint is a well-known modality of treatment of arthritic joints. Its efficacy is well-documented. Increased incidence of infection secondary to steroid injection as compared to uninjected joints is reported in recent literature. A retrospective study was conducted. Four hundred and forty patients underwent Total Knee Replacement by the senior author during 1997–2005 at Wrightington hospital. Ninety patients had intraarticular steroid injection prior to surgery of which 35 patients had injection within 1 year prior to surgery. All patients had at least one year follow-up. Infection rate was assessed by case note, x-rays and microbiology review till last follow-up. One hundred and eighty patients of matched cohort who had Total Knee Replacement without steroid injection were compared for infection rate. Two cases of superficial infection were noted in the infection group and 5 cases of superficial infection in the non-injection group. No case of deep infection was noted in either group. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in incidence of infection in either group. Steroids are useful adjuncts in the management of patients with arthritic joints. This study shows no increased incidence of infection in patients who were given steroid injection prior to arthroplasty

Aim: To assess the long-term treatment outcome following conservative treatment of wrist ganglions by aspiration and steroid injections. Materials and Methods: Between December 2001 and November 2003, 49 patients with wrist ganglions were seen and treated by one surgeon*. There were 20 males and 29 females with an average age of 37 years (range 13 to 70 years). Anatomically we had 41 dorsal wrist, 5 volar wrist and 3 digital ganglions. Diagnosis was made on clinical examination, explained to patients about the condition and given three options of treatment. Reassurance,. Aspiration and steroid injection and. Surgery with its associated complications. 39% (14) were satisfied with reassurance alone, 69%(34) had aspiration and steroid injection and one opted for surgery. Those who opted for aspiration and steroid injection are included in the study. The aspiration was carried out under sterile technique, area infiltrated with 1% lignocaine, followed by aspiration of ganglion content using 16 G needle and injection of Methyl-prednisolone Acetate BP 40 mg/ml. The patients were advised to carry out their normal activities and followed up at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Follow up period range between 6 weeks to 6 months (average of 3.8 months). Results: 34 ganglia treated with aspiration and steroid injection had a cure rate of 47%(16), 31%(10) and 12%(4) respectively after 1,2 and 3 treatments with a cumulative success rate of 88%(30 of 34). We had recurrence rate of 12% (4 of 34) after 3 injections and two patients with skin discoloration. Conclusion: Treatment options should be given to patients with wrist and digital ganglions. Conservative treatment is quite successful, which will avoid surgery and associated complications. Even though our sample size is too small to make any statistical significance, cumulative success rate of 88% following multiple treatments of aspiration and steroid injections are in comparable with other studies

Aims & Objectives: To assess whether the incidence of infection in Primary Total knee Arthroplasty is increased as a result of previous steroid infiltration into the knee joint. Introduction: Steroid injection into the arthritic joint is a well-known modality of treatment of the arthritic joints. Its efficacy is well documented. Increased incidence of Infection secondary to steroid injection as compared to uninjected joints is reported in recent literature. Material & Methods: 440 patients underwent Total Knee replacement (PFC SIGMA-Depuy) by senior author during 1997–2005 at Wrightington hospital. 90 patients had intraarticular steroid injection prior to surgery of which 45 patients had injection with in 1 year prior to surgery. All patients had at least one year follow up. Infection rate was assessed by case note, x-rays and microbiology review till last follow up.180 patients of a matched cohort who had total knee replacement without steroid injection were compared for infection rate. Results: 2 cases of superficial infection were noted in Injection group and 5 cases of superficial infection in Non Injection group. No cases of Deep infection noted in either group. Stastical analysis showed no significant difference in incidence of infection in either group. Conclusion: Steroids are useful adjuncts in the management of patients with arthritic joints. This study shows no increased incidence of infection in patients given steroid injection prior to arthroplasty

Open surgery is rarely justified for the initial treatment of a unicameral bone cyst, but there is some debate concerning the relative effectiveness of closed methods. This study compared the results of steroid injection with those of autologous bone marrow grafting for the treatment of unicameral bone cysts. Between 1990 and 2001, 30 patients were treated by steroid injection and 28 by grafting with autologous bone marrow. The overall success rates were 86.7% and 92.0%, respectively (p > 0.05). The success rate after the initial procedure was 23.3% in the steroid group and 52.0% in those receiving autologous bone marrow (p < 0.05), and the respective cumulative success rates after second injections were 63.3% and 80.0% (p > 0.05). The mean number of procedures required was 2.19 (1 to 5) and 1.57 (1 to 3) (p < 0.05), the mean interval to healing was 12.5 months (4 to 32) and 14.3 months (7 to 36) (p > 0.05), and the rate of recurrence after the initial procedure was 41.7% and 13.3% in the steroid and in the autologous bone marrow groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Although the overall rates of success of both methods were similar, the steroid group had higher recurrence after a single procedure and required more injections to achieve healing

Study Design: A retrospective study of the clinical outcome of patients with lumbar discogenic pain with Modic changes on MRI prior to intradiscal steroid injection. Objectives: To determine whether the clinical outcome of patients with discogenic back pain who underwent intradiscal steroid injection could be predicted from MRI Modic changes. Methods: The pre-operative scans were studied by two senior spinal surgeons. The lumbar vertebral end-plate changes were then classified according to the method described by Modic. The intra- and inter-observer ratings were satisfactory. Subjects: 40 patients with discogenic back pain were recruited in this study. The mean age was 43.6 years (23 to 72 years). The male to female ratio was 1 to 1. Outcome Measures: The clinical outcomes at six months post-intradiscal steroid injection were correlated with the Modic changes. The clinical outcomes were assessed using visual analogue scores for back pain as well as Oswestry disability index (ODI). At least a 2-point improvement in visual analogue score and a 20-point improvement in ODI were required to indicate significant symptomatic relief. Results: We found that in those patients without Modic changes there was improvement of the low back pain in 9% (1/11). In those with Modic I changes there were significant relief in 64% (9/14), moderate relief in 29% (4/14) and no relief in 7% (1/14). In those with Modic II changes there were significant relief in 27% (4/15), moderate relief in 27% (4/15) and no relief in 47% (7/15). There were no cases with Modic III changes. Conclusions: Previous studies on intradiscal steroid injections have shown variable results. Two prospective double-blind clinical trials, using intradiscal steroids, identified no significant benefit or improvement in the clinical outcome. Our results however suggest that patients with Modic I changes on MRI are most likely to benefit from intradiscal steroid injection in the short term

Objective: To assess the possible effect of intra-articular steroid injections to future TKA. Materials-Method: We retrospectively studied all 231 patients who underwent AGC (Biomet) TKR in our hospital from February 2002 to October 2004. Twenty notes were not available in medical records and were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria were previous surgery (other than knee arthroscopy) on the affected site, a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, immunosu-pressed patients, a previous history of infection around the knee, smoking, diabetic patients. Applying these criteria we excluded a further sixty-seven patients. The remaining 144 patients were separated in to two groups. Group I (n=54) consisted of those patients that received one or more recorded I/A steroid injections in their operated knee in an orthopaedic clinic, rheumatology clinic or general practice setting prior to surgery. Group II (n=90) consisted of those patients with no record of receiving an I/A steroid injection prior to surgery. Results: We found that all the deep infections (3) were from Group I and had received an I/A steroid injection up to 11 months prior to surgery. The incidence of superficial infection was not significantly different from the control group (Group II). In addition to those patients with confirmed deep infections, five patients underwent post-operative investigations for suspected deep infection, due to symptoms of persistent swelling or pain. All had received an I/A steroid injection pre-operatively. The length of time between injection and subsequent post-operative infection leads us to speculate that the steroid agent might not fully dissolve, becoming trapped within the soft tissues or cystic areas of degeneration in the knee joint. Such steroids may become re-activated during operation, leading to catastrophic results. Indeed, there is experimental evidence to suggest an increased risk of infection with the intra-operative administration of steroids. Conclusion: We conclude that the decision to administer intra-articular steroids to a patient who may be a candidate for knee replacement surgery should not be taken lightly because of a risk of post operative deep infection

Purpose. Osteoarthritis of the trapezio-metacarpal joint (TMJ or basal thumb joint) is a common condition causing significant disability. A range of non-operative and operative management options can be used for its treatment. One of the most common conservative treatments is a steroid injection into the joint. To confirm correct placement of the steroid it is preferable to use X-ray image intensification. Few previous studies have audited effectiveness, particularly with the use of radiological guidance. Methods. This clinical observational study prospectively reviewed the longevity of benefit of steroid injections into the TMJ. They were followed up until the analgesic effects ceased with a questionnaire including visual analogue scores. The clinical improvement was compared with the degree of radiological osteoarthritis (Eaton grade). Seventy-seven patients were recruited with a median age of 62 years and injected with steroid and local anaesthetic under radioscopic guidance. Results. Nearly half of the patients had a 3-month improvement. Two-thirds benefited for at least 2 months. One in six patients had a 6-month benefit, with some patients still improved 2 years after injection. Previously injected patients had a reduced duration of benefit compared to their previous injection. Effectiveness was not affected by Eaton grade. We had no complications except pain during injection. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that there are potentially significant benefits to be gained from steroid injections into the TMJ. We believe the outcome is improved by using radiological guidance and by adding local anaesthetic. Based on this study we recommend steroid injections in all degrees of TMJ osteoarthritis

An intra-articular steroid injection can be a useful diagnostic tool in patients presenting with debilitating hip pain and radiographically mild osteoarthritis. The clinical and patient reported outcomes associated with patients who have radiographically mild osteoarthritis and undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain poorly studied. Patients undergoing primary, elective THA at a single academic medical center by a fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeon between 2017–2023 were identified. Only those patients who underwent an intra-articular corticosteroid injection into the operative hip within one year of surgery were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on the severity of their osteoarthritis as determined by preoperative radiographs; those with Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade I-II arthritis were classified as “mild” whereas those with KL grade III-IV arthritis were classified as “severe”. Clinical and patient reported outcomes at final follow-up were compared between cohorts. The final cohorts included 25 and 224 patients with radiographically mild and severe osteoarthritis, respectively. There were no baseline differences in age, gender or time between intra-articular corticosteroid injection and THA between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the preoperative or postoperative HOOS JR values between patients with mild or severe arthritis (all p>0.05). There were no significant differences in the change in HOOS JR scores from the preoperative to final follow-up timepoints between cohorts. There were no significant differences in the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the HOOS JR questionnaire between cohorts. Patients with radiographically mild osteoarthritis who feel relief of their hip pain following an intra-articular corticosteroid injection report similar preoperative debility and demonstrate similar improvements in patient reported outcome scores following THA compared to patients with radiographically severe osteoarthritis

Tendoscopy in the treatment of peroneal tendon disorders is becoming an increasingly safe, reliable, and reproducible technique. Peroneal tendoscopy can be used as both an isolated procedure and as an adjacent procedure with other surgical techniques. The aim of our study was to review all peroneal tendoscopy that was undertaken at the AOC, by the senior authors (IGW, SH), and to determine the safety and efficacy of this surgical technique. Methods. From 2000 to 2017 a manual and electronic database search was undertaken of all procedures by the senior authors. Peroneal tendoscopy cases were identified and then prospectively analysed. Results. 51 patients (23 male, 28 female) were identified from 2004–2017 using a manual and electronic database search. The mean age at time of surgery was 41.5 years (range 16–83) with a mean follow-up time post operatively of 11.8 months (range 9–64 months). The main indications for surgery were lateral and/or postero-lateral ankle pain and lateral ankle swelling. The majority of cases showed unstable peroneal tendon tears that were debrided safely using tendoscopy. Of the 51 patients, 23 required an adjacent foot and ankle operation at the same time, 5 open and 17 arthroscopic (12 ankle, 5 subtalar). Open procedures included 2 first ray osteotomies, 2 open debridements of accessory tissue, one PL to PB transfer. One patient also had an endoscopic FHL transfer. Complication rates to date have been low: 2 superficial wound infections (4%) and one repeat tendoscopy for ongoing pain. A small proportion of patients with ongoing pain were treated with USS guided steroid injections with good results. Conclusion. Our series of peroneal tendoscopy has a low complication rate with high patient satisfaction at discharge. Results of tendoscopic treatment are similar to open techniques, however its advantages make tendoscopic procedures an excellent method to treat peroneal tendon disorders

Aim: To determine the need for caudal epidural steroid injections to be administered with a mixture containing local anaesthetic. Patients: 100 consecutive patients listed for caudal epidural by two spinal orthopaedic consultants with lum-bosacral radiculopathic pain. 19 patients did not fulfil the criteria for the trial. Methods: Subjects randomised to either steroid injection (80mg triamcinolone) with 18mls 0.25% bupivicaine or steroid injection with 18mls Normal saline. Pre-injection maximal (Pmax) and average (Pav) pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were obtained for each patient. Pain scores were repeated at 48 hours, 2 weeks and 8 weeks with a second ODI. Results: A significant improvement in both Pav and Pmax were seen over the study period for both groups. There was no significant difference in either group for ΔPav. or ΔPmax at any stage of the study. Those patients who received a mixture containing bupivicaine underwent a significant improvement in their ODI in contrast to those who were injected with the saline mixture. There was also a significant difference in the ΔODI between groups. Conclusion: Epidural bupivicaine injection appears to enhance the effect of epidural steroid injection with adequate levels of monitoring and access to specialist support. There may be a beneficial effect on the local pain pathways by the local anaeasthetic that outlasts the direct pharmacolgical effect

The aim of this randomised, controlled trial is to compare subacromial steroid injections, physiotherapy and both interventions with a control treatment in early painful arc of the shoulder. Over a six-month period patients with “painful arc”, of less than six months duration, were recruited via their GPs. Eligible patients were consented to enter the trial and were then randomised, by sealed envelopes, to one of four arms of the study: control (normal analgesia and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication), a specified and repeatable Exercise and Manual Therapy Package (EMTP), a course of up to three subacromial steroid injections or both the EMTP and the steroid injections. The interventions and clinic follow-ups were over an 18-week period. A final postal questionnaire was sent out at one year. The progress of the patients was monitored using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the SF36 general health questionnaire. Seventy-nine GPs referred 186 patients, of whom 112 were randomised (Control=27, EMTP=29, Injections=28, Both=28). 64 patients were female and 48 male. The mean age was 54.5 years (range 23–88 years). Ninety patients completed the trial (Control=20, EMTP=22, Injections=26, Both=22). Sixty-two returned the follow-up questionnaire. By paired sample t-tests, no significant differences were found between the OSS scores or SF-36 (physical health total) at the beginning and end of the intervention period, or at one year. Two patients in the injection group went on to surgery, along with one each in the control and EMTP groups. We have found no significant differences in outcome between steroid injections, a physiotherapy package, both treatments, or symptomatic treatment in our group of patients presenting with symptoms of painful arc of the shoulder

Introduction. The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) improves hip joint mechanics in patients with symptomatic dysplasia. As a consequence of the multi-planar acetabular re-orientation, the course of the iliopsoas tendon over the hip may be affected, potentially resulting in iliopsoas tendon-related pain. At present, little information regarding the incidence of iliopsoas-related pathology following PAO exists. We aimed to identify the incidence of iliopsoas-related pain following PAO. Secondarily, we aimed to identify any risk factors associated with this pathology. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the PAO's performed from 2014–2017, for symptomatic dysplasia in our unit (single-surgeon, minimum 1-year follow-up). All patients with adequate pelvic radiographs were included. Radiographic parameters of dysplasia were measured from pre- and post-operative AP pelvic radiographs using a validated software (SHIPS). 1. The degree of pubis displacement was classified according to our novel system. Cases were defined as those with evidence of iliopsoas-related pain post PAO (positive response to iliopsoas tendon-sheath steroid/local anaesthetic injection). Results. A total of 241 patients were included (mean age 28 years). We identified 23 cases (10.6%) with iliopsoas tendon-related pain post-PAO. Three of these cases required an open iliopsoas tendon release and 1 required a revision of their PAO. This was successful in treating symptoms in all. The remainder required either 1–2 iliopsoas tendon-sheath steroid injections to successfully treat their symptoms. We found no significantly associated risk factors with regard to demographics, severity or type of dysplasia, and degree of pubis displacement. Conclusion. The minimally-invasive PAO remains a successful technique for treating symptomatic dysplasia. Despite this, we report a 10.6% incidence of iliopsoas tendon-related pain following surgery. In the vast majority this is successfully treated with an iliopsoas tendon-sheath steroid injection. The ability to identify and treat patients with this pathology early during their post-operative PAO recovery will enable patients to maximise their rehabilitation outcomes

Utilization of nerve conduction studies in the investigation and management of carpal tunnel syndrome varies according to their perceived usefulness and availability. The use of steroid injections and splinting also varies according to service availability and their perceived effectiveness. We present a three year follow up of 230 patients managed in an environment where nerve conduction testing was not readily available. The majority received splinting and a steroid injection in an effort to manage their symptoms conservatively in the first instance. Our results show that a clear majority of patients who were treated with initial splinting and steroid injections saw a recurrence of their symptoms (71.9% and 79.7% respectively) requiring eventual surgical decompression. These results would seem to suggest that conservative management of carpal tunnel does not produce the desired curative results and that there may be an argument for proceeding directly to surgery. We also showed that 55% of patients referred for Nerve Conduction Studies seem to progress to surgical decompression. This would seem to suggest that Nerve Conduction Studies could form a robust part of the standard investigation of carpal tunnel in order to identify those who would benefit from surgery

A Morton's neuroma is a painful forefoot disorder characterised by plantar pain and toe paraesthesia. Many treatments have been tried including modification of shoe wear, injections and surgery. The results from different treatment modalities are extremely variable in the scientific literature. We reviewed 79 patients who presented with an ultrasound proven Morton's Neuromata at an average of 60 months following treatment in a patient blind randomised trial. 35 had surgery with resection of the Morton's Neuromata. We compared the results of the patients who had had a steroid injection and surgery, a steroid injection alone, a placebo injection and then surgery and a placebo injection alone. We looked at the requirement for further consultations, pain scores, activity restrictions, footwear restriction, overall satisfaction with their treatment and overall quality of life scores. We found no significant difference between the groups. Overall 80% of the surgical patients had a good or excellent result and 67% of the non- operatively managed patients had a good or excellent result. There was no difference in their quality of life scores. Previous studies have shown little benefit in steroid injections in the treatment of Morton's Neuromata. We conclude at the five year mark there is no significant differences between operating on Morton's Neuromata and treating them conservatively. Further research should focus on comparing operative vs conservative treatment in the short to medium term. In order to justify the risks and costs of surgery

Shoulder pain represents a significant burden of disease in the general population, yet there is a lack of evidence about the effectiveness of routinely used interventions. Current management of ‘painful arc’ of the shoulder in Primary Care is not evidence-based. Over a six-month period patients with ‘painful arc’ of less than six months duration were recruited via their GPs. Eligible patients were consented to enter the trial and were then randomised, by sealed envelopes, to one of four arms of the study: control (normal analgesia and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication), a specified and repeatable Exercise and Manual Therapy Package (EMTP), a course of up to three subacromial steroid injections or both the EMTP and the steroid injections. The interventions and clinic follow-ups were over an 18-week period. A final postal questionnaire was sent out at one year. The progress of the patients was monitored using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the SF36 general health questionnaire. Seventy-nine GPs referred 186 patients, of whom 112 were randomised (Control=27, EMTP=29, Injections=28, Both=28). 64 patients were female and 48 male. The mean age was 54.5 years (range 23-88 years). Ninety patients completed the trial (Control=20, EMTP=22, Injections=26, Both=22). Sixty-two returned the follow-up questionnaire. By paired sample t-tests, no significant differences were found between the OSS scores or SF-36 (physical health total) at the beginning and end of the intervention period, or at one year, in any group. There were no differences in changes in scores between groups. Two patients in the injection group went on to surgery, along with one each in the control and EMTP groups. We have found no significant differences in outcome between steroid injections, a physiotherapy package, both treatments, or symptomatic treatment in our group of patients presenting with symptoms of painful arc of the shoulder

Aim: To demonstrate that the conservative management of meralgia paraesthetica in children is effective. Method: Clinic case-notes of the senior author (CB) were retrospectively searched between January 1997 and February 2007 to identify cases of meralgia paraesthetica. Sixteen cases were discovered in fourteen patients, 6 right, 6 left, and 2 bilateral. Four patients had had previous pelvic surgery and two combined pelvic and femoral osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip. One underwent bilateral pinning for slipped upper femoral epiphyses. Clinical symptoms were assessed subjectively. All patients were initially managed conservatively with NSAIDs and counselled to avoid tight fitting clothing across the waist. If symptoms had failed to settle at follow-up a local anaesthetic/steroid injection was administered to the site of maximal tenderness. Surgical decompression was performed for intractable cases. Results: There were 10 females and 4 males, with a mean age of 13.6 years (8–17). Mean follow-up was 15 months (1–50). Eleven cases (68.8%) improved with conservative management and a further three cases improved following a local anaesthetic/steroid injection. Two cases (12.5%) who did not improve with these measures underwent surgical decompression with subsequent improvement in symptoms. No side effects were reported from the either the steroid injection or surgical decompression. Conclusions: There is no current evidence supporting the management of meralgia paraesthetica in children. In adults, this elusive diagnosis is managed conservatively to good effect. This retrospective study demonstrates that conservative management is also effective in paediatric patients. In those cases where symptoms prove intractable, surgical decompression produces clinical improvement

Purpose: The management of radicular pain due to lumbar or sacral nerve root compromise remains controversial. Caudal epidural steroid injections are widely employed although there is little hard evidence to confirm their efficacy. This empirical treatment still remains a matter of personal choice and experience. To investigate the clinical effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) in the treatment of sciatica and to identify potential predictors (clinical subgroups) of response to CESIs. Method: Prospective study. All patients with corresponding radicular pain received a course of three caudal epidural steroid injections, two weeks apart. All patients reviewed at three months interval in a dedicated epidural follow up clinic and one-year postal and telephonic follow-up. Exhaustive epidural database maintained. VAS scores documented both axial and limb pain for actual and comparative analysis. ODI and HADS were recorded prior to treatment, at three months follow-up and one year. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ). The Visual analogue score (VAS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS) were also employed in all cases. Results: In the largest single series to date, we report on 928 consecutive patients, with three months follow-up and 354 patients with 12 months follow-up. Fifty-eight percent were females, 24% smoked and 4.1% had ongoing litigation due to their pain. The mean age was 56 years with BMI ranging from 17 to 50 (mean=28). Ten (0.6%) patients required subsequent surgical intervention due to disc herniation. The mean VAS, ODI and HADS improved significantly at three months and one-year results were encouraging. Conclusion: Significant improvement in both axial and limb pain in the short and intermediate terms achieved facilitating onward referral for physical therapy. Subgroups predicting poor outcome are identified. Positive primary care feedback encourages further recruitment

Introduction: Shoulder pain represents a significant burden of disease in the general population, yet there is a lack of evidence about the effectiveness of routinely used interventions such as corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy. Methods: Over a six-month period patients with “painful arc” of less than six months duration were recruited via their GPs. Eligible patients randomised to one of four arms of the study: control (normal analgesia and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication), a specified and repeatable Exercise and Manual Therapy Package (EMTP), a course of up to three subacromial steroid injections or both the EMTP and the steroid injections. Follow-up was for 18 weeks, with postal questionnaire at one year. The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). Results: 186 patients were referred, 112 were randomised. Mean age was 54.5 years. Ninety patients completed the trial. Sixty-two returned the follow-up questionnaire. By analysis of covariance, no significant differences were found between the OSS scores or SF-36 (physical health total) at the beginning and end of the trial, or at one year. Two patients in the injection group went on to surgery, along with one each in the control and EMTP groups. No significant differences were found between treatment groups. Conclusion: We have found no significant differences in outcome between steroid injections, physiotherapy, both treatments, and symptomatic treatment in a group of patients with early painful arc of the shoulder. Further, larger studies may be needed to find small differences in outcome between these treatments

Aim: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of steroid injection in AC joint arthritis. Method: We prospectively evaluated the outcome of 20 consecutive patients (25 shoulders) with clinical and radiological evidence of primary ACJ arthritis after steroid injections. All patients were evaluated using the Constant score after a minimum of 12 months follow up. Only patients with a negative provocative test after injection of 2ml of depomedrone and lignocaine were included in the study. Results: Eleven females (14 shoulders) and 9 males (11 shoulders) were included. The average age was 53.9 years (range 28 Ð79). The mean preinjection score was 61.6 points (SD 13.12). At 6 months this improved to 81 points, mean difference of 19.36 (CI = 14.19 Ð 24.53), p< 0.01, which was highly statistically signiþcant. There was further improvement at 12 months, on the 6 month score, mean 88.4 points, mean difference of 7.4 (CI = 3.55 Ð 11.25), p = 0.001 which was also statistically signiþcant. In addition, the younger the patient, the greater the improvement in the objective score which measures the range of movement and power (r = −0.47; p = 0.01). Conclusion: We conclude that local steroid injection is an effective method of treatment for primary isolated acromioclavicular arthritis and improvement continues for at least 12 months, but may require more than one injection

Steroids are known to have an adverse effect on the blood glucose levels in diabetics. Intra-articular steroids are commonly used in Orthopaedic and Rheumatology practice. However we have failed to identify any studies to date that have been carried out on the short-term effect of intra-articular steroids in diabetics who are taking insulin. This study was carried out to establish the effects of intra-articular (IA) steroid injections on the blood glucose levels and insulin requirements for insulin dependant diabetic patients treated for a “Frozen Shoulder”. Methods: Insulin-dependant diabetic patients suffering from a “Frozen Shoulder” who were referred to our out patient clinics were recruited prospectively for this study. Each patient received 40 mg of long acting steroid plus 9 mls of 0.5% Marcain injected intra-articularly into the glenohumeral joint. They were each asked to record their subsequent blood glucose levels and insulin requirements on a form, four times a day for seven days post injection. Each patient was seen again at 6 weeks and, when appropriate, they were offered a second intra-articular injection according to the recommendations of Jacobs et al. 1. (1991). Results: Fifteen patients were recruited into the study. All patients reported a disturbance of their blood glucose control in the post injection period lasting for a variable period up to seven days. Approximately one third of patients found it necessary to increase their daily insulin requirements during the first two days after the injection. Conclusion: IA steroid injections cause disturbance of the blood glucose control in insulin dependant diabetics. Patients must be warned regarding this side effect when IA steroid injections are given

Introduction: Radial Tunnel Syndrome is characterised by pain over the anterolateral proximal forearm. It is thought to result from compression of the posterior interosseous nerve, and is estimated to be present in 5% of tennis elbow syndrome. This condition has been treated with surgical decompression with varying success. Other nerve compression syndromes are treated with steroid injections and these are reliable in giving relief, even if only temporary. Blind injections have been used as a diagnostic tool in Radial Tunnel Syndrome, but guided steroid injections have not yet been evaluated. Methods: Patients attending one hospital over three years with unresolved lateral epicondylitis were clinically diagnosed with radial tunnel syndrome. They underwent injection of the radial tunnel guided by a nerve stimulator. The patients were evaluated prior to the injection with a brief pain inventory score produced by the British Pain Society. They were evaluated three months after the injection with a further brief pain inventory score. The scores were compared with Student’s t test. Results: Ten patients were recruited over three years. The average pain score before and after injection was not significantly different ( P = 0.4386). An interference score reflecting impeding of function as a result of pain was also not significantly different ( P = 0.095). Discussion: The results of guided injection are worse than a series of blind injections in the literature. We question why this has occurred when the opposite would have been expected. There are several possible explanations. There may have been a double hit phenomenon with the injection only affecting one of two pathological areas. The area of compression may be more proximal to the site of injection. The pathology of radial tunnel syndrome has not been definitively described and the pathology may not be one suitable for treatment with a steroid injection. Post mortem examination of the posterior interosseous nerve in patients with this syndrome may reveal the pathology of the syndrome. Conclusion: Guided injections for radial tunnel syndrome are not effective. The pathology of this syndrome may be different to conventional nerve compression syndromes. We question indications for surgical decompression and suggest further work to investigate this syndrome

Background: The management of radicular pain due to lumbar or sacral nerve root compromise remains controversial. Caudal epidural steroid injections are widely employed although there is little hard evidence to confirm their efficacy. This empirical treatment still remains a matter of personal choice and experience. Objectives: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) in the treatment of sciatica and to identify potential predictors (clinical subgroups) of response to CESIs. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ). The Visual analogue score (VAS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scores (HADS) were also employed in all cases to measure pain relief, physical and psychological function. Method: Prospective study. All patients with corresponding radicular pain received a course of three caudal epidural steroid injections, two weeks apart. A standard mixture of 80 mgs of triamcinalone plus 7 mls of 1% lignocaine plus 5 mls of 0.9% saline used for all patients. All patients reviewed at 3 months interval in a dedicated epidural follow up clinic. The epidural database included age, BMI, duration of symptoms, smoking, employment status and source of referral, any pending litigation, i.e., work or accident related, MRI results, diagnosis and complications. VAS scores documented both axial and limb pain for actual and comparative analysis. ODI and HADS were recorded prior to treatment and at three months follow up. Overall patient satisfaction was recorded on a scale of 0–10 and complications noted. Results: In the largest single series to date, we report on 628 consecutive patients, with 3 months follow up. 58 % were females, 24% smoked and 4.1% had ongoing litigation due to their pain. The mean age was 56yrs with BMI ranging from 17 to 50 (mean=28). 7 (1%) patients required subsequent surgical intervention due to disc herniation. BMI did not affect the outcome. Mean VAS for axial pain reduced from 5.859 to 2.59 at three months. Mean VAS for limb pain similarily reduced from 6.23 to 2.53. Mean ODI reduced from 45.49 at first visit to 21.98 at 3 months. Mean HADS also improved from 17 to 7. Following treatment, overall Patient satisfaction ranged from 0–10 with mean of 5.4. Conclusion: Significant improvement in both axial and limb pain in the short and intermediate terms was achieved facilitating onward referral for physical therapy, which is fundamental in optimising outcomes. Long term follow-up is underway. Subgroups predicting poor outcome are identified. Positive primary care feedback encourages further recruitment

Aims. The pathogenesis of intraneural ganglion cysts is controversial. Recent reports in the literature described medial plantar intraneural ganglion cysts (mIGC) with articular branches to subtalar joints. The aim of the current study was to provide further support for the principles underlying the articular theory, and to explain the successes and failures of treatment of mICGs. Patients and Methods. Between 2006 and 2017, five patients with five mICGs were retrospectively reviewed. There were five men with a mean age of 50.2 years (33 to 68) and a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (0.8 to 6). Case history, physical examination, imaging, and intraoperative findings were reviewed. The outcomes of interest were ultrasound and/or MRI features of mICG, as well as the clinical outcomes. Results. The five intraneural cysts followed the principles of the unifying articular theory. Connection to the posterior subtalar joint (pSTJ) was identified or suspected in four patients. Re-evaluation of preoperative MRI demonstrated a degenerative pSTJ and denervation changes in the abductor hallucis in all patients. Cyst excision with resection of the articular branch (four), cyst incision and drainage (one), and percutaneous aspiration/steroid injection (two) were performed. Removing the connection to the pSTJ prevented recurrence of mIGC, whereas medial plantar nerves remained cystic and symptomatic when resection of the communicating articular branch was not performed. Conclusion. Our findings support a standardized treatment algorithm for mIGC in the presence of degenerative disease at the pSTJ. By understanding the pathoanatomic mechanism for every cyst, we can improve treatment that must address the articular branch to avoid the recurrence of intraneural ganglion cysts, as well as the degenerative pSTJ to avoid extraneural cyst formation or recurrence. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:183–9

Osteoarthritis of the trapezometacarpal joint is a common form of arthritis. At present, there is a significant void between conservative and operative managements. Viscosupplementation is occasionally considered as an in-between therapy. We aimed to compare the therapeutic benefit of a single intra-articular injection of Sodium Hyaluronate (SH; Ostenil®mini) to a single intra-articular injection of Methylprednisolone Acetate (MA; Depomedrone) in the management of rhizarthrosis (TMOA; Trapezometacarpal Osteoarthritis). A retrospective review was performed over a 12 month period. We reviewed 25 patients who had received a single injection of viscosupplementation (SH) performed with fluoroscopic guidance and had been followed up at 12 weeks. These patients were compared with 21 patients who had received a single steroid injection (MA) and had been followed up at 12 weeks. Of the SH group, 52% (n = 13) reported some benefit from the injection. The MA group reported an 86% (n=18) benefit from the injection. We found that a single injection of viscosupplementation (SH) is effective in relieving pain and improving function in about half of patients with rhizarthrosis (TMOA). The efficacy of a single steroid injection (MA), however, was superior with a far greater proportion of patients reporting analgesic and functional benefits

Back pain is a major cause of disability and absence from work. 80% of the population will experience back pain at some point in their lives. In our study we looked at 2 randomised groups of patients. Group 1 patients had only epidural steroid injections (ESI) and group 2 patients had ESI plus radiofrequency (RF). We hypothesized that there is no difference in outcome between group 1 and 2 patients. The 2 groups were sent out a retrospective questionnaire which had 5 parts to it, including SF-36 health survey, pain drawing chart, visual analogue scale (VAS), oswestry disability score (ODS) and a patient satisfaction questionnaire. The patients had treatment between 2002 and 2003 and the post-treatment questionnaires were sent out in May 2004. The SF-36 was scored giving a physical component score (PCS) and a mental component score (MCS) using an online scoring website. The groups studied were from 2 different referral hospitals. The patients were randomised by GP referral being sent to the 2 different hospitals. 115 questionnaires with stamped addressed envelopes were sent out to group 1 patients, out of which 71 were returned (61.7%) and 113 to group 2 patients out of which 55 were returned (48.7%). Statistical analysis was done using the SPSS software programme. As there was some evidence of non-normality Mann-Whitney test was carried out, and for the patient satisfaction questionnaire, chi-squared and fisher’s exact test was used. We found that there was a significant difference among the 2 groups in the PCS (p< 0.0005) and MCS (p=0.017). There was a statistically significant difference among the 2 groups in their pain draw score, VAS and ODS with p values of < 0.0005. In the patient satisfaction questionnaire, 8 questions were asked. Patients were asked to assess how successful the spinal injection was. 35 (67%) patients from group 2 said it was successful, compared with 25 (37%) patients from group 1. 9 (17%) patients from group 2 said it was not successful compared with 27 (40%) patients from group 1. 8 (15%) patients were not sure from group 2 and 16 (24%) were not sure from group 1. The difference was statistically significant with a p value of 0.003. When asked whether they would recommend this type of injection, more patients from group 2 said they would (p=0.029). When asked about the duration of effectiveness of the injection, group 2 noticed an increased duration of benefit compared with group 1 (p< 0.0005). There was no significant difference between the groups when asked how many injections were required (p=0.089) or when asked whether or not they required painkillers (p=0.062). However, more patients from group 2 said that painkillers controlled their pain (p=0.001). When asked if they were able to return to work and do housework/gardening after injection, there were significantly more patients from group 2 being able to do so (p< 0.0005). We conclude that in the patients studied, the group who had radiofrequency treatment and epidural steroid injection did better as compared with patients who had epidural steroid injection alone

The October 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Traumatic spinal cord injury under the spotlight; The odontoid peg nonunion; Driving and spinal surgery; Drains and antibiotics post-spinal surgery; Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty equally effective; Who will benefit from steroid injections?; Back pain following lumbar discectomy

Background. Epidural steroid injections can provide temporary relief of symptoms in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Surgery is indicated when conservative measures fail. We hypothesise that patients who gain temporary relief of symptoms from the administration of epidural steroid injections are more likely to result in an improvement in symptoms following surgical intervention compared to patients who do not respond to injection therapy. Method. The records of patients who had received both an epidural injection and surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis between July 2008 and July 2010 were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Relief of symptoms following epidural injection was noted at 6 weeks post procedure and the patients symptoms following surgical intervention was noted and classified according to MacNab's criteria at 3 months post-surgery. Results. 60 patients who received both an epidural injection and surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis were identified. 76% of patients who gained relief of symptoms from epidural injection scored good or excellent according to MacNab's criteria following surgery (n=34). Only 30% of patients who did not respond to injection therapy scored good or excellent according to MacNab's criteria following surgical intervention (n=5). Conclusion. Patients who gained temporary relief of symptoms from epidural injection were more likely to benefit from surgical intervention in the treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained. We confirm that this abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Purpose: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections is a well established treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, only 60% of patients have a good short-term response and about 20% of patients have a satisfactory long-term response. Genetic variants may play a role in predicting response to corticosteroids. A genetic variant of the macrophage inflammatory factor (MIF) (a physiologic counter-regulator of glucocorticoids), has been associated with poor clinical response in various inflammatory diseases. No studies to date have evaluated the effect of this variant on steroid injections for knee OA. We set out to determine the impact of the – 173(C) variant of the MIF gene on clinical response to intra-articular injections for knee OA. Method: 80 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2–3 OA of the knee were prospectively followed for three months following a standard dose of steroid injection. All patients were genotyped for the – 173 variant of the MIF gene. WOMAC questionnaires for knee OA were done at baseline, one, four and twelve weeks to assess response to treatment. Results: 21 patients (25%) carried the C allele of – 173 variant of the MIF gene. At 12 weeks, patients with the C variant had a statistically significant decrease in the pain dimension of the WOMAC compared to the G variant. Similar responses were not obtained at weeks one and four. Conclusion: A specific polymorphism in the MIF gene appears to be associated with a poor response to intra-articular knee injections. Further validation is required with larger sample sizes to assess the impact of prospectively genotyping for this variant prior to knee injections

We reviewed 231 patients who had undergone total knee replacement with an AGC (Biomet) implant over a period of 2.5 years. After applying exclusion criteria and with some loss to follow-up, there were 144 patients available for study. These were divided into two groups; those who had received intra-articular steroid in the 11 months before surgery and those who had not. There were three deep infections, all of which occurred in patients who had received a steroid injection. The incidence of superficial infection was not significantly different in the two groups. Five patients had undergone investigation for suspected deep infection because of persistent swelling or pain and all of these had received an intra-articular injection pre-operatively. We conclude that the decision to administer intra-articular steroids to a patient who may be a candidate for total knee replacement should not be taken lightly because of a risk of post-operative deep infection

We evaluated the long-term benefits of steroid injection in 20 consecutive patients (25 shoulders) with primary acromioclavicular arthritis using the Constant score. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 5 years. The average age of the patients was 55 years. The mean pre-injection Constant score was 61 points. At six months this improved to 81 points, (mean difference – 19.36) which was highly statistically significant (p< 0.01). There was further improvement at 12 months, on the 6-month score, mean 86 points that also showed a significant improvement on the 6-month score (p = 0.001). At 5 years the mean score was 81 points and this was a significant detoriation compared with the 12-month score (p=0.01) but still a significant improvement when compared to the preinjection scores (p< 0.0005). In addition, the younger the patients, the greater the improvement in the objective score which measures range of movement and power (r= − 0.47; p= 0.01). Female patients also had a greater improvement (r=0.405; p=0.05). We conclude that local steroid injection is an effective method of treatment for primary isolated acromioclavicular arthritis and improvement continues for at least 12 months and the benefit is felt up to 5 years though the pain relief tends to tail off long-term

Purpose of study. The outcomes of conservatively managed minimally displaced isolated greater tuberosity fractures are sparsely reported and the aim of this study was to look at the outcome of these fractures. patients and methods. Twenty-seven patients who had sustained a greater tuberosity fracture were identified. They were all managed by a single surgeon. All patients had a regime of initial immobilisation for 3 weeks followed by physiotherapy and range of motion exercises. They were all x-rayed at 1 week and 3 weeks after injury to monitor for any displacement. Four fractures occurred with an anterior dislocation. In seven patients the fracture was not visible on x-ray but was diagnosed on Ultrasound or MRI. Twenty-three of 27 patients were available for follow-up. For this follow up, the patients were telephonically contacted and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was completed to assess their outcome. Results. There were 12 males and 11 females in the review. The average age was 44 yrs (6–71 yrs) and the average follow up was 26.2 months (6–43 months). The OSS for the 23 patients ranged from 22–48 (average 44, median 47, mode of 48). Fourteen patients had LASI as part of their management after they started to develop pain and impingement symptoms. The ones with LASI had a slightly lower median OSS (46) compared to those without (48) but the modal scores were the same (48). One patient needed surgery after the initial fracture displaced at 3 weeks while another patient needed an acromioplasty at 10 months for impingement. Three patients developed a frozen shoulder but subsequently settled and had excellent outcome scores. Summary. In this study, 30% (7) of the fractures were not visible on the x-rays but diagnosed on ultrasound or MRI. Nearly half the patients required subacromial steroid injections to improve recovery. In only one patient did the fracture displace and require fixation. Conclusion. Conservative management of minimally displaced greater tuberosity fractures yields good functional results though a high percentage of patients require subacromial steroid injections. Secondary displacement is rare, however close vigilance of fracture is advised with x-rays done at 1 and 3 weeks postoperatively. NO DISCLOSURES

31 patients, between the ages of 59 and 74 years, were referred to one onrthopaedic consultant as trochanteric bursitis. All were females. Of these 7 patients were diagnosed as osteoarthritis of the hip or underwent further investigations for spinal conditions. 24 patients were clinically diagnosed as trochanteric bursitis. All these patients had ultrasound examination of the hips by a radiologist with a special interest in musculoskeletal diseases. Except for one patient the rest had either gluteus medius inflammation or tears with or without involvement of gluteus minimus. All these patients with positive findings had 80mg of depomedrone injection under USG guidance. At 6 weeks follow up 21 had complete relief of symptoms. 4 had recurrence of symptoms at 3 months when they had another dose of depomedrone und USG guidance. At one year 18 were free of symptoms and the 3 with some recurrence of symptoms did not want any intervention. Discussion: Etiology of greater trochanteric pain syndrome has been a source of considerable debate. Empirical treatment with ‘blind’ steroid injection is the usual course of action. In unresolving trochanteric bursitis excision of trochanteric bursa has been advocated. Gluteus medius and minimus tears have been referred to as rotator cuff tears of the hip (1). Our study shows an association between trochanteric bursitis and ‘rotator cuff tears of hip’. Ultrasound guided steroid injection can give a better success rate of ‘hitting the right spot’. Further investigations are required to identify whether this association could be a cause and effect relationship

Study Design: A retrospective cross sectional cohort study of degeneration of the lumbar spine, using pre- and post-discography MRI scans of 28 patients, as compared to two consecutive MRI scans of an age and sex matched control group of 32 patients. Objective: To determine whether injection of steroid into a lumbar intervertebral disc causes degeneration, as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Twenty-eight patients with chronic discogenic low back pain were selected. Each had been investigated with an MRI, discography (with intradiscal injection of methylprednisolone), and a post-discography MRI scan. A randomly selected control group of thirty-two age and sex matched patients, having been examined on two occasions with MRI, was established. Two interpreters blinded to the patient groups assessed the degree of lumbar disc degeneration on the MRI scans on two separate occasions, using the Pfirrmann grading system. Results: Kappa values proved interpretation consistency as compared with the published Pfirrmann paper. Variables of age and sex in the two groups showed no true variation in whether the discs improved, stayed the same or degenerated. The difference in the proportions for those with and without the injection gave a test statistic of 11.92 (p-value=0.002), indicating a discrepancy in the degeneration between those discs with and without an injection. Conclusion: Previous studies on intradiscal steroid injections have shown variable results. Animal studies have shown that steroid administered intradiscally causes degeneration and primary calcification in discs. Two prospective double blind clinical trials using intradiscal steroids identified no significant benefit or improvement in the clinical outcome. This study indicates that intradiscal steroid injections cause MRI visible disc degeneration. In association with the results of the clinical trials, this study questions the indications for the use of intradiscal steroids in the management of discogenic low back pain

Aim. Skeletal tuberculosis (TB) accounts for up to one third of cases of extra-pulmonary TB but comprises a minority of osteoarticular infection in areas with low TB incidence. Consequently, unexpected cases may receive surgical management targeted at non-tuberculous orthopaedic infections. This study reviewed treatment and outcomes of non-spinal osteoarticular TB to assess outcomes from modern surgical techniques. Method. All patients with a diagnosis of non-spinal osteoarticular TB between 2009–2017 from one tertiary referral centre were included. Retrospective review of surgical intervention, antibiotic treatment and outcome was conducted. Results. Fourteen patients with an average age of 48 (range 20–77) were identified; all were HIV-negative. Articular infections affected 7 patients, including one prosthetic joint infection. Osteomyelitis affecting the carpus, femur, tibia, olecranon and metatarsals was diagnosed in the remaining patients. Only 4 patients had radiological findings consistent with prior pulmonary TB, and only 3 had a history of prior TB or TB exposure. In 2 cases, symptom exacerbation was associated with local steroid injection. Diagnostic biopsy was employed in 5 cases, of whom 4 proceeded to medical management. Diagnosis was made following positive culture in 86% of cases; all TB isolates were fully sensitive. 71% of cases underwent surgical treatment according to best practice for biofilm-forming infection, including excision of osteomyelitis with local antibiotic therapy for three patients, and first-stage excision with spacer implantation for four patients. Quadruple therapy for an average of 8.5 months, range 6–12 months, was administered. Patients were followed up for a mean of 15.2 months. Half of the patients treated with surgery reported ongoing pain at 3 months and 4 patients underwent further surgery for persistent signs of infection (2 for probable persistent TB, 2 for bacterial super-infection). Conclusions. The role of surgical debridement in management of osteoarticular TB is unclear. In patients with a previous history of TB exposure a pre-operative diagnosis of TB could prevent unnecessary surgery and therefore prevent associated post-operative complications including bacterial super-infection and pain. Pre-op biopsy should therefore be considered in all patients with a history of TB exposure

This study presents the clinical outcome of Boyd-McLeod procedure for lateral epicondylitis of elbow. 29 cases with lateral epicondylitis with failed conservative management (rest, physiotherapy, analgesia and steroid injections) were included in the study. There were 14 male, and 15 female cases of which two had bilateral surgery. Data collection included details of patients’ occupation, number of steroid injections, radiograph evaluation and postoperative complications. Post-operative clinical out come was evaluated by Hospital for Special Surgery Total Elbow Scoring System (HSS2), clinical notes review, and telephone questionnaire. Average age: 47 years (range: 34–65), mean post-op follow up time: 16 months (range: 6–32). 93% were manual workers. Dominant elbow involvement was seen in 64%. Mean number of steroid injections: 3 (range: 1–10). Conservative measures included NSAIDS (90%) and physiotherapy (83%). Average tourniquet time: 32 min (range: 18–59). Mean HSS2 score pre-op and post-op were 38 and 92 respectively (p value: 0.0001). 91% reported excellent/good results. Average post-op time for the continuation of professional/recreational activity was 5 weeks. 2 cases (9%) had poor results. One case had ectopic bone formation. Boyd-McLeod procedure is done as a day case procedure involving excision of degenerative tissue from common extensor origin, decortication and decompression of lateral epicondyle and partial release of annular ligament. Although an extensive procedure, this procedure addresses the management of all offending factors that are likely to contribute to pain and disability in tennis elbow. There are few studies regarding the outcome of Boyd-McLeod procedure. There was no evidence to suggest that late presentation had any adverse effect on the post-op success. This study revealed a high success rate and a low complication rate. We conclude that Boyd-McLeod procedure is an effective treatment option in patients with resistant lateral epicondylitis

Rotator cuff pathology is common in orthopaedic patients. However, there are still debates about the best way of treating those patients. We present the clinical experience from our Unit. We present 85 patients who had arthroscopic or arthroscopically assisted shoulder surgery for full thickness rotator cuff tears between 1994 and 2001. Their medical records and radiological investigations were reviewed, and the management as well as the outcome of their treatment were recorded. The aim was to review those patients and determine if optimum assessment and management was implemented to them. There were 47 male and 38 female patients with average age 58.8 years and weight 79.9 kg, 32 of the patients reported trauma prior to their symptoms. 63 patients had MRI scan and they had average 2.6 years of symptoms and 2.4 steroid injections before their operative management. 27 patients had arthroscopic and 58 mini open rotator cuff repair. From those with recorded pain management 32 patients had interscalene block and 21 infiltration with local anaesthetic. Their average hospital stay was 1.4 and 1.8 days for the arthroscopic and mini open repairs respectively. In 69 (77.7%) patients the result was considered overall satisfactory; 8 (9.4%) patients had temporary shoulder stiffness and/or pain, which were treated conservatively with steroid injections and physiotherapy. 11 (12.9%) of the patients required reoperation, 5 from which required cuff resuturing and 4 manipulations under anaesthetic for postoperative stiffness. 3 patients (3.5%) had other than shoulder complications including CVA, chest infection, and CTS. Rotator cuff surgery remains a challenge where often the working surgical plan is altered intraoperatively and tissue quality is of major importance for the final outcome. Arthroscopy has reduced patient’s hospital stay and rehabilitation time. However, a not durable repair, or postoperative stiffness can be a potential risk complicating the surgical result. In this study it is demonstrated that treatment of patients with rotator cuff disease is still a challenge, time in hospital is reduced with arthroscopic management, but the overall risk for reoperation/MUA either for not durable previous repair or postoperative stiffness was still quite high (12.9%)

Introduction and Aims: Caudal and lumbar epidural steroid injections have had a contentious history in the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy. We set out to assess the efficacy of these injections with relation to key discriminators and to assess the safety of these injections. Method: After a literature search highlighted several possible discriminators regarding outcomes for lumbar radiculopathy and surgery we undertook a pilot study to assess the above aims. This took the form of a retrospective telephone interview. When our pilot study reached statistical significance after only 25 patients, we undertook a retrospective study of all 138 patients who had received a caudal or epidural steroid injection for radiculopathy in the last eight years. This took the form of a postal questionnaire, with telephone interview follow-up. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed for the paired and non-paired data collected. Results: Of the 138 patients, 105 could be traced and of these it was possible to compare caudal vs. lumbar epidural in 75. All other comparisons were made on the full available population (105). We showed a statistically significant difference in the following: (i) an overall reduction in pain scores from 7.78 to 5.16 (mean values, difference –2.62, p< 0.0001); (ii) an overall increase in march tolerance from 804m to 1788m (mean values, difference 984m, p,0.0001); (iii) smokers had a higher level of pain overall before, immediately after and longer term than non(N)smokers (mean values smokers vs. non are; before 8.25:7.4, immediately 5.75:4.269, long-term 6.708:5.173, p< 0.01). We found no significant difference between sexes, activity-provoked pain, cough/impulse pain, unemployment due to pain or number of injections received. We had only one serious complication (anaphylactoid reaction) and 10 minor complications including headaches (five), pain at injection site (two), dizziness (one), hot flushes (one) and one diabetic patient had different insulin requirements for two days. Conclusion: Although more research, ideally in the form of a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial is indicated, we have concluded that by either route these injections are a safe and effective measure of temporary pain relief for lumbar radiculopathy and that smoking is associated with higher levels of pain

Arthrosis of the hip joint can be a significant source of pain and dysfunction. While hip replacement surgery has emerged as the gold standard for the treatment of end stage coxarthrosis, there are several non-arthroplasty management options that can help patients with mild and moderate hip arthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review early prophylactic interventions that may help defer or avoid hip arthroplasty. Nonoperative management for the symptomatic hip involves minimizing joint inflammation and maximizing joint mobility through intra-articular joint injections and exercise therapy. While weight loss, activity modifications, and low impact exercises is generally recommended for patients with arthritis, the effects of these modalities on joint strength and mobility are highly variable. Intra-articular steroid injections tended to offer reliable short-term pain relief (3–4 weeks) but provided unreliable long-term efficacy. Additionally, injections of hyaluronic acid do not appear to provide improved pain relief compared to other modalities. Finally, platelet rich plasma injections do not perform better than HA injections for patients with moderate hip joint arthrosis. Primary hip joint arthrosis is rare, and therefore treatment such as peri-acetabular osteotomies, surgical dislocations, and hip arthroscopy and related procedures are aimed to minimise symptoms but potentially aim to alter the natural history of hip diseases. The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery is critical to the success or failure of any joint preservation procedures. Lech et al. reported in a series of dysplastic patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomies that one third of hips survived 30 years without progression of arthritis or conversion to THA. Similarly, surgical dislocation of the hip, while effective for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement, carries a high re-operation rate at 7 years follow up. Finally, as the prevalence of hip arthroscopic procedures continues to rise, it is important to recognise that failure to address the underlying structural pathologies can lead to failure and rapid joint destruction. In summary, several treatment modalities are available for the management of hip pain and dysfunction in patients with a preserved joint space. While joint preservation procedures can help improve pain and function, they rarely alter the natural history of hip disease. The status of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery is the most important predictor of treatment success or failure

Introduction Local steroid injection is commonly performed as a treatment for facet joint arthritis in the lumbosacral spine. The injection is performed under image guidance for which some surgeons utilise antero-posterior (A-P) imaging only while others prefer oblique imaging. Purpose The aim of this study is to find out the difference in the functional outcome in patients who received the facet joint steroid injection by A-P imaging and those who had the injection by oblique imaging. Material and Methods A prospective randomised controlled trial was performed by randomly allocating the 20 patients who were diagnosed to have facet joint arthritis clinically and by magnetic reasonance image scans, and who were then placed in the list for facet joint injections. Ten patients in Group I received the facet joint injections with A-P imaging while 10 patients in Group II received the facet joint injections with oblique imaging using image intensifier. All the patients received 40mg of methylprednisolone acetate with 1mL of 1% lignocaine and 1mL of 0.5% bupivacaine to each joint. The duration of the entire procedure was noted. Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used before the procedure and at six weeks after the procedure to assess the functional outcome. Results All the patients were followed up for a period of six weeks. The mean age was 51.3 yrs in Group I and 48.3 yrs in Group II. The male to female ratio was 3:7 in Group I and 2:5 in Group II. One patient in Group I had the facet injections at only one level while it was in two patients in Group II (L4/5 or L5/S1). Further one patient in Group I and one in Group two had unilateral facet joint injections at two levels. All the other patients had bilateral facet joint injections at two levels (L4/5 and L5/S1). One patient was excluded from the study as the A-P image obtained was very poor and that an oblique image had to be performed to visualise the facet joint because of obesity. The mean duration of the procedure was 18.33 min (10–25 min) in Group I and 22 min (10–35 min) in Group II (p=0.14, 95%CI −8.5 to +1.4). The patient function score improved from a mean of 20.0% to 32.5% after the injection in Group I, and from 30.0% to 41.0% in Group II. The pain score improved from a mean of 33.3% to 47.2% in Group I, and from 35.6% to 44.4% in Group II. The difference in physical function score (p=0.85, 95% C.I. −15.29 to +18.29), and pain score(p=0.71, 95% C.I. −24.21 to +34.22) between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions There is no difference in the functional outcome of patients treated by facet joint injections using A-P or oblique imaging. There is no significant difference in the duration of the procedure as well between the two techniques. However, with experience we found that it may be difficult to visualise the facet joint clearly by A-P imaging alone in obese individuals

Introduction Local steroid injection is commonly performed as a treatment for facet joint arthritis in the lumbosacral spine. The injection is performed under image guidance for which some surgeons utilise antero-posterior (A-P) imaging only while others prefer oblique imaging. The entry point and the direction of the needle entering into the facet joint are different in these techniques. Further the difficulties encountered in both the techniques are different. Purpose To find out the difference in the functional outcome in patients who received the facet joint steroid injection by A-P imaging and those who had the injection by oblique imaging. Material and Methods A prospective randomised controlled trial was performed by randomly allocating the 20 patients who was diagnosed to have facet joint arthritis clinically and by magnetic reasonance image scans, and who were then placed in the list for facet joint injections. Ten patients in Group I received the facet joint injections with A-P imaging while 10 patients in Group II received the facet joint injections with oblique imaging using image intensifier. All the patients received 40mg of methylprednisolone acetate with 1mL of 1% lignocaine and 1mL of 0.5% bupivacaine to each joint. The duration of the entire procedure was noted. Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used before the procedure and at six weeks after the procedure to assess the functional outcome. Results All the patients were followed up for a period of six weeks. The mean age was 51.3 yrs in Group I and 48.3 yrs in Group II. The male to female ratio was 3:7 in Group I and 2:5 in Group II. One patient in Group I had the facet injections at only one level (L4/5 or L5/S1) while it was in two patients in Group II. Further one patient in Group I and one in Group two had unilateral facet joint injections at two levels. All the other patients had bilateral facet joint injections at two levels (L4/5 and L5/S1). One patient was excluded from the study as the A-P image obtained was very poor and that an oblique image had to be performed to visualise the facet joint because of obesity. The mean duration of the procedure was 18.33 min (10–25 min) in Group I and 22 min (10–35 min) in Group II (p=0.14, 95%CI −8.5 to +1.4). The patient function score improved from a mean of 20.0% to 32.5% after the injection in Group I, and from 30.0% to 41.0% in Group II. The pain score improved from a mean of 33.3% to 47.2% in Group I, and from 35.6% to 44.4% in Group II. The difference in physical function score (p=0.85, 95% C.I. −15.29 to +18.29), and pain score (p=0.71, 95% C.I. −24.21 to +34.22) between the two groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions There is no difference in the functional outcome of patients treated by facet joint injections using A-P or oblique imaging. However, with experience we found that it may be difficult to visualise the facet joint clearly by A-P imaging alone in obese individuals

Bertolotti first described articulation of the L5 transverse process with the sacrum as a cause of back pain in 1917. Since then little attention has been payed to these atypical articulations despite their high reported incidence. Here we describe our early experience of surgical treatment and propose a validated CT based classification of lumbosacral segment abnormalities (LSSA). 400 lumbosacral CT scans were reviewed (NBT), a classification devised and incidence of abnormalities recorded. 40 patients were selected and 4 independent observers classified each scan. Case notes for all patients (C&V) who received steroid injections into or surgical excision of LSSAs were reviewed. Results as follows:. 5 types of abnormality were identified. Type 0 - normal. Type 1 - asymmetrical shortening of the iliolumbar ligament. Type 2 - transverse process of L5 within 2mm of the sacrum. Type 3 - diarthrodial joint (3A: no evidence of degeneration 3B: degenerative change). Type 4 - transverse process and sacrum have fused. Type 5 - extends to L4. 54.5% of patients had abnormalities. The kappa values for the intra-observer results were 0.69 to 0.88 and the inter-observer ratings gave a combined score of over 0.7 indicating substantial agreement. Our CT classification of LSSAs is both straight forward to use and repeatable. The incidence of these abnormalities is higher in our population of CT scans compared to previous published series using plain radiographs. All patients treated with surgical excision of established articulations (Type 3A or above) reported good or excellent outcomes following excision

Hip abductor deficiency (HAD) associated with hip arthroplasty can be a chronic, painful condition that can lead to abnormalities in gait and instability of the hip. HAD is often confused with trochanteric bursitis and patients are often delayed in diagnosis after protracted courses of therapy and steroid injection. A high index of suspicion is subsequently warranted. Risk factors for HAD include female gender, older age, and surgical approach. The Hardinge approach is most commonly associated with HAD because of failure of repair at the time of index surgery or subsequent late degenerative or traumatic rupture. Injury to the superior gluteal nerve at exposure can also result in HAD and is more commonly associated with anterolateral approaches. Multiple surgeries, chronic infection, and chronic inflammation from osteolysis or metal debris are also risk factors especially as they can result in bone stock deficiency and direct injury to muscle. Increased offset and/or leg length can also contribute to HAD, especially when both are present. Physical exam demonstrates abductor weakness with walking and single leg stance. There is often a palpable defect over the greater trochanter and palpation in that area usually elicits significant focal pain. Note may be made of multiple incisions. Increased leg length may be seen. Radiographs may demonstrate avulsion of the greater trochanter or significant osteolysis. Significant polyethylene wear or a metal-on-metal implant should be considered as risk factors, as well as the presence of increased offset and/or leg length. Ultrasound or MRI are helpful in confirming the diagnosis but false negatives and positive results are possible. Treatment is difficult, especially since most patients have failed conservative management before diagnosis of HAD is made. Surgical options include allograft and mesh reconstruction as well as autologous muscle transfers. Modest to good results have been reported, but reproducibility is challenging. In the case of increased offset and leg length, revision of the components to reduce offset and leg length may be considered. In the case of significant instability, abductor repair may require constrained or multi-polar liners to augment the surgical repair. HAD is a chronic problem that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Detailed informed consent appropriately setting patient expectations with a comprehensive surgical plan is required if surgery is to be considered. Be judicious when offering this surgery

Background. Recently, some studies have focused attention on the possibility that anaerobic pathogens of low virulence could constitute an etiological factor in disc herniation. There have been isolated such strains, predominantly Propionibacterium acne, between 7 and 53% of patients undergoing surgery for disc pathology. According to these studies, patients with anaerobic infections of the disc are more likely to develop Modic changes in the adjacent vertebrae. The aim of this work was to test this hypothesis by growing in specific media the disc material extracted in a series of lumbar discectomy and relating this factor with the presence of pre-intervention Modic changes. Methods. A total of 22 consecutive patients undergoing primary unisegmental discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (77.2% male, mean age 40.1 ± 9.1 years) were included. All patients were immunocompetent and none had previously received an epidural steroid injection prior surgery. MRI study confirmed the disc herniation. Following strict antiseptic protocols, the extracted disc material was sent for slow-growth anaerobic enriched culture (>10 days). Results. In total, anaerobic cultures were positive in 7 cases (31.8%) all men. In 5 of these cases, the symptoms developed with an acute onset. The isolated germs were always unique: Propionibacterium acne (3), Streptococcus parasanguinis (1), Actinomyces naeslundii (1), Actinomyces meyeri (1) and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus epidermidis. Only two (28.6%) of these 7 patients had Modic changes on MRI prior surgery (one type I, one type 2). None of the patients with negative cultures had Modic changes. Conclusions. These findings support the theory that anaerobic infections of low virulence and slow growth may contribute to the pathogenesis of herniated discs. However, these cases do not necessarily develop type 1 Modic changes as previously speculated. Level of evidence. Level IV

Purpose:. To evaluate if adding clonidine to a standard nerve root block containing local anaesthetic and steroid improved the outcome of patients with severe lumbar nerve root pain secondary to MRI proven lumbar disc prolapse. Methods:. We undertook a single blind, prospective, randomised controlled trial evaluating 100 consecutive patients with nerve root pain secondary to lumbar disc prolapse undergoing trans-foraminal epidural steroid injection either with or without the addition of clonidine. 50 patients were allocated to each arm of the study. The primary outcome measure was the avoidance of a second procedure- repeat injection or micro-discectomy surgery. Secondary outcome measures were also studied: pain scores for leg and back pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Measure Your Own Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP). Follow up was carried out at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. Results:. No serious complications occurred. Of the 50 patients who received the addition of clonidine, 56% were classified as successful injections, with no further intervention required, as opposed to 40% who received the standard injection. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.109, chi-squared test). All secondary measures showed no statistically significant differences between the groups except curiously, the standard group who had been classified as successful had better leg pain relief than the clonidine group (p=0.026) at 1 year. Conclusions:. This pilot study has shown a 16% treatment effect with adding clonidine to lumbar nerve root blocks and that it is a safe injectate for this purpose