Aims. The escalating demand for medical resources to address spinal diseases as society ages is an issue that requires careful evaluation. However, few studies have examined trends in spinal surgery, especially unscheduled hospitalizations or surgeries performed after hours, through large databases. Our study aimed to determine national trends in the number of spine surgeries in Japan. We also aimed to identify trends in after-hours surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations and their impact on complications and costs. Methods. We retrospectively investigated data extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a representative inpatient database in Japan. The data from April 2010 to March 2020 were used for this study. We included all patients who had undergone any combination of laminectomy, laminoplasty, discectomy, and/or spinal arthrodesis. Results. This investigation included 739,474 spinal surgeries and 739,215 hospitalizations in Japan. There was an average annual increase of 4.6% in the number of spinal surgeries. Scheduled hospitalizations increased by 3.7% per year while unscheduled hospitalizations increased by 11.8% per year. In-hours surgeries increased by 4.5% per year while after-hours surgeries increased by 9.9% per year. Complication rates and costs increased for both after-hours surgery and unscheduled hospitalizations, in comparison to their respective counterparts of in-hours surgery and scheduled hospitalizations. Conclusion. This study provides important insights for those interested in improving spine care in an ageing society. The swift surge in after-hours spinal surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations highlights that the medical needs of an increasing number of patients due to an ageing society are outpacing the capacity of existing medical resources. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):662–670

Objectives: To surgery the UK Specialist Orthopaedic Registrars (SpRs) to assess their perceptions of and attitudes towards spinal surgery, and to identify factors discouraging interest in spinal surgery. Introduction: In order to improve the provision of spinal surgery in the UK, the existing 175 Orthopaedic Surgeons with an interest in Spinal Surgery needs to increase by 25%. There is a predicted shortfall in the number of orthopaedic trainees intending to practise spinal surgery. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to all 578 SpRs. Results: Three hundred and seventy-four replied (71%). Sixty-nine percent intend to avoid spinal surgery. Thirtyfive (9%) intend becoming either Specialist Spinal Surgeons or Surgeons with a Spinal interest. Their perceptions will be discussed; the intellectual challenge and opportunities for research are widely recognised but are outweighed by poor perceptions of outcomes of surgery, psychological complications, and of badly organised clinics. There is also inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during training. Conclusions: Training in spinal surgery could be improved by exposure to spinal surgery at an earlier stage of training, and the development of more specialised units with properly structured spinal clinics to include triage systems to assess referrals and close liaison between the specialities required to treat these patients

Adverse events (AEs) are still a major problem in spinal surgery, despite advances in surgical techniques, innovative technologies available and the introduction of checklist and predictive score systems aimed at reducing surgical complications. We previously analysed the results of the introduction of the WHO Safety Surgical Checklist (SSC) in our Institution, comparing the incidence of complications between two periods: from January to December 2010 (without checklist) and from January 2011 and December 2012 (with checklist), in order to assess the checklist effectiveness. The sample size was 917 patients with an average of 30 months of follow-up. Complications were observed in 107 patients (11.6%) among 917 spinal surgery procedures performed, with 159 (17.3%) complications in total. The overall incidence of complications for trauma, infectious pathology, oncology, and degenerative disease was 22.2%, 19.2%, 18.4%, and 15.3%, respectively. We observed a reduction of the overall incidence of complications following the introduction of the WHO Surgical Checklist: in 2010 without checklist, the incidence of complications was 24.2%, while in 2011 and 2012, following the checklist introduction, the incidence of complications was 16.7% and 11.7%, respectively (mean 14.2%) (p<0.0005). Thus, the SSC appeared to be an effective tool to reduce complications in spinal surgery and we proposed to extend the use of checklist system also to the pre-operative and post-operative phases in order to further reduce the incidence of complications. We also believe that a correct capture and classification of complications is fundamental to generate a clinical decision support system aimed at improving patients’ safety in spinal surgery. In the period between January 2017 and January 2018 we prospectively recorded the adverse events and complications of patients undergoing spinal surgery in our department, without using any collection system. Then we retrospectively recorded the intraoperative and postoperative adverse events of surgically treated patients during the same one-year period, using the SAVES v2 system introduced by Rampersaud and collaborators (Rampersaud YR et al. J Neurosurg Spine 2016 Aug; 25 (2): 256-63) to classify them. In the one-year period from January 2017 to January 2018 a total of 336 patients underwent spinal surgery: 223 for degenerative conditions and 113 for spinal tumors. Comorbidities were collected (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]). Overall, a higher number of adverse events (AEs) was recorded using SAVES compared to the prospective recording without the use of any capture system and the increased number was statistically significant for early postoperative AEs (138/336 vs 44/336, p<0.001). 210 adverse events were retrospectively recorded using the SAVES system (30 intraoperative adverse events, 138 early postoperative and 42 late postoperative adverse events). 99 patients (29.5%) on the cohort had at least one complication. Furthermore, the correlation between some risk factors and the onset of complications or the prolonged length of stay was statistically analyzed. The risk factors taken into account were: age, presence of comorbidities (CCI), ASA score, previous surgery at the same level, type of intervention, location of the disease, duration of the surgery. In particular, the duration of the surgery (more than 3 hours) and the presence of previous surgeries resulted to be risk factors for complications in multivariate analyses

Introduction: Following the publication of our original survey in 2000 (. Eur. Sp. J. 11. (6):. 515. –8 . 2002. ) we have sought to re-evaluate the perceptions and attitudes towards spinal surgery of the current UK orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpR’s), and to identify factors influencing an interest in spinal surgery. At that time 175 orthopaedic spinal surgeons in the UK needed to increase by 25% to satisfy parity with other European countries. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to all 950 SpR’s. The questionnaire sought to identify perceptions in spinal surgery, levels of current training and practice, and intentions to pursue a career in spinal surgery. Results: As before, a 70% response rate has confirmed that 74% of trainees intend to avoid spinal surgery (69% in 2000). However 10% are committed to become a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (9% in 2000). Their perceptions were wide ranging but most concluded that the intellectual challenge and opportunities for research are widely recognised. However enthusiasm is dampened by poor perceptions of outcomes from surgery, negative somatization and depression associations, complications and the fear of litigation. In some areas there is inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during the first 4 years of training. Conclusions: Spinal surgery remains a career choice for 10% of surgical trainees (up 1% since 2000). With a large SpR expansion (578 to 950 SpRs in the last 5 years) an average of 16 new spinal surgeons annually will be produced over the next six years. This has improved on the figure of 8.6 per year from 2000 and represents a 200% increase in numbers per year. These figures suggest that by 2011 and allowing for retirement, there should be enough spinal surgeons to meet the desired UK/Europe ratio

Background. Over 55,000 spinal operations are performed annually in the NHS. Effective postoperative analgesia facilitates early mobilisation and assists rehabilitation and hospital discharge, but is difficult to achieve with conventional, opioid-based, oral analgesia. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of two alternative techniques, namely intrathecal opioid and the more novel erector-spinae plane blockade, is unknown. The Pain Relief After Instrumented Spinal Surgery (PRAISE) trial aims to evaluate these techniques. Methods. PRAISE is a multicentre, prospective, parallel group, patient-blinded, randomised trial, seeking to recruit 456 adult participants undergoing elective, posterior lumbar-instrumented spinal surgery from up to 25 NHS hospitals. Participants will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive (1) Usual Care with local wound infiltration, (2) Intrathecal Opioid plus Usual Care with local wound infiltration or (3) Erector Spinae Plane blockade plus Usual Care with no local wound infiltration. The primary outcome is pain on movement on a 100mm visual analogue scale at 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain at rest, leg pain, quality of recovery (QoR-15), postoperative opioid consumption, time to mobilisation, length of hospital stay, health utility (EQ-5D-5L), adverse events and resource use. Parallel economic evaluation will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Results. Differences in the primary outcome at 24 hours will be estimated by mixed-effects linear regression modelling, with fixed effects for randomisation factors and other important prognostic variables, and random effects for centre, using the as-randomised population. Treatment effects with 95% confidence intervals will be presented. Conclusion. The study is due to open in May 2024 and complete in 2026. Conflicts of Interest. No conflicts of interest declared. Sources of Funding. NIHR Health Technology Award – grant number NIHR153170. Trial presentations so far. APOMP 2023 and 2024; RCOA conference, York, November 2023; Faculty of Pain Management training day, London, February 2024

Neurological complications in oncological and degenerative spine surgery represent one of the most feared risks of these procedures. Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) mainly uses methods to detect changes in the patient's neurological status in a timely manner, thus allowing actions that can reverse neurological deficits before they become irreversible. The utopian goal of spinal surgery is the absence of neurological complications while the realistic goal is to optimize the responses to changes in neuromonitoring such that permanent deficits occur less frequently as possible. In 2014, an algorithm was proposed in response to changes in neuromonitoring for deformity corrections in spinal surgery. There are several studies that confirm the positive impact that a checklist has on care. The proposed checklist has been specifically designed for interventions on stable columns which is significantly different from oncological and degenerative surgery. The goal of this project is to provide a checklist for oncological and degenerative spine surgery to improve the quality of care and minimize the risk of neurological deficit through the optimization of clinical decision-making during periods of intraoperative stress or uncertainty. After a literature review on risk factors and recommendations for responding to IONM changes, 3 surveys were administered to 8 surgeons with experience in oncological and degenerative spine surgery from 5 hospitals in Italy. In addition, anesthesiologists, intraoperative neuro-monitoring teams, operating room nurses participated. The members participated in the optimization and final drafting of the checklist. The authors reassessed and modified the checklist during 3 meetings over 9 months, including a clinical validation period using a modified Delphi process. A checklist containing 28 items to be considered in responding to the changes of the IONM was created. The checklist was submitted for inclusion in the new recommendations of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SINC) for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The final checklist represents the consensus of a group of experienced spine surgeons. The checklist includes the most important and high-performance items to consider when responding to IONM changes in patients with an unstable spine. The implementation of this checklist has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and patient safety in the field of spinal surgery

Informed consent is a very important part of surgical treatment. In this paper, we report a number of legal judgements in spinal surgery where there was no criticism of the surgical procedure itself. The fault that was identified was a failure to inform the patient of alternatives to, and material risks of, surgery, or overemphasizing the benefits of surgery. In one case, there was a promise that a specific surgeon was to perform the operation, which did not ensue. All of the faults in these cases were faults purely of the consenting process. In many cases, the surgeon claimed to have explained certain risks to the patient but was unable to provide proof of doing so. We propose a checklist that, if followed, would ensure that the surgeon would take their patients through the relevant matters but also, crucially, would act as strong evidence in any future court proceedings that the appropriate discussions had taken place. Although this article focuses on spinal surgery, the principles and messages are applicable to the whole of orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:355–360

In recent years, machine learning (ML) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), a particular subset of ML, have been adopted by various areas of healthcare. A number of diagnostic and prognostic algorithms have been designed and implemented across a range of orthopaedic sub-specialties to date, with many positive results. However, the methodology of many of these studies is flawed, and few compare the use of ML with the current approach in clinical practice. Spinal surgery has advanced rapidly over the past three decades, particularly in the areas of implant technology, advanced surgical techniques, biologics, and enhanced recovery protocols. It is therefore regarded an innovative field. Inevitably, spinal surgeons will wish to incorporate ML into their practice should models prove effective in diagnostic or prognostic terms. The purpose of this article is to review published studies that describe the application of neural networks to spinal surgery and which actively compare ANN models to contemporary clinical standards allowing evaluation of their efficacy, accuracy, and relatability. It also explores some of the limitations of the technology, which act to constrain the widespread adoption of neural networks for diagnostic and prognostic use in spinal care. Finally, it describes the necessary considerations should institutions wish to incorporate ANNs into their practices. In doing so, the aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for spinal surgeons to understand the relevant aspects of neural networks. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1442–1448

Aims. The current pandemic caused by COVID-19 is the biggest challenge for national health systems for a century. While most medical resources are allocated to treat COVID-19 patients, several non-COVID-19 medical emergencies still need to be treated, including vertebral fractures and spinal cord compression. The aim of this paper is to report the early experience and an organizational protocol for emergency spinal surgery currently being used in a large metropolitan area by an integrated team of orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. Methods. An organizational model is presented based on case centralization in hub hospitals and early management of surgical cases to reduce hospital stay. Data from all the patients admitted for emergency spinal surgery from the beginning of the outbreak were prospectively collected and compared to data from patients admitted for the same reason in the same time span in the previous year, and treated by the same integrated team. Results. A total of 19 patients (11 males and eight females, with a mean age of 49.9 years (14 to 83)) were admitted either for vertebral fracture or spinal cord compression in a 19-day period, compared to the ten admitted in the previous year. No COVID-19 patients were treated. The mean time between admission and surgery was 1.7 days, significantly lower than 6.8 days the previous year (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The structural organization and the management protocol we describe allowed us to reduce the time to surgery and ultimately hospital stay, thereby maximizing the already stretched medical resources available. We hope that our early experience can be of value to the medical communities that will soon be in the same emergency situation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):671–676

Purpose of study and background. Spinal surgery is a high-risk surgical speciality, a patient's understanding of surgical interventions, alternative treatment options, and the benefits and risks must be ascertained to gain informed consent. This pilot study aims to evaluate if the provision of a digital recording of a patient's consultation enhances patient satisfaction, improves recall of clinical diagnosis, recall of treatment options and the risks and benefits of Spinal Surgery. Methodology and results. A coalition team was identified. A safe and secure process for recording and storage identified. Both qualitative and quantitative data was collected via questionnaires. 62 patients were invited to participate in the pilot, 12 declined. Data was collected immediately post consultation, and two weeks following the consultation via telephone. Comparison was made of the relative increase or decrease in patient recall of the clinical diagnosis, treatment options, and the benefits and the risks of spinal surgery. Patient satisfaction was measured pre- and post- consultation. 50 patients (81%) participated. 32 participants (52%) responded to follow up questionnaire at 2 weeks. Recall of risk for surgical intervention increased by 37%, and of benefit by 36%. Patient satisfaction was rated excellent or very satisfied in 93% at initial consultation and at 2 week follow up all participant's rated satisfaction as excellent or very satisfied. Conclusion. This pilot study was small. COVID delayed further recruitment. Initial outcomes demonstrated high levels of patient satisfaction and appear to demonstrate improved recall. Significant technological issues were identified. Further collaborative work needs to be undertaken. Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding: No funding obtained

With the identification of literature shortfalls on the techniques employed in intraoperative navigated (ION) spinal surgery, we outline a number of measures which have been synthesised into a coherent operative technique. These include positioning, dissection, management of the reference frame, the grip, the angle of attack, the drill, the template, the pedicle screw, the wire, and navigated intrathecal analgesia. Optimizing techniques to improve accuracy allow an overall reduction of the repetition of the surgical steps with its associated productivity benefits including time, cost, radiation, and safety. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):371–375

During the pandemic of COVID-19, some patients with COVID-19 may need emergency surgeries. As spine surgeons, it is our responsibility to ensure appropriate treatment to the patients with COVID-19 and spinal diseases. A protocol for spinal surgery and related management on patients with COVID-19 has been reviewed. Patient preparation for emergency surgeries, indications, and contraindications of emergency surgeries, operating room preparation, infection control precautions and personal protective equipments (PPE), anesthesia management, intraoperative procedures, postoperative management, medical waste disposal, and surveillance of healthcare workers were reviewed. It should be safe for surgeons with PPE of protection level 2 to perform spinal surgeries on patients with COVID-19. Standardized and careful surgical procedures should be necessary to reduce the exposure to COVID-19

The Spine Surgery Unit of IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli is dedicated to the diagnosis and the treatment of vertebral pathologies of oncologic, degenerative, and post-traumatic origin. To achieve increasingly challenging goals, research has represented a further strength for Spinal Surgery Unit for several years. Thanks to the close synergy with the Complex Structure Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, extensive research was carried out. The addition of the research activities intensifies a complementary focus and provides a unique opportunity of innovation. The overall goal of spine research for the Spine Surgery Unit and for the Complex Structure Surgical Sciences and Technologies is and has been to:. - investigate the factors that influence normal spine function;. - engineer and validate new and advanced strategies for improving segmental spinal instrumentation, fusion augmentation and grafting;. - develop and characterize advanced and alternative preclinical models of vertebral bone metastasis to test drugs and innovative strategies, taking into account patient individual characteristics and specific tumour subtypes so predicting patient specific responses;. - evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and potential contributing and prognostic factors in patients with vertebral bone metastases;. - realize customized prosthesis to replace vertebral bodies affected by tumours or major traumatic events, specifically engineered to reduce infections, and increase patients’ surgical options. These efforts have made possible to obtain important results that favour the translation of basic research to application at the patient's bedside, and from here to routine clinical practice (without excluding the opposite pathway, in which the evidence generated by clinical practice helps to guide research). Although translational research can provide patients with valuable therapeutic resources, it is not risk-free. Thus, it is therefore necessary an always close collaboration between researchers and clinicians in order to guarantee the ethicality of translational research, by promoting the good of individuals and minimising the risks

Introduction. To face the problem of surgical complications, which is generally relevant in surgical fields, an intraoperative checklist (Safety Surgical Checklist, SSC) was elaborated and released by the World Health Organization in 2008, and its use has been described in 2009. In our Institution, the WHO SSC was introduced in 2011. In spinal surgery, many preventive measures were investigated to reduce complications, but there is no report on the effectiveness of the WHO checklist in reducing complications. Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of complications between the two periods, from January to December 2010 (without checklist) and from January 2011 to December 2012 (with checklist), in order to assess the checklist effectiveness. Materials and Methods. A retrospective and single center study was carried out on patients who underwent spinal surgery during the three-year period from January 2010 to December 2012. Patients were classified according to the spine pathology and the different presentation of the complication. We registered the complications arising in patients treated from 2010 to 2012 during a 3 years follow up period for each patient, assessing the possible differences before and after the checklist's introduction. Results. The sample size was 917 patients, the mean age was 52.88 years. The majority of procedures were performed for oncological diseases (54.4%) and degenerative diseases (39.8%). 159 complications in total were detected (17.3%). The overall incidence of complications for trauma, infectious pathology, oncology, and degenerative disease was 22.2%, 19.2%, 18.4%, and 15.3%, respectively. No correlation was observed between the type of pathology and the complication incidence. We observed a reduction of the overall incidence of complications following the introduction of the SSC: in 2010 without checklist, the incidence of complications was 24.2%, while in 2011 and 2012, following the checklist introduction, the incidence of complications was 16.7% and 11.7%, respectively (mean 14.2%). Conclusion. Despite the limitations of the study, in particular the impossibility to carry out a randomized study, SSC seems to be an effective tool to reduce complications in spinal surgery. We propose to extend the use of checklist system also to the pre-operative and post-operative phases in order to further reduce the incidence of complications

The COVID-19 pandemic creates unique challenges in the practice of spinal surgery. We aim to show how the use of a high-definition 3D digital exoscope can help streamline workflows, and protect both patients and healthcare staff

There is an inherent risk of iatrogenic new neurological deficit (NND) arising at the spinal cord, cauda equina and nerve root during spinal surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) can be employed to preserve spinal cord function during spinal surgery. IONM techniques include somatosensory and motor evoked potentials, amongst others. A Canadian survey of 95 spinal surgeons showed that 62.1% used IONM and a similar survey in France of 117 spinal surgeons showed that only 36% used IONM. Unavailability was a common reason for its disuse. Current literature by the British Society of Clinical Neurophysiology has outlined the importance of IONM in preventing NND and the need for the implementation of guidelines for IONM. The lack of an established guideline has resulted in a varied approach in the use of IONM in England. There has been no previous attempt to ascertain the current use of IONM in England. Our study is aimed at assessing the variability of the use of IONM in England as well as identifying the rationale amongst surgeons that dictate their use of IONM. We are in the process of investigating the indications of use of IONM for cervical and lumbar spine procedures in 252 spinal surgeons from 33 hospitals with spinal services. Our survey will illustrate the current use of IONM in spinal surgery in England. It will highlight some of the reasons for the variability of use of IONM and identify factors that can contribute to a more standardised use of IONM in spinal surgery

Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in the scores of patient-reported outcome measures allow clinicians to assess the outcome of intervention from the perspective of the patient. There has been significant variation in their absolute values in previous publications and a lack of consistency in their calculation. The purpose of this study was first, to establish whether these values, following spinal surgery, vary depending on the surgical intervention and their method of calculation and secondly, to assess whether there is any correlation between the two external anchors most frequently used to calculate the MCID. . We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data of adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between 1994 and 2009. A total of 244 patients were included. There were 125 men and 119 women with a mean age of 54 years (16 to 84); the mean follow-up was 62 months (6 to 199) The MCID was calculated using three previously published methods. Our results show that the value of the MCID varies considerably with the operation and its method of calculation. There was good correlation between the two external anchors. The global outcome tool correlated significantly better. We conclude that consensus needs to be reached on the best method of calculating the MCID. This then needs to be defined for each spinal procedure. Using a blanket value for the MCID for all spinal procedures should be avoided. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:366–71

Introduction A prospective cohort study was conducted to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in 300 patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Although this subject has been extensively studied in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery, the true incidence of VTE related to spinal surgery remains unknown. We also sought to assess the efficacy of various forms of VTE prophylaxis, another area which has not been adequately studied. Methods Bilateral lower extremity venous duplex scans were performed pre-operatively, within one week postoperatively and at 4 to 6 weeks post-operatively. Information was collected regarding age, gender, body mass index, type and duration of surgical procedure, intra-operative blood loss and blood transfusion, pre- and post-operative mobility and other risk factors for VTE. All patients received vigorous mechanical prophylaxis with 56% of patients receiving pharmacological prophylaxis (unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin) according to surgeon preference. Results The overall incidence of post-operative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was 3.4%. The incidence in those receiving pharmacological prophylaxis was 1.2% versus 6.3% in those who received mechanical prophylaxis alone (p< 0.05). Just under half of the post-operative DVTs (1.4%) occurred after hospital discharge with none of these patients receiving heparin. There were two cases of pulmonary embolism (0.7%), both occurring during hospitalization, and there were no deaths. There was no difference in blood loss or transfusion rates between patients receiving or not receiving pharmacological prophylaxis and there were no serious complications related to blood loss. There was a surprisingly high incidence of abnormalities detected on pre-operative scanning, with DVT occurring in 3.0% and superficial thrombophlebitis in 24.8%. Discussion The incidence of DVT in patients after spinal surgery was 3.4% and was significantly lower (1.2 %) in patients who received pharmacological prophylaxis. Given that the rates of bleeding-related complications were not different between the two groups, we conclude that it is both efficacious and safe to use pharmacological prophylaxis in combination with mechanical prophylaxis routinely in patients undergoing spinal surgery. A 27.8% incidence of pre-operative venous abnormalities may reflect pre-operative immobility due to pain in this group of patients, and justifies the use of ultrasound scanning as an important pre-operative screening tool. In addition, the high incidence of late-onset DVT justifies the need for follow-up scanning several weeks after discharge. This study is the amongst the largest of its type to date, however a larger, randomized and controlled trial is now necessary to confirm these results and allow the formulation of unambiguous guidelines for spinal surgery and VTE prophylaxis

Introduction. Guidelines from the North American Spine Society (2009 and 2013) are the best evidence-based instructions on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery. NICE guidelines exist for VTE prophylaxis but do not specifically address spinal surgery. In addition, the ruling of the UK Supreme Court in 2015 resulted in new guidance on consent being published by the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng). This study assesses our compliance in antibiotic, VTE prophylaxis and consent in spinal surgery against both US and UK standards. Methods. Retrospective review of spinal operations performed between August and December 2016. Case notes, consent forms and operation notes were analysed for consent, peri-operative antibiotic prescribing and post-operative VTE instructions. Results. Four Spinal surgeons performed 45 operations during this period. 31 patients (69%) received a copy of the signed consent with this process being formally documented in 22 (71%) of those cases. All patients were consented by a competent surgeon. 82% of cases consented prior to the date of procedure were countersigned on the day of operation. There was a mean time of 25.3 days between initial consent and operation (Range: 0–170). 37 (82%) cases had clear instructions for VTE and antibiotic prophylaxis. All prescribed post-operative antibiotics were administered. Discussion. The North American Guidelines state that prophylactic antibiotic is appropriate in all spinal surgery with prolonged cases requiring intraoperative re-dosing and only complex cases needing a postoperative regimen. Eight patients underwent a complex procedure and 7 appropriately received postoperative antibiotics. Of the 29 patients that underwent a simple procedure, 12 did not receive post-operative regimen, in line with the guidelines. However, the remainder 17 were over treated. The US Guidelines recommend mechanical VTE prophylaxis only in elective spinal surgery except in high risk patients. All our patients received VTE mechanical prophylaxis. RCSEng guidelines require consent being taken prior to procedure by a competent surgeon and confirmed on day of procedure. All patients in our cohort were consented prior to the date of operation allowing time for considering options and independent research. 82% of patients had consent confirmed on day of operation. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that we met guideline advice for all patients with regards VTE prophylaxis. We have a tendency to over treat with post-operative antibiotics and not all patients had their consent confirmed on day of procedure but was consented well before day of operation. North America still lead the way with guidelines on spinal surgery to which we should adhere, with NICE guidelines providing limited instructions. New consenting guidelines from RCSEng may not be currently widely known and thus should be a source of education for all surgeons

Introduction. Following the publication of our original survey in 2000 (Eur. Sp. J. 11(6):515-8 2002) we have sought to re-evaluate the perceptions and attitudes towards spinal surgery of the current UK orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs), and to identify factors influencing an interest in spinal surgery. At that time 175 orthopaedic spinal surgeons in the UK needed to increase by 25% to satisfy parity with other European countries. Methods. A postal questionnaire was sent to all 917 SpRs. The questionnaire sought to identify perceptions in spinal surgery, levels of current training and practice, and intentions to pursue a career in spinal surgery. Results. A 61% response rate has confirmed that 74% of trainees intend to avoid spinal surgery (69% in 2000). However 10% are committed to become a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (6.5% in 2000). Their perceptions were wide ranging but most concluded that the intellectual challenge and opportunities for research are widely recognised. However enthusiasm is dampened by poor perceptions of outcomes from surgery, negative somatisation and depression associations, complications and the fear of litigation. In some areas there is inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during the first 4 years of training. Conclusions. Spinal surgery remains a career choice for 10% of surgical trainees (up 3.5% since 2000). With a large SpR expansion (578 to 917 SpRs in the last 5 years) an average of 9 new spinal surgeons annually will be produced over the next six years. This has improved on the figure of 6 per year from 2000. These figures suggest that by 2011 and allowing for retirement, there should be enough spinal surgeons to meet the desired UK/Europe ratio

Lumbar spinal surgery may be associated with considerable pain in the early postoperative period. This often leads to a delay in patient mobilisation and a consequent increase in the risk of developing perioperative complications. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intrathecal opioids for analgesia following spinal surgery. 1. –. 3. Morphine has been the most widely studied opioid and although improved analgesia has been reported with its use the risk of serious side effects such as respiratory depression has resulted in patients having to be nursed postoperatively in a high dependency unit. 2. Intrathecal diamorphine has been widely used for analgesia following lower limb joint replacement where it is an effective analgesic agent with a good safety profile. 4. –. 5. Its use for analgesia following lumbar spinal surgery has never been reported. We present our experience of using intrathecal diamorphine for analgesia following lumbar spinal surgery. Data were collected on all patients undergoing surgery who received intrathecal diamorphine and stored on a database (Microsoft Access). Results: 194 patients received intrathecal diamorphine following spinal surgery over a 30 month period. All patients underwent lower lumbosacral decompressive and/or fusion surgery. Mean dose of diamorphine administered was 1.6mg (range 1–4mg or 20–50mcg/kg). In all cases intrathecal diamorphine was administered by the anaesthetist once the patient was anaesthetised. Only 9% of patients had a pain score of 2 or greater within the first 24 hours (using a verbal rating scale 0–10). No patients required rescue analgesia with intravenous opiates. All patients except one were nursed on a regular orthopaedic ward. Side effects were rare. Respiratory depression occurred in one patient necessitating supplemental oxygen and monitoring in a high dependency unit for 12 hours. Hypotension was an infrequent finding (3.5%) but was most common upon return to the ward and in the following 24 hours. It was easily treated with the administration of intravenous fluids and vasopressors were never required. Sedation occurred in 4 of the patients whilst in the recovery ward but the incidence was nil once patients had been discharged to the orthopaedic ward. The most common complication recorded was pruritis, occurring in 9% of patients within the first 12 hours. Conclusion: Intrathecal diamorphine is an effective and safe method of providing analgesia following lumbar spinal surgery. High Dependency nursing care is not required as the incidence of serious side effects is low

Purpose: To review the existing practice of coding in spinal surgery and ascertain its accuracy for surgical procedures, co-morbidities and complications. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 cervical and 100 lumbar consecutive spinal surgeries performed since April 2006 was conducted. The clinical coding data and hospital notes were reviewed. Results: Coding data of 5 cervical spine surgeries were not available. Of the 165 cases, the accuracy of primary procedural codes was 93.9% (90.8% cervical & 96% lumbar). This reduced to 77.6% (75.4% cervical & 79% lumbar) when the accuracy for entire description of performed surgery was considered. Medical co-morbidities were coded appropriately in 64.2% of the patients (55% cervical & 70% lumbar). The procedural codes did not specifically reflect the surgery performed and lacked reproducibility. Surgical levels were coded incorrectly in 9% of the cases. Cervical surgeries were coded as lumbar in 4 and posterior surgery as anterior in 3 cases respectively. The commonly missed co-morbidities were drug allergies, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and alcoholism. Post-op adverse events were coded in 75% of the cases (16/20 cervical & 5/8 lumbar). The accuracy was better for lumbar as compared to cervical spinal surgeries. Conclusion: Coding is a universal language of communication and its accuracy is important not just for PbR, but for data quality, audit and research purposes too. The financial implications regarding PbR governed by HRG codes (dictated by OPCS 4.4 & ICD–10 codes) are discussed. Following this study, a clinical coding facilitation form has been introduced to improve data quality. Ethics approval: None. Interest statement: None

Aim. The aim of this study is to evaluate the causes of litigation in spinal surgery and to identify preventable causes. Methods. Retrospective analysis of all claim data made available under Freedom of information act from NHS Litigation Authority between years 2000 to 2010. Results. A total of 581 (331 Orthopaedics and 250 Neurosurgery) claims were filed in England and Wales, of these 543 cases were settled while 38 cases were pending. 371 (69%) of 543 settled resulted in payout but 172 (31%) claims were successfully defended by the NHSLA. Average payout was £63,573 total £ 36935933 maximum payout of £ 1800000). This figure rose to average of £ 95125, (Total £553627720) when defence and claimant costs were included. The allegations categories were 123 failure or delay in diagnosis, 108 intra operative problems, 90 failure or delay in treatment, 45 suboptimal consent and in 40 failure to recognise complications. The successful litigations were result of neurological injury in 143, un necessary operation in 37, avoidable pain in 29, death 15 and Misc 31. Conclusion. Litigation can in part be attributed to the “no win no fee” culture; steps that can be taken to reduce the number of successful claims. Failure or delay in diagnosis and Intra operative problems can partially be attributed to lack of resources and or expertise emphasising the need for spinal surgery to be concentrated in specialist centres. Documented informed consent can also potentially decrease litigation. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common complication following major joint surgery. While attention has focused on VTE following joint arthroplasty their exists a gap in the literature examining the incidence of VTE in spinal surgery; with a shortage of epidemiological data, guidelines for optimal prophylaxis are limited. This survey, undertaken at the 2009 BASS Annual Meeting, sought to examine prevailing trends in VTE thromboprophylaxis in spinal surgery and to compare selections made by Orthopaedic and Neurosurgeons. We developed a questionnaire based around eight clinical scenarios. Participants were asked to supply details on their speciality (orthopaedics or neurosurgery) and level of training (grade) and to select which method(s) of thromboprophylaxis they would employ for each scenario. Thirty-nine participants provided responses to the eight scenarios; complete details, including speciality and grade of those surveyed, were complied for 27 of the 39 questionnaires completed. LMWH was the preferred pharmacological method of thromboprophylaixs selected 31% and 72% of the time by orthopaedic and neurosurgeons respectively. For each of the eight clinical scenarios LMWH and BK TEDS were selected more frequently by neurosurgeons than orthopaedic surgeons who elected to employ early mobilisation and mechanical prophylaxis. Neurosurgeons were more likely to employ more than method of thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylactic selections differed between the two groups; Neurosurgeons preferred LMWH and BK TEDS whilst Early Mobilisation and Mechanical prophylaxis were the preferred methods of thromboprophylaxis amongst orthopaedic surgeons. Based on the results of this survey neurosurgeons more closely adhered to guidelines outlined by NICE/BASS

Between January 1999 and December 2000, 82 patients who had undergone previous spinal surgery were diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Fifty of the patients completed questionnaires about their medical histories, demographic details, symptoms, quality of life and preoperative and postoperative function. The Medical Research Council performed statistical analysis of the questionnaires. The ages of the respondents varied, with 70% falling into the 40 to 60-year age group. The majority (80%) were married and reported good to excellent ties with spouse and family. Matriculants made up 76%, and 56% had tertiary education. In 70%, chronic tiredness impaired their daily activity, and 88% reported sleep disturbances. Only 10% believed that surgery had alleviated their neck or back symptoms, and 62% were unhappy with the results of surgery. Before surgery 82% had chronic pain, and after surgery 80% still had pain. Even after treatment for fibromyalgia, 68% still had back pain. There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative evaluations of quality of life, and the impact of spinal surgery on function was negative. The demographic profile of our patients compares with that in the literature. The symptoms of fibromyalgia are diverse and current treatment regimes do not give satisfactory control. In our study, we found that spinal surgery neither ameliorates the symptoms nor improves the poor quality of life of fibromyalgia patients

To review blood transfusion practices during elective spinal surgery procedures. Prospective clinical audit. All patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between January 2009 and March 2009. Crossmatch: Transfusion ratio (C: T ratio); Transfusion index (TI) (Evaluates cost-effective crossmatch). British Haematological society standards are C:T ratio= 2.5:1 and TI>0.5. Data was collected from electronic records of blood bank, pathology system (NOTIS) and review of patient notes. A total of 194 patients underwent elective spinal surgery in our unit. (Cervical spine = 15, Thoracic spine = 3, Vertebroplasty = 10, Lumbar spine = 142, Deformity = 31, other = 8). Of these, 62 patients had 197 blood products crossmatched but only 37 units were used. C:T ratio in lumbar spine surgery was 22:1. However C: T ratio in cervical spine procedures, thoracic spine and deformity correction were 6:1, 11:0 and 4:1 respectively. TI was <0.5 in all procedures except deformity surgery (TI=1). Over- ordering of blood products is still common in spinal surgery as routine blood transfusion may not be required in most elective procedures. Therefore implementing Electronic Issue (EI) of blood products for elective spinal procedures for non deformity procedures can be a cost effective and safe practice

Introduction. Many journals require outcome data at 2 years post-operative for the assessment of operative procedures in spinal surgery. This study seeks to clarify the timescale of improvement after surgery to see if a shorter period of assessment will indicate the final outcome. Methods. Outcome data for 185 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery was analysed. All were given a global outcome assessment questionnaire (as used in the Swedish Spinal Fusion study) at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years following surgery. Results were analysed according to the type of spinal surgery undertaken. Results. Six patients had incomplete data and were excluded. 124 of 179 patients were ‘much better’ or ‘better’ at 6 months. There was no significant change in the outcome of this group at 2 years (p<0.05). Only 18 showed any deterioration at 1 year and 2 years post surgery. Conclusion. Of the 55 patients who were ‘same’ or ‘worse’ at 6 months, most had no significant improvement in outcome at 2 years. Only 6 showed any significant improvement. Sixty four patients underwent disc replacement or spinal fusion. Of these, 19 patients improved between 6 months and 2 years follow-up. Eight patients got worse during the same period. Fifty eight patients underwent decompressive surgery. Of these 12 had a better outcome at 2 years than 6 months, and 17 had a worse outcome. Data from the remaining 57 patients was too heterogenous to analyse by subgroup

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY. The anterior approach to the thoracic and lumbar spine is used with increasing frequency for various indications. With the advent of prosthetic intervertebral disc replacement, its use has become even more frequent and has often been associated with serious complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate vascular complications in patients who underwent anterior spinal surgery of the thoracic and lumbar spine. MATERIAL. We performed a total of 531 operations of the thoracolumbar spine from the anterior approach. In 12 cases, after exposure of the body of the first or second thoracic vertebrae, we employed the Smith-Robinson technique to expose the cervical spine. We used sternotomy in six, posterolateral thoracotomy in 209, pararectal retroperitoneal approach in 239, anterolateral lumbotomy in 58 and the transperitoneal approach in seven patients. The aim of surgery was somatectomy in 190 patients and discectomy in 341 patients. Sternotomy and transperitoneal approaches were carried out by a thoracic or vascular surgeon and all the other procedures were done by the first author. The indications for spinal surgery included an accident in 171, tumour in 56, spondylodiscitis in 43 and a degenerative disease in 261 patients. METHODS. The Smith-Robinson approach was used for exposure of T1 or T2. Sternotomy was indicated for treatment of T2–T4 and also T1 in the patients with a short, thick neck. Access to T3–L1 was gained by posterolateral thoracotomy, in most cases performed as a minimally invasive transpleural procedure. For access to the lumbar spine we usually used the retroperitoneal approach from a pararectal incision or lumbotomy. We preferred the pararectal retroperitoneal approach in L2–S1 degenerative disease, L5 fractures, and L5–S1 spondylodiscitis. We carried out lumbotomy in patients with trauma, tumors and L1–L4 spondylodiscitis. The transperitoneal approach from lower middle laparotomy was used only in tumors at L5 or L4. The patients were followed up for 2 to 96 months (average, 31.4 months) after anterior spinal surgery. RESULTS. In 12 patients treated by the Smith-Robinson procedure and in six patients undergoing sternotomy, neither early nor late signs of any injury to major blood vessels or internal organs were recorded. The 209 patients with posterolateral thoracotomy were also free from any signs of vascular injury, but trauma to the thoracic duet was recorded in one case. We found injury to major blood vessels in three patients in the group treated by the pararectal retroperitoneal procedure. In the total of 531 anterior spinal surgery procedures this accounts for 0.56 %; of the 304 lumbar operations and 239 pararectal retroperitoneal operations it is 0.99 % and 1.26 %, respectively. In one patient the vascular injury was associated with trauma to the ureter. CONCLUSIONS. The technique of anterior approach is safe only in the hands of experienced spinal surgeons with long experience. In institutions where anterior spinal surgery is not a routine method it is advisable to involve a vascular or cardiac surgeon. However, the most important point is to know when not to operate

To evaluate the prevalence of infection after elective spinal surgery, a prospective study of patients was carried out over 10 years to 2002. Demographic details, diagnosis and indications for surgery, duration of surgery, time delay before surgery and concomitant diseases were recorded. The management and outcome of patients who developed infection postoperatively were noted. During the period, 1050 elective cases were done for scoliosis, tuberculous spine, tumours, trauma, biopsy and degenerative disorders. There were four deep and six superficial infections. Deep infections were treated by debridement and implant removal, with good outcomes. Superficial sepsis settled with local therapy. The rate of sepsis following elective spinal surgery was 0.95% and infections responded well to treatment

Introduction: In order to improve the provision of Spinal Surgery in the United Kingdom, the number of Specialist Spinal Surgeons and Surgeons with an Interest in Spinal Surgery needs to increase by 25% from the existing 175 surgeons. There is an expected shortage of Orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs) planning careers in Spinal Surgery not only to maintain the status quo, with one third of Specialist Spinal Surgeons due to retire in the next three years, but also to provide the needed expansion in numbers. Methods and results: A postal survey of the 528 SpRs was performed with a response rate fo 71%. The critical question was the post accreditation intention as either a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (greater than 70% of elective work), as a Surgeon with an Interest in Spinal Surgery (more than 30% of elective work), a surgeon doing occasional Spinal Surgery (less than 30% of elective work) or one who avoids all Spinal Surgery. This attitude could then be taken into account when analysing the training provided and the perceptions of Spinal Surgery to identify factors which could be discouraging an interest in Spinal Surgery. Sixty-nine per cent indicated that they intended to avoid all Spinal Surgery. Thirty-five (9%) intended becoming either Specialist Spinal Surgeons or Surgeons with a Spinal Interest but only nine (2%) are in their final two years of training. The declared intention to avoid Spinal Surgery increases from 54% in the first two years of training, to 70% in the middle two years, and to 75% in the final two years and post C.C.S.T. fellowships. There should be 24 newly accredited Specialist Spinal Surgeons based on a projection of the 4.3% response intending to become Specialist Spinal Surgeons. This leaves a shortfall of 34 Specialist Spinal Surgeons by 2005. The survey has revealed three main features of Spinal Surgery which appear to have a negative effect on the attitude of the SpRs to Spinal Surgery and overwhelm the potentially attractive features. These are badly organised clinics; the perceived psychological complications of spinal patients; and a perceived inadequate exposure to Spinal Surgery during their training. Conclusion: It is clear from the response of SpRs that there are important misconceptions concerning Spinal Surgery, together with the shortcomings of training and of the provision of services within the NHS. These have to be addressed urgently if the speciality is to become more attractive to them. Areas where positive action can be taken include the modification of training programmes so that all SpRs are exposed to Spinal Surgery in the formative first three years; properly structured spinal clinics; and above all the need for Spinal Surgeons to be encouraging and enthusiastic about a field of surgery which provides some of the exciting challenges in Orthopaedic Surgery

Background. The majority of studies assessing minimal clinical important difference in outcome do so for management of chronic low back pain. Those that identify MCID following spinal surgical intervention fail to differentiate between the different pathologies and treatments or use variable methods and anchors in the calculation. Aim. To identify the MCID in scores across the most common spinal surgical procedures using standardised methods of calculation. Method. Prospective longitudinal study following elective lumbar spinal surgery. All patients had a complete set of spinal outcome assessments (ODI and VAS) and self perceived rating of the global and Mcnab criteria. MCID was calculated as defined by Hagg et al. Results. 244 patients of average age 53 years were followed up for 62 months post surgery. The MCID across the range of spinal surgeries was a 10 point change in ODI and 28 points for the VAS. A MCID following lumbar decompression surgery was a 3 point change in ODI and 29 points for VAS; 24 points in ODI and 37 points in the VAS for a discectomy, and 13 points in ODI and 23 point change in VAS for revision surgery. This value also varied depending on the anchor and method used for calculation. Conclusion. The MCID in score varies between different spinal procedures, method of calculation and the external anchor used. Standardised methods of calculating MCID in outcome measures should be used to allow comparative research and assessment. Generalisation of MCID in scores across a range of spinal procedures should be strongly discouraged. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. None. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

To quantify the expected shortage of Orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs) planning careers in Spinal Surgery with one third of Specialist Spinal Surgeons due to retire in the next 3 years and to provide the needed expansion of 25% in the existing number of 175 surgeons. A postal survey of the 528 SpRs was performed with a response rate of 71%. The critical question was the post accreditation intention as either a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (greater than 70% of elective work), as a Surgeon with an Interest in Spinal Surgery (more than 30% of elective work), a surgeon doing occasional Spinal Surgery (less than 30% of elective work) or one who avoids all Spinal Surgery. This attitude could then be taken into account when analysing the training provided and the perceptions of Spinal Surgery to identify factors which could be discouraging an interest in Spinal Surgery. Sixty nine percent indicated that they intended to avoid all Spinal Surgery. Thirty five (9%) intended becoming either Specialist Spinal Surgeons or Surgeons with a Spinal Interest but only 9 (2%) are in their final two years of training. The declared intention to avoid Spinal Surgery increases from 54% in the first 2 years of training, to 70% in the middle 2 years, and to 75% in the final 2 years and post CCST fellowships. Based on a projection of the 4. 3% response intending to become Specialist Spinal Surgeons there will be a shortfall of 34 Specialist Spinal Surgeons by 2005. The features of Spinal Surgery which appear to have a negative affect and overwhelm the potentially attractive features are badly organised clinics; the perceived psychological complications of spinal patients; and a perceived inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during SpR training. The modification of training programmes so that all SpRs are exposed to Spinal Surgery in the formative first three years; properly structured spinal clinics; and a need for Spinal Surgeons to be encouraging and enthusiastic about this field of surgery are essential

Aims. With resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic. Methods. A prospective observational study was conducted from eight spinal centres for the first month of operating following restoration of elective spine surgery in each individual unit. Primary outcome measure was the 30-day postoperative COVID-19 infection rate. Secondary outcomes analyzed were the 30-day mortality rate, surgical adverse events, medical complications, and length of inpatient stay. Results. In all, 257 patients (128 males) with a median age of 54 years (2 to 88) formed the study cohort. The mean number of procedures performed from each unit was 32 (16 to 101), with 118 procedures (46%) done as category three prioritization level. The majority of patients (87%) were low-medium “risk stratification” category and the mean length of hospital stay was 5.2 days. None of the patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection, nor was there any mortality related to COVID-19 during the 30-day follow-up period, with 25 patients (10%) having been tested for symptoms. Overall, 32 patients (12%) developed a total of 34 complications, with the majority (19/34) being grade 1 to 2 Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. No patient required postoperative care in an intensive care setting for any unexpected complication. Conclusion. This study shows that safe and effective planned spinal surgical services can be restored avoiding viral transmission, with diligent adherence to national guidelines and COVID-19-secure pathways tailored according to the resources of the individual spinal units. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1096–1101

An independent audit of Lumbar Spinal surgery performed by a single surgeon over a 4 year period is presented. The three groups evaluated included Lumbar fusion, decompression and discectomy. Patients were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Questionairre and five other questions related to overall outcome and patient satisfaction. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. Patient response rate was 74%. The overall outcome was 81% Excellent/Good vs 19% Fair/Poor. The best outcomes were in the discectomy group. The decompression group showed a variable and unpredictable outcome. Complications encountered in the three subgroups are discussed. Lumbar spinal surgery offers lasting and predictable outcomes to a large majority of well selected patients. Independent surgical audits form an important part of evaluating one’s surgical practice

Background: Autologous bone graft remains the “gold standard”, but the associated morbidity and finite supply of tissue has resulted in surgeons seeking methods of enhancing healing with bone graft substitutes and bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs). There are 54 bone graft substitutes and 2 BMPs currently on sale in the UK. The aim of this study was to review the published clinical evidence in support of their use in spinal surgery. Methods: The 19 manufacturers of bone graft substitutes and BMPs were contacted asking for details of their products on the market. A systematic literature review was conducted using the ISI Web of Knowledge, EMBASE (1980–2008) and OVID databases. Publications providing clinical data were classified according to the hierarchy of clinical evidence published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am in 2003. Level I evidence is a prospective randomised control trial with definitive results to support the use of an intervention in a clinical setting. Level V evidence is isolated case reports. A Grade of recommendation A-i was accredited to each product to assist the clinical spinal surgeon in making decisions on which product to use based on the evidence in the literature. Results: 102 clinical studies found, most of which were level IV or V evidence. Both BMPs, InductOS® and OP-1® have Level I papers and have Grade A recommendation. There is very poor evidence for the use of bone graft substitutes in spinal surgery with no products receiving Grade A recommendation and only 6 out of 54 products having Grade B recommendation. Conclusions: There is a lack of evidenced based clinical data for the use of bone graft substitutes in spinal surgery. Regarding BMPs there is good evidence for the use of these products in spinal surgery but surgeons must be aware of the reported complications

This study was conducted to quantify the incidence of gastrointestinal morbidity and identify risk factors for developing gastrointestinal morbidity following spinal surgery in children. A retrospective review was conducted on 253 surgical spinal procedures performed over a 5 year period at Starship Children’s Hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant risk factors. Seventy eight (77.9%) percent of the study population developed gastrointestinal morbidity and this significantly prolonged the median post-operative hospital stay (8 days vs. 4 days; p< 0.0001). Emesis (50.6%), paralytic ileus (42.3%) and constipation (22.5%) were the most frequent gastrointestinal morbidities. Significant risk factors for developing gastrointestinal morbidity were fusion surgery, co-morbidities and duration of post-operative opioid use. The high incidence of gastrointestinal morbidity after paediatric spinal surgery and consequent prolonged hospital stay has clinical implications to both the patient and the institution. Awareness of those with significant risk factors identified by this study could assist in the timely implementation of appropriate treatment

Introduction. Traditionally complex spinal surgery in Belfast has been performed at the Royal Victoria Hospital (RVH). Since an amalgamation the RVH has become effectively the level 1 trauma centre for the province. The ever increasing complexity of spinal surgery in addition to changes in practice such as the management of metastatic spinal cord, are placing significant demands on the service. At a time when resources are scarce trends in patient profiles are highly important to allow adequate planning of our service. Aim. To establish trends in patient profiles in a level one trauma centre also managing spinal pathology over the last 10 years and to examine the impact of this on our service. Methods. The Fracture Outcome Research Data base (FORD) was interrogated to provide data for patient profiles from 2000 to 2010. The Hospital planning and performance department contacted for finance data. Results. In 2000 the most common admission was for a fractured neck of femur (n=1014). This has not significantly changed over the ten years. In 2000 fractured tibia (n= 386), fractured forearms (n= 324), fractured ankles (n= 312) and spinal cases (n=335) were admitted. By 2010 a 49% increase had occurred in spinal admissions making them the second most common patient admitted to the unit. Of spinal case admissions, tumours have increased by 333%, spinal fractures by 10%, cervical disc surgery by 163% and suspected cauda equine cases by a staggering 537%. Conclusions. The throughput of spinal admissions to the unit has significantly increased between 2000 and 2010 making them now the second most common admission to the unit. The impact of this on bed days, theatre usage and oncall arrangements is huge and must be taken into account in stratregic planning of our service especially given the background of ongoing financial constraint

Introduction This study was conducted to quantify the incidence of gastrointestinal morbidity and identify risk factors for developing gastrointestinal morbidity following spinal surgery in children. Method A retrospective review was conducted on 253 surgical spinal procedures performed over a 5 year period at Starship Children’s Hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant risk factors. Co-morbidity included co-existing cardiac, respiratory, genitorurinary or central nervous system problems, or delayed development. Results Seventy eight (77.9%) percent of the study population developed gastrointestinal morbidity and this significantly prolonged the median post-operative hospital stay (8 days vs.4 days; p< 0.0001). Emesis (50.6%), paralytic ileus (42.3%) and constipation (22.5%) were the most frequent gastrointestinal morbidities. Significant risk factors for developing gastrointestinal morbidity were fusion surgery (p< 0.01), co-morbidities (p-value) and duration of post-operative opioid use (p-value). Discussion There is a high incidence of gastrointestinal morbidity after paediatric spinal surgery. The consequent prolonged hospital stay has clinical implications to both the patient and the institution. We have further identified risk factors for developing gastrointestinal morbidity, of which the duration of post-operative opioid use is modifiable. Awareness of those with the other significant risk factors identified by this study could assist in the timely implementation of appropriate treatment

There is increasing knowledge regarding the functional outcome of patients following posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions of the spine. There is less known regarding the expectations patients have for spinal surgery and how that may relate to commonly reported surgical outcome measures. It was the purpose of this study to evaluate the results of elective lumbar spinal surgery as it relates to patient expectations for outcome. and outcome as quantified by both physician reported outcome and patient derived generic and disease-specific measures. Patient expectations for surgery were evaluated in one hundred and fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions (single institution, two surgeons). SF-36+Oswestry disability was quantified preoperatively, and serially postoperatively. Preoperative expectations (pain relief, sleep, recreational, ADL, work return) were documented and postoperative expectations quantified at time of anticipated maximal medical improvement (6mos decompressions,1yr with fusions). Mean preoperative SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were 3.4 and 1.2 S.D. below age/gender matched Canadian norms. Although patients reported improvements in SF-36+Oswestry scores following surgery, mean SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were still 2 and 1.5 S.D. below norms. Mean Oswestry disability improved from 48.7%±1.7% to 23.1±1.9%. Expectations for surgery were met in 81%(responders:143/155). Of 19%(27/143) where expectations were not met, 6/27 have either nonunion, technical, or medical factors. There was no difference in mean age, gender, comorbidity, procedure type and follow-up comparing patients where expectations were met to those that were not. Patients where expectations were not met reported lower preoperative SF-36 (GH and VT) domain scores (p=0.02 and 0.04, respectively), however, preoperative Oswestry, SF-36 MCS and PCS scores were not significantly different. Patients were less satisfied if they had prior lumbar surgery (p=0.02) or involved in WCB/litigation (p< 0.001). We note 15%(21/143) where expectations were not met and there were no apparent surgical or medical confounds to account. There are likely other factors that may influence patient perception and expectation for treatment which requires further study

Purpose: Purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence of spinal surgery for patients with back pain. Methods and results: During past five years 5145 patients were seen in the back pain screening clinic. 823 patients (16%) were referred to the spine clinic (p< 0.001). 127 patients (2.47%) were operated on (p< 0.001).106 patients (2.1%) had lumbar discectomy/decompression, 9 (0.59%) cervical discectomy, 3 (0.06%) pars reconstruction, 9 (0.17%) fusion and PLIF for spondylolisthesis, 5 (0.1%) decompression for spinal stenosis and 1 (0.01%) subtraction osteotomy for kyphosis. 5 patients (0.1%) were referred with “red flag” symptoms: 4 with spinal stenosis and 1 with tumour. 17 patients (0.3%) had discogram. 4 of them went for surgery: 1 had L4/5 PLIF, 2 L5/S1PLIF and 1 L5/S1 discectomy. 289 patients (5.6%) had nerve root blockade. Following NRB 47 patients (0.9%) had discectomy/decompression (p< 0.001). 62 patients had discectomy/decompression without previous NRB. L5/S1 discectomy was the most common (48 pts; 0.9%). 86 patients (1.7%) had facet joint injections. 8 patients (0.15%) had surgery following FJI (p< 0.001). 1 patient had L4 nerve root decompression, 3 L4/5 discectomy, 1 L5/S1 nerve rot decompression, 1 alartransverse fusion and 1 L5/S1 PLIF. 465 patients (9%) did not have nerve root blocks or facet joint injections. 3 patients (0.06%) had epidural injections of local anaesthetic and steroid. Conclusion: Spinal surgery is not commonly performed in patients with back pain. Majority of patients can be treated conservatively. Prior to surgery nerve root blocks and facet joint injections are useful in selected patients

Objective: To analyse the incidence and gravity of reported complications that arise in spinal surgery and assess the comparative safety, or otherwise, of Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty. Methods: The Spinal Foundation, Rochdale, has performed 958 Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty procedures and holds a comprehensive database of the results of all operations carried out in this manner. The records of these procedures provided the basis for a comparison of the safety of Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty to that found for other spinal surgical techniques as reported in the literature. Nine hundred and fifty eight procedures have been performed on 716 patients. Complications that arose during the operation and the postoperative phase of six weeks following the procedure were elicited from patient records. This data was correlated and compared to a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trial data available on complications arising during and after conventional spinal surgery. The ‘SPSS’ and ‘CIA’ statistical packages were used to draw conclusions as to the safety of endoscopically assisted laser spinal surgery. Results: The cohort integrity of operative and review records at six weeks after surgery was 100%. In 958 ELFs performed, 24 complications occurred in 23 patients. There were nine cases of discitis (one infective) (0.9%), one dural tear (0.1%), one deep wound infection (0.1%), two patients suffered a foot drop (one transient) (0.2%), one myocardial infarction (0.1%), one erectile dysfunction (0.1%) and one patient who developed panic attacks post-operatively (0.1%). This amounts to an overall surgical complication rate of 1.6%. MRI follow up of clinically symptomatic patients highlighted eight residual disc herniations (0.8%). Meta analysis of randomised controlled trials of conventional spinal surgery for adult onset degenerative disc disease and/or sciatic pain reported overall complication rates for fusion (11.8%), decompression (7.6%), discectomy (6.0%) and chemonucleolysis (9.6%). Conclusions: The complication rate of Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty is shown to be significantly lower than that reported following conventional spinal surgery (P < 0.01). From these results it must therefore be concluded that ELF as a treatment for chronic low back pain and sciatica presents less risk to a patient than conventional methods of spinal surgery

Purpose: Back pain is a significant problem in Europe with important socio-economic impact. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of spinal surgery for patients with back pain. Sudy design: This was a retrospective Level II type study. Patient sample included five thousand and forty five patients with a five year follow up. Methods and results: During past five years 5145 patients were seen in the back pain screening clinic. 823 patients (16%) were referred to the spine clinic (p< 0.001). 127 patients (2.47%) were operated on (p< 0.001). 106 patients (2.1%) had lumbar discectomy/decompression, 9 (0.59%) cervical discectomy, 3 (0.06%) pars reconstruction, 9 (0.17%) fusion and PLIF for spondylolisthesis, 5 (0.1%) decompression for spinal stenosis and 1 (0.01%) subtraction osteotomy for kyphosis. 5 patients (0.1%) were referred with “red flag” symptoms: 4 with spinal stenosis and 1 with tumour. 17 patients (0.3%) had discogram. 4 of them went for surgery: 1 had L4/5 PLIF, 2 L5/S1PLIF and 1 L5/S1 discectomy. 289 patients (5.6%) had nerve root blockade. Following NRB 47 patients (0.9%) had discectomy/decompression (p< 0.001). 62 patients had discectomy/decompression without previous NRB. L5/S1 discectomy was the most common (48 pts; 0.9%). 86 patients (1.7%) had facet joint injections. 8 patients (0.15%) had surgery following FJI (p< 0.001). 1 patient had L4 nerve root decompression, 3 L4/5 discectomy, 1 L5/S1 nerve rot decompression, 1 alartransverse fusion and 1 L5/S1 PLIF. 465 patients (9%) did not have nerve root blocks or facet joint injections. 3 patients (0.06%) had epidural injections of local anaesthetic and steroid. Conclusion: Spinal surgery is not commonly performed in patients with back pain. Majority of patients can be treated conservatively. Prior to surgery nerve root blocks and facet joint injections are useful in selected patients

Aim: To establish the effectiveness of using the intra-operative cell saver in spinal surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing posterior instrumental lumber spine fusion with iliac crest bone graft were selected to have intra-operative red cell salvage using the cell saver machine (Dideco Electra-Auto-transfusion Cell Separator). 20 patients were in the study group. The control group consisted of 28 patients who had undergone similar surgery prior to introducing the cell saver. The parameters identified were: pre and post operative haemoglobin, clotting state, volume of transfused allogenic blood, volume of transfused autollogous blood using the cell saver and indications for transfusion. Statistical analysis: the chi-square and the t-test. Results: The average age in the cell saver group was 43.8 years and in the control group 48.3 (p> 0.09). The number of levels fused was comparable between the two groups (p> 0.1). There was no difference in the pre and post operative haemoglobin level in the two groups (p> 0.7 & p> 0.3 respectively). No patient had a pre-operative coagulopathy. Two patients (10%) in the cell saver group received an intra-operative allogenic transfusion, 14 patients (50%) in the non-cell saver group received a transfusion. The difference was significant (p< 0.004). Conclusion: The use of the cell saver significantly reduces the need for allogenic blood transfusion in major spinal surgery. We therefore recommend its routine use in such procedures

Introduction: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) in spinal surgery at the James Cook University Hospital was investigated and compared with the published rates of 1 – 12%. Variables of instrumentation, laminar air flow, duration of operation, and blood units transfused in the first 48 hours were examined. Methods: 556 spinal operations were carried out in 2005–6. 147 of these involved the use of instrumentation. Infections were defined as positive wound or blood cultures. The duration of surgery, presence of laminar air flow and units of blood transfused were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Fishers exact test. Results: 9 cases of SSI were identified in the 147 instrumented spinal operations in comparison to zero in the 409 non-instrumented patients (p < 0.0001). The mean duration of surgery was 4 hours 19mins. The results for operation duration < 5hours vs. operation duration > 5hours (3/96 vs 6/51) were not statistically significant. (p=0.065). Of the 147 instrumented spinal operations, 8 of the infected were performed in a laminar air flow system and 1 without (not statistically significant, p=0.69). The results for blood transfusion < 2units vs. blood transfusion ≥2 units (4/85 vs 5/62) were not significant (P=0.49). Conclusion: The rate of SSI at the James Cook University Hospital in instrumented spinal surgery was 6%. SSI in spinal surgery was heavily influenced by instrumentation, but was not reduced by laminar airflow. Duration of operation and number of units of blood transfused were not significant factors

Introduction: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) in spinal surgery at the James Cook University Hospital was investigated and compared with the published rates of 1–12%. Variables of instrumentation, laminar air flow, duration of operation, and blood units transfused in the first 48 hours were examined. Methods: 556 spinal operations were carried out in 2005–6. 147 of these involved the use of instrumentation. Infections were defined as positive wound or blood cultures. The duration of surgery, presence of laminar air flow and units of blood transfused were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher’s Exact Test. Results: Nine cases of SSI were identified in the 147 instrumented spinal operations in comparison to Zero in the 409 non-instrumented patients (p < 0.0001). The mean duration of instrumented surgery was 4 hours 19mins. The infection rates for operation duration < 5 h versus operation duration > 5 h (3/96 Vs 6/51) were not statistically significant (p = 0.065). Of the 147 instrumented spinal operations, 8 of 117 operations performed in a laminar air flow system and 1 of 30 performed without laminar air flow were infected (p = 0.69). Infection rates for those patients transfused < 2 units (4/85) were not significantly different to those in patients transfused > 2 units (5/62), p = 0.49. Conclusion: The rate of SSI at the James Cook University Hospital in instrumented spinal surgery was 6%. SSI in spinal surgery was heavily influenced by instrumentation, but was not reduced by laminar airflow. Duration of operation and number of units of blood transfused were not significant factors

Objective: To analyse the incidence and gravity of reported complications that arise in spinal surgery and assess the comparative safety, or otherwise, of Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty. Design: Prospective independently analysed study of complications arising during the six weeks following Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty was correlated and compared to a meta-analysis of reported data on complications in conventional spinal surgery. Subjects: Nine hundred and fifty-eight procedures performed on 716 patients. Outcome measures: Occurrence of complications. Results: The cohort integrity of operative and review records at six weeks after surgery was 100%. Twenty four complications occurred in 23 patients: nine cases of discitis (one infective) (0.9%), one dural tear (0.1%), one deep wound infection (0.1%), two patients suffered a foot drop (one transient) (0.2%), one myocardial infarction (0.1%), one erectile dysfunction (0.1%) and one post operative panic attacks (0.1%). MRI later demonstrated eight residual disc herniations (0.8%). The overall surgical complication rate was 1.6%. Meta-analysis of conventional spinal surgery reported overall complication rates for fusion (11.8%), decompression (7.6%), discectomy (6.0%) and chemonucleolysis (9.6%). Conclusions: The complication rate of Endoscopic Laser Foraminoplasty is significantly lower than that reported following conventional spinal surgery (P < 0.01)

Aims: To determine outcomes in somatised patients and identify factors of clinical utility that help predict favourable and unfavourable results. Introduction: Somatisation is a tendency to experience and express somatic distress and symptoms unaccounted for by pathological findings and to attribute them to physical illness, often with excess seeking of medical help for them. Somatised patients undergoing spinal surgery have less favourable outcomes than the normal surgical population. However a range of outcomes occur. Methods: Prospective data from a single centre was obtained. Pre-operative modified somatic perception (MSP) and modified Zung depression (MZD) scores were available on 993 patients. The 46 patients with high somatic scores were identified as a discrete sub-group. Some patients did extremely well some patients had poor outcomes. Quantification of the number of consultants seen, outpatient clinic (OPD) reviews and duration of symptoms were compared to indicators of poor outcome (unchanged or increased visual analogue score (VAS), increased or < 10 point decrease in Oswestry disability index (ODI)) at 6 and 12 months of follow up. Results: In the 46 patients the mean pre surgical scores were ODI 64.9 (SD 12.75) MSP 16 (SD 7.74); MZD 38 (SD 10.4); Prior to surgery they had a mean of 9.6 OPD attendances, the average number of consultants seen was 3.28 (SD 2.83). Overall the post-operative mean ODI was 36.81 (SD 24.58) a clinically satisfactory improvement. At 6 months patients who have a good outcome (ODI) had had an increased number of orthopaedic consultations (60% vs. 39.7%) but this was not statistically significant; p=0.16. At 12 months patients with a good outcome (ODI) had waited a lower number of months before surgery (5.5 vs. 11; p=0.026). Across all other parameters, including gender, age, surgical procedure undertaken, no other significant correlation exists between OPD, consultants seen and the changes in VAS, ODI at 6 and 12 months of follow up. Conclusions: Dramatic differences exist between somatised patients who have good and poor outcome following spinal surgery. The number of months from decision to operate to surgery appears to predict good outcome at 12 months. No other identifiable pre-op factors were found

A dural tear is a common but troublesome complication of endoscopic spinal surgery. The limitations of space make repair difficult, and it is often necessary to proceed to an open operation to suture the dura in order to prevent leakage of cerebrospinal fluid. We describe a new patch technique in which a small piece of polyglactin 910 is fixed to the injured dura with fibrin glue. Three pieces are generally required to obtain a watertight closure after lavage with saline. We have applied this technique in seven cases. All recovered well with no adverse effects. MRI showed no sign of leakage of cerebrospinal fluid

Aim of Study: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of muscle retractors on intramuscular pressure in the posterior spinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing posterior spinal surgery were recruited into this study and recordings of intramuscular pressure during surgery were performed using a Stryker® compartment pressure monitoring system, prior to insertion of retractors, 5, 30 and 60 minutes into surgery and on removal of retractors. Prior to and following use of the retractors, muscle biopsies were taken from the erector spinae muscle for analysis. Results: A significant increase in intramuscular pressure (p< 0.001) was observed during surgery, with pressure rising from 7.1±4.1 mmHg pre-operatively to 26.4±16.0 mmHg 30 minutes into the operation. On removal of retractors, this pressure returned to or near to the original value. Analysis of muscle biopsies using calcium-activated ATPase birefringence revealed a reduction in muscle function following prolonged use of self-retaining retractors. Discussion: This study demonstrates a substantial rise in pressure in the erector spinae muscle during posterior spinal surgery. Following retraction, marked changes were noted in the function of the muscles. This could be an important factor in the generation of operative scar tissue and post-operative dysfunction of the spinal muscles, and therefore, may be a cause of persistent back pain frequently observed in post-operative patients. Currently, this work is being extended to investigate the relationship between loss of muscle function and duration of retraction, and to study the long term implications of loss of muscle function with respect to surgical outcome and chronic back pain

Since several spinal conditions are currently treated with spinal fusion, alternatives to autogenous bone graft in spinal surgery have been under study for many years. Results have shown that, compared to other non.-spinal conditions, such as filling bone cavities, spinal fusion, in particular posterolateral fusion, is much more challenging due to the reduced area of the graft bed. As a result, most of the bone substitutes are still under investigation and their effectiveness in the clinical setting has yet to be demonstrated. In recent years the authors analysed several bone graft substitutes using an animal model which has been widely used in experimental spinal fusion. In particular, porous ceramics have been used alone or with osteoin-ductive material such as fresh bone marrow or cultured mesenchymal stem cells. The results of these studies have shown that with ceramic alone a percentage of solid fusion similar to that with autogenous bone graft cannot be achieved. However, compared to the latter, more favorable results have been obtained when ceramics are loaded with mesenchymal stem cells. The addition of fresh bone marrow to ceramics also increases the fusion rates; however, in this case new bone formation was mainly found in the peripheral portions of the graft and to a lesser extent than when cultured mesenchymal stem cells were used

The surgical treatment of spinal deformities and degenerative or oncological vertebral diseases is becoming more common. However, this kind of surgery is complex and associated to a high rate of early and late complications. We retrospectively collected all the major complications observed in the perioperative and post-operative period for surgeries performed at our Division of Spine Surgery in the 2010–2012 period,. 285 surgeries were registered in 2010, 324 in 2011 and 308 in 2012. All the complications observed during the procedure and the follow-up period were recorded and classified according to the type (mechanical complications, neurological complications, infection, hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, systemic complications, death related to the surgery). In 2010, on 285 surgeries 47 patients (16.5 %) had 69 complications (24.2%): 25.7% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 23% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 27% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 11% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis (infectious diseases). In 2011, on 324 surgeries 35 patients (10.8 %) had 54 complications (16.7%): 16.3% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 16.3% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 20% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 28.6% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis. In 2012, on 308 surgeries, 25 patients (8.1 %) had 36 complications (11.7%): 14.4% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 7.2% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 16.7% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 20% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis. On 917 spinal surgeries performed from January 2010 to December 2012, 159 complications (17.3%) were recorded, with a prevalence of mechanical complications and infections. We are also prospectively collecting complications related to 2013–2015, in order to have a larger amount of data and try to detect potential risk factors to be taken into consideration in the decision-making process for complex spinal surgery

Introduction: Accurate and ethical coding is challenging and directly impacts on Payment by Results (PbR). The aims & objectives of this study were to review the existing pattern of coding for spinal surgery and ascertain its appropriateness & accuracy for surgical procedures, medical co-morbidities and post-op complications. Methods: A retrospective review of 70 consecutive cervical and 100 consecutive lumbar spine patients who were operated from April 2006 onwards was conducted. The excel sheet provided by coding department, hospital notes – clinic letters, physicians’ entries, theatre notes and laboratory reports (biochemistry/microbiology/histology) – were reviewed. Of the 170 cases, 165 were available for analysis. Results: Coding data of 5 patients who underwent cervical spine surgeries were not available. Of the 165 cases, the accuracy of primary procedural codes was 93.9% (90.8% cervical & 96% lumbar). However this reduced to 77.6% (75.4% cervical & 79% lumbar) when the accuracy for entire description of performed surgery was considered. The procedural codes did not specifically reflect the surgery performed and lacked reproducibility. Surgical levels were coded incorrectly in 9% of the cases. Cervical surgeries were coded as lumbar in 4 and posterior surgery as anterior in 3 cases respectively. Harvest of iliac crest bone graft was not coded in 5 cases. Medical comorbidities were coded appropriately in 64.2% of the patients (55% cervical & 70% lumbar). The commonly missed comorbidities were drug allergies, hypercholesterolemia, smoking and alcoholism. Post-op adverse events were coded in 75% of the cases (16/20 cervical & 5/8 lumbar). The accuracy was better for lumbar as compared to cervical spinal surgeries. Conclusion: Coding is a universal language of communication amongst healthcare professionals. Its accuracy is important not just for PbR, but for data quality, audit and research purposes too. The financial implications regarding PbR governed by HRG codes (dictated by OPCS 4.4 & ICD–10 codes) are discussed. The awareness of clinical coding is low amongst junior doctors. Following this study, a clinical coding facilitation form has been introduced to improve data quality. Our plan is to close the audit loop and re-evaluate. Literature emphasises qualification of coders, legible documentation by physicians and interaction between coders and clinicians

Purpose: Thoracoscopic spinal surgery may be less aggressive than classical open surgery. We relate our experience over the last five years, analysing complications observed. Material and methods: Between 1995 and 2000, 68 patients underwent thoracoscopic spinal surgery. There were 34 men and 34 women, mean age 30.2 years (13–69). We analysed indications, preoperative anaesthesia parameters, peroperative and postoperative parameters and pulmonary, vascular, neurological and instrumental complications. Results: Indications were: metastatic compression in three patients, disc herniation in eight with five calcified discs, fracture in 25, anterior release for scoliosis in 32 with inter-somatic graft in 20. Mean duration of the hospital stay was 19.6 days (7–48). There were three fractures with lung contusion that were excluded from the analysis although thoracoscopic surgery was possible. The analysis thus included 61 right and four left thoracoscopies. Four to nine trocars were used. There were three cases of intercostal nevralgia. Operation time depended on the underlying disease: 18 min for scoliosis, 2 hr 40 min for fractures, 4 hr 15 min for discal herniation (2 h 20–7 h 15). Blood loss was less than 200 cc for scoliosis, a mean 533 cc for fractures, and 800 cc for metastases. There were no pulmonary, vascular or instrumental complications. The image amplifier was used to monitor all osteosyntheses. We had one patient whose neurological situation worsened after resection of a transdural calcified thoracic herniation. Stay in the intensive care unit after surgery was 3.4 days, the drain was removed at 3.26 days and had collected 1240 cc. Postoperative paint was assessed for patients who had undergone thoracoscopy alone and who had no other disease (19 fractures and 8 herniation cases). level three antalgesics were required for 3.2 days. There were no vascular complications or signs of phlebitis. One residual atelectasia of the lower right lobe occurred in a female patient with major traumatic contusion, and pleural effusion was observed in three. One patient developed a contralateral pneumothorax that was punctured after release of major scoliosis (Cobe 92°). Residual pleural effusion after withdrawing the drain was aspirated at 48 hours. There were no infections. Discussion: Thoracoscopy allowed the planned procedure in all patients. Blood loss was much lower than with classical open surgery. Pain was controlled better and the cosmetic effect was exceptional. Function was recovered rapidly by fracture patients. the quality of the anterior release for the scoliosis patients was equivalent to that obtained with classical techniques. Conclusion: The complication rate was lower than that usually observed for similar procedures using classical techniques

To introduce a new robot-assisted surgical system for spinal posterior fixation which called TiRobot, based on intraoperative three-dimensional images. TiRobot has three components: the planning and navigation system, optical tracking system and robotic arm system. By combining navigation and robot techniques, TiRobot can guide the screw trajectories for orthopedic surgeries. In this randomised controlled study approved by the Ethics Committee, 40 patients were involved and all has been fully informed and sign the informed consent. 17 patients were treated by free-hand fluoroscopy-guided surgery, and 23 patients were treated by robot-assisted spinal surgery. A total of 190 pedicle screws were implanted. The overall operation times were not different for both groups. None of the screws necessitated re-surgery for revised placement. In the robot-assisted group, assessment of pedicle screw accuracy showed that 102 of 102 screws (100%) were safely placed (<2 mm, category A+B). And mean deviation in entry point was 1.70 +/− 0.83mm, mean deviation in end point was 1.84 +/− 1.04mm. In the conventional freehand group, assessment of pedicle screw accuracy showed that 87 of 88 (98.9%) were safely placed (<2 mm, category A+B), 1 screw fall in category C, mean deviation in entry point was 3.73 +/− 2.28mm, mean deviation in end point was 4.11 +/− 2.31mm. This randomised controlled study verified that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement with real-time navigation is a more accuracy and safer method, and also revealed great clinical potential of robot-assisted surgery in the future

Surgery of the spine is associated with blood loss and frequently transfusion, with consequent risk of infection and reactions. It also costly, and puts a strain on national blood banks. A new blood salvage device works by ‘washing’ and centrifuging the blood lost during surgery; which can then be re-transfused into the patient. In a retrospective study 46 consecutive spinal surgeries with Cell Saver were compared with 39 matched surgeries without. Blood loss and units transfused was obtained from the transfusion database and the anaesthetic record. Average blood loss in the Cell saver group was 1382ml compared to 1405ml in the pre-Cell Saver group. Average allogenic transfusion was 1.30 units with cell saver compared to 2.78 units without. An average 2.3 units of lost blood were re-infused in the Cell Saver group. 26 (57%) of the Cell Saver group require no allogenic blood at all, whereas only 10 (26%) of patients in the pre-Cell Saver group had no transfusions. One unit of blood costs £130.52, and the Cell saver device costs £100 per patient. The average cost per patient in the Cell saver group was £270 (any transfusion plus cost of Cell Saver), compared to an average of £368.50 in the pre-Cell Saver group: a saving of £92.50. The Cell Saver decreased blood transfusions by 46% per patient and by 40% overall, a saving of £92.50 per patient. The number of patients receiving no allogenic blood increased by 31%

Introduction: Radiation dose exposure to patients in a main X-ray department in a hospital is well documented and controlled. Few studies report the radiation exposure to patients undergoing spinal surgery received from an image intensifier. There are no recommended doses published when using the image intensifier. Methods: We reviewed the radiation doses and exposure times from computer and radiation log records of all the patients who underwent trauma & orthopaedic surgery which required an image intensifier between January and September 2005. The Dose-Area-Product (Gray/cm2) and screening time was recorded. Results: More than 600 patients underwent trauma & orthopaedic surgery that required an image intensifier at the time of surgery. The mean screening Dose Area Product of the patients undergoing spinal surgery and other common procedures are shown (Gray/cm2):- Lumbar fusion – 23. Disc replacement – 10. Discogram – 4.9. Foraminal injection – 4.4. DHS – 1.86. IMHS – 1.33. ORIF Ankle – 0.89. MUA k-wire wrist – 0.04. The four surgical procedures which required the most radiation were spinal procedures. The maximum radiation is given to patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Conclusion: Patients undergoing spinal surgery can receive as much radiation exposure as those undergoing procedures such as barium swallow or standard lumbar spine films. Efforts should be made to reduce radiation exposure to orthopaedic patients, and operating surgeons especially those undergoing spinal surgery. By publishing our radiation exposure doses, we can begin to establish guidelines for recommended patient doses

Aim. Spinal infection is the most frequent complication of spine surgery. Its incidence varies between 1% and 14% in the literature, depending on various studied populations and surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to describe a consecutive 2706 case series. Method. We analyzed a prospective cohort of 2706 patients operated for spine disease between 2013 and 2016 in a University Hospital. The infection rates, germs, time between surgery and infection and outcomes after surgical revision were assessed with a minimum follow-up of 7 months. We developed a mathematical model to analyze risk factors in this difficult-to-treat population. Results. Among 2706 patient who underwent spinal surgery during the three-year study period, 106 developed a postoperative spine infection. Clinical indicators for infection were the sudden onset of local pain and swelling without fever after an initial pain-free interval. We observed a masculine predominance (68%); the median age was 56 years. The rate of infection was comprised between 0,3% (discal herniation surgery) to over 20% in posterior cervical instrumented surgery (acute cervical fractures), with a global rate of 4%. Polymicrobial infections with more than 3 germs were found in only 2 case, with 3 germs in 8 cases, 2 germs in 27 cases and 1 germ in 69 cases. Staphylococcus aureus, Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis were the three main germs identified (53, 36 and 22 respectively). Propionibacterium acnes was involved with a higher rate in instrumented surgery but also in 8% of conventional non-instrumented surgery, with a median relapse time of 24 days (12 days to 4 years). Staphylococcus aureus was involved at a higher rate in posterior non-instrumented surgery with a median relapse time of 18 days (8–66 days). The rate of infection per month was globally stable along the year except an increased rate in February-March. All patients with a suspicion of post-op infection were initially treated with wound/deep tissues revision within the first month after surgery and associated with implant removal after one-month post-op. Pejorative outcomes were associated with incomplete revision surgery, several surgeries and polymicrobial infection. Conclusions. In this study, the rate of postoperative infection is comparable to the literature. In contrast, Propionibacterium incidence is high, especially for acute infections. This unexpected rate can be linked to technical improvements in culture detection but this should also lead us to further discuss the natural process of spine/disk colonization of this germ

Scoliosis correction surgery is one of the longest and most complex procedures of all orthopedic surgery. The complication rate is therefore not negligible and is particularly high when the surgery is performed in patients with neuromuscular or connective tissue disease or complex genetic syndromes. In fact, these patients have various comorbidities and organ deficits (respiratory capacity, swallowing / nutrition, heart function, etc.), which can compromise the outcome of the surgery. In these cases, an accurate assessment and preparation for surgery is essential, also making use of external consultants. To make this phase simpler, more effective and homogeneous, a multidisciplinary path of peri-operative optimization is being developed in our Institute, which also includes the possibility of post-operative hospitalization for rehabilitation and recovery. The goal is to improve the basic functional status as much as possible, in order to ensure faster functional recovery and minimize the incidence of peri-operative complications, to be assessed by clinical audit. The path model and the preliminary results on the first patients managed according to the new modality are presented here.

The multidisciplinary path involves the execution of the following assessments / interventions: • Pediatric visit with particular attention to the state of the upper airways and the evaluation of chronic or frequent inflammatory states • Cardiological Consultation with Echocardiogram. • Respiratory Function Tests, Blood Gas Analysis and Pneumological Consultation to evaluate indications for preoperative respiratory physiotherapy cycles, Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) cycles, Cough Machine. Possible Polysomnography. • Nutrition consultancy to assess the need for nutritional preparation in order to improve muscle trophism. • Consultation of the speech therapist in cases of dysphagia for liquids and / or solids. • Electroencephalogram and Neurological Consultation in epileptic patients. • Physiological consultation in patients already being treated with a cough machine and / or NIV. • Availability of postoperative hospitalization in the rehabilitation center (with skills in respiratory and neurological rehabilitation) for the most complex cases. When all the appropriate assessments have been completed, the anesthetist in charge at our Institute examines the clinical documentation and establishes whether the path can be considered complete and whether the patient is ready for surgery. At the end of the surgery, the patient is admitted to the Post-operative Intensive Care Unit of the Institute. If necessary, a new program of postoperative rehabilitation (respiratory, neuromotor, etc.) is programmed in a specialist reference center.

To date, two patients have been referred to the preoperative optimization path: one with Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy, and one with 6q25 Microdeletion Syndrome. In the first case, the surgery was performed successfully, and the patient was discharged at home. In the second case, after completing the optimization process, the surgery was postponed due to the finding of urethral malformation with the impossibility of bladder catheterization, which made it necessary to proceed with urological surgery first.

The preliminary case series presented here is still very limited and does not allow evaluations on the impact of the program on the clinical practice and the complication rate. However, these first experiences made it possible to demonstrate the feasibility of this complex multidisciplinary path in which a network of specialists takes part.

HIV and musculoskeletal trauma have reached epidemic proportions in the developing world especially in sub Saharan Africa. The epidemic has adversely affected health care delivery in limited resource settings. We assessed the outcome of HIV+ patients following spinal surgery for fractures and dislocations. Forty seven HIV+ patients were treated surgically over the past three years. The mean age was 32 years (19–53 years) and included 39 males. The dorsolumbar region was affected in 28 patients and the cervical spine in 19. Motor vehicle collisions (34) accounted for 72% of the injuries. Neurology occurred in 49% of patients (23). The mean CD4 count was 426 (range 98–742). The albumen was 29 gm/d? (range 26–34) and the lymphocyte count was 1.6c/cumm range 1.4–1.9). Twenty eight patients had generalized lymphadenopathy and recent weight loss was noted in 11 patients. Fifteen patients were treated for pulmonary TB and seven patients were on ARVs. The dislocations at the cervical spine commonly occurred at C5/6 (8). Three patients required a posterior cervical release with facetectomy prior to anterior cervical plating which was performed in all patients. The dislocations and unstable burst fractures of the dorsolumbar spine were treated by a one/two level posterior fusion. Post-operative sepsis due to S. aureus occurred in 8 (17%) patients. In four patients with deep infection vacuum dressings were used to clear the sepsis. Post-operative sepsis is best avoided by optimization of patients and meticulous surgery

Introduction: Postoperative overdistention of the bladder produces chronic, irreversible changes in the detrusor muscle. This study investigated whether an effective epidural, may cause postoperative overdistention of the bladder. Methods: A retrospective single surgeon/unit study of 144 male patients who had undergone spinal surgery over a two year period was undertaken. Data was collected into two groups: Patients requiring catheterisation and those that did not. All patients received a 16G epidural catheter inserted at the end of the procedure. Demographics, operation type and epidural rate were all correlated with the need for catheterization. In all cases the residual volumes were recorded. Results: Patients remained on postoperative epidural analgesia for an average of 50hours. 54 patients required urinary catheterisation. The average postoperative duration until catheterisation was 18hours, with a maximum of 33hours. The average residual volume at catheterization was 936mls, with a maximum of 2200mls. All patients were managed with intermittent catheterisation, most, (63%) requiring only a single episode before spontaneously voiding. Discussion: Although patients in the catheterised group were older, (p< 0.05), we found no other significant differences in patients that subsequently required catheterisation, when compared for operation type, or epidural infusion rates. We were therefore unable to predict which patients would require catheterisation. Questioning and bladder palpation was found to be unreliable when assessing overdistention. Our study demonstrated that patients undergoing spinal surgery using epidural analgesia should be closely monitored in order to prevent overdistention of the bladder and has led to a proactive regimen for spinal patients with epidural analgesia in our unit

Introduction Surgeons request cross-match based on habit not evidence. The spinal unit requested 686 units of blood during 2002–2003 and transfused only 42 for elective lumbar spine surgery. This wastes money, time and blood. Aim Optimise the transfusion requests in elective lumbar spinal surgery by creating evidence based guidelines. Methods The data on elective operations performed on the lumbar spine during the period June 2002 to June 2003 was collected from the spinal unit database and cross-referenced with the records of blood transfusion. Cross-match: Transfusion ratios (C:T Ratio) and Transfusion Index (TI) for common procedures were calculated. Based on these results, a Maximum Surgical Blood Ordering Schedule (MSBOS) was created and prospectively audited for six months. Conclusion Eighty units were cross-matched during the prospective audit. Therefore, in one year one hundred and sixty units would be requested. This represents a reduction of over five hundred units

Introduction: In 1998 the British Scoliosis Society was asked by the Board of Affiliated Societies to the BOA to provide information concerning the activity, numbers and training implications for specialists in our field. We had no systematic data so with the valuable assistance of the BOA a survey of spinal surgery activity was undertaken amongst 187 Orthopaedic Surgeons who had declared spinal surgery as a main interest in a previous BOA survey. One hundred and fifty questionnaires were returned (80.2%). This data was collated and analysed by the Statistical Department of the British Orthopaedic Association. As a result of the information obtained a template for the organisation of management of spinal disorders in UK and its manpower implications was developed. This template was then circulated to the Presidents of all the British Spine Societies for consideration at their AGMs in 1999. There was widespread support. It is understood that the BOA have also discussed these proposals along with those from other affiliated societies and it is perhaps time for further action. Methods and results: The results from the postal questionnaires were analysed along with information from other sources. Fifty-five surgeons were identified as being Specialist Spinal Surgeons (greater than 70% of their time), 120 Surgeons were designated Surgeons With An Interest (greater than 30% of their time), 25 Surgeons spent less than 30% of their time on spines. Sixty-two per cent (93 Surgeons) considered their facilities for spinal work were adequate, 34.7% (52) considered that they were inadequate and 3.3% (5) said that they were unacceptable. Forty-nine per cent (73) of those responding employed a triage system with 58.5% using a physiotherapist and 16.2% using a nurse. Five point nine per cent used a clinical assistant and 19.1% of triage was done by the Spinal Surgeon. Regarding outpatient waiting times, 31% of Surgeons had a waiting time of three to six weeks for urgent appointments with 20% longer than six weeks. Sixty per cent had a waiting time of over six months for non urgent consultations. For urgent but not emergency surgery 70% had a waiting time of over three weeks and half of those were over six weeks. For non urgent spinal surgery 70% were waiting more than six months with 50% waiting more than nine months. Conclusion: Our limited manpower and resources must be used with maximum efficiency while we wait for the inevitably slow build up to international best practice which is likely to take at least ten years with a fair wind. The Template: 20 Regional Spine Centres each with at least five Specialist Spinal Surgoens (SSS) including one or two Neurosurgeons, total 100 Surgeons. Sixty-five District Spine Centres (at least three per Region) with at least two Surgeons With An Interest (SWI) (Orthopaedic or Neuro), total 130 Surgeons. At present we have 55 SSS of whom 18 will be retired by 2005. We have around 120 SWI of whom only nine will be retired in 2005 taking retirement age at 65. We therefore have a shortfall of 63 SSS and perhaps 10 SWI a number of whom may wish to upgrade to SSS. According to Okafor and Sullivan (1998) the average European country of our size would have 150 SSS compared with our 55. 1.There is an urgent need for more Orthopaedic Surgeons and in particular Spinal Surgeons. 2.Surgeons need adequate facilities and infrastructure to allow them to work efficiently. Finance is required. 3. Until the training base for future Specialists involved in the management of spinal disorders is steadily expanded from bottom to top, little progress can be expected

Introduction and Aims: To assess the effectiveness of intrathecal fentanyl in the relief of post-operative pain in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Method: Sixty patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were prospectively recruited. All patients received our standard analgesic regime with PCA via a syringe driver. They were also randomised to receive either 15 micrograms of fentanyl intrathecally, or nothing. The fentanyl was administered by the operating surgeon (GM) under direct vision one or two levels above the site of operation at the end of the procedure. VAS pain scores were then taken at two, four, 24 and 48 hours post-operatively. Time to first bolus delivery of morphine from the PCA was also recorded, as was the total dose of morphine required. Results: The patients randomised to receive fentanyl showed a significant increase in the time to first bolus delivery of morphine, as well as a 40% reduction in the total morphine dose delivered. There was also a decrease in their mean VAS scores. There was no increased incidence of side effects in the group receiving fentanyl. No patients suffered respiratory compromise requiring treatment and only two patients required HDU observation overnight. The rest of the cohort left recovery after two hours to be nursed in an open ward. Conclusion: Intrathecal Fentanyl is effective at reducing morphine use via a PCA and mean pain VAS scores after lumbar spinal surgery. We would support its use over intrathecal morphine because of the reduced incidence of respiratory complications and the ability to nurse patients in the open ward

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of intrathecal fentanyl in the relief of post operative pain in patients undergoing lumbar decompression or fusion. Morphine has been shown to be effective intrathecally in spinal surgery but there is an increased incidence of respiratory complications. Fentanyl has not been formally evaluated in this setting. Design: This was a prospective randomized double blind trial. All patients received our standard analgesic regime with PCA via a syringe driver. They were also randomized to receive either 15 micrograms of fentanyl intrathecally, or nothing. The fentanyl was administered by the operating surgeon (GM) under direct vision one or two levels above the site of operation at the end of the procedure. Subjects: 30 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were prospectively recruited. Outcome measures: VAS pain scores were taken at 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours post operatively. Time to first bolus delivery of morphine from the PCA was also recorded as was the total dose of morphine required. Results: The patients randomized to receive fentanyl showed a significant increase in the time to first bolus delivery of morphine as well as a 40% reduction in the total morphine dose delivered. There was also a decrease in their mean VAS scores. There was no increased incidence of side effects in the group receiving fentanyl. No patients suffered respiratory compromise requiring treatment and only 2 patients required HDU observation overnight. The rest of the cohort left recovery after 2 hours to be nursed on an open ward. Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl is effective at reducing morphine use via a PCA and mean pain VAS scores after lumbar spinal surgery. We would support its use over intrathecal morphine because of the reduced incidence of respiratory complications and the ability to nurse patients on the open ward

Use of epidural analgesia post-operatively in spinal surgery is becoming increasingly common. We have conducted a prospective study examining the side-effects associated with epidurals and the need for additional analgesia in 36 adult patients undergoing either lumbar spine decompression, lumbar spine fusion, or a combination of decompression and fusion. A mixture of bupivacaine and fentanyl was used for up to 72 hours post-operatively via an epidural catheter placed under direct vision at the time of surgery. All patients had urinary catheters inserted peri-operatively. 15 patients experienced one or more side-effects; 6 patients had a subjectively unpleasant sensory block, 3 patients developed a motor block, 4 patients had pruritus, 3 developed hypotension, and 2 had episodes of nausea or vomiting. All these features resolved upon reduction of the epidural rate or cessation of the epidural. All patients required additional oral analgesia at some point during their observation. There were no serious complications, such as infection, permanent neurological deficit, or cord compression. We conclude epidural analgesia following lumbar spine surgery is a safe practice, although the high rate of side-effects necessitates close observation by fully trained staff. It appears additional oral analgesia is required to obtain satisfactory levels of analgesia

Background: Clonidine is an 2 adrenoreceptor and imidazoline receptor agonist which has analgesic, sedative and MAC sparing effects. It has been used orally, intravenously (including as an additive to morphine in PCA devices) and epidurally in combination with local anaesthetics and alone. We hypothesised that epidural administration of clonidine without local anaesthesia might provide adequate postoperative analgesia following spinal surgery without centroneuraxial block, and that if the drug’s effect site is spinal then this might be achieved with smaller doses and with fewer side effects than if given systemically. Method: This randomised controlled trial evaluated the effect of epidural clonidine versus saline on analgesia requirement and pain scores following spinal decompressive surgery. 66 patients were recruited and received a standardized general anaesthetic. At the end of surgery group C received a bolus of 1.5 mcg/kg of epidural clonidine followed by an infusion of 25 mcg/h for 36 to 48 hours. Patients in group P received a similar bolus and infusion of saline. Verbal pain scores, morphine consumption by patient-controlled device (PCA), sedation score, haemodynamic variables and the incidence of PONV were recorded for up to 48 hours. Results: Pain scores in both groups were low, but significantly lower for the first 6 hours in the clonidine group. Cumulative morphine consumption, used as a proxy for pain perception, was significantly lower in the morphine group throughout the whole period; mean (SEM) at 48 hours 62 (7) mg vs 35 (7) mg. Conclusion: Epidural clonidine has a useful effect in post operative pain relief following spinal surgery with few side effects

To evaluate the effect of wait time to surgery on patient derived generic and disease-specific functional outcome following lumbar surgery. Study cohort of seventy patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions. Prospectively collected SF-36 and Oswestry Disability questionnaires administered preoperatively, six weeks, six months, one year postoperatively. Time intervals from onset of symptoms to initial consultation by family physician through investigations, spinal surgical consultation and time spent on the surgical waiting list to surgery quantified. Time intervals compared to patient-specific improvements in reported outcome following surgery using Cox-Regression analysis. The effect of patient and surgical parameters on wait time was evaluated using median time as a reference for patients with either a longer or shorter wait. Patient follow-up completed in fifty-three (76%). Improvements in patient derived outcome were observed comparing post-operative to pre-operative baseline scores (p< 0.05). The greatest improvements were observed in aspects relating to physical function and pain. A longer wait to surgery was associated with less improvement in surgical outcome (p< 0.05, SF-36 domains BP, GH, RP, VT, and Physical Component Scores). The greatest impact observed was a prolonged surgical wait-list time on SF-36 PCS scores following surgery (Hazard’s ratio 3.53). Patients requiring spinal fusion had a longer wait when compared to those not requiring fusion (p< 0.05). A longer wait time to spinal surgery can negatively influence surgical results as quantified by patient derived functional outcome measures. Surgery resulted in the greatest improvement in pain severity and physical aspects of function, however, these areas also appeared the most impacted by a longer wait to surgery

Study Design: Prospective randomized double blind trial. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of intrathecal fentanyl in the relief of post operative pain in patients undergoing lumbar decompression or fusion. Summary of Background Data: Morphine has been shown to be effective intrathecally in spinal surgery but there is an increased incidence of respiratory complications. Fentanyl has not been formally evaluated in this setting. Methods: All patients received our standard analgesic regime with PCA via a syringe driver. They were also randomised to receive either 15 micrograms of fentanyl intrathecally, or nothing. The fentanyl was administered by the operating surgeon under direct vision one or two levels above the site of operation at the end of the procedure. Subjects: 30 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were prospectively recruited. Outcome measures: VAS pain scores were taken at 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours post operatively. Time to first bolus delivery of morphine from the PCA was also recorded as was the total dose of morphine required. Results: The patients randomized to receive fentanyl showed a significant increase in the time to first bolus delivery of morphine as well as a 40% reduction in the total morphine dose delivered. There was also a decrease in their mean VAS scores. There was no increased incidence of side effects in the group receiving fentanyl. No patients suffered respiratory compromise requiring treatment and only two patients required HDU observation overnight. The remainder of the cohort left recovery after 2 hours to be nursed on an open ward. Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl is effective at reducing morphine use via a PCA and mean pain VAS scores after lumbar spinal surgery. We would support its use over intrathecal morphine because of the reduced incidence of respiratory complications and the ability to nurse patients on the open ward

Introduction: Spinal surgical procedures are associated with significant morbidity. It is vital the patients are aware of the potential complications and the implications. The General Medical Council published guidelines regarding consent in June 2008. Aim: To examine the adequacy for consenting for spinal surgical procedures and focussing on documentation of serious risks. Methods: Case notes of seventy consecutive patients who had undergone spinal surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The consent forms were examined for documented procedures, complications, grade of the consenting member and timing of the consent. Results: The documented procedure on the consent form and the operation sheet matched in all seventy cases (100%). Consent was taken by the consultant in 50% of the patients, 30% were consented by middle grade doctors and 20% were consented by the junior doctor. The consenting person was present at the procedure in 63% of the cases. Sixty percent (60%) of the patients were consented in the pre-admission clinic, 23% were consented on the day before the procedure and 17% were consented on the day of the procedure. Common and serious complications such as infection (84%), bleeding (76%), pain (67%), bladder and bowel problems (84%), paralysis (70%) and nerve root damage (67%) were clearly documented. Conclusion: Two-thirds of the patients are given adequate information to obtain informed consent in the pre-admission clinic. Majority of the patients are aware of the common and the serious risks associated prior to the procedure. Interests: None. Ethics approval: None

Background/purpose: Clinical outcomes of surgery for disc herniation and spinal stenosis are variable. Surveys show that post-operative management is inconsistent, and spinal surgeons and their patients are uncertain about what best to do during the recovery phase. The aim of this study was to develop a patient-centred, evidence-based booklet that spinal surgeons can give to their patients to reduce uncertainty, guide post-operative management and facilitate recovery. Methods: A systematic literature search led to a best-evidence synthesis of appropriate information and advice on post-operative activation, restrictions, rehabilitation, and expectations about surgical and functional outcomes. Data were extracted into evidence statements which were graded by consensus for consistency and practicality so as to inform and prioritise the booklet’s messages. Following peer review (n = 16), a sample of patients (n = 11) gave a structured evaluation of the draft text. Results: The review found scant evidence in favour of post-operative activity restriction, yet an early active approach to post-operative rehabilitation can improve clinical, functional and occupational outcomes. Thus, the text of the booklet presents carefully selected messages to reduce uncertainty, promote positive beliefs, encourage early reactivation, and provide practical advice to aid self-management. Peer reviewers’ comments were incorporated into the text; all the spinal surgeons (n = 7) said they would find the booklet useful. Patients found it readable, interesting and helpful; they understood and accepted the intended messages. Conclusions: Following careful development, an evidence-based booklet to aid post-operative management in spinal surgery is now available, and is factored into a RCT of post-surgical rehabilitation

Introduction. Our clinic has started to use MAZOR's Spine-Assist(r) robotic device in routine spinal surgery practice since 2006. The use of this system is diverse and now applicable for Vertebroplasty, Biopsy procedures and different techniques of Spinal fusion. During this time our clinic performed near 150 robotic assisted surgeries. Amongst its benefits the system allows the reduction of the duration of fluoroscopic exposure in the OR, better accuracy due to computerized assisted planning and navigation, avoidance of human caused complications and a less traumatic procedure for the patient. On the other hand, the duration of the procedure is prolonged, the wound is subdued to a longer exposure in cases of the open surgery, and the operational cost is higher and requires a good trained medical staff. Materials and Methods. In the last 2 years we have performed 56 robotic assisted Vertebroplasty procedures (research group). At the same time we have performed 44 non assisted Vertebroplasty procedures. There was a significant difference in the fluoroscopic time and subsequent exposure time to radiation between the groups: in the research group we used only an average of 3 seconds of staff fluoroscopic exposure (an average of 5 fluoroscopic images) compared to an average of 11 seconds of exposure (an average of 24 fluoroscopic images). Furthermore, we have successfully inserted more than 400 pedical screws with less than 1mm accuracy from planning, out which only 8 were misplaced. Subsequently we have also performed 16 biopsies, which were effective as CT based biopsies. The average duration of a surgical procedure without the use of the system in 1 level fusion was 82 min. With the use of the system the average time was 106 min. The operational cost with the use of the system was about 1,000 ∊ more expensive. Furthermore, the use of the system required performing of an additional CT scan with 1 mm slices, which caused an additional exposure to patient radiation. Results. Robotic assisted spinal surgery is a new and safe approach aiming to dramatically shorten the duration of fluoroscopic exposure of the staff and surgeon thus reducing the exposure to radiogenic dose. This novel procedure, promotes a better accuracy with regard to Vertebroplasty, Spinal fusion, insertion of Pedical Screws and also for biopsies procedures. We continue to broaden the usage of the robotic assisted device to other fields of spinal surgery and to general orthopaedic surgery. However, we have to resolve some issues such as cost, operation time and less fluoroscopic exposure for the patient

Abstract

Patients have an important role in evaluating the health-care they receive; including the treatment they receive as well as the healthcare process. This information can be invaluable in understanding patient needs and developing a more patient centred approach to health care. As part of an RCT into the post-operative management of spinal surgery we explored patient’s experience of the health care system and their perceptions of how the system worked for them. To date 201 patients have completed the trial; 60 receiving usual care, 37 an educational booklet, 48 rehabilitation and 56 received both booklet and rehabilitation after decompression surgery for stenosis or disc prolapse. The majority (82%) were referred to the consultant through their GP. 40% identified a specific event that led to their pain; of these 48% reported a longstanding pain and 33% noting a sudden injury. 30% waited less than a month for surgery, and 32% 1–3 months. 18% experienced surgical cancellations. The majority of patients felt well informed pre-operatively, had faith in their surgical team and had sufficient time to discuss their condition. Similarly during their operative stay they felt supported and in good hands. When questioned about their feelings on the health care process as a whole; positive patient comments included: the speed and quality of surgery and the pain relief experienced; whilst negative comments included: lack of information or advice, the delays between diagnosis and management, dissatisfaction with GP care, feeling abandoned, lack of respect from the surgeon, and disappointment with the outcome. Conflict of Interest: None. Source of Funding: ARC

Clinical outcomes of surgery for disc herniation and spinal stenosis are variable. Surveys show that postoperative management is inconsistent; spinal surgeons and their patients are uncertain about what best to do post-operatively. Following a focused literature review, a patient-centred, evidence-based booklet was developed, which aims to reduce uncertainty, guide post-operative management and facilitate recovery. Initial peer and patient evaluations were encouraging and the booklet Your back operation (. www.tso.co.uk/bookshop. ) is currently factored into a trial investigating the post-operative management of spinal patients. To date, 80 patients have been recruited into the study of which 34 have been randomised to receive the booklet. At 6 months post-surgery all of these patients are requested to complete a questionnaire on the booklet. This questionnaire contained forced-choice questions on readability, style, information level, believability, length, content and helpfulness. Further open questions concern the booklet’s messages, giving patients the opportunity to identify anything they did not like or understand, voice any concerns that were not covered, and say if they thought the booklet would change what they did after surgery. Finally, they were asked their overall rating of the booklet on a scale from 1 to 10. Feedback is very positive. The average overall rating of the booklet was 8.6/10. Over 80% found it easy to read, interesting, and of appropriate length. Over 80% also stated they had learnt new and helpful information. All subjects stated that they would recommend the booklet to a friend, and the majority stated that they frequently referred to the booklet. The predominant messages received and understood by the patients were related to the safe benefits of early activation and return to normal activities. The results show that spinal surgery patients appreciate evidence-based information in booklet form, and suggest that this booklet may be an important adjunct to post-operative management of spinal patients

BACKGROUND: Physical outcomes following surgery for degenerative spine disease have been well studied. It is only relatively recently however that the importance of psychological factors in determining outcome from spine surgery has been addressed. Previous studies suggest that pre-operative psychological distress is a predictor of poor outcome. In the drive to identify patients who will not benefit from spine surgery these patients may in future be denied surgery. AIM: The aim of the current study was to examine the relationship between the severity of physical symptoms, levels of pre-operative psychological distress and out-come in patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing elective spinal surgery. PATIENTS & METHODS: The study was a prospective cohort study. Health status and psychological distress were measured pre-operatively and at 12 months or more post-operatively using the Short Form 36 (SF36) Health Survey Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). We compared levels of physical disability (SF-36 physical domain scores) and psychological distress (HADS scores) before and after surgery in this group. Comparisons of pre- and post-operative scores were made using the Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Mann Whitney U tests as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were included (178 men, 155 women, mean age 54y). Pre-operatively patients with severe levels of anxiety and depression (higher HADS score) had worse (lower) SF-36 physical domain (SF-36 PD) scores compared to those with normal HADS scores (median 181.5 vs 109, p< 0.0001). Both HADS and SF-36 PD scores improved post-operatively (HADS 13 vs 6 p< 0.0001; SF-36 PD 134 vs 250.5 p< 0.0001). Greater reduction in HADS score was observed in patients with severe pre-operative HADS scores compared to those with normal pre-operative HADS scores (p< 0.0001). Patients with severe HADS scores also had greater improvement in SF36 PD scores when compared to patients with normal pre-operative HADS scores (77.24 vs 53.87 p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Poor physical function pre-operatively correlates with severe psychological distress. Both physical and psychological symptoms improve after surgery. Severe levels of anxiety and depression pre-operatively are associated with the greatest symptomatic improvement and psychological morbidity does not worsen outcome

The volume of spinal procedures have increased over the last two decades (220% in lumbar region). A simultaneous increase in re-operation rates (up to 20%) has been reported. Our aim was to compare with literature the reoperation rates and complications for various spinal procedures from a peripheral unit and to provide this information to the patients. This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent spinal surgery during the period 1995 to 2005 by one surgeon. Using ICDM-9 codes and private notes patients were identified and medical records were used to gather relevant data. The following information was extracted-demographics, diagnosis, ASA criteria, primary procedure, any complication/s, secondary procedures, duration of follow up and to secondary procedure. The index procedures were grouped into regional and according to indication. Both complications and reoperations were grouped into early (within three months) or delayed (after three months) from the index operation. Reoperation rates and complications were calculated and compared with literature. Four hundred and thirty-nine patients formed the study population. Five patients had inadequate data and were excluded. 23 patients have since died. Demographics showed 22% were smokers and 9% were either unemployed or sickness beneficiary. The commonest diagnosis in the lumbar spine was disc herniation (194). Stenosis and disc degeneration were the next most common surgical indications. In the cervical spine 27 patients had disc herniation and 15 patients were operated for trauma. Lumbar discectomy was the commonest procedure-191 patients with one third having microdiscectomy. Instrumented fusion was performed in 97 while 37 patients underwent decompression only. The majority of cervical spine patients (46) had discectomy and fusion. Stabilisation for trauma formed a reasonable workload in both cervical and lumbar regions. Early complications included dural tears (seven), neurological symptoms (eight), wound infections (12) and pulmonary embolism (one) and repeat disc herniation. Delayed problems included repeat disc herniation, pseudoarthrosis and implant related symptoms. Overall re-operation rate was 14.52% with 5.02% early and 9.4%delayed repeat surgery. Repeat discectomy (eight) and decompression and exploration (seven) were the common early reoperation whereas fusion post discectomy (19) and recurrent disc herniation (12) were indications for delayed intervention. Removal of metalware (8) was another large late re-operation group. Our re-operation rates fall within the quoted figures in literature. However our early re-operation rates are somewhat higher. These figures help us to inform patients better at the time of consent for the primary procedure especially lumbar disc surgery as most of the re-operation were required after discectomy

Objectives:. To establish the demand, referral pathways, utility and patient satisfaction of a physiotherapy led post operative spinal surgery review clinic. Methods:. From July 2014 to January 2015 a pilot physiotherapy led clinic was established. The following clinic data was collected: number of patients reviewed, surgical procedure, outcome of clinic assessment, numbers requiring further investigation, numbers requiring review in the consultant led clinic and adverse events. A patient satisfaction survey was also administered to all English speaking patients. Patients were asked to rate the ease of getting through to the service by phone, length of wait, time spent with the clinician, answers to questions, explanation of results, advice about exercise and return to activities, the technical skills of the clinician, their personal manner and their overall visit. Data was anonymised and inserted into an excel spreadsheet for analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was undertaken. Results:. 28 patients were reviewed in the pilot clinic. 17 (61%) patients were reviewed and discharged. 11 (39%) patients required discussion with the consultant. The outcome was: Referral for further imaging: n=5 (18%), referral to other specialist: n=2 (6%), consultant led OPD clinic review n=4 (14%) and surgical review of wound n=1 (4%). 84% (n=21/25) of eligible patients completed a post operative satisfaction survey. 86% (n= 18/21) rated their overall visit as excellent. There were no adverse events reported. Conclusion:. The pilot clinic has informed the development of a permanent physiotherapy led post op clinic in the National Neurosurgical Spinal Service and demonstrates the value of interdisciplinary care in this population

The FASTER study (Function after spinal treatment, exercise and rehabilitation) aims to evaluate, via a factorial RCT, the benefits of a rehabilitation programme and an education booklet Your back operation, . www.tso.co.uk/bookshop. , for the postoperative management of patients undergoing discectomy or lateral nerve root decompression, each compared with “usual care”. Included in this larger study is an evaluation of the booklet which forms the focus of this abstract. To date, 128 patients have been recruited into the study of which 63 have been randomised to receive the booklet. At 3 months post-surgery all of these patients are requested to complete a questionnaire on the booklet. This questionnaire contained forced-choice questions on readability etc and open questions regarding content. Finally, patients were asked their overall rating of the booklet on a scale from 1 to 10. Feedback is very positive. The average overall rating of the booklet was 8.3/10. Over 85% found it easy to read, interesting, and of appropriate length. Over 90% also stated they had learnt new and helpful information. All subjects stated that they would recommend the booklet to a friend, and the majority stated that they frequently referred to the booklet. The predominant messages received and understood by the patients were related to the safe benefits of early activation and return to normal activities. The results show that spinal surgery patients appreciate evidence-based information in booklet form, and suggest that this booklet may be an important adjunct to post-operative management of spinal patients

Objective To assess the effectiveness of intrathecal fentanyl in the relief of post operative pain in patients undergoing lumbar decompression or fusion. Method 60 patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery were prospectively recruited. All patients received our standard analgesic regime with PCA via a syringe driver. They were also randomised to receive either 15 micrograms of fentanyl intrathecally, or nothing. The fentanyl was administered by the operating surgeon (GM) under direct vision one or two levels above the site of the operation at the end of the procedure. VAS pain scores were taken at 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours post operatively independently. The total dose of morphine required was recorded. Results The patients randomised to receive fentanyl showed a decrease in their mean VAS scores as well as a 40% reduction in the total morphine dose delivered. There was no increased incidence of side effects in the group receiving fentanyl. No patients suffered respiratory compromise requiring treatment. All patients left recovery after 2 hours to be nursed on an open ward. Conclusion Intrathecal fentanyl is effective at reducing mean pain VAS scores and morphine use via a PCA after lumbar spinal surgery. We would support its use over intrathecal morphine because of the reduced incidence of respiratory complications and the ability to nurse patients on the open ward

Background. The Robotic Spinal Surgery System (RSSS) is a robot system designed for pedicle screw insertion containing image based navigation system, trajectory planning system and force state recognition system. The special force state recognition system can guarantee the safety during the operation. The RSSS is helpful in pedicle screw insertion surgery and it will be applied in clinic in the near future. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy and safety of RSSS in an animal experiment. Methods. Computer tomography (CT) scan data for two anesthetised experimental sheep was acquired using the C-arm and transferred to RSSS for pre-surgery screw trajectory planning. With the assist of RSSS, we inserted 8 and 4 screws into two sheep respectively. Operation time and blood loss during the surgery were recorded, and CT scan was repeated after surgery. Real screw position and trajectory acquired by the post-surgery CT scan and ideal trajectory planned by RSSS were compared to evaluate the accuracy and safety of RSSS. The result is shown as mean±SD. Results. We planted totally 12 screws into two sheep. The operation time for each sheep is 140min and 110min, and the blood loss is 100ml and 80 ml respectively. Compared with planned trajectory, the average deviation of the entry points in lateral and axial view are 1.07±0.56mm and 1.25±0.42mm and the mean screw deviation angles in later and axial view are 1.78±0.98°and 2.52±1.03°respectively. The RSSS successfully recognised the force stages and guaranteed the safety during the drilling process. There is no penetration in all 12 pedicles, and all the screws fell into group A according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Conclusion. This animal study demonstrated the accuracy and safety of the RSSS, which also supported the potential application in clinic

Objective: To assess the effect of spinal surgery and nocturnal ventilation on lung function and survival in patients with scoliosis secondary to Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Study design: Prospective, observational study by a single observer (Research Physiotherapist). Subjects: 80 patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy were treated between 1986 and 2002. During this period 40 patients underwent a spinal fusion at a mean age of 14.05y (95 % CI 13.6 – 14.6). Nocturnal ventilation was commenced when symptoms and signs of respiratory failure were evident. The mean FVC at commencement of nocturnal ventilation was 0.41 litres. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they received nocturnal ventilation. A total of twenty eight patients received nocturnal ventilation and 52 did not. The groups were further sub-divided based on whether they had spinal fusion. There were fourteen patients in each sub-group of the ventilated group and 26 patients in each sub-group of those that were not ventilated. Outcomes: Serial forced vital capacity (FVC) measurements and survival measured by Kaplan Meir survival analysis. Results: The mean vital capacity dropped from 1.41 l (95 % CI 1.21 – 1.61) to 1.13 (95 % CI 0.893 – 1.37), a year post-operatively. This was not associated with the development of respiratory compromise. The vital capacity improved gradually, reaching the pre-operative level before it declined again. The shortest survival was seen in patients who received neither surgery nor ventilation (median survival 19.7y). The patients who received surgery but no ventilatory support were not as good as the patients that were ventilated but did not have surgery (median survival 24.3y). The best results were seen in the patients who had both surgery and ventilation (median survival 26.4y). The worst prognosis is in patients with early onset symptomatic cardiomyopathy (6 patients, with a median survival of 16.3y). Conclusion: Nocturnal ventilation is the most important factor in the improvement in survival of patients with Duchennes muscular dystrophy. Spinal surgery is also beneficial and the best results are in those patients who have both

Preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) is widely practised in elective orthopaedic surgery, but few data are available as regards recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) support during a PABD programme in children. In January 1999 we introduced a PABD protocol with erythropoietin (10000 U s.c. twice weekly during the 3 weeks preceding surgery) in children who were scheduled for corrective surgery of scoliosis. Between January 1999 and November 2003, 23 consecutive patients (five males and 18 females, median age 15.1 years) were enrolled. Preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) levels, the numbers of collected and of autologous and allogeneic blood transfused units were determined. The results were compared with a historical group of 28 consecutive patients (seven males and 21 females, median age 15.4 years) who underwent spinal surgery between January 1994 and December 1998 and who differed from the first group only by the absence of concomitant erythropoietin therapy. Administration of rHuEpo allowed all patients to complete the PABD programme, whereas 36% of patients in the non-treated group had to stop predeposit because they developed anaemia. Furthermore, significantly higher numbers of collected blood units and haemoglobin levels were measured. A significantly lower requirement for allogeneic blood was observed in the rHuEpo-treated group: 1/23 vs. 9/28 patients (4.3%–32.1%, p < 0.001). The present study documents the efficacy of presurgical rHuEpo in facilitating autologous blood collection, thus reducing exposure to allogeneic blood, in paediatric patients undergoing corrective spinal surgery

There are currently no agreed guidelines for the type and frequency of post spinal surgery neurological observations. This lack of an agreed standard can lead to the failure to adequately monitor cord function following surgery and thus neurological deficits can be missed. We have carried out an audit of the postoperative spinal observations against our agreed standards of care. Standards of care:. All patients should have the frequency of required neuro obs documented in the post op instructions. The frequency of documented observations in recovery should be adhered to. The frequency of documented observations in HDU should be adhered to. Any neurological loss should be properly documented. The nurses will report any neurological change promptly. The SHO will exam and document a full neurological examination. 28 case notes were reviewed. 21 of these cases were scoliosis correction through anterior, posterior and combined approaches. 3 had disc replacements, 2 had decompression for metastatic cancer and one had fixa-tion of a fracture. All patients failed to complete all standards fully. There was a lack of clear postoperative guidelines, failure to record neurological status in recovery, incomplete documentation of neurological state in HDU, failure to inform medical staff in presence of a neurological deficit and inadequate assessment of patient by medical staff. One patient returned to theatre for a foot drop, which is still only partially recovered. We recommend the audit of current practice and implementation of locally agreed standards for the postoperative monitoring

Introduction and Aims: Incidental dural tears and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are common complications of spinal surgery. Collagen matrix (DuraGen, Integra LifeSciences) derived from bovine flexor tendons allows CSF absorption up to 100 times its weight without a volume change. Aim of this study was categorising the dural tears and monitoring post-operative complications. Method: In this three-year prospective study, 35 patients (22 males, 13 females; mean age 53.8 years (range 16–82)) were selected by the following criteria: (1) any spine operation resulting in intra-operative CSF leak due to dural tear; or (2) persistent post-operative CSF leak. Collagen matrix was cut according to the extent of the dural defect (pinhole, < 1cm, 1–2 cm, and > 2cm). Dural matrix was moistened and applied as a graft and overlying tissues were meticulously reconstituted. Collagen sponge was not sutured on the dura. Subfascial drain was used at the discretion of surgeon to avoid hematoma and blood loss. Results: The 39 procedures were as follows: 23 laminectomies, six diskectomies, four hematoma repairs, three structural repairs, two fracture stabilisations and one cystectomy. The locations of the 39 procedures were: 27 lumbar, seven thoracic, and five cervical. In 33 of 39 procedures, hemovac subfascial drain was used to avoid hematoma and excessive blood loss. Fibrin glue was used in two cases only. In 13 cases the dural defect was > 2cm, five cases 1–2cm, five cases < 2cm, and nine were pinhole defects. Of importance was the successful repair of 13 large dural tears (> 2cm) using the collagen sponge. Our study showed a 97.4% success rate for repairing dural tears using the collagen sponge surpassing the established techniques success rates by up to 10%. There were no wound infections post-operatively, versus the 6% rate of deep wound infection using the standard suture and fibrin glue. The mean follow-up time was 3.1 months. In two out of 39 procedures collagen sponge was used to repair persistent post-operative CSF leaks (no dural sponge used in the original operation). Conclusion: Considering the technical challenge of dural tears, especially ventral or lateral tears, the use of collagen sponge offers an excellent alternative mini-mising a prolonged procedure, wound infection, use of tissue grafts, as well as excessive blood loss. This study showed collagen sponge to be effective as a permanent dural substitute

Wrong-level surgery is a unique pitfall in spinal surgery and is part of the wider field of wrong-site surgery. Wrong-site surgery affects both patients and surgeons and has received much media attention. We performed this systematic review to determine the incidence and prevalence of wrong-level procedures in spinal surgery and to identify effective prevention strategies. We retrieved 12 studies reporting the incidence or prevalence of wrong-site surgery and that provided information about prevention strategies. Of these, ten studies were performed on patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery and two on patients undergoing lumbar, thoracic or cervical spine procedures. A higher frequency of wrong-level surgery in lumbar procedures than in cervical procedures was found. Only one study assessed preventative strategies for wrong-site surgery, demonstrating that current site-verification protocols did not prevent about one-third of the cases. The current literature does not provide a definitive estimate of the occurrence of wrong-site spinal surgery, and there is no published evidence to support the effectiveness of site-verification protocols. Further prevention strategies need to be developed to reduce the risk of wrong-site surgery.

As an example of benchmarking in spinal surgery using Spine Tango, we extracted data on dural tears, one of the most frequent types of complications in posterior spinal fusion. Little is known about their predictors. This study examined which factors predict the occurrence of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion. Prospective consecutive documentation of hospital based interventions with an evidence level 2++. Between May 2005 and November 2006 data of 3437 patients were documented in the registry. Nine hundred and twenty nine patients, who had been treated with posterior spinal fusion after opening of the spinal canal, were included in this study. Dural tears being the most frequent type of complications in the registry were chosen as dependent outcome variable. Multiple linear regression with stepwise elimination was performed on potential predictor-variables of the occurrence of dural tears. Benchmarking compared the performance of single hospitals with international peers. Median age was 62.7 years (min 12.5, max 90.5 yrs) with a female to male ratio of 2:1. In 18 of 929 cases a dural tear occurred. Hospital (p=0.02) and number of segments of fusion (p=0.018) were found to be predictors of the occurrence of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion. Number of fusions per hospital (min 25, max 526) and academic status of hospital had no influence on the rate of dural tears. Fusions of four and more segments showed an increase of the rate of dural tears by a factor of three compared to fusions of less than four segments. There was no significant difference between fusions of one segment and fusions of two or three segments (1.3 vs. 1.9%) as well as between fusions of four or five segments and fusions of more than five segments (4.6 vs. 4.2%). Differences between hospitals remained when benchmarking dural tears with case mix. Predictors of dural tears in posterior spinal fusion are. hospital and. number of segments of fusion. In fusions of four and more segments a threefold higher risk of dural tears in comparison to fusions of less than four segments should be taken into consideration

Introduction: Recent years have witnessed something of a paradigm shift in relation to the assessment of outcome in spine surgery: multidimensional patient-centred questionnaires have superseded the traditional surgeon-based rating of global outcome, and surgical registries have been developed to capitalise on the principle of “strength in numbers”. Interestingly, although recognised as a potential determinant of the patient’s view of the success of the surgery, the assessment of complications — in this context defined as new or unexpected problems arising as a result of surgery — has not enjoyed the same enlightened approach in relation to the patient’s perspective. The present study sought to fill this gap in the current array of outcome measures. Methods: All German-speaking patients undergoing spinal surgery within our Spine Unit in the two years from Jan 2005 to Dec 2006 were asked to complete the patient-orientated Core-Measures-Index of the SSE Spine Tango Spine Surgery Registry 12 mo after surgery; the surgeon completed a Spine Tango surgery form and follow-up forms at various intervals up to 12 mo postop. In the patient questionnaire, the patient was asked “did any complications arise as a consequence of your operation 1 year ago (e.g. problems with wound healing, paralysis, sensory disturbances, etc.)? If so, give details.” Patients were also asked about their satisfaction with the operation and the global outcome of surgery. Results: 2080/2259 (92%) patients returned a 12-month questionnaire. 28% patients answered “yes” to the complications question. This compares with complication rates of 3–10% recorded during the various Spine Tango Surgical follow-ups up to 12 months post-op. Patients sometimes listed “complications” that would rarely classify as such in the traditional sense; however, the incidence of their reported complications was significantly associated with outcome/satisfaction, suggesting they were not trivial to the patient. The more recent addition of a question concerning the “bothersomeness” of the reported complications revealed that 6% patients thought the complications were not at all bothersome; 21%, slightly bothersome; 30%, moderately bothersome; 27%, very bothersome and 16%, extremely bothersome. Discussion: The results indicate that, just like outcome, “complications” should be assessed from both the patient’s and the surgeon’s perspectives, not least to better understand the reasons accounting for dissatisfaction and a poor patient-rated outcome

Aims

Psychoeducative prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes is relatively novel in spinal fusion surgery and, like most rehabilitation treatments, they are rarely well specified. Spinal fusion patients experience anxieties perioperatively about pain and immobility, which might prolong hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine if a Preoperative Spinal Education (POSE) programme, specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and designed to normalize expectations and reduce anxieties, was safe and reduced LOS.

Objective: This is a prospective, randomised, double blind trial to assess the effectiveness of intrathecal fentanyl in the relief of post-operative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Method: 60 patients were recruited. All received our standard analgesic regime with morphine PCA via a syringe driver. They were electronically randomised to two groups – one received 15 micrograms of fentanyl intathecally; the other had nothing. The fentanyl was administered by the operating surgeon under direct vision at the end of the procedure. All patients were monitored in recovery for two hours. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were assessed at 2, 4, 24 and 48 hours post-op. The time to first bolus delivery of PCA was recorded as was the total amount of morphine PCA used. Both patient and assessor were blinded. Results: The patients randomised to receive fentanyl showed a significant decrease in their mean VAS pain scores for the first 24 hours. Their time to first bolus of PCA was significantly increased. They also used 40% less morphine PCA (p< 0.05 in all cases). None of the patients suffered respiratory compromise requiring treatment and they all left recovery after 2 hours to be nursed on the general ward. Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl is effective at reducing post-operative pain and PCA morphine use after lumbar spinal surgery. We support its use over morphine because of the reduced incidence of respiratory complications and the ability to nurse patients on a general ward

Objective: To evaluate a new system of prescribing and administering IV morphine introduced by our Paediatric Pain Service for paediatric patients undergoing corrective spinal surgery. Design: An audit of post-operative pain management was conducted retrospectively on patients who had undergone scoliosis correction between November 1999 and September 2001. Subjects: Sixteen patients between the ages of nine and seventeen years who had undergone spinal scoliosis correction during the study period were evaluated. Outcome measures: The average post-operative IV morphine consumption, the pain and sedation scores, the incidence of side effects, and the use of adjuvant analgesics were analysed. Statistical evaluation was carried out using the Student’s T test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Morphine consumption was significantly higher in the first post-operative twenty-four hour period, as well as in the over 13 year-old age group. There was no significant difference in morphine consumption between genders or ASA physical status. The pain scores were significantly higher in males compared to females on day one post-operatively. There was no statistical difference in sedation scores. Conclusions: An audit of the post-operative pain regimen for patients undergoing spinal scoliosis correction provided by the Paediatric Pain Management Service has shown that it is both efficient and safe. We recommend an anticipated pain management pathway of recovery following spinal fusion for idiopathic adolescent scoliosis

Introduction. This study sought to determine whether the functional outcome of two common spinal operations could be improved by a programme of post-operative rehabilitation and/or an educational booklet each compared with usual care. Methods. This was a multi-centre, factorial, randomised controlled trial on the post operative management of spinal surgery patients, with randomisation stratified by surgeon and operative procedure. The study compared the effectiveness of a rehabilitation programme and an education booklet for the postoperative management of patients undergoing discectomy or lateral nerve root decompression surgery, each compared with “usual care” using a 2 × 2 factorial design, randomising patient to four groups; rehabilitation-only, booklet-only, rehabilitation-plus-booklet, and usual care only. The primary outcome measure was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months, with secondary outcomes including visual analogue scale measures of back and leg pain. An economic analysis was also performed. Results. 338 patients were recruited into the study with outcomes preformed pre-operatively, and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-operatively. At the one year review the effect of rehabilitation on ODI was −2.7 (95% CI −6.8 to 1.5) and the effect of booklet was 2.7 (95% CI −1.5 to 6.9). There were no significant differences in costs or outcomes associated with either intervention and neither intervention was cost-effective. Discussion. This study found that neither intervention had a significant impact on long term outcome or cost. There was some evidence to suggest that the impact of the interventions was different between patients undergoing discectomy and those having spinal decompression. Conflicts of Interest. None. Source of Funding. Arthritis Research UK. Previously presented at International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine 2011

Objectives. To determine the limits of spinal displacement before the onset of neurophysiological changes during spinal surgery. Assessing if the type of force applied or the section of the adjacent nerve roots increases the tolerance to displacement. Methods. Experimental study in 21 domestic pigs. Three groups were established according to the displacing force applied to the cord: separation (group 1, n=7), root stump pull (group2, n=7) and torque (group3, n=7). Successive records of cord-to-cord motor evoked potential were obtained. The displacing force was removed immediately when neurophysiological changes observed. The experiment was repeated after sectioning the adjacent nerve roots. Results. The diameter of the dura in the study area was 7.2 ± 1 mm. Group 1: evoked potential changes appeared with displacement of 10.1 ± 1.6 mm with roots unharmed and 15.3 ± 4.7 mm (p <0.01) with section of four adjacent roots. Group 2: evoked potential disturbance at 17.5 ± 4.7 mm, which increased to 23.5 ± 2.1 mm (p <0.05) after cutting the two contralateral roots. Group 3: cord allowed torque of 95.3° ± 9.2 increasing to 112.4 ° ± 7.1 ° if the contralateral roots were cut. Except in two cases in group 3 (torsion), the potentials were normalized immediately after releasing the deforming force. Discussion. This experimental study shows that it is possible to surgically displace the medulla a distance superior to the diameter of the dura without detecting neurophysiological changes. The limits of cord displacement may be increased by the section of the adjacent nerve roots and if the tensile force is applied by traction of the root stumps. These findings support the neurological safety of spine deformity correction by isolated posterior approach, obviating the morbidity related to an additional anterior procedure

To audit patient satisfaction throughout the perioperative period amongst emergency and elective admissions in the spinal team.

92 patients were identified whom underwent operations within a 3 month period using the operating database. A self administered postal questionnaire was sent to assess preoperative waiting time, quality of preoperative assessment and information given, assessment of their admission, their experience throughout hospital stay and the quality of their post operative assessment and discharge.

Patient reported outcomes (PROMS)

Response rate 35% (32/92) of which 24 (14F 10M) were elective admissions and 8 emergency admissions (2F 6M). Average wait for elective procedure was 5.7 weeks (median 2).

63% of elective patients were seen in prescreening clinic and 79% of these received an information booklet prior to operation.

22% of patients had delayed discharge due to non clinical causes including awaiting transport, awaiting medications and physiotherapy clearance.

88% of patients reported they were given adequate information regarding post-operative daily activities.

79% of elective patients reported seeing a doctor on the day of their discharge however only 38% reported seeing a physiotherapist postoperatively. This fell to 0% for patients operated on a Friday.

Although 94% of patients reported that they were satisfied with the overall care they were given, they reported certain aspects of their clinical care being less than optimal.

Trust wide assessment of patient reported outcomes to assess and improve the quality of care against national guidelines.

Ethics Approval: Self questionnaire approved by ethics committee

Clinical governance encompasses audit. Audit is a requirement of our professional bodies and our hospital trusts. It is not usually resourced adequately and the ability to audit spinal surgical outcomes is haphazard nationally. This presentation describes the results that can be achieved in the absence of formal audit support.

A surgical database was started in 1993; its evolution involved the use of standard outcome measures in 1995. Between 1995 and 1999, four hundred and one major spine procedures were undertaken by a single surgeon. The outcome measures were the Oswestry disability index, the low back outcome, MSP MZD and a visual analogue pain scale.

Pre-operative data was collected on all 233 elective cases. Follow up was 59% at 6 months, 51% at one year and 57% at 2 years. At two years a Macnab score was available in 106 cases and the results were excellent/ good 81%, fair/poor 19%.

There were 56 recorded perioperative complications. 21 occurred in the 77 instrumented procedures and 35 in the 156 non instrumented procedures.

The results of this type of audit can only be cautiously compared to published data because of poor follow up. Quality outcome measures and audit probably require a funded resource to be of value.

We have examined how many and which potential complications (PCs) are recorded on the consent form by a group of consultant surgeons performing common spinal procedures - anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior lumbar discectomy and/or medial facetectomy (PLD).

Email survey

Consultant spinal surgeons performing ACDF and/or PLD practicing in Southwest England

Identification of the PCs each surgeon listed on the consent form for the specified procedures.

There were 23 responses from 28 Consultant surgeons approached. 21 surgeons performed both ACDF and PLD, 2 performed only PLD. Surgeons quoted 5 to 17 (mode 10) PCs for ACDF and 4 to 15 (mode 13) for PLD. These did not necessarily represent the most common or most dangerous PCs recorded in the literature^1,2. Small difference in PCs mentioned by Neurosurgeons and Orthopaedic surgeons was seen (ACDF mode: 12vs10, PLD mode: 12vs13). There was a strong correlation between the number of PCs recorded by surgeons for ACDF and PLD.

We have found a wide variation in consenting practice amongst a group of surgeons performing common spinal operations. Issues of consent are common causes of formal complaints and potential litigation, causing anxiety for both patient and surgeon. A more homogenous consent process, employing objective measures where possible, may help reduce this burden and may be achieved by setting a national standard.