Aims. Arthroplasties of the elbow, including total elbow arthroplasty, radial head arthroplasty, distal humeral hemiarthroplasty, and radiocapitellar arthroplasty, are rarely undertaken. This scoping review aims to outline the current research in this area to inform the development of future research. Methods. A scoping review was undertaken adhering to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines using Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, and trial registries, limited to studies published between 1 January 1990 and 7 February 2021. Endnote software was used for screening and selection, and included randomized trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, analytical cross-sectional studies, and case series of ten or more patients reporting the clinical outcomes of elbow arthroplasty. The results are presented as the number of types of studies, sample size, length of follow-up, clinical outcome domains and instruments used, sources of funding, and a narrative review. Results. A total of 362 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were of total elbow arthroplasty (246; 68%), followed by radial head arthroplasty (100; 28%), distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (11; 3%), and radiocapitellar arthroplasty (5; 1%). Most were retrospective (326; 90%) and observational (315; 87%). The median sample size for all types of implant across all studies was 36 (interquartile range (IQR) 21 to 75). The median length of follow-up for all studies was 56 months (IQR 36 to 81). A total of 583 unique outcome descriptors were used and were categorized into 18 domains. A total of 105 instruments were used to measure 39 outcomes. Conclusion. We found that most of the literature dealing with elbow arthroplasty consists of retrospective observational studies with small sample sizes and short follow-up. Many outcomes have been used with many different instruments for their measurement, indicating a need to define a core set of outcomes and instruments for future research in this area. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1148–1155

The February 2024 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Does indomethacin prevent heterotopic ossification following elbow fracture fixation?; Arthroscopic capsular shift in atraumatic shoulder joint instability; Ultrasound-guided lavage with corticosteroid injection versus sham; Combined surgical and exercise-based interventions following primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Are vascularized fibula autografts a long-lasting reconstruction after intercalary resection of the humerus for primary bone tumours?; Anatomical versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with limited forward elevation; Tension band or plate fixation for simple displaced olecranon fractures?; Is long-term follow-up and monitoring in shoulder and elbow arthroplasty needed?

The June 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360. looks at: Proximal humerus fractures: what does the literature say now?; Infection risk of steroid injections and subsequent reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Surgical versus non-surgical management of humeral shaft fractures; Core outcome set needed for elbow arthroplasty; Minimally invasive approaches to locating radial nerve in the posterior humeral approach; Predictors of bone loss in anterior glenohumeral instability; Does the addition of motor control or strengthening exercises improve rotator cuff-related shoulder pain?; Terminology and diagnostic criteria used in patients with subacromial pain syndrome

Aims. Our primary aim was to establish the proportion of female orthopaedic consultants who perform arthroplasty via cases submitted to the National Joint Registry (NJR), which covers England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man, and Guernsey. Secondary aims included comparing time since specialist registration, private practice participation, and number of hospitals worked in between male and female surgeons. Methods. Publicly available data from the NJR was extracted on the types of arthroplasty performed by each surgeon, and the number of procedures of each type undertaken. Each surgeon was cross-referenced with the General Medical Council (GMC) website, using GMC number to extract surgeon demographic data. These included sex, region of practice, and dates of full and specialist registration. Results. Of 2,895 surgeons contributing to the NJR in 2023, 102 (4%) were female. The highest proportions of female surgeons were among those who performed elbow (n = 25; 5%), shoulder (n = 24; 4%), and ankle (n = 8; 4%) arthroplasty. Hip (n = 66; 3%) and knee arthroplasty (n = 39; 2%) had the lowest female representation. Female surgeons had been practising for a median of 10.4 years since specialist registration compared to 13.7 years for males (p < 0.001). Northern Ireland was the region with the highest proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons (8%). A greater proportion of male surgeons worked in private practice (63% vs 24%; p < 0.001) and in multiple hospitals (74% vs 40%; p < 0.001). Conclusion. Only 4% of surgeons currently contributing cases to the NJR are female, with the highest proportion performing elbow arthroplasty (5%). Female orthopaedic surgeons in the NJR are earlier in their careers than male surgeons, and are less involved in private practice. There is a wide geographical variation in the proportion of female arthroplasty surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(8):637–643

The aim of the New Zealand Elbow Arthroplasty Register is to evaluate the provision of elbow arthroplasty across the entire country by both recording accurate technical information and measuring the clinical outcomes of all elbow replacements performed in New Zealand. An initial form is completed at the time of surgery which includes details of the patient, surgical indications, the surgical procedure, the implant and the operating surgeon. Six months following surgery, all registered patients are asked to complete a questionnaire to measure the pain and function of the replaced elbow and to comment on any post operative complications. Data from 99 consecutive primary and 16 revision elbow arthroplasties was prospectively collected from January 2000 till December 2003. Rheumatoid arthritis was the commonest indication (63 cases) and the outcome was significantly better than for trauma and osteoarthritis. The Coonrad-Morrey was the most commonly used prosthesis (86 cases) followed by the Kudo (eight cases) and the Acclaim (five cases). 21 surgeons performed elbow arthroplasty during the study period but only five performed on average more than one case per year. Their results at six months were statistically superior to those provided by other surgeons. The number of complications reported by patients and the revision rate within the study period was low. An infection was seen in only two patients. The New Zealand Elbow Arthroplasty Register has become a robust method of assessment of the provision of elbow arthroplasty within the country. Our findings support the idea that elbow arthroplasty should not be performed by general orthopaedic surgeons on an occasional basis

We divided 309 patients with an inflammatory arthritis who had undergone primary elbow replacement using the Souter-Strathclyde implant into two groups according to their age. The mean follow-up in the older group (mean age 64 years) was 7.3 years while in the younger patients (mean age 42 years) it was 12 years. Survivorship for three different failure end-points (revision, revision because of aseptic loosening of the humeral component, and gross loosening of the humeral implant), was compared in both groups. Our findings showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of loosening when young rheumatoid patients were compared with an older age group

Introduction: The design of the GSB III elbow arthroplasty has essentially remained unchanged since 1978 until recently. Because of observations of aseptic loosening of the ulnar component, the ulnar stem was changed in an excentric curved shape. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcome after more than 2 years of follow up with the new ulnar stem shape. Patients and methods: Between january 2000 and august 2002, 34 patients had undergone 36 total elbow replacements with the GSB III device with a new curved ulnar shape. Nineteen patients (20 elbows) underwent the operation for the first elbow arthroplasty and 16 patients underwent revision surgery. The mean follow up was 35 months (R: 25–49). The subjective satisfaction and pain intensity were assessed. Clinical exam recorded range of motion and strength. Radiographs were analysed for implant loosening and osteolysis. Results: There was a significant improvement of the average range of motion in flexion-extension from pre-operative 82degree to postoperative 105degree for all 36 elbows (t-test, p< 0,005). The 20 cases with primary elbow arthroplasty showed a significant improvement in the average range of flexion-extension from 76degree to 106degree (t-test, p< 0,001). The subjective assessment for satisfaction averaged 93 per cent at the time of follow up. For the 16 patients with revision elbow arthroplasty, the average range of flexion-extension improved from 90degree to 103degree (p< 0,01). The mean subjective satisfaction rated at 94 per cent. One case showed a radiolucent line at the ulnar component which remained unchanged at follow up. There was no component loosening. Discussion: The new excentric curved ulnar component shows no case of component loosening in our series for primary and revision elbow arthroplasty after 2 years. The range of motion and patient satisfaction are promising

Objective:. Total elbow joint arthroplasty has limited longevity and is therefore not appropriate for younger rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthroplasty using an inter-positional membrane may be another surgical option for this population. However, clinical results for joint arthroplasty using the inter-positional membrane have not traditionally been favorable because rheumatoid activity could not be controlled. Today, rheumatoid activity can be controlled with biologics; therefore, the utility of the inter-positional membrane procedure was re-evaluated. Methods:. An 8×6 cm sheet of fascia was detached from the patient's tensor fascia lata muscle to produce a JK membrane. The fascia was stretched on a frame and kept in a 2% chromic acid potassium solution for 24 hours. Then, the fascia was exposed to direct sunlight in order to reduce the dichromic acid. The fascia was washed out in running water for 24 hours and was then stored in phenol with the addition of 70% alcohol. Elbow arthroplasties were performed on three elbow joints in two young female patients. The first case had a significantly damaged right elbow joint with severe joint dysfunction. A JK membrane arthroplasty was done for the first case in 2003, when this patient was 34 years old. Biologics were administered with methotrexate after the surgery. The second case demonstrated bilateral ankylosed elbows due to idiopathic juvenile arthritis. Bilateral JK membrane arthroplasties were performed in 2010, when this patient was 32 years old. Several operative and manual manipulations were necessary in order to increase the range of motion following surgery. Biologics were administered with cyclosporine. Results:. Joint function was significantly improved in all three joints without pain after the JK membrane elbow arthroplasties. In case one, the JOA (Japan Orthopaedic Association) elbow score improved from 21 points before surgery to 85 points after surgery and active elbow flexion improved to 110 degrees following surgery. In case two, the JOA elbow score was 55 and 82 points in the right elbow and 52 and 83 points in left elbow before and after surgery, respectively. In case two, active flexion improved to 120 degrees for the right elbow and 110 degrees for the left elbow following surgery. RA was well controlled in both patients. Conclusion:. Elbow arthroplasty using an inter-positional membrane appears to be useful in young patients when RA activity is controlled with biologics

We report 5 cases of linked shoulder and elbow replacement (LSER) following failure of single-joint arthroplasty. Whilst total humeral replacement has been reported for treatment following resection for tumour we know of no reports of linked shoulder and elbow prostheses for arthropathy alone. Between May and December 2005, 2 patients with total elbow arthroplasty and 3 patients with total shoulder arthroplasty were revised to LSER for loosening of the long humeral stems or periprosthetic fracture. Custom-made prostheses were produced using computer-aided design and manufacture technology. There were no early complications including infection. All 5 patients reported early improvement of symptoms, with the ability to bear weight axially through the limb, restored. This technique avoids the problem of a stress riser between the stems of separate shoulder and elbow replacements and solves the problem of salvage of long-stemmed implants where no further humeral fixation is possible

Introduction. Cement pressurisation in the distal humerus is technically difficult due to the anatomy of the humeral intramedullary (IM) cavity. Conventional cement restrictors often migrate proximally or leak, reducing the effect of pressurisation during implantation. Theoretically with a better cement bone interdigitation, the longevity of the elbow replacement can be improved. The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel technique for cementation. Method. Eight paired fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were randomly allocated to conventional cementing techniques or cementing using a paediatric foley catheter as a temporary restrictor. The traditional cementing technique consisted of canal preparation using irrigation, brushing and drying prior to cementation, with no use of a cement restrictor. The new technique involved same canal preparation but prior to cementation a size 8 foley catheter was introduced and the balloon inflated to act as a temporary cement restrictor. The humeri were cut into 10mm sections. Each slice was photographed and radiographed. This dual imaging technique was used to establish the best methodology for evaluation of cement penetration. Cement penetration was calculated as a ratio of the area of intra-medullary cavity occupied by the cement. Results. There was no significant difference between the photographic and radiographic method of measuring cement penetration. Cement penetration was significantly better in the foley catheter group (P = 0.002-0.037). The maximum penetration was observed in the most distal 2-5cm. Conclusion. The foley catheter technique consistently and significantly achieved a better cement interdigitation into the cancellous bone, without leaving a void in the cement. This study has demonstrated a new cementing technique for elbow arthroplasty, utilising a paediatric foley catheter as a temporary humeral intra-medullary plug, increasing cement pressurisation and restricting proximal cement migration. Future studies using this methodology will not require supplementation of photographs with radiographic analysis

We present the results of 525 primary Souter elbow arthroplasties undertaken in 406 patients between 1982 and 1997. There were 372 women and 34 men with a mean age of 57 years; 119 patients had a bilateral procedure. The elbows were affected by chronic inflammatory disease, usually rheumatoid arthritis, which had been present for a mean of 24.7 years (2 to 70). In about 30% the joints were grossly destroyed with significant loss of bone. In 179 elbows the ulnar components were metal-backed and retentive; in the remaining 346, with better bone stock, non-retentive, all-polyethylene prostheses were used. Because of complications, 108 further operations were required in 82 patients. During the early years the incidence of complications was higher. Dislocation was the indication for 30 further procedures in 26 patients. Thirty patients underwent 33 revision procedures for aseptic loosening, 12 had 29 operations because of deep infection, two for superficial infection, and 14 further operations were done for other reasons. The cumulative rate of success, without aseptic loosening, five and ten years after surgery, was 96% and 85%, respectively

A systematic review of the English language literature has suggested that the performance of linked and unlinked elbow replacement implants differ in terms of function, survival and mode of failure; however, in this review, only one comparative series using contemporary implants was identified. We have performed a cohort study of Kudo, Souter-Strathclyde and Coonrad-Morrey elbow replacements performed at a single centre by or under the direct supervision of a single Consultant shoulder and elbow surgeon to see if these findings were reflected in clinical practice. The first forty implantations in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis for each device have been reviewed with respect to surgical complications, elbow function and implant survival. The follow-up was shorter for the Coonrad-Morrey cohort. In terms of pain relief and range of motion, the performance of the implants was comparable. The mode of failure was different, with no dislocations/ instability seen with the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants. The loosening rate of the Coonrad-Morrey implants (both clinical and radiographic) was lower, albeit with a shorter follow-up period. The loosening rates seen in this series were higher than those previously reported in the English language literature. We conclude that the functional performance of the implants, at similar stages of the surgical learning curves, are similar in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis, but that use of a linked implant removes the risk of post-operative instability and may reduce the risk of the radiographic and clinical loosening

This study assesses long term performance of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty. From 1984 to 1999, 68 Souter-Strathclyde prostheses were inserted in 53 patients; nine patients died, one was lost and 38 (88%) had full clinical examination. Mean survival was 72 months (range 8 to 187), 25 elbows survived to 5-year follow up, with improvement in pain, motion, stability and function. Mayo score was satisfactory in 92% of all 68 elbows. Complications occurred in 13 elbows (19%) and 14 elbows were revised for instability (six), fracture (three), loosening (three) and intraoperative problems (two). Survivorship at 10 years was 74% (95% Confidence Interval ± 7. 7)

Introduction: Distal humeral fractures represent a constant challenge to the most experienced surgeon. This is the first report of the use of an unlinked prosthesis for the treatment of distal humeral fractures in elderly persons. Materials and Methods: From July 2000 to June 2001, 9 iBP elbow arthroplasties were performed in patients with acute fractures of the distal humerus. The average age of the group was 71 years. The mean interval between injury and TER was 11 days. The follow-up period averaged 12 months (range 5 to 16). Results: Functional outcome was evaluated with patient-completed questionnaires. All patients had a flexion contracture of the elbow ranging from 15 to 30 degrees. All patients were able to perform daily activities, pain relief was satisfactory and patient satisfaction was high. All elbows met the criteria for functional motion and were stable at the latest follow-up examination. There were no major complications such as dislocation, ulnar nerve dysfunction or deep infection. Conclusion: Unlinked non-congruous elbow arthroplasty when combined with a surgical exposure that allows proper soft tissue balance and instrumentation that enables correct positioning of the components can be a successful alternative in the management of acute distal humeral fractures in selected patients when conventional fixation is not a viable option

This paper describes the development, operative technique and results of an unconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. Forty-seven elbow replacements were carried out in 44 patients between 1974 and 1982. There was a high rate of loosening in the early condylar replacements. The results in patients with post-traumatic arthritis were poor. The later design employs an ulnar stem, with a humeral stem if the distal humeral bone stock is poor. When used in carefully selected patients with rheumatoid arthritis, pain is reduced significantly, stability and movement are preserved and function is improved

Introduction: In the evaluation of the major joints, self assessment tools have become wide spread aiming at a more precise quantification of joint function. Different tools have been developed for the elbow joint. However, there are only few data on the relationship between subjective self-assessment of joint function and objective measures. We developed a comprehensive assessment set for the evaluation of subjective elbow function and objective clinical findings and investigate long-term results after implantation of GSB III Elbow arthroplasties in a first study. The PREE-G was cross-culturally adapted, following the recommendations of the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. Material and Methods: 79 patients (56 female, 23 male, mean age 64 years) after elbow arthroplasty between 1984 and 1996 due to rheumatoid (59) or posttraumatic (20) arthritis underwent an assessment of the joint function using the PREE, the Short Form 36 (SF-36), the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH)) and the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (mASES) for a clinical evaluation. In 62 patients implantation was performed unilaterally and in 17 patients bilaterally, resulting in 96 elbow joints altogether. The mean follow up time was 11,2 years. Results: In the SF-36 score, the mean physical component scale (PCS) was worse (37,2 vs 41,7, p=0,004), the mean mental component scale (MCS) better (52,3 vs 50,3, p=0,092) than normative values of a German population. Subjective assessment by the PREE revealed a mean of 66,8, by the mASES of 63,1 and by the DASH of 56,5 points. Clinical examination resulted in a mean mASES score of 71,6 points. Comparison between the patients self assessment and the objective score revealed a significant correlation between the DASH (r=0,46, p< 0,001), PREE (p=0,54, p< 0,001) and mASES (r=0,60, p< 0,001) with the clinical mASES. In contrast, no significant correlation was found between the physical component scale (PCS) and mental component scale (MCS) of SF-36 and the clinical mASES. Also the patients assessment scores DASH, PREE and mASES showed a strong significant correlation among one another (r=0,74–0,92, p< 0,001) and (PCS) (r=0,58–0,75, p< 0,001) but not with the (MCS) of SF-36. Conclusion: Assessment of long term results after elbow arthroplasty yielded favourable clinical and subjective results. The clinical outcome tended to be higher than results of the patient self-rated scores. Hereby, the newly developed assessment set proved to be a feasible tool for a comprehensive assessment of elbow function. In addition to clinical outcome assessment, with this set it is possible to gain important and new insights on the relationship between objective measures and subjective patients-assessment of elbow disorders and postoperative conditions

This study assesses the clinical performance of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty with a standardised index and long term survivorship analysis. We undertook assessment of 68 primary Souter-Strathclyde total elbow replacements. Of 53 patients assessed with pre-operative Souter-Strathclyde charts, nine died and one was lost to follow-up, 43 had radiographic and telephone review, and 38 (88%) had clinical examination according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. Survival of the 43 elbows was to a mean of 72 months (range: eight to 187 months) with improvement in pain, motion, stability and function. Eight of 10 elbows in deceased patients had satisfactory scores at the last assessment. Ulnar neuropraxia occurred in eight elbows (12%), persistent sensory deficit in two (3%) and motor deficit in one. Two triceps abscesses required local skin flap cover. Revision was undertaken in 14 elbows (20%) for instability (six) bony injury (three), loosening (three) and intraoperative problems (two). The survivorship at 13 years was 74% with 62 (91%) of all elbows achieving a satisfactory Mayo score

This study assesses the clinical performance of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow arthroplasty with a standardised index and long-term survivorship analysis. We undertook assessment of 68 primary Souter-Strathclyde total elbow replacements. Of 53 patients assessed with pre-operative Souter-Strathclyde charts, nine died and one was lost to follow-up, 43 had radiographic and telephone review, and 38 (88%) had clinical examination according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. Survival of the 43 elbows was to a mean of 72 months (range 8 to 187). A cohort of 25 elbows available for review with > 5-year follow up had improvement in pain, motion, stability and function. Eight of ten elbows in deceased patients had satisfactory scores at the last assessment. Ulnar neuropraxia occurred in eight elbows (12%), persistent sensory deficit in two (3%) and motor deficit in one. Two triceps abscesses required local skin flap cover. Revision was undertaken in 14 elbows (20%) for instability (6) bony injury (3), loosening (3) and intraoperative problems (2). The survivorship at 13 years was 74% with 62 (91%) of all elbows achieving a satisfactory Mayo score

We have reviewed 36 of 39 consecutive patients with an average age of 68 years who had semiconstrained elbow replacement for distal humeral nonunion at an average follow-up of 50.4 months (24 to 127). Of these, 31 (86%) had satisfactory results, three (8%) had fair, and two (6%) had poor results; 32 patients (88%) had moderate or severe pain before and 91% had no or only mild discomfort after the procedure. Motion had improved from a mean arc of 29 degrees to 103 degrees before operation to 16 degrees to 127 degrees after surgery. All five flail extremities were stable at last assessment. There were seven complications (18%): two patients had deep infection, two had particulate synovitis, two had ulnar neuropathy and one had worn polyethylene bushes. Five of these seven, excluding the two with transient nueropathy, required reoperation (13%). Joint replacement arthroplasty can be a safe and reliable treatment for this difficult clinical condition, seen most commonly in elderly patients. This is a significant advance, since repeated osteosynthesis has been shown to be ineffective in most patients

Aims: To evaluate the short to medium term outcome of the Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis when used as a primary elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Introduction: The Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis has been evaluated in several studies. In our hospital the operation is carried out using the same strict precautions as for lower limb arthroplasty. At the onset of surgery the ulnar nerve is handled minimally. This study looked at infection and complication rates, and also at outcome. Methods: The operations were carried out in laminar flow theatres and scrubbed staff wore exhaust suits. At the start of the procedure the ulnar nerve was decompressed, but not mobilised from its bed, and held loosely with tape while being kept moist. Cases were identified from theatre and implant records. 61 implants in 53 patients were identified. Complication and revision rates were established from case sheets. Of this group 19 patients had died, leaving 40 implants in 34 patients suitable for review. Case notes were analysed. Patients were contacted by post and were requested to fill out a DASH form. 30 patients (34 implants) responded; 2 declined to be involved leaving 31 implants in 28 patients to analyse, 78% of those available. Results: From the 61 implants there were 4 complications within the first year; one ulnar nerve palsy – transient, one dislocated prosthesis – open reduction, two wound infections. The infection rate is thus 3.3%. Overall to date 4 implants from 61 required revision, a rate of 6.6% (range 13–92 months, mean 37 months). Reasons – one loose, two periprosthetic fractures and one infection. Mean follow up at clinic was 74 months (range 36–120). Mean DASH score at follow up was 48.7 (range 4.5–81.8). Conclusion: The lower incidence of ulnar nerve palsy, compared to published studies, may be attributable to the surgical technique. The use of laminar flow theatres and exhaust suits may account for the lower infection rates. The complication rate and revision rate is favourable compared to previous studies

Aim: To evaluate the short to medium term outcome of the Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis when used as a primary elbow arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Introduction: The Souter-Strathclyde prosthesis has been evaluated in several studies. In our hospital the operation is carried out using the same strict precautions as for lower limb arthroplasty. At the onset of surgery the ulnar nerve is handled minimally. This study looked at infection and complication rates, and also at outcome. Methods: The operations were carried out in laminar flow theatres with exhaust suits. At the start of the procedure the ulnar nerve was decompressed, but not mobilised from its bed, and held loosely with tape while being kept moist. Cases were identified from theatre and implant records. 61 implants in 53 patients were identified. Complication and revision rates were established from case sheets. Of this group 19 patients had died leaving 40 implants in 34 patients suitable for review. Case notes were analysed. Patients were contacted by post and were asked to fill out a DASH form. 30 patients (34 implants) responded. 26 patients (30 implants) attended a review clinic. Results: From the 61 implants there were 4 complications (one ulnar nerve dysthesia – transient, one dislocated prosthesis – open reduction, two wound infections) within the first year. Overall, 4 implants from 62 required revision, a rate of 6.5% (range 11–92 months, mean 37 months). Reasons – One loose, two periprosthetic fractures and one infection. Mean follow up was 74 months (range 36–120). Mean DASH score at follow up was 48.7 (range 4.5–81.8). Conclusion: The low incidence of ulnar nerve palsy, compared to published studies, may be attributable to the surgical technique. The use of laminar flow theatres and exhaust suits may account for the low infection rate. The complication rate and revision rate is comparable to previous published studies

Purpose: The long-term experience of linked semicon-strained total elbow arthroplasty was investigated as a salvage procedure for patients with distal humerus non-union not amenable to internal fixation. Method: Ninety-two consecutive total elbow arthroplasties performed for the treatment of a distal humeral nonunion were reviewed at an average follow-up of 6.5 years (range, 0.5 to 20.3 years). There were twenty-two men and sixty-nine women with an average age of sixtyfive years (range, twenty-two to eighty-four years) at the time of elbow replacement. Seventy-six elbows (83 per cent) had undergone prior surgery, with an average of two previous operations (range, one to ten). Five elbows had had at least one prior operation due to infection. Results: Seventy-nine per cent of the patients had no pain or mild pain at latest follow-up compared with moderate or severe pain in 86 percent prior to surgery. Mean extension was improved from thirty-seven to twenty-two degrees and mean flexion from 106 to 135 degrees. Joint stability was restored in all patients, including nine with a grossly flail elbow. Complications included aseptic loosening in sixteen (four with periprosthetic fractures), component fracture in five, deep infection in five (three with previous infection), and bushing wear in one patient. At most recent follow-up, 85 per cent of the patients were satisfied with their outcome. Survivorship for not requiring removal or revision for any cause was 95.7 per cent at two years, 82.1 per cent at five years, 65.3 per cent at ten and fifteen years. Factors that increased the risk of implant failure were patient age less than sixty-five, two or more prior surgeries, and history of previous infection. Conclusion: Linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty provides a reliable salvage procedure to provide pain relief and restoration of motion and function in patients with distal humerus nonunion not amenable to internal fixation. Risk factors for failure include younger patients, multiple previous surgeries, and history of infection

We reviewed 50 capitellocondylar elbow replacements performed by the lateral approach in 42 rheumatoid patients, at a median follow-up of three years. There were two major and 17 minor complications; 18 were early and one was late. Eight elbows required reoperation: soft-tissue surgery was performed in seven and prosthesis removal in one because of a deep infection. There were few problems of instability, but one patient sustained a traumatic dislocation which was stabilised after ligament reconstruction. Wound healing was delayed in two of five elbows which had been immobilised postoperatively for only five days, but healing was rapid in 45 elbows immobilised for 12 days. There was transient ulnar-nerve palsy postoperatively in 11 patients, with permanent palsy in three. All elbows were painfree or only slightly painful at follow-up; 49 were stable and 43 had a range of motion sufficient for activities of daily living. Radiological loosening of the humeral component was suspected in one asymptomatic elbow. The lateral approach is recommended for use with the capitellocondylar type of prosthesis in rheumatoid elbows with reasonably well-preserved bone stock

Cement pressurisation in the distal humerus is technically difficult due to the anatomy of the humeral intramedullary (IM) cavity. Conventional cement restrictors often migrate proximally, reducing the effect of pressurisation during arthroplasty. Theoretically with a better cement bone interdigitation, the longevity of the elbow replacement can be improved. The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the usefulness of a novel technique for cementation. Eight paired cadaveric elbows were used. The sides were randomly allocated to the conventional cementation group and pressurisation using a foley cathetre used as a cement restrictor. The cathetre was inserted into the IM canal after thorough washout and drying the cavity. The balloon inflated to act as a cement restrictor. Cementation was then performed and the cathetre removed just prior to cement setting. Radiographs of each pair was taken. Each distal humerus sample was cut in 1 cm increments starting from proximal part of the coronoid fossa. The slices were also radiographed to assess cement-bone interdigitation. The area of IM canal and the cement were calculated. The paired samples were compared. The new technique consistently and significantly achieved a better cement interdigitation into the cancellous bone. The maximum penetration was observed in the proximal 1–3 cms from the coronoid fossa. According to previous studies, this area is the most common part involved in cement failure and loosening. This study confirms the effectiveness of a foley cathetre as a cement restrictor. The ease of the technique and excellent pressurisation achived support its use

The Acclaim total elbow replacement is a modular system which allows implantation in both unlinked and linked modes. The results of the use of this implant in primary total elbow replacement in 36 patients, operated on between July 2000 and August 2002, are presented at a mean follow-up of 36 months (24 to 49). Only one patient did not have good relief of pain, but all had improved movement and function.

No implant showed clinical or radiological loosening, although one had a lucent area in three of seven humeral zones. The short-term results of the Acclaim total elbow replacement are encouraging. However, 11 patients (30.5%) suffered an intra-operative fracture of the humeral condyle. This did not affect the outcome, or the requirement for further surgery, except in one case where the fracture failed to unite. This problem has hopefully been addressed by redesigning the humeral resection guide. Other complications included three cases of ulnar neuropathy (8.3%) and one of deep infection (2.8%).

Medium-term results of the Discovery elbow replacement are presented. We reviewed 51 consecutive primary Discovery total elbow replacements (TERs) implanted in 48 patients. The mean age of the patients was 69.2 years (49 to 92), there were 19 males and 32 females (37%:63%) The mean follow-up was 40.6 months (24 to 69). A total of six patients were lost to follow-up. Statistically significant improvements in range movement and Oxford Elbow Score were found (p < 0.001). Radiolucent lines were much more common in, and aseptic loosening was exclusive to, the humeral component. Kaplan–Meier survivorship at five years was 92.2% (95% CI 74.5% to 96.4%) for aseptic loosening. In four TERs, periprosthetic infection occurred resulting in failure. A statistically significant association between infection and increased BMI was found (p = 0.0268). Triceps failure was more frequent after the Mayo surgical approach and TER performed after previous trauma surgery. No failures of the implant were noted.

Our comparison shows that the Discovery has early clinical results that are similar to other semi-constrained TERs. We found continued radiological surveillance with particular focus on humeral lucency is warranted and has not previously been reported. Despite advances in the design of total elbow replacement prostheses, rates of complication remain high.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1359–65

We studied, ten patients (11 elbows) who had undergone 14 allograft-prosthesis composite reconstructions following failure of a previous total elbow replacement with massive structural bone loss. There were nine women and one man with a mean age of 64 years (40 to 84), who were reviewed at a mean of 75 months (24 to 213). One patient developed a deep infection after 26 months and had the allograft-prosthesis composite removed, and two patients had mild pain. The median flexion-extension arc was 100° (95% confidence interval (CI) 76° to 124°). With the exception of the patient who had the infected failure, all the patients could use their elbows comfortably without splints or braces for activities of daily living. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index improved from 9.5 (95% CI 4.4 to 14.7) pre-operatively to 74 (95% CI 62.4 to 84.9) at final review.

Radiologically, the rate of partial resorption was similar in the humeral and ulnar allografts (three of six and four of eight, respectively; p > 0.999). The patterns of resorption, however, were different. Union at the host-bone-allograft junction was also different between the humeral and ulnar allografts (one of six and seven of eight showing union, respectively; p = 0.03).

At medium-term follow-up, allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction appears to be a useful salvage technique for failed elbow replacements with massive bone loss. The effects of allograft resorption and host-bone-allograft junctional union on the longevity of allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction, however, remain unknown, and it is our view that these patients should remain under long-term regular review.

The Norway elbow prosthesis is a non-constrained cemented total replacement. It depends on intact collateral ligaments for stability, and allows a full range of movement. The system includes several sizes of components, all freely interchangeable, and semi-constraint can be provided by a locking ring if damaged collateral ligaments make dislocation possible.

The prosthesis has been used in more than 350 elbows in Norway and the detailed results for 118 elbows studied prospectively since 1987 are reported. It is inserted through a posterolateral triceps-splitting incision with minimal muscle disruption and bone resection, preserving the collateral ligaments. The results as regards pain relief and range of movement were comparable with those of other elbow prostheses, but there were fewer serious complications. At a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, the failure rate was 3.4%.

Unlinked, linked and convertible total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) are currently available. This study is the first to report the clinical results of the convertible Latitude TEA. This was a retrospective study of a consecutive cohort of 63 patients (69 primary TEAs) with a mean age of 60 years (23 to 87). Between 2006 and 2008 a total of 19 men and 50 women underwent surgery. The mean follow-up was 43 months (8 to 84). The range of movement, function and pain all improved six months post-operatively and either continued to improve slightly or reached a plateau thereafter. The complication rate is similar to that reported for other TEA systems. No loosening was seen. Remarkable is the disengagement of the radial head component in 13 TEAs (31%) with a radial head component implanted.

Implantation of both the linked and the unlinked versions of the Latitude TEA results in improvement of function and decreased pain, and shows high patient satisfaction at mid-term follow-up.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B:681–8.

Determining and accurately restoring the flexion-extension axis of the elbow is essential for functional recovery after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). We evaluated the effect of morphological features of the elbow on variations of alignment of the components at TEA. Morphological and positioning variables were compared by systematic CT scans of 22 elbows in 21 patients after TEA.

There were five men and 16 women, and the mean age was 63 years (38 to 80). The mean follow-up was 22 months (11 to 44).

The anterior offset and version of the humeral components were significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the humerus (p = 0.052 and p = 0.004, respectively). The anterior offset and version of the ulnar components were strongly significantly affected by the anterior angulation of the ulna (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001).

The closer the anterior angulation of the ulna was to the joint, the lower the ulnar anterior offset (p = 0.030) and version of the ulnar component (p = 0.010). The distance from the joint to the varus angulation also affected the lateral offset of the ulnar component (p = 0.046).

Anatomical variations at the distal humerus and proximal ulna affect the alignment of the components at TEA. This is explained by abutment of the stems of the components and is particularly severe when there are substantial deformities or the deformities are close to the joint.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1539–45.

Between 1978 and 1986, 59 patients received a GSB III elbow prosthesis, six of them in both elbows. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the underlying cause in 51 of the patients and post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) in eight. Of these, 24 patients (28 prostheses) have since died; two, both operated on bilaterally, had had their implants for more than ten years and had already been assessed for inclusion in the long-term follow-up. Two patients, each with one elbow prosthesis, have been lost to follow-up and three males who are still living (two with PTOA, one with juvenile RA) had their prosthesis removed before ten years had elapsed.

The remaining 32 patients (28 RA, 4 PTOA) with 36 GSB III elbows were examined clinically and radiologically after a mean period of 13.5 years. Pain was considerably reduced in 91.6%. Mobility was increased by 37° in those with RA and by 67° in those with PTOA.

There were three cases of aseptic loosening and three of deep infection. The main complication was disassembly of the prosthetic component in nine elbows (13.8%). This last group included two patients with postoperative fractures unrelated to the operative technique and one with neuropathic arthritis. Ulnar neuritis occurred in two patients.

Since 87.7% of all the GSB III prostheses implanted in this period remained in situ, our results are comparable with those for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Six highly unstable elbows with severe bone loss due to rheumatoid arthritis were replaced by a non-constrained, unlinked prosthesis. Bone defects were filled with autogenous bone grafts. The mean follow-up was 4.5 years (2 to 8).

The clinical results were excellent in four elbows and good in two, with good varus-valgus stability in all. Radiological follow-up showed no appreciable signs of loosening, and the bone grafts had retained most of their original size, with minimal resorption. There were no major complications such as dislocation, skin necrosis, infection or ulnar neuropathy.

The study has shown that the so-called mutilans elbow can be successfully replaced using a properly selected type of non-constrained, unlinked prosthesis with bone grafting of the major defects.

Purpose: We conducted a retrospective study of 20 total elbow prostheses GUEPAR humerocubital and humeroradial (G3) implanted in 19 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. This anatomic metal-polyethylene prosthesis is available in a left and right model and in two sizes, large and small. A radial head prosthesis is now available in addition to the humerocubital prosthesis. The radial head prosthesis has an intramedullary metallic stem and a mobile polyethylene cup which comes in several sizes.

Material and methods: Among 20 prostheses implanted between 1997 and 2001, four were first-generation prostheses which did not have a radial head. At three to four years, these four prostheses developed valgus instability with deterioration of the polyethylene of the cubital piece requiring revision with a new generation GUEPAR associated with a radial head. This gave two good results and two failures revised with a semi-constrained prosthesis. For the 16 other cases of rheumatoid disease, the G3 humerocubital prosthesis associated with a radial head was inserted. These 16 prostheses were followed two years and were retained for this analysis. The posterior approach was used with inverted-V section of the triceps using the surgical technique recommended by the promoters. Patients had permanent severe to moderate pain. The Mayo Clinic score (1992 including daily life activities) was 33/100. Radiographically, seven elbows were Larsen grade III, nine grade IV, seven grade IIA and nine grade IIIb (Larsen classification modified by the Mayo Clinic).

Results: All patients were reviewed with mean follow-up of two years (1–5). The Mayo Clinic score improved from 33/100 to33/90 with outcome considered excellent in 15 elbows and fair in one.

Discussion: We recommend total elbow prostheses for rheumatoid arthritis patients. Semi-constrained prostheses have indications in certain cases of massive destruction, but the minimally or non-constrained gliding prostheses, such as the GUEPAR prosthesis, are part of the evolution of these prostheses, just as was the case for knee prostheses. These good results can be expected to persist over time.

We studied 12 patients (13 elbows) who underwent total elbow replacement (TER) using the Kudo Mk IV or V prosthesis between 1989 and 1997. There were eight females and four males (mean age: 61 years, range: 38–74 years). The diagnosis was Rheumatoid arthritis in 10 patients and osteoarthritis in two patients. In each patient the initial result was classified as either excellent or good. All these patients then reported the recurrence of severe pain at a mean of four years from the time of the primary operation. Radiographic examination demonstrated fracture of the humeral stem in 10 elbows and subluxation of the joint in three elbows. The fractured humeral components were exchanged for long stem components. The three subluxated elbows were found to have undergone delamination and loosening of the ulnar components which were revised. One of these required revision to a linked prosthesis due to bone loss.

In each case metallosis was found involving principally the synovial tissues which were as far as possible excised. Each patient regained a similar range of movement to that following the primary arthroplasty but continues to experience episodes of pain requiring anti-inflammatory medication. This is in contrast to our patients requiring revision procedures for implant loosening or instability who have become pain free.

We conclude that the development of metallosis complicating mechanical implant failure predisposes to persisting symptoms following revision arthroplasty and recommend that this should be undertaken sooner rather than later when mechanical failure is detected.

From 1984 to 1995, 68 ankylosed elbows and 11 which were unstable after trauma were replaced in India by Baksi sloppy hinge prostheses. The mean age of the patients was 28.6 years (17 to 70) and the mean follow-up 9.6 years (2 to 13.5).

Of the 68 ankylosed elbows, 59 (87%) regained a mean arc of painless movement of 88.5° (27 to 115). The mean improvement of supination was 24° and of pronation 16.5°. There were 54 good results (80%), eight fair and three poor. There were two complete failures due to infection, and one due to a broken humeral stem.

Of the 11 unstable elbows, the nine with good results had a mean arc of 125° (15 to 140) of painless stable movement, with a mean improvement in supination of 26° and of pronation of 19.5°. There was one fair result and one failure due to loosening with subsequent late infection.

There were significant complications in 14 cases with infection in seven and aseptic loosening in four. Patients with loosening or late removal of the prosthesis often retained reasonably stable elbow movement because periprosthetic fibrosis had connected the approximated bone ends, and muscle balance had been restored.

To measure any observed migration and rotation of humeral and ulnar components using radiostereometric analysis. From 2002–2004 in a prospective ongoing study, twelve elbows in patients treated with either a linked or unlinked Acclaim total elbow prosthesis were included in a radiostereometry study. Six tantalum markers were introduced into the humerus another three markers were located on a humeral component. Four markers were placed in to ulna and three markers located on the ulnar component. RSA radiographs were taken postoperatively, six, twelve and twenty-four months. The radiographs were digitised and analysed using UmRSA software. The relative movement of the humeral and ulnar implants with respect to the bone was measured. At twelve months, the largest segment translation of the humeral component was in the anterior/posterior direction with a mean of 0.44mm followed by medial/lateral translation of 0.39 mm; there was minimal proximal/ distal translation or with a mean of 0.16mm. Paired t-tests between twelve and 24 months segment translation data showed the mean differences to be no more than 0.056mm. The largest rotation at twelve months was anteversion/retroversion with a mean of 2.40deg, anterior tilt had a mean of 1.20deg and varus/valgus tilt was minimal mean 0.60deg. Mean difference between twelve and 24 months segment rotation was no more than 0.30deg. In contrast, humeral tip motion produced a mean of 1.1mm at 12 months dominated by movement in the plane horizontal plane with a mean difference at 24 months of 0.06mm. No patients could be measured for segment micromotion of the ulnar component due to technical difficulty in visualising tantalum markers in the ulna. Early micromotion of the Acclaim humeral implant occurs mostly by rotation about the vertical axis accompanied by anterior tilt. This motion reaches a plateau at 12 months after operation.

Purpose: Anterior flanges have been added to the humeral components of some total elbow arthroplasty systems. Surgeons have the option of placing a wedge of bone or bone cement between the anterior surface of the humerus and the flange in an effort to improve implant stability and load transfer. The purpose of this study was to quantify the cortical strains in the humerus after arthroplasty for different materials placed behind the flange.

Methods: Five fresh-frozen cadaveric distal humeri were thawed and cleaned of all soft tissues. Strain gauges were applied to the anterior and posterior surfaces to record bending and axial strains. The bending gauges were positioned just proximal to the location of the flange tip. Cantilever bending and axial compression were applied using a materials testing machine. Following intact testing, the humeral component of a total elbow was implanted by an experienced surgeon and fixed using bone cement. Testing was repeated three times, each with a different material behind the flange: no graft (simulating a humeral component without an anterior flange), cancellous bone graft, and cement graft. Strains were normalized to the intact state and for the applied moments. Data were analyzed using repeated-measure ANOVAs (p< 0.05).

Results: For bending, the strain values were approximately 80% of the intact values with no graft material, 80% with the bone graft, and 87% with the cement graft. These differences among the graft materials were not significant (p=0.5). Similar results were found for the axial strains (p=0.3).

Conclusions: The intention of the anterior flange is to transfer a portion of the load carried by the implant stem to the distal humerus, thereby reducing stress-shielding and improving strength of the construct. In this investigation that employed bending and axial loads, the presence of an anterior flange had no significant effect on load transfer through the distal humerus regardless of graft material used. This would suggest that for the humeral component employed in this study, the flange might not be fulfilling its intended purpose.

Aims. The follow-up interval of a study represents an important aspect that is frequently mentioned in the title of the manuscript. Authors arbitrarily define whether the follow-up of their study is short-, mid-, or long-term. There is no clear consensus in that regard and definitions show a large range of variation. It was therefore the aim of this study to systematically identify clinical research published in high-impact orthopaedic journals in the last five years and extract follow-up information to deduce corresponding evidence-based definitions of short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed to identify papers published in the six highest ranked orthopaedic journals during the years 2015 to 2019. Follow-up intervals were analyzed. Each article was assigned to a corresponding subspecialty field: sports traumatology, knee arthroplasty and reconstruction, hip-preserving surgery, hip arthroplasty, shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, hand and wrist, foot and ankle, paediatric orthopaedics, orthopaedic trauma, spine, and tumour. Mean follow-up data were tabulated for the corresponding subspecialty fields. Comparison between means was conducted using analysis of variance. Results. Of 16,161 published articles, 590 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 321 were of level IV evidence, 176 level III, 53 level II, and 40 level I. Considering all included articles, a long-term study published in the included high impact journals had a mean follow-up of 151.6 months, a mid-term study of 63.5 months, and a short-term study of 30.0 months. Conclusion. The results of this study provide evidence-based definitions for orthopaedic follow-up intervals that should provide a citable standard for the planning of clinical studies. A minimum mean follow-up of a short-term study should be 30 months (2.5 years), while a mid-term study should aim for a mean follow-up of 60 months (five years), and a long-term study should aim for a mean of 150 months (12.5 years). Level of Evidence: Level I. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(5):344–350

Abstract. Introduction. Intra-articular distal humerus OTA type C fractures are challenging to treat. When osteosynthesis is not feasible one can choose to do a primary arthroplasty of elbow or manage non-operatively. The indications for treatment of this fracture pattern are evolving. Objectives. We present our outcomes and complications when this cohort of patients was managed with either open reduction internal fixator (ORIF), elbow arthroplasty or non-operatively. Methods. Retrospective study to include OTA type C2 and C3 fracture distal humerus of 36 patients over the age of 50 years managed with all the three modalities. Patient's clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed. Results. Between 2016 and 2022, 21 patients underwent ORIF – group 1, 10 patients were treated with arthroplasty – group 2 and 5 were managed conservatively- group 3. The mean age of patients was 62 years in group 1, 70 years in group 2 and 76 years in group 3. The mean range of movement (ROM) arc achieved in the group 1 & 2 was 103 while group 3 was 68. At least follow up was 6 months. 5 patients in group 1 underwent metalwork removal and 2 patients in group 3 under arthroplasty. Conclusion. The outcomes of arthroplasty and ORIF are comparable, but reoperation rates and stiffness were higher in ORIF and conservative group. Surgeon choice and patient factors play important role in decision towards choosing treatment modality. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

The June 2013 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: whether suture anchors are still the gold standard; infection and revision elbow arthroplasty; the variable success of elbow replacements; sliding knots; neurologic cuff pain and the suprascapular nerve; lies, damn lies and statistics; osteoarthritis; and one- or two-stage treatment for the infected shoulder revision

Introduction. The epicondylar axis of the elbow is a surface anatomical approximation of the true flexion-extension (F-E) axis used in the application of an external fixator/elbow arthroplasty. We hypothesise that the epicondylar axis coincides with the true F-E axis in terms of both angular displacement and position (ie. offset). This suggests that it can serve as a good landmark in total dynamic external fixator application and elbow arthroplasty. Methods. Three-dimensional elbow models were obtained through manual segmentation and reconstruction from 142±40 slices of CT scans per elbow in 15 cadeveric specimens. Epicondylar axis was defined to be the axis through the 2 epicondyles manually identified on the elbow models. F-E axis was defined to be the normal of a circle fitted on 20 points identified on the trochlear groove. The long axis of the elbow was identified through a line fit through the center of the distal humerus on several slices along the elbow CT. Angle between the long axis and epicondylar axis was measured. Angular deviation of the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis was calculated in reference to the long axis. All axes were projected onto the orthogonal planes on the elbow CTs and all measurements were repeated. Angular differences in the axial, saggital and coronal planes are described in internal/external rotation, flexion/extension and valgus/varus respectively. Offset in the axial and coronal planes are described in the following directions respectively: proximal/distal and anterior/posterior respectively. Comparisons between angles were performed using student's t-test. Results. Angle between the long axis and the epicondylar axis in our study (85.9±5.30) was not significantly different when compared to an existing study (87.3±2.80) (p=0.327). The epicondylar axis deviates from the true F-E axis by 1.9±4.50 (p=0.523) in flexion, 2.1±3.40 (p=0.442) varus, and 0.5±2.70 (p=0.851) in external rotation with an overall angular deviation of 2.2±4.80 (p=0.204). There was no statistical significance difference in the angle deviations mentioned. The offset between the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis was 15.6±3.4 mm anterior and 9.4±2.9 mm distal with an overall offset of 17.6±2.5 mm. Discussion. Our study demonstrated small and statistically insignificant angular difference between the epicondylar axis and the F-E axis. However, offset between the axes exists and may be clinically significant. When the epicondylar axis is used as an approximation to the natural F-E axis, this offset may introduce a moment on elbow flexion resulting in additional strain on the elbow collateral ligaments and dynamic external fixators. Implications of this as well as ligament balancing and implant stress-strain patterns in elbow arthroplasty merit further research with potential modification of technique and jigs. Significance. Although the angular difference between between the epicondylar and F-E axes was not statistically significant, an offset between the axes exist. Further research is required to elucidate its impact and the need for modification on elbow implants and external fixators

The August 2014 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: Myofibroblasts perhaps not implicated in post-traumatic elbow stiffness; olecranon tip biomechanically sound for coranoid reconstruction; obesity and elbow replacement don’t mix; single column plating successful for extra-articular distal humeral fractures; satisfaction not predictable in frozen shoulder; tenodesis and repair both acceptable in Grade II SLAP tears; glenoid bone grafting is effective and glenohumeral articular lesions best seen with an arthroscope

The December 2014 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: cuff tears and plexus injury; . corticosteroids and physiotherapy in SAI; diabetes and elbow arthroplasty; distal biceps tendon repairs; shockwave therapy in frozen shoulder; hydrodilation and steroids for adhesive capsulitis; just what do our patients read?; and what happens to that stable radial head fracture?

To date there has been only one published series of elbow arthroplasty in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic arthritis. These patients pose particular problems because of the size and variable shape of the humerus and ulna together with the soft tissue contractures and bony erosion which can sometimes be severe. We have reviewed the results of elbow arthroplasty using the unlinked Kudo 5 and the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants which in our practice have different indications dependent upon bone stock and stability. Methods 19 total elbow replacements in 13 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were performed by 1 specialist elbow surgeon, the senior author. 13 of these are Kudo 5 and 6 are Coonrad-Morrey implants. The mean age at operation was 39 years. 6 of the elbow replacements had undergone previous surgery, 4 had an interposition arthroplasty and 2 a synovectomy and radial head excision. No patients were lost to follow up. All were evaluated at a mean follow up of 49 months [6–84 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films. Results Preoperatively 7 had moderate pain and 12 had severe pain. Postoperatively the pain was rated as none by 13 and mild by 6. The average Mayo Elbow Score improved from 26 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively. The mean arc of flexion/extension improved from 85 to 108 degrees.12 elbow replacements had intra and post-operative complications and 2 elbows have been revised. Conclusions The medium-term results of Total Elbow Replacements in patients with Juvenile Chronic Arthritis are acceptable and comparable to the only other published series which also records a high complication rate

The October 2013 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: Deltoid impairment not necessarily a contra-indication for shoulder arthroplasty; The tricky radiograph; Not so asymptomatic cuff tears; Total shoulder arthroplasty: kinder on the glenoid; Barbotage for calcific tendonitis; What happens to the arthritic glenoid?; Two screws a screw too few?; Sloppy hinge best for elbow arthroplasty

Background: To date there has been only one published series of elbow arthroplasty in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic arthritis. These patients pose particular problems because of the size and variable shape of the humerus and ulna together with the soft tissue contractures and bony erosion which can sometimes be severe. We have reviewed the results of elbow arthroplasty using the unlinked Kudo 5 and the linked Coonrad-Morrey implants which in our practice have different indications dependent upon bone stock and stability. Methods: 19 total elbow replacements in 13 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were performed by 1 specialist elbow surgeon, the senior author. 13 of these are Kudo 5 and 6 are Coonrad-Morrey implants. The mean age at operation was 39 years. 6 of the elbow replacements had undergone previous surgery, 4 had an interposition arthroplasty and 2 a synovectomy and radial head excision. No patients were lost to follow up. All were evaluated at a mean follow up of 49 months [6–84 months] using the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Postoperative radiographs were also reviewed for loosening using standard anteroposterior and lateral films. Results: Preoperatively 7 had moderate pain and 12 had severe pain. Postoperatively the pain was rated as none by 13 and mild by 6. The average Mayo Elbow Score improved from 26 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively. The mean arc of flexion/extension improved from 85 to 108 degrees.12 elbow replacements had intra and postoperative complications. 2 elbows have been revised, 1 for malalignment resulting in instability and 1 for aseptic loosening of the ulna component. 1 customised extra small implant has radiographic loosening of both components with minimal pain and a further aseptic loose implant awaits revision at 7 years. Conclusions: The medium-term results of Total Elbow Replacements in patients with Juvenile Chronic Arthritis are acceptable and comparable to the only other published series which also records a high complication rate similar to that reported by ourselves

Aim: Patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis who were managed with ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties were reviewed to determine appropriate sequence of surgery, operative technique and the functional outcome. Methods: Between 1992 and 2002, twenty-two patients underwent ipsilateral elbow and shoulder arthroplasties. Nineteen patients were available for final review. Clinical and radiological assessments were done on these patients. Results: Twenty-four upper limbs in nineteen patients were reviewed. Mean age at final follow-up was 61.1 years (49.9 to 73.3yrs; SD 8.2). Mean duration of follow-up from the last operation was 55.5 months (12 to 129.3m; SD 33.5). The average interval between the operations was 40.1 months; it was 41.2 months when elbow operated first and 38.7 months when shoulder was operated first. This difference was not significant (p=0.82). All movements showed significant improvement after respective joint replacements. There was a significantly greater improvement in external rotation of the shoulder when it was operated first (p=0.48). The average improvement in Constant-Murley scores was 28.8 points; with no statistically significant difference between either sequence of operations (p=0.49). However, there was statistically significant improvement in the average Mayo elbow performance score after the elbow arthroplasty when it was operated first (p=0.03). Two patients needed conversion of shoulder hemi-arthroplasty to total shoulder replacement due to subsequent erosion of the glenoid. One elbow replacement was revised because of recurrent dislocations. There were four patients who developed ulnar neuropathy, of which two were permanent. There were no peri-prosthetic fractures in this series. One patient needed custom-made short-stemmed shoulder prosthesis due to the presence of a long-stemmed humeral component of total elbow prosthesis in situ. Conclusion: Ipsilateral shoulder and elbow replacements significantly improve pain and function of the limb, when there is advanced arthritis. The joint that appears clinically and radiologically worse should be replaced first. However if both the joints are equally involved we feel that elbow should be replaced first as the functional improvement seems to be better. Careful preoperative planning is required in choosing the type and size of prosthesis, to avoid potential complications

The February 2015 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at: Proximal Humerus fractures a comprehensive review, Predicting complications in shoulder ORIF, The Coronoid Revisited, Remplissage and bankart repair for Hill-Sach’s lesions, Diabetes and elbow arthroplasty, Salvage surgery for failed bankart repair, Sternoclavicular Joint Reconstruction, Steroids effective in the short-term for tennis elbow

The April 2012 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup. 360 . looks at katakori in Japan, frozen shoulder, if shoulder impingement actually exists, shoulder arthroscopy and suprascapular nerve blocks, why shoulder replacements fail, the infected elbow replacement, the four-part fracture, the acromion index, and arm transplantation

From 1985 to 1998 we used the Souter implant for elbow replacement in the rheumatoid population. We have followed this cohort prospectively, and present simple outcome measures including initial pain relief, early complication rates, radiological changes with time, and survivorship. We performed 71 Souter elbow replacements in 62 rheumatoid patients (51 female, 11 male). The average age at surgery was 61 (range 38–79). All patients had end stage arthropathy. Early results and complications were assessed in all patients. Subsequently, ten cases were revised for loosening, and eight patients (10 elbows) died before recent follow up, leaving 51 cases for long term study. Clinical and radiological data were obtained. On early follow up, 94% had no or minimal pain. Thirty-one percent suffered a complication. Overall, 18% cases had ulnar nerve problems and 7% dislocated in the first year. Seven percent had wound problems, including two deep infections. At mean long term follow up of 6 years (range: 2–15 years) there were high rates of satisfaction in patients with retained prostheses. Progressive radiolucency around the humeral component was common and treated expectantly. Late instability was not seen. Pain relief was maintained. There have been few long-term reports on the Souter elbow replacement. This group of patients from a single centre has been followed prospectively. Infection and ulnar nerve complications are comparable with other series, and are less related to prosthesis. The rate of humeral component loosening in this series is high. The rate of dislocation, however, is low. This prosthesis sacrifices stability to transmit forces through the soft tissues. Although stability is acceptable there is no beneficial reduction in loosening

Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of total elbow replacement surgery by looking at pain, range of movements and functional improvement as well as immediate and delayed complications. Methods: It is a retrospective study of medical and Nursing notes from June 1994 until November 2003. 32 elbow replacements were performed. However 1 set of notes were unrecoverable, therefore the study group was 31 elbow replacements on 22 people. 9 bilateral replacements. The range of follow up time was 5 months to 9.5 years. (Mean of 5 years). 3 patients (5 elbows) were deceased at the time of study. All except 3 of the elbows were replaced as a result of rheumatoid arthritis with a mean patient age of 67 years. ((range 41–84). Results: 84% of patients were documented to have impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) pre-operatively. Average range of movement before surgery was 500 – 1250 (750). All were operated on by the same surgeon. 6 elbow (19%) had a pre-discharge complication, 4 ulna nerve palsies and 2 superficial wound infections. No cases of proven deep prosthetic infection. 1 case of symptomatic loosening after 12–24 months, awaiting revision. 1 case of loosening seen on X-ray after 5 years, the patient is asymptomatic but still under follow up. 21 of the 22 patients reported to be very satisfied with the outcome with only 4 elbows not allowing improvement in ADLs. Documented range of movement improved on an average by 200 of extension and 110 of flexion. Conclusion: The majority of elbow replacements were done for rheumatoid arthritis and the outcome has been very good with few lasting complications. The main pre-operative complains of inability to perform ADLs was greatly improved by the surgery. Documentation of range of movements and objective pain measurement was poor making this difficult to comment on

The National Joint Registry (NJR) was established in 2003, and was extended to include ankle arthroplasty on 1. st. April 2010, and shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in April 2012. The aim of this study was to evaluate the uptake of the NJR for ankle arthroplasty over its first 3 years. This is compared to the first 3 years of hip and knee data, and the first year of shoulder and elbow data. The methods of measuring compliance are also evaluated. NJR compliance is measured by comparing the number of procedures submitted to the NJR, against the number of levies raised through implant sales. This applies to all of the UK, and both independent and NHS providers. However, compliance can also be measured by comparing NJR submissions with data submitted to the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. This only relates to NHS institutions in England. The NJR ankle data was compared to implant data, and adjusted to compare to HES data, to evaluate the different methods of measuring compliance. We also compared these figures with the first 3 years for hip and knee arthroplasties and the first year for shoulder and elbow arthroplasties. Results:. In 2011 there were 493 arthroplasties and the compliance was 64% against industry data. In 2012 there were 590 procedures with compliance improved to 77% against industry data. When adjusting NJR to compare with HES data, the compliance was 87% in 2012., with 507 ankle arthroplasties registered with the NJR and 582 on HES data. The reasons for this discrepancy are discussed. The specific difficulties of capturing ankle revisions are discussed, as some get revised to arthrodeses. The uptake is significantly higher than the first year for all other joints (shoulders 52%, hips 57%, knees 57%, and elbows 60%)

There have been few reports in the literature of total elbow arthroplasty extending beyond 10 to 15 years. We reviewed 40 patients (41 elbows) with a mean age of 56 years (19 to 83) who had undergone a Coonrad/Coonrad-Morrey elbow arthroplasty by one surgeon for various diagnoses between 1974 and 1994. Surgical selection excluded patients with previous elbow infection or who refused to accept a sedentary level of elbow activity postoperatively. Objective data were collected from charts, radiographs, clinical photographs and supplemented by the referring orthopaedic surgeons’ records and radiographs if health or distance prevented a patient from returning for final review. Subjective outcome was defined by patient satisfaction. Of the 41 elbows, 21 were functional between 10 and 14 years after operation, ten between 15 and 19 years and ten between 20 and 31 years. There were 14 complications and 13 revisions, but no cases of acute infection, or permanent removal of any implant

Ulnar neuropathy presents as a complication in 5% to 10% of total elbow replacements, but subsequent ulnar neurolysis is rarely performed. Little information is available on the surgical management of persistent ulnar neuropathy after elbow replacement. We describe our experience with the surgical management of this problem. Of 1607 total elbow replacements performed at our institution between January 1969 and December 2004, eight patients (0.5%) had a further operation for persistent or progressive ulnar neuropathy. At a mean follow-up of 9.2 years (3.1 to 21.7) six were clinically improved and satisfied with their outcome, although, only four had complete recovery. When transposition was performed on a previously untransposed nerve the rate of recovery was 75%, but this was reduced to 25% if the nerve had been transposed at the time of the replacement

We studied retrospectively the results of revision arthroplasty of the elbow using a linked Coonrad-Morrey implant in 23 patients (24 elbows) after a mean follow-up period of 55 months. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, 19 elbows were satisfactory, nine were excellent and ten good. The median total score had improved from 35 points (20 to 75) before the primary arthroplasty to 85 points (40 to 100) at the latest follow-up. There was a marked relief of pain, but the range of movement showed no overall improvement. Two patients had a second revision because of infection and two for aseptic loosening. The estimated five-year survival rate of the prosthesis was 83.1% (95% confidence interval 61.1 to 93.3). Revision elbow arthroplasty using the Coonrad-Morrey implant provided satisfactory results but with complications occurring in 13 cases

Vascularised soft tissue transfer may be helpful in the salvage of severe sepsis involving avascular tissues hosting joint replacements or other metal work. Transferred tissue covers the exposed implants and delivers intravenous antibiotics. Twenty-one cases for the knee, elbow and shoulder are presented. Gastrocnemius flaps were used for seven knee replacements and 10 knee fractures. Antegrade radial artery flaps were used for two elbow replacements. Pectoralis major or minor flaps were used for two shoulder replacements. All procedures were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon with supplementary plastics training. Synchronous bony surgery included revision arthroplasty in seven cases, conversion to fusion in one case and preservation of existing hardware in the remainder. Sepsis was eliminated in the longterm in 9 of 10 knee fracture fixation cases, 5 out of 7 knee replacements and both elbow replacements. Both shoulder replacements remained septic despite multiple repeat procedures. Complications included necrosis of two gastrocnemius flaps, one from pre-existing partial compartment syndrome and one when combined with fusion of the knee. One other knee replacement developed further sepsis three years post procedure. No limb required amputation. These procedures are well within the remit of orthopaedic surgeons, the non reliance on plastics surgeons allowed prompt treatment combined with bony procedures. Results were good for the knee and elbow but disappointing for the shoulder—this, probably related to the natural mobility of the joint

We examined the effects of previous resection of the radial head and synovectomy on the outcome of subsequent total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Fifteen elbows with a history of resection and synovectomy were compared with a control group of patients who had elbow arthroplasty with an implant of the same design. The mean age in both groups was 63 years. In the study group, resection of the radial head and synovectomy had been undertaken at a mean of 8.9 years before arthroplasty. The mean radiological follow-up for the 13 available patients in the study group was 5.89 years (0.3 to 11.0) and in the control group was 6.6 years (2.2 to 12.6). There were no revisions in either group. The mean Mayo elbow performance score improved from 29 to 96 in the study group, with similar improvement in the control group (28 to 87). The study group had excellent results in 13 elbows and good results in two. The control group had excellent results in seven and good results in six. Our experience indicates that previous resection of the radial head and synovectomy are not associated with an increased rate of revision following subsequent arthroplasty of the elbow. However, there was a higher rate of complication in the study group compared with the control group

Aims

The aims of this study were to identify and evaluate the current literature examining the prognostic factors which are associated with failure of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA).

We present six patients with chronic dislocation of the elbow who were treated by primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. All were women with a mean age of 65 years (51 to 76), the mean interval between dislocation and surgery was 17 weeks (5 to 52) and the mean follow-up 58 months (24 to 123). The most dramatic improvement was in function. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score was 5.2 times better (p < 0.001) and the mean total range of movement increased from 33° to 121° (p < 0.001) after operation. Three patients developed wear of polyethylene. One required revision for a periprosthetic fracture, and another required a bushing exchange. Primary semiconstrained elbow arthroplasty provides significant, predictable functional improvement. Potential solutions for wear of polyethylene include a different operative technique or design of implant. Despite the high incidence of such wear, total elbow arthroplasty should be considered as a viable treatment option for chronic dislocation of the elbow in elderly patients

The aim of management of an adult distal humeral fracture is to restore mobility, stability and pain-free elbow function. Good results are usually achieved in the majority of fractures treated with ORIF, but the management of comminuted fractures in elderly, frail patients with osteoporotic bone remains controversial. The literature focuses on elbow replacement if stable internal fixation cannot be achieved, with “bag-of-bones” management now rarely discussed eg. key-note paper - 10 successful cases reported by Brown RF & Morgan RG in 1971 (JBJS 53-B(3):425-428). We present the experience in two units in which conservative management has been actively adopted in selected cases by consultants with a subspecialty interest in the elbow. All patients over the age of 60 with distal humeral fractures (2007 – 2009) who had been treated conservatively were reviewed clinically and radiologically. Duration of follow-up and outcome, including the Oxford and quick DASH scores, were recorded, with the fractures classified using the AO system. There were 25 patients, 19 female and 6 male. 19/25 patients have been successfully treated conservatively with a mean Range Of Movement: Extension/Flexion: 45/125, Pronation/Supination 74/70. Only 5 underwent subsequent total elbow replacement and one delayed ORIF. There is a significant complication rate following surgical treatment with ORIF or elbow replacement in elderly, frail patients, including infection, painful non-union and/or stiffness. We believe that there is a role for initial conservative treatment in selected patients with low, displaced, comminuted humeral fractures in osteoporotic bone. Initial early mobilisation as pain allows can give good functional results without the risks of operation. It does not preclude future surgery if conservative treatment fails, but this is not required in the majority of cases

Purpose: Resection elbow arthroplasty is a salvage procedure typically considered as a last resort when other reconstructive options have failed. It was the intent of this study to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients following resection elbow arthroplasty. Method: Fifty-four elbow resections performed between 1975 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Pre and post-operative elbow function was evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and additional follow-up data was compiled using the Disability of Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. All patients in this study had a resection following a failed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). Nineteen patients had died at time of follow-up, and 5 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 30 of the surviving 34 patients (88%) available for long-term evaluation. Results: The main indication for resection in this study was infection (50 of 54 elbows). The average MEPS prior to resection was 36. The long-term results in 30 patients at an average of 11 yrs (range 2.7–28 yrs) demonstrated an average MEPS score of 60, and a DASH score of 71. Complications were common including persistent infection requiring re-operation (44%), intra-operative fracture (32%), transient (11%) or permanent (5.5%) nerve damage, and one case of vascular injury requiring amputation. Achieving a stable resected elbow correlated strongly with a good long-term MEPS score (r=0.75). Conclusion: This study emphasizes the difficulty in treating patients with a failed total elbow arthroplasty. Resection arthroplasty is a salvage procedure indicated primarily for persistently infected TEA and results in satisfactory outcomes in this population

To prevent insufficiency of the triceps after total elbow arthroplasty, we have, since 2008, used a triceps-sparing ulnar approach. This study evaluates the clinical results and post-operative alignment of the prosthesis using this approach. We reviewed 25 elbows in 23 patients. There were five men and 18 women with a mean age of 69 years (54 to 83). There were 18 elbows with rheumatoid arthritis, six with a fracture or pseudoarthrosis and one elbow with osteoarthritis. Post-operative complications included one intra-operative fracture, one elbow with heterotopic ossification, one transient ulnar nerve palsy, and one elbow with skin necrosis, but no elbow was affected by insufficiency of the triceps. Patients were followed for a mean of 42 months (24 to 77). The mean post-operative Japanese Orthopaedic Association Elbow Score was 90.8 (51 to 100) and the mean Mayo Elbow Performance score 93.8 (65 to 100). The mean post-operative flexion/extension of the elbow was 135°/-8°. The Manual Muscle Testing score of the triceps was 5 in 23 elbows and 2 in two elbows (one patient). The mean alignment of the implants examined by 3D-CT was 2.8° pronation (standard deviation (. sd). 5.5), 0.3° valgus (. sd. 2.7), and 0.7° extension (. sd. 3.2) for the humeral component, and 9.3° pronation (. sd. 9.7), 0.3° valgus (. sd. 4.0), and 8.6° extension (. sd. 3.1) for the ulnar component. There was no radiolucent line or loosening of the implants on the final radiographs. . The triceps-sparing ulnar approach allows satisfactory alignment of the implants, is effective in preventing post-operative triceps insufficiency, and gives satisfactory short-term results. . Cite this article: 2015;97-B:1096–1101

At our institution between 1994 and 2003 a total of 36 revision total elbow Arthroplasties were performed in 34 patients. We clinically reviewed 25 patients and reviewed the notes and x-rays of all of them. Of eleven who were not reviewed clinically seven had died from an unrelated cause and four were unable to attend because of illness but we were able to include them as sufficient data were available in the notes. There were 24 female and 12 male, Average age was 67 years and twelve had elbow Arthroplasty in a non-dominant side. The average follow up was 6 years (range 5–13 years). The mean period between the primary and revision surgery was sixty three months (range 3–240 months). The indication for surgery was mainly for aseptic loosening in 15 cases, followed by septic loosening in twelve. All cases of septic loosening had two stage revisions. Other reasons for revision in this series include unstable elbows, implant fracture and peri-prosthetic fractures. Twelve of these revisions had a further revision for a variety of reasons at an average period of twenty eight months. Seven patients had thirteen complications in this series, two radial nerve palsies (one recovered), one distal humeral fracture, five cortical perforations and five triceps weakness. Most of the patients are satisfied with their elbows. The mean Mayo elbow Performance Score was 79 points. We conclude that revision Elbow Arthroplasty is a specialized surgery which is technically demanding, with high risk of complications and high re-revision rate and therefore, should be done in a specialised centres

Fifteen patients with rheumatoid arthritis had 19 elbow arthroplasties with the Wadsworth type of surface replacement prosthesis. After a follow-up period averaging 30 months, 11 patients with 15 elbow arthroplasties were entirely satisfied with their freedom from pain and range of movement. Radiologically, however, the humeral component was loose in 10 of the 19 elbows and the ulnar component in 5. Two patients had reoperation, one to remove a prosthesis for early deep infection and one to exchange a humeral component which was loose. The risk of mechanical loosening is reduced by accurate positioning of the humeral component, but there is a high potential for failure. Changes in the design of the prosthesis and better instrumentation for alignment of the components are desirable. Prosthetic replacement of the elbow should still be regarded as experimental

This retrospective study examines the outcomes of 17 semi-constraint elbow replacement procedures done over 7 years. There were 14 primary and three revision procedures. The mean age of patients was 61 years. The indication for surgery was RA in 11 patients, trauma in six and tuberculosis in one. All but two patients, who died of unrelated causes, were available for follow-up. In 13 patients the mean follow-up time was 4 years, and in the other two there was an 8-month follow-up. The results were assessed according to the Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score. There were seven excellent MEP scores, seven good and one fair. Mean flexion was 132°, extension −23°, with the range of motion 107°. Except in two patients, pronation and supination were full. Radiographs showed two patients had radiolucent lines of more than 2 mm, which covered less than 50% of the interface. To date no revisions have been necessary. Medium-term results of semi-constraint elbow replacements are gratifying

Seven patients with chronic insufficiency of the triceps were treated by either a rotation flap using anconeus (4) or an allograft of tendo Achillis (3). The latter procedure was selected for patients with a large defect in whom the anconeus muscle had been devitalised. Five disruptions were in patients who had previously undergone an elbow replacement. The patients were assessed for subjective satisfaction, pain, range of movement and strength, and the results were graded using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). The mean follow-up was for 33 months (9 to 63). One rotation flap failed six months after operation. At the most recent follow-up, the remaining six patients had no or slight pain, restoration of a functional arc of movement and normal or slightly decreased power of extension. All six were satisfied with the outcome and were able to resume their daily activities with no limitations other than those imposed by the previous elbow replacement. The final MEPS was 100 points in five patients and 75 in one

Aim. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to identify the incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) following elective and trauma elbow arthroplasty. The secondary aim was to determine clinical outcomes with respect to the formation of heterotopic ossification. Patients and Methods. A total of 55 total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) (52 patients) performed between June 2007 and December 2015 were eligible for inclusion in the study (29 TEAs for primary elective arthroplasty and 26 TEAs for trauma). At review, 15 patients (17 total elbow arthroplasties) had died from unrelated causes. There were 14 men and 38 women with a mean age of 70 years (42 to 90). The median clinical follow-up was 3.6 years (1.2 to 6) and the median radiological follow-up was 3.1 years (0.5 to 7.5). Results. The overall incidence of HO was 84% (46/55). This was higher in the trauma group (96%, 25/26) compared with the elective arthroplasty group (72%, 21/29) (p = 0.027, Fisher’s exact test). Patients in the trauma group had HO of higher Brooker class. The presence of HO did not significantly affect elbow range of movement within the trauma or elective groups (elective arthroplasty, Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.070; trauma arthroplasty, p = 0.370, Mann–Whitney U test). Conclusion. HO after total elbow arthroplasty is seen more commonly than previously reported. We have reported a significantly higher rate of HO in TEAs performed for trauma than those performed electively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:767–71

Aims

Arthroplasty is being increasingly used for the management of distal humeral fractures (DHFs) in elderly patients. Arthroplasty options include total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA); both have unique complications and there is not yet a consensus on which implant is superior. This systematic review asked: in patients aged over 65 years with unreconstructable DHFs, what differences are there in outcomes, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), and complications, between distal humeral HA and TEA?

Aims

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the provision of arthroplasty services in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. This study aimed to quantify the backlog, analyze national trends, and predict time to recovery.

The December 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Clavicle fractures: is the evidence changing practice?; Humeral shaft fractures, and another meta-analysis…let’s wait for the trials now!; Hemiarthroplasty or total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fractures…what does the registry say?; What to do with a first-time shoulder dislocation?; Deprivation indices and minimal clinically important difference for patient-reported outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Prospective randomized clinical trial of arthroscopic repair versus debridement for partial subscapularis tears; Long-term follow-up following closed reduction and early movement for simple dislocation of the elbow; Sternoclavicular joint reconstruction for traumatic acute and chronic anterior and posterior instability.

Aim. To investigate the responsiveness to change of four different elbow-scoring instruments, two Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) elbow assessment scales, the Mayo Clinic elbow-performance index (Mayo) and the Elbow Functional Assessment (EFA) scale. Methods. A group of 24 RA patients (median age 60 years) undergoing either elbow arthroplasty (22 elbows) or synovectomy with radial head excision (3 elbows), were evaluated both prior and after surgery (median: seven months postoperatively). Score changes, obtained by using the scales under study, were calculated. The patient’s opinion of global perceived effect of the intervention was used as a criterion to classify them as ‘improved’ or ‘non-changed’. Responsiveness was evaluated with use of three approaches: using paired t-statistics (pre- and post-surgery scores), effect size statistics (standardized response mean, effect size and responsiveness ratios) and Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves. Results. Each of the elbow rating measures under study proved to be responsive to change when evaluating RA patients undergoing elbow arthroplasty or synovectomy. The EFA scale demonstrated the highest power to detect a clinically meaningful difference and had the best discriminative ability to distinguish improved from non-changed patients, as was revealed by all responsiveness statistics applied. Conclusions. The HSS, the Mayo and the EFA elbow-scoring scales can all be used as an evaluative instrument to assess the efficacy of surgical treatment of the rheumatoid elbow joint. However, using the EFA scale will require smaller sample sizes to achieve a fixed level of statistical power than the other scales under study

Background. The procedures of total elbow and shoulder replacements increased 6% to 13% annually from 1993 to 2007 with revision-related burden increasing from 4.5% to 7%. The revisions of the shoulder and elbow prostheses due to aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, infections have led to the use of standard or custom-made implants due to significant bone loss. This study reports our experience in the management of complicated primary and revisions of total shoulder and elbow replacements with significant humeral bone loss and in metabolic diseases of the elbow and shoulder treated with bone resection using The Mosaic Humeral Replacement System. Patients and Materials. A total of 20 patients underwent total elbow or shoulder arthroplasty using the Mosaic Humeral Replacement System (Biomet, UK). The Mosaic system was used in 8 shoulder arthroplasties (Group A) and in 12 elbow arthroplasties (Group B). The underlying pathologis in Group A included 2 malunited proximal humerus fracture, 1 humeral osteomyelitis, 1 shoulder chondrosarcoma, 1 aggressive Gigantic Cell Tumor with prosthetic fracture, 2 metastatic lytic lesion, and 1 failed fixation of non-union proximal humerus. Figure 1 shows Mosaic implant after complex fracture of proximal humerus. Reasons for Mosaic arthroplasty in Group B included 3 humeral component revisions due to periprosthetic fracture, 1 prosthesis breaking-up with fractures, 1 revision of loose Souter Strathclyde prosthesis, 1 loose prosthesis due to infection, 1 highly comminuted elbow fracture, 1 aseptic loosening of humeral component of total elbow replacement, 3 revision of total elbow replacement due loosening and 1 pathological distal humerus fracture due to metastasis. Figure 2&3 shows pre- and post-operative Mosaic implant following complex periprosthetic fracture of distal humerus. Clinical Observation/Discussion. The Mosaic Humeral Replacement System is a complete system for complex revision, salvage/oncology, and complex humeral fractures. It is a completely modular system which can be adapted to different patient anatomies and indications. It has been designed to face several surgical challenges, including reattaching soft tissues, properly tensioning the glenohumeral joint and restoring joint function. It is a cost-effective procedure with the benefits of a custom made humeral component in a standard tray. Our study shows that good results can be achieved with this form of treatment. Radiological assessment of all patients showed a satisfactory position of the implant with appropriate margin of bony resection. One patient with proximal and another one with distal humeral Mosaic replacement had late infection. One patient had aseptic loosening 3 years after distal humeral replacement. Most of the patients had satisfactory improvement in range of movement and chronic pain. While primary clinical observations and imaging results indicate acceptable results with Mosaic arthroplasty; a realistic assessment can only be achieved in long-term using the appropriate outcome measures. At the present we continue to regularly assess the patients clinically and radiologically and by means of Liverpool elbow score for distal and Quick- DASH for proximal Mosaic Humeral Replacement System and plan to report the long-term results in due time

Aims

The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry.

Our study examines a group of patients less than fifty years of age who underwent Total Elbow Arthroplasty with the Souter Strathclyde Elbow Replacement and compares their survivorship with a dataset of older group of patients. 309 patients were who underwent standard long stemmed Souter Implants as a primary procedure for rheumatoid arthritis over the last 16 years were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the their age at the time of surgery. In the first group of older patients greater than or equal to 50 years of age (Mean Age =64.4 years) there were 263 patients with a mean follow up of 7.3 years. The second group consisted of patients less than 50 years of age (Mean Age 42.04 years) who had a longer mean follow up period of 9.3 years. The survivorship of the implants for three different failure events was compared for both groups. The radiographs were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meir survival analyses, to produce survival curves for revision, revision due to aseptic loosening of the humeral component and finally gross loosening of the humeral implant (Hidex> 1). For each terminal event there were two curves and the age group analyses were all non-significant when log rank tested. The rates of loosening/revision were comparable in all curves. We set out to determine the role of age as predictive factor for loosening. Our conclusions were that Total Elbow Arthroplasty is suitable for younger patients with rheumatoid elbow. Using survivorship data there does not appear to be any difference in loosening when compared to patients of an older age group. As previously published the position of the humeral component within the humerus is crucial for long-term survivorship. Thus age alone should not be the sole discretionary factor for withholding the benefits of elbow Arthroplasty in younger patients

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of application of a 3D-printed megaprosthesis with hemiarthroplasty design for defects of the distal humerus or proximal ulna following tumour resection.

Thermal injury to the radial nerve caused by cement leakage is a rare complication after revision elbow arthroplasty. Several reports have described nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after hip arthroplasty. However, little information is available regarding whether radial nerve injury due to cement leakage after humeral stem revision will recover. In a recent study, radial nerve palsy occurred in 2 of 7 patients who had thermal injury from leaked cement during humeral component revisions. These patients did not regain function of the radial nerve after observation. We present a case of functional recovery from a radial nerve palsy caused by cement leakage after immediate nerve decompression in revision elbow arthroplasty[Fig. 1.2]

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of periprosthetic fractures of the humerus and to assess the uniformity of the classifications used for these fractures (including those around elbow and/or shoulder arthroplasties) by performing a systematic review of the literature.

The April 2023 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Arthroscopic Bankart repair in athletes: in it for the long run?; Functional outcomes and the Wrightington classification of elbow fracture-dislocations; Hemiarthroplasty or ORIF intra-articular distal humerus fractures in older patients; Return to sport after total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty; Readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty; Arthroscopic Bankart repair in the longer term; Bankart repair with(out) remplissage or the Latarjet procedure? A systematic review and meta-analysis; Regaining motion among patients with shoulder pathology: are all exercises equal?

The December 2022 Shoulder & Elbow Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Biceps tenotomy versus soft-tissue tenodesis in females aged 60 years and older with rotator cuff tears; Resistance training combined with corticosteroid injections or tendon needling in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy; Two-year functional outcomes of completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents; Patients who undergo rotator cuff repair can safely return to driving at two weeks postoperatively; Are two plates better than one? A systematic review of dual plating for acute midshaft clavicle fractures; Treatment of acute distal biceps tendon ruptures; Rotator cuff tendinopathy: disability associated with depression rather than pathology severity; Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty implications in young patients with post-traumatic sequelae.

Aims

National joint registries under-report revisions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We aimed to validate PJI reporting to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) and the factors associated with its accuracy. We then applied these data to refine estimates of the total national burden of PJI.

Aims. We review our experience of Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for fractures of the distal humerus in non-rheumatoid patients with a minimum of ten years follow-up. Patients and Methods. TEA through a triceps splitting approach was peformed in 37 non-rheumatoid patients for a fracture of the distal humerus between 1996 and 2004. One patient could not be traced and 17 had died before the tenth anniversary of their surgery. This left 19 patients with a minimum follow-up of ten years to form the study group. Of these, 13 patients were alive at the time of final review. The other six had died, but after the tenth anniversary of their elbow arthroplasty. Their clinical and radiological data were included in the study. . Results. The mean follow-up of the 19 patients was 156 months (120 to 210). Two patients in the study group had undergone revision. One further patient had undergone a two-stage revision for infection but died before ten-year follow-up. Six other patients in the study group had evidence of loosening or wear of their bushings. Two were clinically symptomatic and were offered revision surgery. Male patients showed higher incidence of loosening and wear. Survivorship, with revision and definite loosening as end-points, was 89.5% at ten years in those patients followed for a minimum of ten years and 86% in the whole group of 36 patients. Conclusion. This study shows that only 53% of non-rheumatoid patients who undergo TEA for a fracture of the distal humerus survive to the tenth anniversary of their index procedure. For those that survive, TEA provides acceptable outcomes in terms of function and implant survival. Take home message: The surgeons undertaking these procedures should be aware of the long-term revision rates and also the gender difference in the rates of loosening. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:381–6

Aims

Orthopaedic surgeries are complex, frequently performed procedures associated with significant haemorrhage and perioperative blood transfusion. Given refinements in surgical techniques and changes to transfusion practices, we aim to describe contemporary transfusion practices in orthopaedic surgery in order to inform perioperative planning and blood banking requirements.

In bone and joint infections, several materials can be used for local antibiotic elution at site of infection. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement is often used. Recently the use of antibiotic impregnated dissolvable synthetic pure calcium sulphate beads [Stimulan R]1 has been used as an alternative, due to several perceived advantages. We present our experience of using Calcium sulphate beads in infections involving the upper limb. From Jan 2012 to Jan 2015, we used Calcium sulphate beads in 7 complex upper limb infections including 1 elbow replacement, 2 infected non unions, 2 shoulder replacement, 1 wrist fusion and I ORIF elbow. We used combination of Vancomycin and Gentamicin in the beads, using manufacturer's mixing guide for optimum setting. Arthroplasty infections underwent explantation, addition of antibiotic impregnated calcium sulphate beads in the joint space, followed by a second stage, and systemic antibiotics. Fracture non-union cases had surgical debridement, calcium sulphate beads and systemic antibiotics. Follow up (6months to 2 years) indicate no recurrence of infection in any case. The most common organisms isolated were Coagulase negative staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus. Others included Group B Streptococcus, Serratia marscesens and Corynebacterium spp. In 2 of 7 cases there was significant drainage from the wound. This settled without further input. For fracture non-union fixation, there was no need to do second procedure to remove beads as they dissolve. In cases of staged revisions, the beads were inserted at first stage with microbiological clearance at 2nd stage. At present there are no reports in the literature of the use of this product in the upper limb. Our experience suggests use of dissolvable pure Calcium sulphate beads impregnated with selected antibiotics, is an effective adjunct to current treatments. Aseptic drainage has been reported and this was seen in some of our cases. It is postulated that the use of Calcium sulphate beads in more superficial joints may lead to more drainage. It may be necessary to avoid packing any beads in the subcutaneous spaces and using lower volumes in upper limb. Further work will include long-term follow up and any evidence of relapse or recurrence of infection

Peri-prosthetic fractures around implants in the proximal humerus can present substantial challenges. Most individuals who undergo upper limb arthroplasty tend to be osteopenic to begin with, and the anatomy of the proximal humerus does not provide an excess of bone to work with. Therefore, peri-prosthetic fractures pose difficulties to rotator cuff function and implant stability. There are multiple classification systems, but series are small and the classification does not always lead to treatment algorithms. Risk factors for humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty include endosteal notching, cortical perforation, varus malalignment, stem perforation, ipsilateral shoulder and elbow arthroplasties, and loose stems. Many of these risk factors are directly related to technical errors at the time of surgery. Poor exposure can lead to aberrant starting point and errors in reaming. Oversized prostheses can lead to cortical perforation or even stem perforation. Proper positioning of the patient on the table and surgical releases help avoid these technical errors. Peri-prosthetic fractures should be carefully evaluated radiographically for stability. Two important considerations: 1. Is the implant stable? 2. Is the fracture stable? Generally, if the implant is unstable, the implant must be revised. In the setting of a stable implant, many humeral fractures can be treated nonoperatively. Many fractures at or below the level of the tip of the implant can be treated as typical humeral fractures. Options for fixation include plates with cables or long stem prostheses which bypass the fracture. Displaced tuberosity fractures are treated with suture or wire fixation. Risk factors for a poor outcome include increased time to union, skin breakdown, and stiff shoulder

Aims

Stemless humeral implants have been developed to overcome stem-related complications in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). However, stemless implant designs may hypothetically result in less stable initial fixation, potentially affecting long-term survival. The aim of this study is to investigate early fixation and migration patterns of the stemless humeral component of the Simpliciti Shoulder System and to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been shown to be a treatment option for elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures and osteoporotic bone. The published results have often included rheumatoid patients who traditionally would be expected to do well from elbow arthroplasty. Only short-term results have been published using this technique in non-rheumatoid patients. The current study contains the largest number and longest follow-up of non-rheumatoid patients whose fractures have been treated with a non-custom TEA. In total there were 26 patients, mean age 72 years, 22 female and 4 male, 25% dominant arm. The mean follow-up was of 5 years. There was 1 case of loosening, 1 radial nerve palsy and 2 cases of heterotrophic ossification. At final review the mean range of flexion/extension was 97.5 degrees and the mean range of pronation/supination was 151.75 degrees. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance score was 92. We would suggest that TEA provides a very satisfactory outcome in elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures, the benefit of which can be observed at a mean of 5 years

Aims

There is little published on the outcomes after restarting elective orthopaedic procedures following cessation of surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the reported perioperative mortality in patients who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection while undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery was 18% to 20%. The aim of this study is to report the surgical outcomes, complications, and risk of developing COVID-19 in 2,316 consecutive patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery in the latter part of 2020 and comparing it to the same, pre-pandemic, period in 2019.

Sixty unconstrained elbow replacements of a new design have been followed prospectively for three to nine years. Review showed that 50% had excellent relief of pain and return of function, 27% had had major complications requiring removal or revision of the prosthesis and 23% had minor complications which marred the result. Further research in this field seems worthwhile

Mechanical loosening which begins with early-onset migration of the prosthesis is the major reason for failure of the Souter-Strathclyde elbow replacement. In a prospective study of 18 Souter-Strathclyde replacements we evaluated the patterns of migration using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. We had previously reported the short-term results after a follow-up of two years which we have now extended to a mean follow-up of 8.2 years (1 to 11.3). Migration was assessed along the co-ordinal axes and overall micromovement was expressed as the maximum total point movement. The alignment of the prosthesis and the presence of radiolucent lines were examined on conventional standardised radiographs. All the humeral components showed increased and variable patterns of migration at the extended follow-up and four humeral components were revised. The maximum total point movement at two years in the revised prostheses was 1.8 mm (. sd. 1.0) and in the non-revised 0.7 mm (. sd. 0.5, p = 0.01). Most humeral components migrated into external rotation resulting in an anterior and varus tilt. The ulnar components remained stable

We report the use of a new approach for elbow arthroplasty in 58 cases over a 20-year period. A wide exposure, obtained by elevating the triceps attachment and dividing the radial collateral ligament, allows the excision of diseased tissue, articular irregularities and osteophytes. Normal anatomy is restored and active mobilisation can be started 10 days after operation. Good or fair results, with over 70 degrees of joint movement, were achieved in 88% of cases

Total elbow replacement can be a valuable option for the treatment of the elbow in haemophilia where there are associated arthropathic changes. We describe the outcome of seven elbow replacements in five consecutive patients with severe haemophilia A (native factor levels < 1%) at a mean of 42 months (25 to 65) after operation. All the patients had excellent relief of pain and improvement in function. One failure was due to infection in an immunocompromised patient with both HIV and Hepatitis C antibodies who was on anti-retroviral chemotherapy. The implant was revised at 30 months in a one-stage procedure and showed no evidence of loosening or infection 35 months later

We treated three patients with malunion after comminuted intercondylar fractures of the humerus by intra-articular derotational opening-wedge osteotomy and the insertion of a tricortical iliac bone graft. Two patients required additional operations, including interposition arthroplasty and hardware removal. A mean arc of increased motion of 65 degrees was achieved in flexion and extension in two patients and a more functional arc in the third. Although this is viewed as a salvage procedure in patients who are thought to be too young for elbow arthroplasty, none of the three patients has significant pain and none has required total elbow arthroplasty after an average follow-up of 7.6 years

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been shown to be a treatment option for elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures and osteoporotic bone. The published results have often included rheumatoid patients who traditionally would be expected to do well from elbow arthroplasty. Only short-term results have been published using this technique in non-rheumatoid patients The current study contains the largest number and longest follow-up of non-rheumatoid patients whose fractures have been treated with a non-custom TEA. In total there were 26 patients, mean age 72 years, 22 female and 4 male, 25% dominant arm. All had a minimum of 5 years follow-up. There was 1 case of loosening, 1 radial nerve palsy and 2 cases of heterotrophic ossification. At final review the mean range of flexion/extension was 97.5 degrees and the mean range of pronation/supination was 151.75 degrees. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance score was 92. We would suggest that TEA provides a very satisfactory outcome in elderly patients with complex distal humeral fractures, the benefit of which can be observed for at least 5 years

Introduction. Although the majority of adult distal humeral fractures are successfully treated with ORIF, the management in frail patients, often elderly with multiple co-morbidities and osteoporotic bone, remains controversial. Elbow replacement is frequently recommended if stable internal fixation cannot be achieved, especially in low, displaced, comminuted fractures. The “bag-of-bones” method ie early movement with fragments accepted in their displaced position, is rarely considered as there has been little in the literature since 10 successful cases were reported by Brown & Morgan in 1971 (JBJS 53-B(3):425–428). We present the experience of three units in which conservative management has been actively adopted in selected cases. Methods. 44 distal humeral fractures were initially treated conservatively - 2004–2010. Mean age 73.9 yrs (40–91) and 34 F: 10 M. Clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 2 years (1–6). Results. There were 18 AO Type A, 7 B and 19 C fractures. The range of elbow movement was extension/flexion 38/124, and pronation/supination 75/76 at their last follow-up. Using the Oxford elbow score (0 = worst/4 best result), the mean pain score was 2.44 (range 1–4), 2.26 (0–4) for function, and 2.04 (0–4) for psycho-social, although several patients had early dementia. Only 5 subsequently underwent replacement out of 44 patients whose residual symptoms have not been sufficient to require surgery. Discussion. We believe that there is a role for initial conservative treatment in selected higher-risk patients, as initial early mobilisation within the limits of discomfort can give good functional results. There is a significant complication rate after fixation or replacement in elderly, frail patients, which includes infection, stiffness and loosening. Unnecessary operations can be avoided in the majority of cases, with replacement of a virgin joint at a later date only if required

Stability of the elbow joint is provided primarily by the integrity of the ulno humeral articulation. Secondary contributions to stability are provided by the radio-capitelar joint and the medial collateral ligament complex. Lesser contributions are provided by the lateral ligament and the joint capsule. A dislocation which is complicated by an injury to one of these main stabilising structures will have a greater risk of instability and recurrent dislocation. Poor outcomes have been noted to occur with both coronoid fractures and significant radial head fractures. There is a group of patients with a more severe injury within this spectrum who have a pattern of injury which leads to gross instability. This “unhappy triad” is a dislocation where there is an associated coronoid fracture, a radial head fracture and complete disruption of the medial collateral ligament complex. These severe injuries tend to present to a specialist after significant delay with recurrent dislocation following failure of initial management. Three cases will be presented to illustrate the anatomical considerations and management strategies for this pattern of injury by immediate reconstruction, hinged external fixation or elbow replacement

Fifty-three of 55 consecutive elbow replacements for post-traumatic arthritis were followed for a minimum of two years (mean 6.3, range 2 to 14.4). The patients presented difficult management problems, having undergone an average of two previous operations per joint; 22 joints had suffered prior complications; 18 had less than 50 degrees of flexion and six were flail. One of three versions of the Coonrad prosthesis was employed in all. During the follow-up period, 10 patients underwent 14 revision procedures for aseptic loosening; 38 elbows are currently without progressive radiolucent lines. In two patients an elbow had to be resected, one for deep infection and the other for bone resorption following a foreign-body reaction to titanium. The current design of the Coonrad prosthesis offers a reliable option for the treatment of post-traumatic arthritis but should be used only in carefully selected patients over the age of 60 years