Aims. To identify the incidence and risk factors for five-year same-site recurrent disc herniation (sRDH) after primary single-level lumbar discectomy. Secondary outcome was the incidence and risk factors for five-year sRDH reoperation. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted using prospectively collected data and patient-reported outcome measures, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), between 2008 and 2019. Postoperative sRDH was identified from clinical notes and the centre’s MRI database, with all imaging providers in the region checked for missing events. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate five-year sRDH incidence. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent variables predictive of sRDH, with any variable not significant at the p < 0.1 level removed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. Complete baseline data capture was available for 733 of 754 (97.2%) consecutive patients. Median follow-up time for censored patients was 2.2 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.0 to 5.0). sRDH occurred in 63 patients at a median 0.8 years (IQR 0.5 to 1.7) after surgery. The five-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for sRDH was 12.1% (95% CI 9.5 to 15.4), sRDH reoperation was 7.5% (95% CI 5.5 to 10.2), and any-procedure reoperation was 14.1% (95% CI 11.1 to 17.5). Current smoker (HR 2.12 (95% CI 1.26 to 3.56)) and higher preoperative ODI (HR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.03)) were independent risk factors associated with sRDH. Current smoker (HR 2.15 (95% CI 1.12 to 4.09)) was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. Conclusion. This is one of the largest series to date which has identified current smoker and higher preoperative disability as independent risk factors for sRDH. Current smoker was an independent risk factor for sRDH reoperation. These findings are important for spinal surgeons and rehabilitation specialists in risk assessment, consenting patients, and perioperative management. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):315–322

Aims. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the type of cervical disc herniation influences the severity of symptoms at the time of presentation, and the outcome after surgical treatment. Methods. The type and extent of disc herniation at the time of presentation in 108 patients who underwent anterior discectomy for cervical radiculopathy were analyzed on MRI, using a four-point scale. These were dichotomized into disc bulge and disc herniation groups. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in the neck and arm at baseline and two years postoperatively. The perceived recovery was also assessed at this time. Results. At baseline, 46 patients had a disc bulge and 62 had a herniation. There was no significant difference in the mean NDI and SF-36 between the two groups at baseline. Those in the disc bulge group had a mean NDI of 44.6 (SD 15.2) compared with 43.8 (SD 16.0) in the herniation group (p = 0.799), and a mean SF-36 of 59.2 (SD 6.9) compared with 59.4 (SD 7.7) (p = 0.895). Likewise, there was no significant difference in the incidence of disabling arm pain in the disc bulge and herniation groups (84% vs 73%; p = 0.163), and no significant difference in the incidence of disabling neck pain in the two groups (70.5% (n = 31) vs 63% (n = 39); p = 0.491). At two years after surgery, no significant difference was found in any of the clinical parameters between the two groups. Conclusion. In patients with cervical radiculopathy, the type and extent of disc herniation measured on MRI prior to surgery correlated neither to the severity of the symptoms at presentation, nor to clinical outcomes at two years postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1242–1248

Aims. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of repeat epidural steroid injections as a form of treatment for patients with insufficiently controlled or recurrent radicular pain due to a lumbar or cervical disc herniation. Patients and Methods. A cohort of 102 patients was prospectively followed, after an epidural steroid injection for radicular symptoms due to lumbar disc herniation, in 57 patients, and cervical disc herniation, in 45 patients. Those patients with persistent pain who requested a second injection were prospectively followed for one year. Radicular and local pain were assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), functional outcome with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or the Neck Pain and Disability Index (NPAD), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-12). Results. A second injection was performed in 17 patients (29.8%) with lumbar herniation and seven (15.6%) with cervical herniation at a mean of 65.3 days . (sd. 46.5) and 47 days . (sd. 37.2), respectively, after the initial injection. All but one patient, who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy, responded satisfactorily with a mean VAS for leg pain of 8.8 mm . (sd. 10.3) and a mean VAS for arm pain of 6.3 mm . (. sd. 9) one year after the second injection, respectively. Similarly, functional outcome and HRQoL were improved significantly from the baseline scores: mean ODI, 12.3 (. sd. 12.4; p < 0.001); mean NPAD, 19.3 (. sd. 24.3; p = 0.041); mean SF-12 physical component summary (PCS) in lumbar herniation, 46.8 (. sd. 7.7; p < 0.001); mean SF-12 PCS in cervical herniation, 43 (. sd. 6.8; p = 0.103). Conclusion. Repeat steroid injections are a justifiable form of treatment in symptomatic patients with lumbar or cervical disc herniation whose symptoms are not satisfactorily relieved after the first injection. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1364–71

Multiple thoracic disc herniations are rare and there are few reports in the literature. Between December 1998 and July 2002, we operated on 12 patients with multiple thoracic disc herniations. All underwent an anterior decompression and fusion through a transthoracic approach. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the Frankel neurological classification and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Under the Frankel classification, two patients improved by two grades (C to E), one patient improved by one grade (C to D), while nine patients who had been classified as grade D did not change. The JOA scores improved significantly after surgery with a mean recovery rate of 44.8% ± 24.5%. Overall, clinical outcomes were excellent in two patients, good in two, fair in six and unchanged in two. Our results indicate that anterior decompression and fusion for multiple thoracic disc herniations through a transthoracic approach can provide satisfactory results

Objective: To asses the outcome of hermivertebrectomy and fusion for symptomatic thoracic disc herniation. Design: A retrospective case analysis. Subjects: Between 1993 and 1999, ten patients (M5, F5) were treated surgically for thoracic disc herniation by the two senior authors (JKW & SHM). The average age of patients at presentation was 5Oyears (range 32–77years). Two patients had two level disc herniations (total 12 disc herniation). The most common sites of disc herniation were at T10/11(4 patients). Duration of diffuse mid thoracic hock pain in eight patients varied from one week to six months. The initial neurological evaluation demonstrated weakness and spasticity of varying grades in eight patients, of which five had paraplegia and three had monoparesis. Sensory changes below the level of the lesion were found in eight patients. Sphincter dysfunction was noted in seven patients. Hemivertebrectomy followed by discectomy and fusion was carried out in all patients. Instrumentation with cages was performed in eight patients and only bone grafting in two patients. Spinal cord monitoring was used in all cases. Outcome Measures: The average follow up was 24 months (range 13–36 months). Pre-operative and postoperative neurological grading was done using MRC grading for motor and sensory deficit. Asymptomatic patients with full activity were regarded as a successful outcome. Results: Three patients had excellent, three had good, three had fair and one had poor outcome. Seven out of eight patients with cages had radiological fusion. The cage stabilises the segment and maintains the spinal height till bony fusion takes place. One patient with hone graft alone had recurrence of symptoms and had a re-surgery with a poor outcome. Six patients had residual back pain of varying degrees. One patient had atelectasis, which recovered within two days of surgery. One patient had suffered from complete paraplegia immediately after surgery detected by SSEPs. She underwent a MRI scan within the hour and was reoperated. She had complete corpectomy and instrumented fusion. At two years she was walking with a support. Conclusion: Exposure of the norrnal tissue above and below herniated disc by hemivertebrectomy facilitates the safe removal of the disc and reduces the risk of further neurological damage. Cages were found to have advantages over autogenous strut only grafts. However, persistent back pain in some cases remains an unsolved problem

Introduction and Aims: Recurrent disc herniation or sciatica is one of the major complications of discectomy, often leading to a cascade of surgical procedures of increasing magnitude, but decreasing surgical outcome. We undertook a study to see if prolapsed disc fragment type can predict the possibility of recurrence of disc herniation or sciatica. Method: We looked at the records of patients who had a discectomy operation during a 10-year period from 1992–2002. We excluded from the study patients who had a concomitant fusion operation, patients with multiple level disc operations and those who have diabetes. We went through the operation records, looking for the type of the disc fragment, i.e. whether it was contained, extruded or sequestrated disc. In the follow-up notes we recorded the patients that complained of leg pain, starting three months after the operation and continuing despite treatment. We recorded the length of follow-up. Results: Sixty-five patients were entered for the study. There were 31 males and 34 females. The age range at surgery was 16–61 years (average 42.1 year). The follow-up ranged from 18 months to 10 years (average 30 months). We divided the patients into two groups. Group A, those patients with recurrent leg pain; and group B, those patients with no leg pain. There were 18 patients in group A – they were all subjected to further examination with MRI scan. In five of the patients, the scan showed recurrence of disc herniation. It was an ipsilateral reherniation in four patients and contralateral in one patient. Eight of these 18 patients required repeat surgery. In the five patients with reherniation (7.69% of whole series), the repeat surgery was a discectomy. In another three patients the surgery was a wide decompression and fusion. On further analysing the pathology found at the initial discectomy, in the group A patients, six (33%) had extruded discs and 12 (66%) had contained discs. In group B, 34 (72%) had extruded discs and 13 (27%) had contained discs. The statistical significance in this small series is debatable. Conclusion: Patients with extruded discs do much better than those with contained discs. Recurrent disc herniation is more common in contained discs and less common in extruded discs. If we could select pre-operatively those patients with contained disc herniations, we could elect to persist with conservative treatment for longer in this group

Aims. The presence of facet tropism has been correlated with an elevated susceptibility to lumbar disc pathology. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of facet tropism on chronic lumbosacral discogenic pain through the analysis of clinical data and finite element modelling (FEM). Methods. Retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data, with a specific focus on the spinal units displaying facet tropism, utilizing FEM analysis for motion simulation. We studied 318 intervertebral levels in 156 patients who had undergone provocation discography. Significant predictors of clinical findings were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Loading conditions were applied in FEM simulations to mimic biomechanical effects on intervertebral discs, focusing on maximal displacement and intradiscal pressures, gauged through alterations in disc morphology and physical stress. Results. A total of 144 discs were categorized as ‘positive’ and 174 discs as ‘negative’ by the results of provocation discography. The presence of defined facet tropism (OR 3.451, 95% CI 1.944 to 6.126) and higher Adams classification (OR 2.172, 95% CI 1.523 to 3.097) were important predictive parameters for discography-‘positive’ discs. FEM simulations showcased uneven stress distribution and significant disc displacement in tropism-affected discs, where loading exacerbated stress on facets with greater angles. During varied positions, notably increased stress and displacement were observed in discs with tropism compared to those with normal facet structure. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that facet tropism can contribute to disc herniation and changes in intradiscal pressure, potentially exacerbating disc degeneration due to altered force distribution and increased mechanical stress. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2024;13(9):452–461

Background: Many studies have examined magnetic resonance images (MRI) with a view to the anatomy and signaling properties of the intervertebral disc and adjacent tissues in asymptomatic populations. In this study we have examined MRIs of a discrete population of patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic disc herniations. Methods: Sixty patients (aged 23–66 years, mean 41.5±8.4) had sagittal T1 and T2- weighted turbo spin echo imaging of the lumbar spine prior to surgery. One disc was herniated at L2-3, 3 at L3-4, 22 at L4-5 and 31 at L5-S1; 3 patients had herniations at both L4-5 and L5-S1. The images were scored for disc narrowing and signal, degree of anterior and posterior bulging and herniation, and assessed for Modic I and II endplate changes and fatty degeneration within the vertebrae. These were carried out for each of 6 discs (T12-S1) for all patients (ie 360 discs and 720 endplates). Results: There were trends of increasing disc narrowing, disc bulging and fatty degeneration with increasing age in these patients. 83% of patients had disc bulging, 53% had endplate irregularities and 44% had fatty degeneration. There was a significant correlation between patient weight and fatty degeneration. 7.5% of vertebrae (in 22% of patients) demonstrated Modic I changes whilst Modic II changes were seen in 14% of vertebrae (40% of patients). This is considerably higher than the incidence reported in asymptomatic individuals where Modic I changes were seen in 0.7% of vertebrae (3% of individuals) and Modic II changes in 1.9% of vertebrae (10% of individuals). Conclusion: There is a higher incidence of Modic I and II changes in disc herniation patients than in asymptomatic individuals

Studies on recurrent disc herniation quote rates of recurrence without regard to the times of recurrence and the influence of longer follow-up. Our objective was to assess the use of survival analysis to measure the rate of revision after lumbar microdiscectomy. We undertook a retrospective analysis of the hospital records of 993 patients who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy over a period of ten years. After calculating the overall rate of revision for the mean length of follow-up, we carried out a survival analysis using the life-table method. During the study period 49 patients had a revision microdiscectomy. This gave an overall rate of revision of 4.9% at a mean follow-up of 5.25 years. Using survival analysis, the rate of revision was 7.9% at a follow-up of ten years when the number at risk was 84. Survival analysis gives a more accurate estimation of the true rate of recurrence for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. The method allows better comparison between different interventions for disc herniation

Background: The dermatomal drawings used in clinical practice are based on questionable experiments performed in the 1930s. Though widely used in the clinical practice to identify the level of nerve root irritation, this may not be a reliable practise. Purpose: To identify the pain distribution and overlap of single level L4, L5 and S1nerve root irritation. Methods: 187 patients with radicular pain to or below the knee made a precise drawing of their pain distribution and then underwent a MRI scan. Only patients identified as having a single level disc herniation were included in this study. Using computer software, the pain distribution of all people who had the same level nerve root irritation was made by layering their pain drawings. The darkest parts of these compound drawings was where most patients experienced pain. Results: 89 patients were excluded due to tumour, depression or disc lesions on several levels. 98 patients with single level disc herniation were included. There was wide overlap in the pain from each nerve root level, and these areas were much wider than shown on dermatome charts. In general, L4 nerve root pain tended to be anterior on the leg, L5 and S1 nerve root pain was on the posterior leg, with L5 root pain tending to be more lateral. Conclusion: Pain distribution from the L4, L5, S1 nerve roots is not concordant with the sensory distribution of common dermatome charts. This might be due to the methods by which these dermatomes were constructed, or because sciatica is a complex pain experience

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to compare the appearance of the spine in 20 adolescents with proven symptomatic intervertebral disc herniations with that in 20 asymptomatic patients who acted as controls. Abnormality in the signal from the nucleus pulposus of one or more discs was present in all patients, while only four of the 20 controls had any abnormal signals. In all the patients the symptomatic disc produced an abnormal signal and in most a herniated fragment of the nucleus pulposus was identified. Fifteen of the 20 patients had multiple-disc abnormality: six had three abnormal discs and nine had two. This suggests there was an underlying diathesis in patients who later developed disc herniation

The purpose of this study was to highlight uncommon and confusing clinical problem of unilateral prolapsed intervertebral disc (PIVD) producing contralateral symptoms based on case reports and literature review. Four cases of patients with disc prolapse contralateral to the symptomatic limb are presented. Two patients had cervical disc herniations, and one patient had a lumbar disc prolapse. All three patients had resolution of their contralateral radicular pain following discectomy. Few reports have been published of patients with unilateral sciatica following contralateral lumbar disc herniation. The authors described the unique features of their patients’ anatomy and related this to their respective pathology. Coexistence of lumbar spondylosis and lateral recess stenosis, as well as the unique features of the attachments of the dural sac and nerve root sleeves to the surrounding osseous structures serve to provide an explanation for contralateral symptoms. The cervical spine is quite different from the lumbar spine. Here the spinal cord rather than the more flexible cauda equina fills most of the spinal canal. A number of reports can be found describing Brown-Sequard syndrome as a consequence of cervical disc herniation. The two cases presented are in our opinion also the consequence of direct pressure on the spinal cord. We suggest that pressure on the ascending spinothalamic tracts leads to contralateral pain without other neurological symptoms

The aim of this study was to assess whether the pro-lapsed disc fragment type was predictive of recurrent disc herniation or sciatica after discectomy. The records of 39 patients treated by lumbar discectomy only were reviewed. Within two months of surgery, the type of disc fragment prolapse and state of the annulus were assessed on CT scans or MRI. Patients who presented later with recurrent sciatica or disc prolapse were reviewed with MRI. All other patients were contacted and asked whether they had had recurrent sciatica or had undergone repeat surgery elsewhere. The follow-up period was three years. The results suggest that patients in whom discs required annulotomy at surgery had poorer results than those with extrusion through an annular fissure. The degree of annular competence can be used to assess the risk of recurrence of herniation or sciatica

Introduction: The purpose of this case report is to highlight an unusual presentation of a well-described but rare condition (idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis) in association with a commonly presenting problem (far-lateral disc herniation). Methods: Retrospective case report and review of the literature. Results: A 46-year-old Caucasian male presented with right L5 radiculopathy secondary to a far-lateral lumbosacral disc protrusion, confirmed on MRI scanning. Treatment consisted of a right L5 foraminal steroid injection with a 50% improvement in symptoms. This was soon followed by symptoms of spinal stenosis, and repeat MRI showed worsening of idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis seen on the initial scan. Over this period the patient had been unable to exercise regularly and had gained 10 kg of weight. Nonoperative treatment, including a supervised Xenical weight-reduction program (which was unsuccessful), failed to alleviate his symptoms so operative decompression was performed, with satisfactory resolution of the stenotic symptoms. Discussion: Spinal epidural lipomatosis may be idiopathic or secondary to excess steroids (endogenous or exogenous). It affects either the thoracic or lumbar spine. Treatment options are withdrawal of exogenous steroids, weight reduction or decompressive surgery. In this case, disability associated with a far-lateral disc herniation resulted in weight gain, and subsequent stenotic symptoms from previously asymptomatic lumbar idiopathic spinal epidural lipomatosis

Thirteen patients with symptomatic disc herniation in the cervical spine were treated with percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD). Patients included 10 males and 3 females with a mean age of 41.4 (range, 24–60) years old. Preoperative symptom was divided into 2 types; myelopathy in 8 and radiculopathy in 5 patients. The level of the treated disc, which was diagnosed from the provoked cervicobrachial neuralgia during discography, distributed to C4/5 in 1, C5/6 in 8, C6/7 in 4 patients. The Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm) was percutaneously irradiated to the involved disc through a needle of 1.5 mm with a mean energy of 600 joules. Clinical evaluations were assessed with modified Macnab`s criteria at a mean follow-up period of 3 years (range, 0.5–5.7 years) excluding one patient who received open surgery 3 weeks after PLDD. Six patients (46.2%) showed good to excellent results without any significant complications. Four patients of 7 with unsuccessful results received a subsequent open surgery. There was no significant difference between successful and unsuccessful group in gender, disc level, preoperative duration of symptoms, positive provocation during discography, and the total amount of irradiated energy. Patients with successful results tended to be younger with a mean age of 35.7 years compared to those with unsuccessful results with a mean of 46.3 (p=0.053). Clinical outcome in two patients with radiculopathy were judged as excellent. Although postoperative MRI revealed few morphological changes on the disc in 2–3 weeks after PLDD, MRI at the final follow-up showed remarkable decrease of signal intensity in the disc. On postoperative radiographs, the disc height and the range of motion during flexion to extension in the treated discs significantly decreased, indicating the acceleration of disc degeneration and the resultant stabilization of the segment

Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of Adcon-L in re-discectomy and/or surgical neurolysis compared to autologous fat graft. Methods: A total of 50 patients with recurrent disc herniation (n=30) and/or epidural þbrosis (n=20) were included. All had failed in conservative treatment and suffered from predominantly radicular pain. MRI scans proofed the re-herniation (same segment, same side) and/or epidural þbrosis. Standard preoperative and follow-up examinations were carried out. Follow-up examination was performed by an independend investigator. Data were analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. Result: The clinical outcome showed no statistically difference between both groups one year after revision surgery. Conclusion: Due to our results, and as we know that the rate of clinically relevant cerebrospinal ßuid leakage is increased after the application of Adcon-L, we prefer the use of autologous graft as an antiadhesive in revision surgery of the spinal canal

Introduction: Discectomy for herniation of the nucleus pulposus is an effective procedure when conservative treatment has failed. However, a number of patients rapidly progress to symptomatic instability after discectomy. Those most likely to develop instability have central and multi-regional herniations. Therefore, primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be a better option than discectomy alone in this group. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive group of such patients treated in one centre by PLIF, but recognises that newer technologies may make such destructive spinal surgery unnecessary in the future. Methods: Between June 1997 and December 2000, PLIF for central disc herniation presenting with acute, subacute and chronic back and leg pain, with or without neurological loss, using Diapason pedicle screw instrumentation and Ogival PEEK (Polyether-ether-ketone) Interbody Fusion cages was performed on 41 patients. Eight patients presented acutely with cauda equina symptoms and 33 patients had sub-acute or chronic symptoms. Formal clinic follow-up was continued for at least two years post-surgery and the final outcome at 2 to 5 years after operation was assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Two independent orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiological evidence of fusion on X-rays taken at least two years after surgery. Results: 39 of the 41 patients completed the LBOS questionnaire (95%). One patient had died from an unrelated cause and the other could not be contacted having moved away. 34 (87%) of these had an excellent or good outcome according to the LBOS criteria. However, every patient who returned the questionnaire stated that they would undergo the operation again if guaranteed the same surgical result and all would recommend it to a friend for similar trouble. Four patients (9.7%) were dissatisfied with the process of care they experienced. Analysis of radiographs taken between two and four years post-operatively revealed that spinal fusion (as defined by the Brantigan and Steffee criteria) was present in 38 cases (92.7%). None of the patients with a non-union radiologically had a poor outcome. Conclusions: Post-discectomy instability causing disabling low back and leg pain is more likely to occur in patients with an incompetent annulus than those with a largely intact annulus. The patients in this series all had good evidence on MRI of complete (pan-annular) failure. The decision to perform an acute single level PLIF was taken after discussion with the patients, presenting them with the option of having only a central discectomy and a later fusion if needed or of dealing with the problem at one operation. The outcomes described in this study show that this condition is a good indication for PLIF. However, newer technologies such as disc arthroplasty may be a better option for this group of patients in the future

INTRODUCTION: Discectomy for herniation of the nucleus pulposus is an effective procedure when conservative treatment has failed. However, a number of patients rapidly progress to symptomatic instability after discectomy. Those most likely to develop instability have central and multi-regional herniations. Therefore, primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) may be a better option than discectomy alone in this group. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive group of such patients treated in one centre by PLIF, but recognises that newer technologies may make such destructive spinal surgery unnecessary in the future. METHODS: Between June 1997 and December 2000, PLIF for central disc herniation presenting with acute, sub-acute and chronic back and leg pain, with or without neurological loss, using Diapason pedicle screw instrumentation and Ogival PEEK (Poly-ether-ether-ketone) Interbody Fusion cages was performed on 41 patients. Eight patients presented acutely with cauda equina symptoms and 33 patients had sub-acute or chronic symptoms. Formal clinic follow-up was continued for at least two years post-surgery and the final outcome at two to five years after operation was assessed using the Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS). Two independent orthopaedic surgeons assessed the radiological evidence of fusion on X-rays taken at least two years after surgery. RESULTS: 39 of the 41 patients completed the LBOS questionnaire (95%). One patient had died from an unrelated cause and the other could not be contacted having moved away. 34 (87%) of these had an excellent or good outcome according to the LBOS criteria. However, every patient who returned the questionnaire stated that they would undergo the operation again if guaranteed the same surgical result and all would recommend it to a friend for similar trouble. Four patients (9.7%) were dissatisfied with the process of care they experienced. Analysis of radiographs taken between two and four years post-operatively revealed that spinal fusion (as defined by the Brantigan and Steffee criteria) was present in 38 cases (92.7%). None of the patients with a non-union radiologically had a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Post-discectomy instability causing disabling low back and leg pain is more likely to occur in patients with an incompetent annulus than those with a largely intact annulus. The patients in this series all had good evidence on MRI of complete (pan-annular) failure. The decision to perform an acute single level PLIF was taken after discussion with the patients, presenting them with the option of having only a central discectomy and a later fusion if needed or of dealing with the problem at one operation. The outcomes described in this study show that this condition is a good indication for PLIF. However, newer technologies such as disc arthroplasty may be a better option for this group of patients in the future

Introduction Symptomatic Thoracic disc prolapse (TDH) is a rare condition, with approximately 1 case per million population presenting per year. There are not many Spinal surgeons with a significant experience in the management of these lesions which necessitate a familiarity with the anatomy of the thorax and thoracic spinal cord. TDH is often diagnosed on modern imaging, but the indications for surgery in asymptomatic cases or in patients with spinal pain only, remain undefined. The natural history of TDH is not known and there is a poor correlation between the radiological and clinical presentation. The advent of newer minimally invasive endoscopic techniques for TDH may have reduced the incidence of open procedures for this condition, but may lead to an increase in operations performed for TDH, especially in cases where the surgical indications remain uncertain. In a small country like New Zealand it is especially difficult to build up a large series and to become very familiar with what remains a difficult operation

Methods The Neurosurgical experience with this condition in Auckland over the last ten years was reviewed. Clinical presentation, diagnostic imaging, surgical management and patient outcome were analyzed.

Results Twenty-one patients were treated over the last 10 years. All had symptomatic TDH. Most operations were performed by the senior author. Patient age varied between 30 and 80, with mean age 50.8 years. There was a slight female preponderance (n=14). Most patients were of European ethnicity. Most patients had spinal cord or nerve root dysfunction, but local pain and sensation change were also noted. MRI was the mainstay in diagnosis, and CT scan was often also used. Surgical exposure was aimed at avoiding spinal cord manipulation and will be discussed. The surgical approach was via thoracotomy in most cases, costotransversectomy, pediculectomy and laminectomy. One case was treated conservatively. There was one case of postoperative paraplegia which will be discussed. There were no other permanent major neurological complications. Patient outcomes will be discussed in detail. Patients with motor weakness showed post operative improvement or full recovery. Pain and sensory loss symptoms were less likely to resolve. Complications that warrant discussion included temporary cranial nerve palsy, thoracic empyema, and long-term opioid addiction for pain.

Discussion Over the past 10 years, a reasonable number of patients with TDH have been treated surgically without major incident. The surgical management of this condition remains a challenge. Younger spinal surgeons may not have the training to deal with these cases, which should be addressed. Endoscopic treatment has a steep learning curve, and may not be well suited to larger symptomatic TDH.

We describe a rare herniation of the disc at the C2/C3 level in a 73-year-old woman. It caused hemicompression of the spinal cord and led to the Brown-Sequard syndrome. The condition was diagnosed clinically and by MRI six months after onset. Discectomy and fusion gave complete neurological resolution.

We evaluated the nerve roots of the cauda equina by CT myelography in 36 patients aged from 11 to 19 years with lumbar disc herniation. On straight-leg-raising tests, six younger patients had isolated hamstring tightness with no sciatica (group A) and 30 had sciatic pain (group B). CT myelography showed that no patient in group A had associated nerve-root swelling, and that the roots were displaced posteriorly, but not compressed. In 21 of the group-B patients, swelling of the nerve roots was confirmed, with compression between the herniated disc and the superior articular process. Our findings suggest that hamstring tightness in these patients may be caused by a different mechanism from that which causes sciatic pain.

Background: Publications concerning recurrent disc disease quote percentage recurrence without regard to the times of recurrence and the influence of longer follow-up.

Objective: To assess the use of survival analysis to measure revision rate after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Design: A retrospective analysis of the hospital records of all patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy over a nine-year period was undertaken. Patients who had a repeat microdiscectomy at the same level as the index procedure were designated ‘revisions’. The overall revision rate was calculated for the average length of follow-up. A survival analysis was then carried out using the life table method, as described by Murray et al for follow-up of hip arthroplasty.

Subjects: Seven hundred and twenty-nine patients underwent primary microdiscectomy during this time period, average age 40 years.

Results: Twenty-seven patients had a revision microdiscectomy during the study period. This gave an overall revision rate of 3.7% at average follow up of five years, one month. Using survival analysis the revision rate was 5.5% at eight years of follow up, number at risk 51.

Conclusions: Survival analysis gives a more accurate estimation of the true recurrence rate for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy. The method would allow better comparison between different interventions for intervertebral disc herniation.

Purpose: In this study, we evaluated AGEs(advanced glycation end products) based on the following points. In routine clinical practice, some patients with intervertebral disc hernia show or previously showed a high blood glucose level, similar to the state in cataract patients. This study is significant for hernia therapy in the near future in context of an approach from sugar(cause),not aging(result).

Materials and Methods: Herniated intervertebral discs were obtained during surgery. We obtained human fetal (aborted) tissue and immunohistologically stained.

Results: AGEs were already exposed during histogenesis, suggesting a relation to apoptosis.

Discussion: In this study, a relationship between programmed cell death and AGEs was suggested. During the early step of glycosylation, the reaction progresses in a manner dependent on saccharide concentration and reaction time. In patients in whom the blood glucose level had been high in the past, the incidence remained high even though the blood glucose level is currently controlled, suggesting that AGEs affect a gene and the effect is memorized.

Despite the clinical relevance of back pain and intervertebral disc herniation, the lack of reliable models has strained their molecular understanding. We characterized the lumbar spinal phenotype of C57BL/6 and SM/J mice during aging. Interestingly, old SM/J lumbar discs evidenced accelerated degeneration, associated with high rates of disc herniation. SM/J AF's and degenerative human's AF transcriptomic profiles showed altered immune cell, inflammation, and p53 pathways. Old SM/J mice presented increased neuronal markers in herniated discs, thicker subchondral bone, and higher sensitization to pain. Dorsal root ganglia transcriptomic studies and spinal cord analysis exhibited increased pain and neuroinflammatory markers associated with altered extracellular matrix regulation. Immune system single-cell and tissue level analysis showed distinctive T-cell and B-cell modulation and negative correlation between mechanical allodynia and INF-α, IL-1β, IL2, and IL4, respectively. This study underscores the multisystemic network behind back pain and highlights the role of genetic background and the immune system in disc herniation disease. Acknowledgments: This study is supported by grants from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) R01AR055655, R01AR064733, R01AR074813 to MVR

Aims. The aim of the study was to determine if there was a direct correlation between the pain and disability experienced by patients and size of their disc prolapse, measured by the disc’s cross-sectional area on T2 axial MRI scans. Methods. Patients were asked to prospectively complete visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores on the day of their MRI scan. All patients with primary disc herniation were included. Exclusion criteria included recurrent disc herniation, cauda equina syndrome, or any other associated spinal pathology. T2 weighted MRI scans were reviewed on picture archiving and communications software. The T2 axial image showing the disc protrusion with the largest cross sectional area was used for measurements. The area of the disc and canal were measured at this level. The size of the disc was measured as a percentage of the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal on the chosen image. The VAS leg pain and ODI scores were each correlated with the size of the disc using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Intraobserver reliability for MRI measurement was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We assessed if the position of the disc prolapse (central, lateral recess, or foraminal) altered the symptoms described by the patient. The VAS and ODI scores from central and lateral recess disc prolapses were compared. Results. A total of 56 patients (mean age 41.1 years (22.8 to 70.3)) were included. A high degree of intraobserver reliability was observed for MRI measurement: single measure ICC was 0.99 (95% confidence interval (CI) from 0.97 to 0.99 (p < 0.001)). The PCC comparing VAS leg scores with canal occupancy for herniated disc was 0.056. The PCC comparing ODI for herniated disc was 0.070. We found 13 disc prolapses centrally and 43 lateral recess prolapses. There were no foraminal prolapses in this group. The position of the prolapse was not found to be related to the mean VAS score or ODI experienced by the patients (VAS, p = 0.251; ODI, p = 0.093). Conclusion. The results of the statistical analysis show that there is no direct correlation between the size or position of the disc prolapse and a patient’s symptoms. The symptoms experienced by patients should be the primary concern in deciding to perform discectomy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(6):715–720

Background. It has become increasingly important to conduct studies assessing clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, and revision rates to better define the indications and efficacy of lumbar spinal procedures and its association with symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration (sASD). Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is defined as the radiographic change in the intervertebral discs adjacent to the surgically treated spinal level. SASD represents adjacent segment degeneration which causes pain or numbness due to post-operative spinal instability or nerve compression at the same level. The most common reason for early reoperation and late operation is sASD, therefore is in our best interest to understand the causes of ASD and make steps to limit the occurrence. Method. A comprehensive literature search was performed selecting Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or prospective studies published up to December 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on 38 studies that met the inclusion criteria and included data of clinical outcomes of patients who had degenerative disc disease, disc herniation, radiculopathy, and spondylolisthesis and underwent lumbar fusion or motion-preservation device surgery; and reported on the prevalence of ASD, sASD, reoperation rate, visual analogue score (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) improvement. Results. When compared to fusion surgery, a significant reduction of ASD, sASD and reoperation was observed in the cohort of patients that underwent motion-preserving surgery. Conclusion. Dynamic fusion constructs are treatment options that may help to prevent sASD. Conflicts of interest. This research was funded by Paradigm Spine. Sources of funding. Paradigm Spine

Abstract. Objectives. There is still controversy in the literature over whether Cervical Foraminotomy or Anterior Cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is best for treating cervical Radiculopathy. Numerous studies have focused on the respective complication rates of these procedures and outcome measures with a lack of due consideration to preoperative MRI findings. Proximal foraminal stenosis can theoretically be accessed via either approach. We aimed to investigate whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) favoured one approach over the other in patients with proximal foraminal stenosis. Methods. A single centre retrospective review of patients undergoing either ACDF or Cervical foraminotomy over the period 2012 to 2022. VAS, Neck disability index (NDI), EQ5DL and Patient Satisfaction on a Five Point Likert scale were obtained. Patients who had both an ACDF and a Foraminotomy were excluded. Axial MRI images were analysed and the location of the worst clinically relevant disc herniation stratified as follows: Central (1), Paracentral (2) and Foraminal (3). Correlations and average PROMs were analysed in SPSS. Results. PROMs scores were available for 33 ACDF patients and 37 Foraminotomy patients. Average surgery time in ACDF group was 167 minutes while Foraminotomy 142 minutes. Average Length of hospital stay was 6.24 days in the Foraminotomy group and 3.54 days in the ACDF group. 18 patients were excluded due to having both surgeries (2 of which developed CSF leaks postoperatively). Of the included patients there were no postoperative complications. 13 patients in the ACDF had Central or Paracentral stenosis in addition to proximal Foraminal stenosis, 3 patients in the Foraminotomy group had some significant Paracentral herniation just before the Proximal foramen. The majority of patients in both groups had pure proximal Foraminal stenosis (N= 17 (ACDF), 20 (Foraminotomy). The results showed no significant difference in PROMs between patients who received an ACDF or a Foraminotomy for Proximal foraminal stenosis (EQ5DL, NDI, and satisfaction, P= 0.268, 0.253 and 0.327). There was no correlation between location of the stenosis and PROM scores in either group. Conclusions. Our data suggest that Proximal foraminal stenosis can be effectively addressed by either an anterior ACDF or a Foraminotomy with no difference in complication rates. Foraminotomy has the benefit of no implant cost but longer hospital stay. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

With the increase in the elderly population, there is a dramatic increase in the number of spinal fusions. Spinal fusion is usually performed in cases of primary instability. However it is also performed to prevent iatrogenic instability created during surgical treatment of spinal stenosis in most cases. In literature, up to 75% of adjacent segment disease (ASD) can be seen according to the follow-up time. 1. Although ASD manifests itself with pathologies such as instability, foraminal stenosis, disc herniation or central stenosis. 1,2. There are several reports in the literature regarding lumbar percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic interventions for lumbar foraminal stenosis or disc herniations. However, to the best our knowledge, there is no report about the treatment of central stenosis in ASD. In this study, we aimed to investigate the short-term results of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompressive laminotomy (UBEDL) technique in ASD cases with symptomatic central or lateral recess stenosis. The number of patients participating in the prospective study was 8. The mean follow-up was 6.9 (ranged 6 to 11) months. The mean age of the patients was 68 (5m, 3F). The development of ASD time after fusion was 30.6 months(ranged 19 to 42). Mean fused segments were 3 (ranged 2 to 8). Preoperative instability was present in 2 of the patients which was proven by dynamic lumbar x-rays. Preoperative mean VAS-back score was 7.8, VAS Leg score was 5.6. The preoperative mean JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association) score was 11.25. At 6th month follow-up, the mean VAS back score of the patients was 1, and the VAS leg score was 0.5. This improvement was statistically significant (p = 0.11 and 0.016, respectively). The mean JOA score at the 6th month was 22.6 and it was also statistically significant comparing preoperative JOA score(p = 0.011). The preoperative mean dural sac area measured in MR was 0.50 cm2, and it was measured as 2.1 cm. 2. at po 6 months.(p = 0.012). There was no progress in any patient's instability during follow-up. In orthopedic surgery, when implant related problems develop in any region of body (pseudoarthrosis, infection, adjacent fracture, etc.), it is generally treated by using more implants in its final operation. This approach is also widely used in spinal surgery. 3. However, it carries more risk in terms of devoloping ASD, infection or another complications. In the literature, endoscopic procedures have almost always been used in the treatment of ventral pathologies which constitute only 10%. In ASD, disease devolops as characterized by wide facet joint arthrosis and hypertrophied ligamentum flavum in the cranial segment and it is mostly presented both lateral recess and santal stenosis symptoms (39%). In this study, we found that UBEDL provides successful results in the treatment of patients without no more muscle and ligament damage in ASD cases with spinal stenosis. One of the most important advantages of UBE is its ability to access both ventral and dorsal pathologies by minimally invasive endoscopic aproach. I think endoscopic decompression also plays an important role in the absence of additional instability at postoperatively in patients. UBE which has already been described in the literature given successful results in most of the spinal degenerative diseases besides it can also be used in the treatment of ASD. Studies with longer follow-up and higher patient numbers will provide more accurate results

Background. FORECAST is a prospective longitudinal cohort study exploring mechanism-based prognostic factors for pain persistence in sciatica. Here, we share an update on this largest deeply-phenotyped primary care sciatica cohort. Methods/results. Our cohort includes 180 people with sciatica (score >4 on Stynes’ Sum Score), aged 18–85, within 3 months of symptom onset. Psychosocial factors, self-reported sensory profiling, clinical examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), biological samples (blood and skin samples), and Magnetic Resonance Neurography of lumbar nerve roots were collected at baseline. Pain persistence was determined at three and twelve months with the Sciatica Bothersomeness Index (SBI) and a numeric pain rating scale (NRS) as primary outcomes. Recruitment nears completion, with 160 participants enrolled to date. 127 and 96 participants have completed 3 and 12 months follow-up respectively. Overall, 56% of our cohort are female, with a mean age (SD) of 54.14yrs (16.57). Ethnicity data approximates local populations. SBI at baseline was (median [IQR]) 13[10-17], and interim longitudinal data shows stepwise improvement at 3 and 12 months. Baseline ‘average’ pain intensity was 5.56 (2.15) for leg pain, and 4.14(2.82) for low back pain (LBP). Overall, pain scores decreased at 3 and 12 months, with greater reductions in leg pain than LBP at 12 months. However, around 55–80% and 40–65% of people reported persistent pain at 3 and 12 months respectively. Conclusion. Leg pain severity was moderate and higher than LBP at baseline. All primary outcome measures demonstrate improvement over time, however 40–65% of patients report persistent pain at 12 months. Conflicts of interest. LR: Paid facilitation of post-graduate courses internationally. SK, MT, FP, KM, WS, CP, CR, SC: No conflicts of interest. GC: Editor in Chief of Health Psychology Review. Director of board of directors, MentalCHealth Care setting NoordWestVlaanderen. JF: Copyright holder of ODI (Oswestry Disability Index). Served on a data monitoring committee for a clinical trial of 2 different surgical approaches to cervical disc herniation (FORVAD). Member of HTA Prioritisation Committee B: Inside hospital Care from 2015-February 2019. Member of HTA Interventional Procedures Panel from 2010–2015. Trustee and board member of 3 spine related charities – Back to Back; British Scoliosis Research Foundation and BackCare. Expert instructed by both claimant and defendant solicitors in negligence and person injury cases. GB: Paid consultancy (RNA-seq) with Ivy Farm and Coding.bio. ABS: Paid post-graduate lecturing internationally. Co-chair NeupSig sciatica working group (unpaid). Sources of funding. This project is funded by UKRI and Versus Arthritis as part of the UKRI Strategic Priorities Fund (SPF) Advanced Pain Discovery Platform (APDP), a co-funded initiative by UKRI (MRC, BBSRC, ESRC), Versus Arthritis, the Medical Research Foundation and Eli Lilly and Company Ltd (Grant MR/W027003/1). Additional funding has been received from the back to back charity to expand longitudinal components of the study. LR has received support with PhD fees from the CSP charitable trust. ABS is supported by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Career Development Fellowship. (222101/Z/20/Z). WS is partly funded through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. FP is funded by a Dorothy Hodgkin Career Development Fellowship in Chemistry in association with Somerville College. GB is supported by the Wellcome Trust (223149/Z/21/Z) and Diabetes UK (19/0005984). GC and KRM are partly funded by UKRI and Versus Arthritis as part of the Advanced Pain Discovery Platform (APDP) PAINSTORM (MR/W002388/1). The UKRI and Versus Arhthritis (APDP) are the major funders of FORECAST. All other funders provided either some people support, or funded projects with legacy data that we reuse

Aims. Patients may present with concurrent symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, with surgical treatment being indicated for both. Whether arthroplasty of the hip or spinal surgery should be performed first remains uncertain. Materials and Methods. Clinical scenarios were devised for a survey asking the preferred order of surgery and the rationale for this decision for five fictional patients with both OA of the hip and degenerative lumbar disorders. These were symptomatic OA of the hip and: 1) lumbar spinal stenosis with neurological claudication; 2) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with leg pain; 3) lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness; 4) lumbar scoliosis with back pain; and 5) thoracolumbar disc herniation with myelopathy. This survey was sent to 110 members of The Hip Society and 101 members of the Scoliosis Research Society. The choices of the surgeons were compared among scenarios and between surgical specialties using the chi-squared test. The free-text comments were analyzed using text-mining. Results. Responses were received from 51 hip surgeons (46%) and 37 spine surgeons (37%). The percentages of hip surgeons recommending ‘hip first’ differed significantly among scenarios: 59% for scenario 1; 73% for scenario 2; 47% for scenario 3; 47% for scenario 4; and 10% for scenario 5 (p < 0.001). The percentages of spine surgeons recommending ‘hip first’ were 49% for scenario 1; 70% for scenario 2; 19% for scenario 3; 78% for scenario 4; and 0% for scenario 5. There were significant differences between the groups for scenarios 3 (more hip surgeons recommended ‘hip first’; p = 0.012) and 4 (more hip surgeons recommended ‘spine first’; p = 0.006). Conclusion. In patients with coexistent OA of the hip and degenerative disorders of the spine, the question of ‘hip or spinal surgery first’ elicits relatively consistent answers in some clinical scenarios, but remains controversial in others, even for experienced surgeons. The nature of neurological symptoms can influence surgeons’ decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):37–44

A 980 nm Diode (Biolitec AG) Laser energy introduced via a 21G needle under C-arm or CT-Scan guidance and local anesthesia, vaporizes a small amount of nucleous polposus with a disc shrinkage and a relief of pressure on nerve root. The procedure in the disc herniation treatment over the years had several changes, not only related to the different types of lasers (Ho:YAG, Nd: YAG, Er:YAG), but also in the types of optical fibers employed and in the neuronavigation systems. In our department starting under C-arm, realized that the only way to visualize the nerve root and increase the total energy delivered in several points of disc herniation, was to use a CT-Scan guidance (Aquilion 64 Slices Toshiba). Matherial and Method: A prospective study on 350 patients (470 cases) affected by contained and non contained disc herniation was performed. The patients had a PLDD (Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression) under CT-Scan guidance. A control group of 200 patients (350 cases) affected both by contained and noncontained disc herniation had a PLDD under C-arm. Results: The results showed a statistically significant difference (p< 0.05) in the effectiveness of the PLDD in Disc Herniation treatment. Non Contained disc herniation had a successful result in 88.5% of cases under Ct-Scan guidance vs 70% of cases under C-arm. No statistically significant (p > 0.05) difference was found in contained disc herniation group. The laser energy delivered under CT-Scan was on average 40% (S.D. 0.36) more than under C-arm, because the visualization of nerve root and the size of the disc herniation permits to apply laser energy on different points, in order to obtain a disc shrinkage over a bigger surface, without any damage on surrounding tissues. In conclusion, CT-Scan guidance appear to be the best way to practice PLDD not only in terms of resolution, treating succesfully non contained disc herniation, but also because the visualization of the nerve root permits a safe application of the laser energy and the effectiveness of the procedure give a faster return to normal life

Repetitive manual handling caused 31% of all work related musculoskeletal disorders in 2015, with the back being the site of injury 38% of the time. Despite its high resilience, studies have shown that intervertebral discs can be damaged during repetitive loading at physiological motions, causing cumulative damage and disc herniation. To understand the mechanism of disc injury resulting from repetitive lifting, it is important to measure disc deformations/strains accompanied by MRI imaging to identify disc tissue damage. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine associations between the magnitude of 3D internal strains, tissue damage and macroscopic evidence of disc injury after simulated repetitive lifting on normal human lumbar discs. Sixteen cadaver lumbar functional spinal units (FSUs) were subjected to pre-test MRI. Eight FSUs (control) underwent 20,000 cycles or until failure (5 mm displacement) of loading under compression (1.7 MPa – to simulate lifting a 20 kg weight) + flexion (13°) + right axial rotation (2°) using a novel Hexapod Robot. The remaining eight FSUs (experimental) had a grid of tantalum wires inserted, and stereoradiographs were taken to track internal disc displacements at increasing cyclic intervals. Maximum shear strains (MSS) were calculated from the displacements using radiostereometric analysis at cycle 1 and 20,000 cycles (or failure). Post-test MRI was conducted to determine the extent of tissue damage and associated with regions of highest MSS. A repeated measures ANOVA was performed on MSS with a within–subjects factor of cycle number (cycle 1 and failure cycle) and a between subjects-factor of disc region and failure type (p < 0 .05). Pfirrmann grading revealed mostly normal discs [I (N=2), II (N=13), and III (N=1)]. No significant difference in MSS between control and experimental groups was found for number of cycles to failure (p=0.279). Pre and post-test MRI analysis revealed that 13 specimens were injured after repetitive lifting with either an endplate failure (N=9) or disc bulge (N=4), and two specimens did not fail. Failure strain was significantly greater than cycle 1 in all regions except posterior, left/right posterolateral (p>0.109). Largest MSS at failure was seen in the anterior (60%), and left/right posterolateral regions (64% and 70%, respectively). MSS at failure for the endplate failure group was significantly larger than the no injury group in all regions except right lateral and nucleus (p>0.707). Disc bulge group MSS was significantly larger than the no injury group in the anterior, right anterolateral, and left/right posterolateral regions (p < 0 .027). Simulated repetitive lifting led to largest shear strains in the anterior, left and right posterolateral regions that corresponded to annular tears or annular protrusion. The no injury group shear strain was less than 50% in all regions, indicating there may be a threshold that could be associated with tissue damage linked with injuries such as disc bulge and endplate failure. There was no evidence of disc herniation in normal discs, agreeing with current clinical knowledge. These results may be indicative of the effects of repetitive manual handling on normal discs of younger patients

Background. NICE guidance suggests that caudal epidural injections of steroid and local anaesthetic may be considered for acute and severe sciatica, however studies have demonstrated limited long-term benefit and impact on future surgery. This study aimed to investigate the use of caudal epidural injections in a district general hospital setting and the rate of subsequent operation. Methods. All patients undergoing caudal epidural injection between 1. st. January and 30. th. June 2015 were included. Records were reviewed to obtain diagnosis, pre- and post-epidural clinical findings, prior interventions, and subsequent operations. Results. A total of 141 patients underwent a caudal epidural, with a median age of 63 (18 – 90). 37 patients went on to surgical intervention within 3 years, resulting in a conversion rate of 26.1%. Amongst those not requiring surgery, 59 (56.19%) had disc herniation, 42 (40%) stenosis, 4 spondylolisthesis, and 1 a facet cyst. Pre-operatively 63.81% reported back pain and 93.33% sciatica. 39.05% of patients had sensorimotor changes. Post-operatively, 27.62% reported an improvement in their back pain, compared to 62.86% reporting improved leg pain. 36.59% of those with sensorimotor changes reported improvement. 32 later had a further caudal epidural or foraminal block, and 25 had facet and sacroiliac joint injections. Amongst those requiring surgery, 21 (56.76%) had disc herniation, 15 (40.54%) stenosis, and 1 spondylolisthesis (2.7%). Conclusion. In our series, approximately three quarters of patients undergoing caudal epidural injection did not subsequently require surgery. Lumbosacral radicular symptoms improved in two thirds, however the epidural was less effective at treating back pain. No conflicts of interest. No funding obtained

Endoscopic spine surgery is a promising and minimally invasive technique for the treatment of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. However, the literature on the outcome of interlaminar endoscopic decompression (IED) versus conventional microsurgical technique (CMT) in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis is scarce. We analyzed 88 patients (IED: 36/88, 40.9%; CMT: 52/88, 59.1%) presenting with lumbar central spinal stenosis between 2018–2020. Surgery-related (operation time, complications, time to hospital release (THR), ASA score, C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), side (unilateral/bilateral), patient-reported (ODI, NRS (leg-, back pain), eQ5D, COMI), and radiological (preoperative dural sack cross-sectional area (DSCA), Shizas score (SC), left (LRH) and right (RRH) lateral recess heights, left (LFA) and right (RFA) facet angle) parameters were extracted. Complication (most often re-stenosis due to hematoma and/or residual sensorimotor deficits) rates were higher in the endoscopic (38.9%) than microsurgical (13.5%) treatment group (p<0.01). Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively evaluated ODI, COMI, eQ5D, NRS leg, or NRS back values in our cohort. We did not observe significant differences in the endoscopic versus microsurgical group for the patient-reported outcomes. Age, THR, SC, CRP, and DSCA revealed significant correlations with patient-centered outcomes and should be considered in future studies. Endoscopic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis was similarly successful as the conventional microsurgical approach, although it was associated with higher complication rates in our single-center study experience. This was probably because of the surgeons' lack of experience with this method and the resulting different learning curve compared with the conventional technique

Introduction. In degenerative lumbar spine, it seems possible that foraminal stenosis is over-diagnosed as axial scanning is not performed in the plane of the exiting nerve root. We carried out a two-part study to determine the true incidence of foraminal stenosis. Patients and Methods. Initially we performed a retrospective analysis of radiology reports of conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 100 cases of definite spinal stenosis to determine the incidence of reported ‘foraminal stenosis’. Subsiquently we performed a prospective study of MRI including fine slice T2 and T2 STIR coronal sequences in 100 patients with suspected stenosis. Three surgeons and one radiologist independently compared the diagnoses on conventional axial and sagittal sequences with the coronal scans. Results. The retrospective analysis found that ‘foraminal stenosis’ was reported by radiologists in 46% using conventional axial and sagittal sequences. In the prospective study of 100 patients suspected of having stenosis, spinal stenosis was reported in 40; degenerative spondylolisthesis in 14; posterolateral disc herniation in 14; normal report in 13; far lateral disc herniation in 7; isthmic (lytic) spondylolisthesis in 6; and degenerative scoliosis in 6. Conventional sequences diagnosed lateral recess stenosis reliably, but also suggested foraminal stenosis in 43%. However, coronal sequences clearly showed no foraminal nerve compression at all. In degenerative spondylolisthesis conventional scans suggested foraminal stenosis in 10 of 14 cases. Coronal imaging again showed no foraminal stenosis. Excellent correlation was found in normal spines and in disc herniation. Foraminal nerve compression was confirmed by conventional and coronal imaging only in isthmic spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis and far lateral disc herniation. Conclusion. The addition of coronal MRI proves that foraminal stenosis is over-diagnosed. True foraminal stenosis definitely exists in isthmic spondylolisthesis, degenerative scoliosis and far lateral disc herniation, but we question its existence in spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis

In a prospective, consecutive study we determined the frequency of common symptoms and signs in 300 patients with lumbar nerve-root compression syndromes. We compared 100 patients with disc herniation (mean age 43 years), 100 with lataral spinal stenosis (41 years) and 100 with central spinal stenosis (65 years), using a standard protocol of common signs and symptoms. The diagnoses were established by one or more of myelography, CT, MRI and nerve-root block, and all were confirmed at operation. The preoperative duration of symptoms was significantly shorter in patients with disc herniation. Pain at rest, at night, and on coughing was as common in lateral stenosis as in disc herniation, but regular consumption of analgesics was more common in patients with disc herniation. Positive straight-leg-raising tests were more common in disc herniation than in lateral stenosis and were uncommon in central stenosis. Motor disturbances were seen most often in central spinal stenosis, especially patellar reflex changes. Sensory disturbances were most common in patients with complete disc herniation

The volume of spinal procedures have increased over the last two decades (220% in lumbar region). A simultaneous increase in re-operation rates (up to 20%) has been reported. Our aim was to compare with literature the reoperation rates and complications for various spinal procedures from a peripheral unit and to provide this information to the patients. This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent spinal surgery during the period 1995 to 2005 by one surgeon. Using ICDM-9 codes and private notes patients were identified and medical records were used to gather relevant data. The following information was extracted-demographics, diagnosis, ASA criteria, primary procedure, any complication/s, secondary procedures, duration of follow up and to secondary procedure. The index procedures were grouped into regional and according to indication. Both complications and reoperations were grouped into early (within three months) or delayed (after three months) from the index operation. Reoperation rates and complications were calculated and compared with literature. Four hundred and thirty-nine patients formed the study population. Five patients had inadequate data and were excluded. 23 patients have since died. Demographics showed 22% were smokers and 9% were either unemployed or sickness beneficiary. The commonest diagnosis in the lumbar spine was disc herniation (194). Stenosis and disc degeneration were the next most common surgical indications. In the cervical spine 27 patients had disc herniation and 15 patients were operated for trauma. Lumbar discectomy was the commonest procedure-191 patients with one third having microdiscectomy. Instrumented fusion was performed in 97 while 37 patients underwent decompression only. The majority of cervical spine patients (46) had discectomy and fusion. Stabilisation for trauma formed a reasonable workload in both cervical and lumbar regions. Early complications included dural tears (seven), neurological symptoms (eight), wound infections (12) and pulmonary embolism (one) and repeat disc herniation. Delayed problems included repeat disc herniation, pseudoarthrosis and implant related symptoms. Overall re-operation rate was 14.52% with 5.02% early and 9.4%delayed repeat surgery. Repeat discectomy (eight) and decompression and exploration (seven) were the common early reoperation whereas fusion post discectomy (19) and recurrent disc herniation (12) were indications for delayed intervention. Removal of metalware (8) was another large late re-operation group. Our re-operation rates fall within the quoted figures in literature. However our early re-operation rates are somewhat higher. These figures help us to inform patients better at the time of consent for the primary procedure especially lumbar disc surgery as most of the re-operation were required after discectomy

Purposes of the study and background. The objective of this overview was to evaluate the available evidence from systematic reviews on the effectiveness of surgical interventions for sciatica due to disc herniation. The last search was conducted in 2011. Since then new reviews have been published or existing reviews have been updated. Summary of the methods used and results. A comprehensive search was performed in multiple databases including Cochrane database of systematic reviews (CDSR), Database of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) and Pubmed. Included are Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews on sciatica due to disc herniation published in peer-reviewed journals. We evaluated surgery versus conservative care and different surgical techniques compared to one another. The methodological quality of the systematic reviews was evaluated using AMSTAR by two independent reviewers. Nine, mostly high quality, systematic reviews on surgical interventions for disc herniation were included. Four reviews compared surgery with conservative treatment and concluded consistently that surgery has only short term benefits while the long term results showed no difference in effect. Four reviews compared open discectomy with micro(endo)scopic discectomy and found no significant and/or clinically relevant differences. The quality of evidence on alternative minimal invasive techniques (laser discectomy, automated percutaneous discectomy, and nucleoplasty or coblation) is consistently low in four recent reviews. Conclusion. Although the quality of the reviews was quite acceptable, the quality of the included studies was mostly poor. The choice between surgical techniques and surgery and conservative intervention should be based on surgeon and patient preferences, among other things

Spinal stenosis and disc herniation are the two most frequent causes of lumbosacral nerve root compression. This can result in muscle weakness and present with or without pain. The difficulty when managing patients with these conditions is knowing when surgery is better than non-operative treatment: the evidence is controversial. Younger patients with a lesser degree of weakness for a shorter period of time have been shown to respond better to surgical treatment than older patients with greater weakness for longer. However, they also constitute a group that fares better without surgery. The main indication for surgical treatment in the management of patients with lumbosacral nerve root compression should be pain rather than weakness

Summary: Twenty six consecutive patients with CSM were operated between Jan 2001–Dec 2004 with anterior corpectomy and reconstruction using strut graft/ lordotic cage and stabilization ACP. 10/26 were wheel chair bound/bought on stretcher. 16/26 had spastic lower limbs with myelopathic hands. Post operatively 20/26 had good gait improvement and are community ambulators. 3/26 house hold ambulators and 1 died. 18/26 had good improvement in hand function. Introduction: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is a degenerative disease of old age. Patients present with severe disabiling symptoms of spastic gait/inability to walk and varied involvement in the hand. The degenerative spondylosis being the commonest cause, CSM is also caused by OPLL and soft disc herniation. Methods: 26 consecutive patients who had undergone anterior decompression and reconstruction were evaluated for recovery. The gait pattern, hand functions and return to activities were evaluated pre and postoperatively. No specific scoring system could be used in our studies due to practical reasons. Results: 18/26 patients had CSM, 5/26 had OPLL and 3/26 soft disc herniations. Soft disc herniation were at 2 levels and all underwent discectomy, tricortical bone grafting and stabilization with ACP. Other patients had corpectomy 1 level – 4, 2 levels – 9, 3 levels – 4, 4 levels – 1. OPLL was removed in 4/5 patients. Xx/10 patients who were wheel chair bound preoperatively became ambulatory, 3/10 had decrease in spasm but still could not walk postoperatively. At 1 year follow up 9/10 patients had good gait pattern and 1 was still wheel chair bound. 18/26 had good hand function recovery with improvement in hand writing, 16/26 returned to previous activity, 1 patient expired. Conclusion: Anterior decompression for CSN is an effective surgical option. It not only prevents further detoriation, but also improvement is seen in most of the patients. Significance: Anterior decompression is indicated for all patients with CSM, OPLL and disc herniation as the pathology is anterior based

The aim of this study was to identify potential inflammatory mediators in herniated and non-herniated intervertebral disc. It has been suggested that inflammation of the nerve root is a pre-requisite for disc herniations to be symptomatic. What leads to this inflammation is a matter of conjecture; one possible cause may be inflammatory mediators released from the herniated disc tissue itself. In this study we have examined discs from individuals with and without disc herniations to determine if there is a different degree of occurrence. Twenty two discs from 21 patients with disc herniation were examined together with four discs from patients with other disc disorders and five age-matched discs from individuals obtained at autopsy. Samples were studied for the presence of blood vessels and inflammatory cytokines: IL-1α and β, IL-6, INOS, MCP1, TNFα, TSG-6 and thromboxane. Of the herniated discs 10 were protrusions, six extrusions and six sequestrations. There was less of all the cytokines in the non-herniated discs than found in the herniated, with very little immunostaining for iNOS or IL-1α in any samples. Staining was seen in all herniated samples for IL-1β, but in fewer for IL-six and MCP1 (86%), thromboxane (68%), TNFα (64%) and TSG-6 (59%). The presence of cytokines was strongly associated with the presence of blood vessels. Protruded discs had less TNFα and thromboxane than sequestrated or extruded discs. Cytokines appear to play an active role in the aetiopathogenesis of disc herniations. Some may be involved in the stimulation of degradative enzymes and hence resorption of, for example, sequestrations, whereas others may be responsible for an inflammatory response in the surrounding tissues such as nerve roots

Retrospective analysis of radiology reports of conventional MRI in 100 patients with definite spinal stenosis to determine the incidence of reported “foraminal stenosis”. Prospective study of MRI including T2 coronal and T2 STIR coronal sequences in 57 patients with suspected stenosis. Three surgeons and one radiologist independently compared the diagnoses on conventional and coronal scans. Patients with suspected spinal stenosis undergoing MRI. Incidence of “foraminal stenosis” on radiologists' reports. Diagnoses obtained by different scanning methods. Retrospective analysis: “foraminal stenosis” called by radiologists in 46% using conventional axial and sagittal sequences. Prospective study - 57 patients: conventional sequences diagnosed lateral recess stenosis well but also suggested foraminal stenosis in 33%. However, coronal sequences clearly showed no foraminal nerve compression. In degenerative spondylolisthesis conventional scans suggested foraminal stenosis in 8 of 11 cases. Coronals showed no foraminal stenosis. Excellent correlation was found in normal spines and in disc herniation. In far lateral disc herniation and isthmic spondylolisthesis, true foraminal stenosis was confirmed by conventional and coronal imaging. Additional coronal MRI sequences prove that foraminal stenosis is over-diagnosed and is rare in spinal stenosis, but true foraminal nerve compression occurs in isthmic spondylolisthesis and far lateral disc herniation

Background. Recently, some studies have focused attention on the possibility that anaerobic pathogens of low virulence could constitute an etiological factor in disc herniation. There have been isolated such strains, predominantly Propionibacterium acne, between 7 and 53% of patients undergoing surgery for disc pathology. According to these studies, patients with anaerobic infections of the disc are more likely to develop Modic changes in the adjacent vertebrae. The aim of this work was to test this hypothesis by growing in specific media the disc material extracted in a series of lumbar discectomy and relating this factor with the presence of pre-intervention Modic changes. Methods. A total of 22 consecutive patients undergoing primary unisegmental discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (77.2% male, mean age 40.1 ± 9.1 years) were included. All patients were immunocompetent and none had previously received an epidural steroid injection prior surgery. MRI study confirmed the disc herniation. Following strict antiseptic protocols, the extracted disc material was sent for slow-growth anaerobic enriched culture (>10 days). Results. In total, anaerobic cultures were positive in 7 cases (31.8%) all men. In 5 of these cases, the symptoms developed with an acute onset. The isolated germs were always unique: Propionibacterium acne (3), Streptococcus parasanguinis (1), Actinomyces naeslundii (1), Actinomyces meyeri (1) and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus epidermidis. Only two (28.6%) of these 7 patients had Modic changes on MRI prior surgery (one type I, one type 2). None of the patients with negative cultures had Modic changes. Conclusions. These findings support the theory that anaerobic infections of low virulence and slow growth may contribute to the pathogenesis of herniated discs. However, these cases do not necessarily develop type 1 Modic changes as previously speculated. Level of evidence. Level IV

Introduction and Aims: Lower back and/or leg pain is a symptom of a number of pathological conditions involving lumbosacral nerve roots. Disc herniation is one of the most common causes of LBP (after mechanical back pain). There is controversy regarding the progression of disc degeneration and/or lower back pain to symptomatic disc prolapse over time. Method: The aim of the study was to determine the natural progression of patients with lower back pain/disc degeneration established clinically and on MRI to symptomatic disc herniation over three to six years. Total of 970 patients who had an MRI scan between January 1998 and September 2000 were included in the study. Information about disc pathology, level and number of discs involved were recorded from MRI scan reports. A short questionnaire was sent to all patients. It contained 10 questions regarding current status of pain and neurology, any treatment in form of back injection and operation, current occupation and smoking status. Results: The collected data was analysed using standard statistics software (SPSS). The results will be discussed. Conclusion: The information provided by this study will be useful in judging the natural progression of lower back pain and/or disc degeneration to a symptomatic prolapse intervertebral disc. It will also be useful in medico-legal cases where patients had pre-existing disc degeneration and subsequently developed disc herniation over time

Purpose of the study: Conventional treatment for recurrent lumbar disc herniation is repeated discectomy. Other methods such as fusion, ligamentoplasty or implantation of a discal prosthesis are sometimes proposed but all increase morbidity. The purpose of this work was to ascertain the efficacy of isolated repeated radicular release for the treatment of recurrent discal herniation. Material and methods: Thirty-four patients underwent surgery for recurrent discal herniation. Repeated radicular release was used in all patients included in this analysis who completed a self-administered questionnaire at last follow-up to assess the final functional outcome. Results: The cohort included 13 women and 21 men, mean age at surgery 45 years. Mean time from first discectomy to revision surgery for recurrence was 55 months. At the time of the review, four patients had died, all four from cancer. None of these patients had undergone a revision procedure on the lumbar spine. One patient was lost to follow-up so 85% of the cohort was analyzed with 60 months average follow-up. A dural tear occurred during the proscedure in six patients (17%. Five patients (14.7%) required revision surgery, one for deep infection, four for recurrent or persistent lumboradiculalgia (recurrent discal herniation, isthmic fracture, lateral stenosis associated with inflammatory discopathy). The rate of revision for painful failure was 11.4%. The final outcome could be assessed for 25 patients and was satisfactory for 22/25 (88%). The self-administered questionnaire revealed 65% average improvement with more than half of the patients reported better than 80% improvement. Ten patients (40%) complained of lumbar pain and a third had residual, generally intermittent, radiculalgia. Eighteen of 25 patients resumed their work at a comparable level after six months on average; 84% of the patient would accept the same operation again. Discussion: In terms of morbidity and rate of revision, the results are comparable to reports in the literature. Repeated release does not increase the risk of a new recurrence. Conclusion: This work enabled us to demonstrate that in the large majority of patients repeated discectomy provides satisfactory functional outcome with little morbidity

Massive disc herniations after surgical decompression develop secondary back pain due to important loss of nucleus material with instability. No earlier proposed method to restore disc function was biological. Chondrocyte culturing allows living repair of lost disc tissue. The contained disc space appears particularly suitable for receiving those tissue cultures. Surprisingly disc replantations had not been attempted before. In 1996 two women and one man (aged 38-55) underwent open resection of a massive disc herniation by hemi-laminotomy, twice at L5-S1, once at L4/5. All the excised disc tissue was given to tissue culture in an identical protocol as in autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) for articular cartilage repair. After sufficient cell multiplication (11.5-23 millions living cells in 750 μl) four weeks later the engineered autolo-gous disc tissue was injected in suspension through a contra-lateral puncture under local anaesthesia. In prospective follow up a simplified Oswestry Disability Index was recorded and functional radiographs and NMR were taken after one, three, six and nine years. All three patients remained freed from radicular pain and vertebral symptoms over the whole follow up period. Two patients never had functional restrictions nor loss of working capacity (Oswestry 1 and 6), one after retirement at 5 years developed rheumatoid disease but is still unchanged at the lumbar spine. The third patient partially recovered from preoperative radiculop-athy (slight loss of strength and sensitivity S1) but still works, with minor adaptations to his original professional activity (Oswestry 18). Functional radiographs up to the last follow up didn’t show vertebral instability. In all cases the replanted intervertebral disc space remained unchanged with minimal widening in one case. In NMR all three discs had partial signal recovery. Twice during the first year a new outgrowth of disc tissue was observed at the site of the primary disc herniation opposite to the replanting injection, without any clinical correlation. Three cases with massive lumbar disc herniations showed good clinical and large anatomical recovery persisting nine years after reimplantation of engineered autologous disc tissue. The encouraging results of this small pilot study led to further closely monitored clinical applications before wider propagation of biological disc repair surgery

The belief that an intervertebral disc must degenerate before it can herniate has clinical and medicolegal significance, but lacks scientific validity. We hypothesised that tissue changes in herniated discs differ from those in discs that degenerate without herniation. Tissues were obtained at surgery from 21 herniated discs and 11 non-herniated discs of similar degeneration as assessed by the Pfirrmann grade. Thin sections were graded histologically, and certain features were quantified using immunofluorescence combined with confocal microscopy and image analysis. Herniated and degenerated tissues were compared separately for each tissue type: nucleus, inner annulus and outer annulus. Herniated tissues showed significantly greater proteoglycan loss (outer annulus), neovascularisation (annulus), innervation (annulus), cellularity/inflammation (annulus) and expression of matrix-degrading enzymes (inner annulus) than degenerated discs. No significant differences were seen in the nucleus tissue from herniated and degenerated discs. Degenerative changes start in the nucleus, so it seems unlikely that advanced degeneration caused herniation in 21 of these 32 discs. On the contrary, specific changes in the annulus can be interpreted as the consequences of herniation, when disruption allows local swelling, proteoglycan loss, and the ingrowth of blood vessels, nerves and inflammatory cells. In conclusion, it should not be assumed that degenerative changes always precede disc herniation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1127–33

Purpose of study and background. The use of NRB (Nerve Root Block) in radicular pain caused by stenosis is considered controversial in some centres, whereas its indication in radiculitis caused by disc herniation is widely accepted. Most studies evaluating NRB have combined disc herniation and stenosis pathologies in their inclusion criteria. This study explores the efficacy of NRB in different categories of stenosis: lateral recess, foraminal and combined. Methods and results. 68 patients underwent NRB by an ESP (Extended Scope Physiotherapist). 37 females, 31 males, mean age 75 years (range 23–87). Their stenosis was categorized as either lateral recess (n=43), foraminal (n=18), or combined (n=7) on MRI scan evaluation by 2 reviewers. Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scores were recorded pre-injection and 6 weeks post injection. 2 year final outcome was recorded with an ‘in-house’ questionnaire. 2 year outcome: Lateral recess stenosis: 37% had surgery, 40% required no further treatment. In foraminal stenosis: 17% had surgery, 50% required no further treatment. Combined pathology: 43% had surgery, 57% required no further treatment. Patients requiring no further treatment rated their 2 year outcome as satisfactory symptom control. Of the whole group 15% required a repeat injection, 7% were referred to pain clinic and one patient had died. Conclusion. A single NRB is an effective long term (two year) treatment for 44% of patients undergoing the procedure for radicular pain secondary to spinal stenosis. Its use should be considered as a first-line intervention in this group of patients prior to exploring surgical options. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Aims

Repeated lumbar spine surgery has been associated with inferior clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine and quantify the impact of this association in a national clinical register cohort.

The February 2014 Spine Roundup. 360 . looks at: single posterior approach for severe kyphosis; risk factors for recurrent disc herniation; dysphagia and cervical disc replacement or fusion; hang on to your topical antibiotics; cost-effective lumbar disc replacement; anxiolytics no role to play in acute lumbar back pain; and surgery best for lumbar disc herniation

Background: To asses the safety and efficacy of the Wallis Stabilization System in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. Methods: A prospective international multicentre clinical and radiological outcome assessment study. The study is ongoing. The study group comprises 260 consecutive patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria with respect to diagnosis (and levels affected), age, medical conditions and prior surgery. 61% were male, 39% female and the mean age was 44 years. The principal diagnosis was massive disc herniation in 37%, degenerative disc disease (with Modic type I change) in 27%, canal stenosis in 13%, recurrent disc herniation in 9% and disc herniation above a transitional segment in 5%. L4/5 was the operated level in 88%. Clinical assessment has been performed using a p atient completed questionnaire incorporating SF-36, JOA (Japanese Orthopaedic Association score), VAS (lumbar pain Visual Analogue Score, 0–100), ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) and Odem’s Criteria. Any adverse or serious adverse events were documented. Pre-operative static and dynamic radiographs and MRI scans have been undertaken, and the radiographs are then repeated at 3 and 6 months post-operatively and yearly thereafter. Post-operative MRI scans are obtained on a yearly basis up to 5 years post-surgery. Results: Mean operating time has been 74 minutes overall, with mean implantation time of 19 minutes. Blood loss averaged 180 mls. The pre-operative mean VAS of 71 improved to 21 at 3 months (p< 0.01) with further improvement at 6 months (VAS 18) and 1 year (VAS 11). SF-36 scores improved in every category from 3 months onwards, this improvement being statistically significant in all categories except general health. At 1 year SF-36 scores were not distinguishable from an age and sex matched general population. JOA scores improved significantly from 6.1 (15 point scale) pre-operatively to 12.5 at 3 months and 13.7 at 12 months (p< 0.01). Odem’s criteria provide additional evidence of efficacy, with 80% of subjects categorized as ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ at 3 months, this proportion improving to 89% at 1 year. Of those graded as ‘fair’ at 3 months, half had improved to ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ by 1 year. From the series of 260 cases there were only 3 implant related complications (1.2%). Conclusion: Previous biomechanical and finite element analysis studies have shown that the Wallis stabilization system off-loads the intervertebral disc and improves the biomechanical characteristics of the degenerative lumbar motion segment. The surgical procedure is simple, minimally invasive and non destructive, preserving surgical options for the future. This study provides preliminary evidence with respect to the safety and efficacy of the Wallis Stabilization System

Aims

The number of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy has increased. In many countries, public hospitals have limited capacity. This has resulted in long waiting times for elective treatment and a need for supplementary private healthcare. It is uncertain whether the management of patients and the outcome of treatment are equivalent in public and private hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare the management and patient-reported outcomes among patients who underwent surgery for degenerative cervical radiculopathy in public and private hospitals in Norway, and to assess whether the effectiveness of the treatment was equivalent.

Purpose of the Study. Assessment of long term results of Chemonucleolysis vs. surgery for soft disc herniation. Material and Methods. From 1982 to 1985, 100 patients with symptomatic disc herniation were randomly allocated to receive either Chemonucleolysis(48) or surgery(52) after a three months trial of conservative treatment. Ten of the chemonucleolysis had surgery. At 10–13 year follow up, Sixty one of the original 100 patients responded, (32 chemonucleolysis; 29 surgery). At 25–27 year Forty four patients responded (24 chemonucleolysis; 20 surgery). Clinical outcome at one year was according to a self-assessment questionnaire: Completely, better improved, the same, or worse, and at the later follow up periods, according to the Macnab criteria. The results of two groups of patients were compared using Chi square and T test for independent samples. The disc height of the affected disc was measured from the lateral lumbar spine radiograph taken pre-operatively, and at the later two time points, and compared to a normal adjacent disc expressed as a percentage. Results. The intent to treat clinical outcome results showed a high success rate at one year (93% chemonucleolysis; 96% surgery completely better or improved); and also at the later two time points with no significant difference between the groups. The radiological data showed no difference in disc height between the groups at any of the time points with some reduction over time with aging. Conclusion. There is no difference between the groups in either clinical or radiological outcome over time. Chymopapain, presently not widely available, should be made available again. No conflict of interest. No funding obtained. This abstract has not been previously published in whole or substantial part nor has it been presented previously at a national meeting

Assessment of long term results of Chemonucleolysis vs. surgical enucleation in soft disc herniation. From 1982 to 1985, 100 patients with symptomatic disc herniation were randomly allocated to receive either Chemonucleolysis or disc enucleation after all these patients had a trial of conservative treatment for three months. The outcome of result was measured using MacNab Criteria with the help of. Questionnaire. Assessing the patients in clinic. 44 patients out of original 100 patients were followed up in the clinic 25 years later. 24 were from chemonucleolysis group and 20 from the surgical group. According to MacNab criteria 62.5% had excellent or good results and 25% poor results in chemonucleolysis group and in surgery group 70% had excellent or good results and 10% poor results. Patients with poor result in Chemonucleolysis group consisted of: a) 1 had poor result post TKR, b) 4 were offered surgical enucleation subsequent to failed Chemonucleolysis though they did not seem to benefit from surgery and 1 out of these 4 also had fibromyalgia. c) 1 had poor result after sustaining fracture neck of femur. Poor results in surgical group were due to persistent back pain. The results at 25 year follow-up have shown no statistically significant difference between the patients treated by either chemonucleolysis or surgery. The added benefit of using the chymopapain injection is that it is of lower cost. Chemonucleolysis should have a wider role in treatment of intervertebral disc herniation

Introduction. In degenerative disorders of the spine such as disc herniation, intervertebral discs can affect neural tissue, which may result in pain as demonstrated in both basic science and clinical investigations. Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that notochordal cells and chondrocyte-like cells in nucleus pulposus affect nervous tissue differently. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the morphology of spinal neural tissue in an in vivo rat model following application of cells derived from nucleus pulposus. Material and method. A disc herniation model in rats (n=58) was used. The L4 nerve root was exposed to a) nucleus pulposus (3mg), b) notochordal cells (25,000 cells) or c) chondrocyte-like cells (25,000 cells). Four control groups were included: 1) application of nucleus pulposus (3 mg) and mechanical displacement of the spinal nerve complex, 2) sham operated animals, 3) application of cell diluent (50 μl) and 4) naïve animals. Seven days after surgery the L4 nerve roots with their dorsal root ganglion were harvested and prepared for blinded neuropathological examinations using light microscopy. Results. Damage and loss of myelinated nerve fibers as well as epineural granulation tissue were most pronounced in the group that had been subjected to nerve root displacement and application of nucleus pulposus. There was significantly less nerve fiber damage in all other groups. The number of myelinated nerve fibers with enlarged outer Schwann cell compartment was significantly higher in all experimental groups as compared to naïve animals, except for animals in which the nerve root complex had been exposed to cell diluent, notochordal cells and chondrocyte-like cells. Discussion and Conclusion. This is the first examination nerve root and dorsal root ganglion morphology after exposure to notochordal cells and chondrocyte-like cells in an in vivo model. The results indicate that application of notochordal cells and chondrocyte-like cells, per se, do not structurally affect the myelinated nerve fibers compared to naïve animals. However, one cannot exclude that there may be physiological effects of notochordal cells and chondrocyte-like cells on nerve tissue in vivo although no morphological differences were observed with the present method. The findings in the present study support previous observations that mechanical nerve tissue displacement and application of nucleus pulposus can induce pronounced morphological nerve tissue changes. However, the combination of mechanical nerve tissue displacement and application of notochordal cells and/or chondrocyte-like cells was not tested. In conclusion, the present study suggests that mechanical nerve tissue displacement is a prerequisite for the induction of morphological changes following application of disc tissue and its components on neural tissue. Summary. The effects of notochordal cells and chondrocyte-like cells on spinal nerve tissue might be dependent on concurrent mechanical nerve tissue deformation

Aims

CRP is an acute-phase protein that is used as a biomarker to follow severity and progression in infectious and inflammatory diseases. Its pathophysiological mechanisms of action are still poorly defined. CRP in its pentameric form exhibits weak anti-inflammatory activity. The monomeric isoform (mCRP) exerts potent proinflammatory properties in chondrocytes, endothelial cells, and leucocytes. No data exist regarding mCRP effects in human intervertebral disc (IVD) cells. This work aimed to verify the pathophysiological relevance of mCRP in the aetiology and/or progression of IVD degeneration.

Summary Statement. Repetitive loading of degenerated human intervertebral discs in combined axial compression, flexion and axial rotation, typical of manual handling lifing activities, causes: an increase in intradiscal maximum shear strains, circumferential annular tears and nuclear seperation from the endplate. Introduction. Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a crippling condition that affects quality of life and is a significant burden to the health care system and the workforce. The mechanisms of LBP are poorly understood, however it is well known that loss of intervertebral disc (disc) height due to degeneration is a common cause of chronic low back and referred pain. Gross disc injury such as herniation can be caused by sudden overload or by damage accumulation via repetitive loading, which is a cause of acute LBP and an accelerant of disc degeneration. The aim of this study was to determine for the first time the relationship between combined repetitive compression, flexion and axial rotation motion of degenerated cadaver lumbar spine segments, and the progression of three-dimensional (3D) internal disc strains that may lead to disc herniation and macroscopic tissue damage. Patients & Methods. Seven degenerated human lumbar functional spinal units (FSUs) underwent pre-test MRI, had a grid of tantalum wires inserted into the mid-transverse plane of the disc and were subjected to 20,000 cycles of repetitive loading in combined compression (1.7 MPa), flexion (11–13°) and right axial rotation (2–3°) in a six degree of freedom hexapod robot. Stereoradiographs were taken at cyclic intervals (1, 500, 1000, 5000, 10000, 15000 and 20000 cycles) from which 3D intradiscal principal strains and maximum shear strains (MSS) were calculated and partitioned into nine disc anatomical regions. After testing the discs underwent post-test MRI followed by macroscopic assessment to identify tissue damage. A repeated measures ANOVA having a within-subjects factor of cycle number, and a between-subjects factor of disc region was used to examine the effects of cycle number and disc region on MSS. Results. No visible evidence of disc herniation occurred after 20,000 cycles, however circumferential annular tears and nucleus separation from the endplate were observed in all specimens in agreement with observed signal changes in post-test MRI images. There was a significant effect of both cycle number, disc region and the interaction of cycle number x disc region on MSS (p<0.001). MSS was significantly larger after 20,000 cycles compared with the first loading cycle in the anterior, left anterolateral, left lateral, and left posterolateral disc regions (p<0.037). Minor changes in MSS were seen in the posterior and nucleus regions. The largest increases were observed in the left anterolateral and left posterolateral regions after 20,000 cycles. Discussion/Conclusion. A significant increase in MSS was observed across most regions in the disc after 20,000 repetitive loading cycles, especially in the left anterolateral and left posterolateral regions. No herniation was observed, although macroscopic and MRI evidence of circumferential annular tears and nuclear separation from the endplate occurred, suggesting internal disc tissue disorganisation that may indicate a progression towards eventual herniation

Aims

Lumbar disc prolapse is a frequent indication for surgery. The few available long-term follow-up studies focus mainly on repeated surgery for recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to analyze all reasons for additional surgery for patients operated on for a primary lumbar disc prolapse.

Aim: The aim of the study was to analyse the long-term follow-up of patients who were treated with chemonucleolysis for single level disc prolapse. Method: In our retrospective study we reviewed 112 cases that underwent chemonucleolysis for single level lumber disc herniation during the period of 1988–1996. Mean follow up was 9.5 years. In order to estimate the functional outcome of chemonucleolysis Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire was used. Results: An excellent or good response occurred in 79 patients (70.5%); 12 patients (10.7%) showed moderate response with minimal disability. Treatment failed in 21 patients (18.5%) who showed poor response and 12 of these 21 patients went for surgery within a mean period of 6 months. One patient had surgery at different level than chemonucleolysis. There was only one incident of procedure termination because of epidural contrast leak. There was no case of anaphylaxis or discitis. Conclusion: We conclude on the basis of our results that chemonucleolysis is a safe and effective treatment modality for lumber disc herniation in carefully selected patients

In a prospective, consecutive study 93 patients who had had previous lumbar spinal surgery underwent repeat decompression for persistent or recurrent back and leg pain. The previous operations had been discectomies in 65 patients and decompression for spinal stenosis in 28; two of the latter group had also had posterolateral fusion. At the repeat operation, disc herniation was found in 19 patients, lateral spinal stenosis in 19, central spinal stenosis in 20 and periradicular fibrosis in 35. Ninety-one patients were followed up for two years after surgery; the effect of the operation was recorded using a four-scale grading system. The results were significantly related to the diagnosis. Nerve-root compression due to recurrent disc herniation or to bony compression responded well to repeat decompression. In patients with a single nerve-root compression the results were similar to those obtained in primary operations. Sciatica due to nerve-root scarring was seldom improved by the repeat operation

Two collagen type IX gene polymorphisms that introduce a tryptophan residue into the protein’s triple-helical domain have been linked to an increased risk of lumbar disc disease. To determine whether a particular subset of symptomatic lumbar disease is specifically associated with these polymorphisms, we performed a prospective case-control study of 107 patients who underwent surgery of the lumbar spine. Patients were assigned to one of five clinical categories (fracture, disc degeneration, disc herniation, spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis) based on history, imaging results, and findings during surgery. Of the 11 tryptophan-positive patients, eight had spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis and three had disc herniation. The presence of the tryptophan allele was significantly associated with African-American or Asian designation for race (odds ratio 4.61, 95% CI 0.63 to 25.35) and with the diagnosis of spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis (odds ratio 6.81, 95% CI 1.47 to 41.95). Our findings indicate that tryptophan polymorphisms predispose carriers to the development of symptomatic spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis which requires surgery

Cervical spine disorders represent a good proportion of the daily practice of many neurosurgeons. The rapidly increasing knowledge base on spinal conditions and the progressive complexity of surgical interventions appear to be generating a renewed interest in this evolving subspecialty among neurosurgical trainees. In order to assess the current level of spinal surgery training and conveyed competence in dealing with spinal disorders, a self assessment questionnaire was devised and distributed to the neurosurgical trainees attending the EANS (European Association of Neurosurgical Society) training courses. 126 questionnaires were returned with a return rate of 32%. The majority of trainees responding to the questionnaire were in their final (6th) year of training or had completed their training (60,3% of total) representing 25 European nations. A separate analysis of the data pertaining to cervical spine disorders revealed 80% of the trainees completing their training in University hospitals with cervical spine injuries predominantly managed by neurosurgeons (75%). In their practical skill assessment, 78% of the senior trainees were competent in the treatment of cervical disc herniation and cervical spinal stenosis in their anterior microsurgical techniques. In emergency management of cervical spinal trauma, 45% of the senior trainees were competent in being able to perform procedures without direct supervision. Regarding skills in anterior and posterior cervical stabilisation techniques, 33% and 15% respectively were competent in performing as well as dealing with complications & difficulties that may arise. Spinal surgery training in European residency programs has clear strength in the traditional areas of microsurgical decompression for spinal stenosis and disc herniation. Deficits are revealed in the management of spinal trauma and spinal conditions requiring the use of implants, with the exception of anterior cervical stabilisation. In order to achieve a high level of competency, EANS trainees advocate the development of a post-residency spine sub-specialty training program

This article reviews the current knowledge of the intervertebral disc (IVD) and its association with low back pain (LBP). The normal IVD is a largely avascular and aneural structure with a high water content, its nutrients mainly diffusing through the end plates. IVD degeneration occurs when its cells die or become dysfunctional, notably in an acidic environment. In the process of degeneration, the IVD becomes dehydrated and vascularised, and there is an ingrowth of nerves. Although not universally the case, the altered physiology of the IVD is believed to precede or be associated with many clinical symptoms or conditions including low back and/or lower limb pain, paraesthesia, spinal stenosis and disc herniation. New treatment options have been developed in recent years. These include biological therapies and novel surgical techniques (such as total disc replacement), although many of these are still in their experimental phase. Central to developing further methods of treatment is the need for effective ways in which to assess patients and measure their outcomes. However, significant difficulties remain and it is therefore an appropriate time to be further investigating the scientific basis of and treatment of LBP

Prospective match cohort study of disc degeneration progression over ten years with and without baseline discography. To compare progression of common degenerative findings between lumbar discs injected ten years earlier with those same disc levels in matched subjects not exposed to discography. Seventy-five subjects without serious low back pain illness underwent a protocol MRI and a L3/4, L4/5 and L5 S1 discography in 1997. A match group was enrolled at the same time and underwent the same protocol MRI examination. Subjects were followed for ten years. At 7 to 10 years after baseline assessment, eligible discography in controlled subjects underwent another protocol MRI. MRI graders, blind to group designation, scored both groups for qualitative findings. Well matched cohorts, including 50 discography subjects and 52 control subjects met eligibility criteria for follow up evaluation. In all graded or measured parameters, discs that had been exposed to puncture and injection had greater progression of degenerative findings compared to control (non-injected) discs: progression of disc degeneration, 54 discs (35%) in the discography group compared to 21 (14%) in the control group (p=0.03); 55 new disc herniations in the discography group compared to 22 in the control group (p=0.0003). New disc herniations were disproportionately found on the side of the annular puncture (p=0.0006). The quantitative measures of disc height and disc signal also showed significantly greater loss of disc height (p=0.05) and signal intensity (p=0.001) in the discography disc compared to the control disc. This study demonstrates that the dimensions of the LSP change with age. Increases in LSP height occur with age. More impressive increases in LSP width occur with advancing age. This study suggests that loss of lumbar lordosis is correlated with changing LSP morphology. The increased width of the LSP with age influences access to the spinal canal, particularly if midline-preserving approaches are attempted in the ageing population. There is increased bone volume for bone grafting procedures with increasing age. The reduced distance between LSPs with age may influence design of implants that stabilize this region of the spine, and occur not only as a result of disk space narrowing, but also as a consequence of increased LSP dimensions

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the results of Micro Endoscopic Discectomy (MED) toMicro Surgical Discectomy (MSD). Methods: 12 Patients were reviewed by an independent observer. This included the þrst 6 patients who underwent MED and 6 patients who underwent MSD selected randomly. There was no signiþcant difference between the two groups concerning age and sex distribution, occupation, preoper-ative time of work and clinical symptomatology. The disc herniations were located at L4-5 in 6 patients and L5-S1 in 6 patients. Patients were followed up for an average of 9 months (Range 2–22 months). They were assessed using the following questionnaires Oswestry low back pain and disability, Modiþed Gre-enough and Fraser and Mc Nab. Results: Both groups faired equally according to Mc Nab. The MED group appeared to require less postoperative analgesia especially opioid based preparations and were discharged earlier. The only complication was one patient in the MED requiring conversion to MSD. Conclusion: Our results indicate that MED is at least as effective as MSD, although it initially takes longer to perform due to the learning curve. However, the decrease in postoperative analgesia requirements and earlier discharge is beneþcial. In addition, we feel it has advantages over the percutaneous posterolateral discectomy for nerve root compression, which cannot treat sequestrated discs, or patients with disc herniations associated with recess stenosis

Revision discetomy is a procedure often assumed to give similar results to primary discectomy. There is no level one or level two evidence to support this view and no publications with pre and post surgical spine specific outcome measures. This aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of revision discectomies using standard spine instruments and to identify factors which influence the outcome. A prospective cohort study was performed between 1996 and 2004. A revision discectomy was defined as surgery at the same lumbar level as a previous discectomy with a minimum three month interval from the index surgery. Outcome measures were available for all 20 patients from the index primary discectomy. Questionnaires were given to the patients preoperatively and at 2 year follow-up. Among the outcomes measures used were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Low Back Outcome(LBO), and a Visual Analogue Score(VAS). 20 revision discectomies were performed on 11 males and 9 females, 7 at L4/5 and 13 at L5/S1. The mean age was 41(30–56) and the mean follow-up was 27(24–36) months. The preoperative ODI, LBO and VAS at the index primary discectomy averaged 54(22–82), 19(7–42) and 8(5–10) respectively. The preoperative ODI, LBO and VAS at the revision discectomy averaged 63(34–82), 18(1–46) and 8(1–10) respectively. The ODI, LBO and VAS all improved significantly at follow-up. The ODI averaged 27(2–66) (p< 0.05), the LBO averaged 47 (14–70) (p< 0.05) and the VAS 4(3–9) (p< 0.05). The outcome of revision discectomies is favourable, in this series the average improvement in ODI was 36 points, a clinically significant change. The risk factors which influence the outcome are preoperative ODI, preoperative VAS and Age (p< 0.05). Sex, preoperative LBO, duration between recurrent disc herniation, level of disc herniation and incidental durotomies were not predictive of outcome

The detailed anatomy of interconnectivity of intervertebral disc annular fibre layers remains unclear and a structural survey of interlammellar connectivity is required to understand this anatomy and mechanical behavior. The subsequent failure modes of the annulus under hydrostatic loading require definition to understand genesis of annular tears and disc herniation. Interlamellar Connectivity. We imaged anterior annular sections from ovine lumbar discs. Using differential interference contrast microscopy we were able to reconstruct a three-dimensional image of the interconnecting bridging network between layers. Annular Disruption. The nuclei of ovine lumbar discs were gradually pressurised to failure by injecting a viscous radio-opaque gel via their inferior vertebrae. Investigation of the resulting annular disruption was carried out using micro-computed tomography and DIC microscopy. This allowed analysis of annular failure patterns and herniation, with analysis of the pathway of nuclear movement during prolapse in relation to annular fibre separation within and between fibre layers. Interlamellar Connectivity. A high level of connectivity between apparently disparate bridging elements was revealed. The extended form of the bridging network is that of occasional substantial radial connections spanning many lamellae with a subsidiary fine branching network. The fibrous bridging network is highly integrated with the lamellar architecture via a collagen-based system of interconnectivity. In particular this bridging network appears to have a major role in anchoring leading edges of incomplete annular lamellae. Annular Disruption and Disc Herniation. Gel extrusion from the posterior annulus was the most common mode of disc failure. Unlike other regions of the annular wall, the posterior region was unable to distribute hydrostatic pressures circumferentially. In each extrusion case, severe disruption to the posterior annulus was observed. While intralamellar disruption occurred in the mid annulus, interlamellar disrupt ion occurred in the outer posterior annulus. Radial ruptures between lamellae always propagated in the mid-axial plane. The interlamellar architecture of the annulus is far more complex than has previously been recognised and this paper further defines the microanatomy of the disc wall. The hydrostatic pressure failure mode of the posterior annulus mirrors clinic al sites of annular tear and disc prolapsed in the neutral loading position

Purpose and background. Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is frequently and increasingly used in lumbar degenerative disorders despite conflicting results and recommendations. Further understanding of patient outcomes after LSF is required to inform decisions regarding surgery and to improve post-surgery management. The objective was to evaluate the course of pain and disability in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine (spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, disc herniation, discogenic low back pain) after first-time LSF. Methods and results. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pain and disability outcomes in prospective cohort studies after first time LSF for degenerative disorders. Two independent researchers searched key databases, determined study eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (modified Quality in Prognostic Studies tool). A third reviewer mediated at each stage. N weighted pooled estimates were calculated. Twenty-five articles (n=1,777 participants) were included. 17 studies were at unclear risk of bias and 8 at high risk. Back pain (12 studies) decreased modestly and irregularly at follow-up intervals. The n weighted mean VAS back pain decreased from 65.4 (±3.3) pre-surgery to 22.2 (±3.1) at 23 months, but then 45.0 (±not reported; 2 studies at risk of bias) at 42 months. In contrast, leg pain (12 studies) improved substantially short and long-term. Disability (20 studies) improved steadily over time with the exception of the 42-months and 48-months intervals. Conclusion. The overall improvement of leg pain and disability after first-time LSF in degenerative disorders is promising in contrast to back pain outcomes. Further research is needed to analyse outcomes in patients of different diagnostic subgroups. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Patients may present with concurrent symptomatic hip and spine problems, with surgical treatment indicated for both. Controversy exists over which procedure, total hip arthroplasty (THA) or lumbar spine procedure, should be performed first. Clinical scenarios were devised for 5 fictional patients with both symptomatic hip and lumbar spine disorders for which surgical treatment was indicated. An email with survey link was sent to 110 clinical members of the NA Hip Society requesting responses to: which procedure should be performed first; the rationale for the decision with comments, and the type of THA prosthesis if “THA first” was chosen. The clinical scenarios were painful hip osteoarthritis and (1) lumbar spinal stenosis with neurologic claudication; (2) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with leg pain; (3) lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness; (4) lumbar scoliosis with back pain; and (5) thoracolumbar disc herniation with myelopathy. Surgeon choices were compared among scenarios using chi-square analysis and comments analyzed using text mining. Complete responses were received from 51 members (46%), with a mean of 30.8 (± 10.4) years of practice experience. The percentages of surgeons recommending “THA first” were 59% for scenario 1; 73% for scenario 2; 47% for scenario 3; 47% for scenario 4; and 10% for scenario 5 (χ. 2. =44.5, p<0.001). Surgeons were significantly more likely to choose “THA first” despite radicular leg pain (scenario 2), and less likely to choose “THA first” with the presence of myelopathy (scenario 5). The choice of “THA first” in scenarios 1, 3, and 4 were more equivocal, dependent on surgeon impression of clinical severity. For type of THA prosthesis, dual mobility component was chosen by: 12% in scenario 1; 16% in scenario 2; 8% in scenario 3; 24% in scenario 4; and 10% in scenario 5. Surgeons were more likely to choose dual mobility in scenario 4, but with the numbers available this was not statistically significant (χ. 2. =6.6, p=0.16). The analysis of comments suggested the importance of injection of the joint for decision making, the merit of predictable outcome with THA first, the concern of THA position with spinal deformity, and the urgency of myelopathy. With the presence of concurrent hip and spine problems, the question of “THA or lumbar surgery first” remains controversial even for a group of experienced hip surgeons. Outcome studies of these patients are necessary for appropriate decision making

Purpose of the study: Discal arthroplasty is warranted as a part of the treatment of discopathy to guarantee mobility after disc removal. Depending on the type of discopathy, the diseased disc can be classified into different categories: absence of herniation (H0), disc herniation (H1), recurrent disc herniation (H2), post discectomy syndrome (H3), or stenosis of a single unit (including grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis) (St-SPd). The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcome after discal arthroplasty for these different clinical situations. Material and methods: This was a prospective study of 152 patients who underwent a single-stage operation for insertion of a lumbar disc prosthesis. Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale for the lumbar level (VAS-L), and for radicular pain (VAS-R) and the Oswestry index (ODI). Patients were classified as follows: 39 H0, 52 H1, 22 H2, 29 H3, 10 ST-SPd). Results: Outcome in patients in groups H0, H1, and St-SPd, i.e. first-intention surgery patients, presented equivalent results for lumbar and radicular pain and for function: VAS-L and VAS-R declined concomitantly. Results at three months postop were equivalent to those observed at 24 months. Patients in groups H2 and H3 who had had prior operation(s) for posterior discectomy experienced rapid relief of lumbar pain but radicular pain persisted postoperatively (6 to 12 m). Discussion: These data confirm the excellent results obtained with single-level disc replacement as assessed by VAS and ODI. The persistence of radiculalgia which then resolves several months later in patients with a history of discal surgery can be explained by the combination of chronic compression, postoperative adherences and restored disc height. In the present series, none of the patients required complementary surgery for posterior radicular release. Conclusion: Discal arthroplasty provides satisfactory results for the different stages of discal disease. The procedure should however be undertaken with prudence for patients who have had prior surgery. A perfect analysis of other factors involved should be helpful in chosing the most appropriate technique and avoid the development of postoperative radiculalgia. The present results could be usefully confirmed with a long-term randomized prospective study comparing discal prosthesis with fusion for the treatment of discal disease

Purpose: Calcified thoracic discal herniation is an uncommon entity. The purpose of this study was to analyse the population concerned to search for radiological signs of sequellar Scheuermann disease and the characteristic features of hernias in this context and to compare computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with intraoperative and histological findings. Material and methods: A retrospective series of 13 patients with symptomatic calcified thoracic discal herniation (CTDH) who underwent surgery from 1996 to 2001 was analysed. Mean age was 50.7 years. The population included ten men and three women. CT was performed in all cases, with myelography in two. MRI was performed in eleven cases with DTPA-gadolinium injection in six. Two neuroradiologists blinded to intraoperative findings reviewed the images independently to search for radiological signs predictive of dural adherence and/or penetration and the presence of Scheuermann squellae. Pathology data were available for five patients. Results: All herniations occurred in the mid to lower thoracic level in patients in their fourth or fifth decade. The disk was calcified at the zone of herniation in all cases. The hernia occupied more than half of the spinal canal in 70% of patients. The nature of the lesion was analysed on axial CT and T1/T2 weighted MRI sequences with fat suppression. Images confirmed the pathological findings: the majority of the calcified herniations were composed of mature haversian bone. In ten of the eleven cases, the radiological interpretation of the hernia/dural interface was found to correspond to the intraoperative observation. Discussion: The sensitivity and specificity of T2 weighted MRI with gadolinium injection of the hernia/dural interface is superior, enabling prediction of dural penetration. Sequellae of Scheuermann disease found in five patients confirmed a probably non-fortuitous association. Conclusion: The natural history of CTDH starts with discal calcification in a degenerative spine during posterior migration, followed by bone metaplasia which can involve neighbouring structures such as the longitudinal ligament and lead to penetration of the dura by the mature ossified lesion

Aims

Cervical radiculopathy is a significant cause of pain and morbidity. For patients with severe and poorly controlled symptoms who may not be candidates for surgical management, treatment with transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESI) has gained widespread acceptance. However, a paucity of high-quality evidence supporting their use balanced against perceived high risks of the procedure potentially undermines the confidence of clinicians who use the technique. We undertook a systematic review of the available literature regarding CTFESI to assess the clinical efficacy and complication rates of the procedure.

Aims

People with severe, persistent low back pain (LBP) may be offered lumbar spine fusion surgery if they have had insufficient benefit from recommended non-surgical treatments. However, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommended not offering spinal fusion surgery for adults with LBP, except as part of a randomized clinical trial. This survey aims to describe UK clinicians’ views about the suitability of patients for such a future trial, along with their views regarding equipoise for randomizing patients in a future clinical trial comparing lumbar spine fusion surgery to best conservative care (BCC; the FORENSIC-UK trial).

This is a study on the results of fifty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic removal of herniated lumbar disc by interlaminar extra-dural approach. The indication for surgery was unrelenting, single level, unilateral sciatic pain not relieved by conservative treatment, with supportive evidence of disc herniation in MRI. Surgery was carried out in the lateral position. After localizing the disc space by X-ray, two 5 mm portals were made, one for an arthroscope and the other for working instruments. The spinal canal was entered through the inter-laminar route and under direct vision the herniated lumbar disc was removed. The duration of study is from February 1998 to July 1999 with an average follow-up of 14.58 months. There were 31 herniated, 9 extruded and 10 sequestrated discs. All patients were mobilized the same day and 42 were discharged the next day. There were two patients who suffered partial but permanent nerve root damage, 4 had post-operative headache and one developed transient extra-pyramidal symptoms. Modified McNab criteria were applied to study the results by an independent observer. 40 patients (80%) had a very good outcome (i.e. fully functional with occasional discomfort); 5 patients were considered to have a good outcome (i.e. normal function with some restriction to strenuous activity); 2 patients who had partial nerve root damage were considered as fair results though their final outcome was good. 3 patients suffered recurrent disc herniation and were operated by open surgery. These were classified as failures. We conclude that this technique is a minimally invasive procedure with results comparable to conventional disc surgery. The advantages to the surgeon are the excellent illumination, magnification and visualization. The advantages to the patient are minimal surgical trauma and speedy recovery

Aims

The escalating demand for medical resources to address spinal diseases as society ages is an issue that requires careful evaluation. However, few studies have examined trends in spinal surgery, especially unscheduled hospitalizations or surgeries performed after hours, through large databases. Our study aimed to determine national trends in the number of spine surgeries in Japan. We also aimed to identify trends in after-hours surgeries and unscheduled hospitalizations and their impact on complications and costs.

Purpose. Patients may present with concurrent symptomatic hip and spine problems, with surgical treatment indicated for both. Controversy exists over which procedure, total hip arthroplasty (THA) or lumbar spine procedure, should be performed first, and does the surgeon's area of expertise influence the choice. Materials & Methods. Clinical scenarios were devised for 5 fictional patients with both symptomatic hip and lumbar spine disorders for which surgical treatment was indicated. An email with survey link was sent to 110 clinical members of the Hip Society and 101 experienced spine surgeons in the USA requesting responses to: which procedure should be performed first, and the rationale for the decision with comments. The clinical scenarios were painful hip osteoarthritis and (1) lumbar spinal stenosis with neurologic claudication; (2) lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with leg pain; (3) lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness; (4) lumbar scoliosis with back pain; and (5) thoracolumbar disc herniation with myelopathy. Surgeon choices were compared among scenarios and between surgical specialties using chi-square analysis and comments analyzed using text mining. Results. Complete responses were received from 51 hip surgeons (46%), with a mean of 30.8 (+ 10.4) years of practice experience, and 37 spine surgeons (37%), with a mean of 23.4 (+ 6.5) years of experience. The percentages of hip surgeons recommending “THA first” differ significantly among scenarios: 59% for scenario 1; 73% for scenario 2; 47% for scenario 3; 47% for scenario 4; and 10% for scenario 5 (χ. 2. =44.5, p<0.001). The percentages of spine surgeons recommending “THA first” were 49% for scenario 1; 70% for scenario 2; 19% for scenario 3; 78% for scenario 4; and 0% for scenario 5. There were significant differences between the surgeon groups only for scenarios 3 and 4 (Fishers exact test, p=0.003 and p=0.006 respectively). Hip surgeons were significantly more likely to choose “THA first” despite radicular leg pain (scenario 2), and less likely to choose “THA first” with the presence of myelopathy (scenario 5). The choice of “THA first” in scenarios 1, 3, and 4 were more equivocal, dependent on surgeon impression of clinical severity. Spine surgeons were more likely to recommend THA first with back pain caused by spinal deformity, and spine surgery first with lumbar disc herniation with leg weakness. Surgeon comments suggested the utility of injection of the joint for decision making, the merit of predictable outcome with THA first, leg weakness as an indication for spine surgery, the concern of THA position with spinal deformity, and the urgency of myelopathy. Conclusion. With the presence of concurrent hip and spine problems, the question of “THA or lumbar surgery first” remains controversial in certain clinical scenarios, even for experienced hip and spine surgeons. Additional outcome studies of these patients are necessary for appropriate decision making

Initial treatment of traumatic spinal cord injury remains as controversial in 2023 as it was in the early 19th century, when Sir Astley Cooper and Sir Charles Bell debated the merits or otherwise of surgery to relieve cord compression. There has been a lack of high-class evidence for early surgery, despite which expeditious intervention has become the surgical norm. This evidence deficit has been progressively addressed in the last decade and more modern statistical methods have been used to clarify some of the issues, which is demonstrated by the results of the SCI-POEM trial. However, there has never been a properly conducted trial of surgery versus active conservative care. As a result, it is still not known whether early surgery or active physiological management of the unstable injured spinal cord offers the better chance for recovery. Surgeons who care for patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries in the acute setting should be aware of the arguments on all sides of the debate, a summary of which this annotation presents.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(4):347–355.

Introduction Far lateral disc prolapse (also known as foraminal or extreme lateral prolapse) make up 10% of all disc herniations. In addition, far lateral disc prolapses tend to affect more proximal levels more frequently than do prolapses in the posterolateral location and they are often associated with greater radicular symptoms than typical posterolateral herniations, most likely due to involvement of the dorsal root ganglion. Surgery for far lateral disc protrusions has been associated with a less favourable outcome, perhaps due to delays in diagnosis, inadequate preoperative imaging, and postoperative instability as a result of excessive bony and facet resection during the surgical approach. Methods Twelve patients with far lateral disc herniations operated on by the senior author (RPW) fulfilled the criteria of having both pre- and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores recorded at each clinic visit. Results of these cases and those of a cohort of age and sex matched patients undergoing standard posterolateral discectomy undertaken by the same surgeon were analyzed. The presence of radiculopathy pre- and postoperatively, workers compensation status, return to work, length of stay and complications, as well as any prior intervention in the form of nerve root sleeve blocks or surgery were recorded. Results Both groups were well matched in terms of age and sex. Follow up ranged from 4 to 18 months. Herniations at more proximal levels (L2/3 and L3/4) were seen more frequently in the far lateral group than in the posterolateral group. Six patients in the far lateral group had preoperative nerve root sleeve blocks compared with one in the posterolateral group. Two patients in each group had had previous (different level) surgery. Patients in each group had similar preoperative ODI scores. Both groups demonstrated a reduction in the preoperative ODI compared with the preoperative score. The mean improvement was 24 (range −26 to +62) for the far lateral group and 22 (range −6 to +46). There was no significant difference between the groups. Discussion The results of this study are encouraging with respect to surgical treatment of far lateral discs. Recent literature has questioned the efficacy of surgical intervention for this pathology. These results show that with carefully selected patients results are comparable with standard posterolateral discectomy

Purpose: In recent years, many reports have described spontaneous resorption of lumbar disc herniation evaluated with Gd-enhanced MRI. We also found retrospectively that sequestrated lumbar disc herniation with Gd-enhanced MRI would disappear, and that patient with this type of lumbar disc herniation would improve clinically. But there is a question that Gd-enhanced MRI is really needed to speculate the prognosis of sequestrated lumbar disc herniation. The purpose of this study is to clarify the prognostic value of Gd-enhanced MRI for sequestrated lumber disc herniation. Materials and methods: Since Nov. 1995, 22 patients of sequestrated lumber disc herniation were treated non-operatively under the speculation of getting good clinical result prospectively. From Nov. 1995 to Oct. 1997, 9 patients with sequestrated lumbar disc herniation with ring-enhancement on Gd-enhanced MRI were treated non-operatively (Group A). From Nov. 1997 to July 2000, 13 patients with sequestrated lumbar disc herniation were treated non-operatively without Gd-enhanced MRI examination (Group B). Clinical results and the last MRI findings of Group A were compared with that of Group B. Results: In Group A, all cases were treated non-operatively and all of them improved clinically within a month of the first MRI examinations. Mean period of NSAID administration was 37 days (range 14–67 days), and the last MRI examinations revealed that the herniated masses disappeared in 5 cases and that the size of herniations diminished in 4 cases. All of 9 cases obtained good clinical results. In Group B, all cases were treated non-operatively but one, whose clinical symptoms were not improved within a month of the first MRI examination. Mean period of NSAID administration was 38 days (range 7–110 days), and the last MRI examinations revealed that the herniated masses disappeared in 5 cases and that the size of herniations diminished in 5 cases. Remaining 2 cases, the second MRI was not examined for some reasons. All of 12 cases obtained good clinical results. There were no differences between Group A and Group B by means of clinical results. Conclusions: Gd-enhanced MRI is not needed to speculate the prognosis of sequestrated lumbar disc herniation. In the case of sequestrated lumbar disc herniation, good clinical result could be obtained without Gd-enhanced MRI examination at the first MRI examination

Purpose of the study: Discal herniation is an exceptional cause of lumbar canal stenosis. When surgery for this disorder was first performed in the sixties, discectomy was not exceptional because discal protrusions were frequent. It was rather rapidly observed however that these protrusions were actually osteoarthitic discal rims that do not cause root compression. Discectomy was thus almost completely abandoned for lumbar stenosis surgery. Consequently, the development of true discal herniation after surgery for lumbar canal stenosis is highly exceptional. To our knowledge, this situation has not been reported in the literature. Among several hundred procedures for decompression of the lumbar canal practised in our unit over the last thirty years, we have observed seven cases. Material and methods: The patients were aged 43 to 74 years at the time of reoperation (mean 61 years). The stenosis was at the L4-L5 level in all patients and extended to L3-L4 in three and to L5-S1 in two and was bilateral in one patient. The L4-L5 disk had been removed at the prior surgery in three patients. Delay to recurrent pain was variable, from six months to eleven years. The sciatic pain was associated with motor disorders in one patient. Discal herniation was observed at the L4-L5 level in all patients and was often voluminous, excluded in three patients. Reossification was present in one patient but did not have a compressive effect. Treatment after recurrence was chemonucleolysis in three patients, with two successes and one failure. Surgical treatment by discal excision was used in four cases associated with instrumented fusion in one patient. Results: The patients were reviewed at one to ten years after the second operation. Nucleolysis was successful in two and a failure in one. The patient with failure of nucleolysis was treated by a new decompression with fusion and achieved an excellent result at ten years. Pain relief was achieved after surgery in all patients though only partial in one. Discussion and conclusion: Discal herniation is rare in elderly subjects and can cause problems late after surgical decompression of lumbar canal stenosis. It is important to search for discal herniation which is not always easy to confirm radiologically due to postoperative remodeling. Chemonucleolysis is an effective and economical solution when the disk has not been resected during the first procedure. When an operation is necessary, spinal fusion is not useful except in case of associated instability

Introduction: This retrospective study examined the clinical characteristics, radiological findings, management, and functional outcome in 34 rehabilitated patients who presented with traumatic central cord syndrome. Methods: Between 1994 and 2004 a total of 34 patients with central cord syndrome were admitted to the National Spinal Injuries Unit. There were 29 men and 5 women. The mean age was 56.1 years (15 to 88). The mean follow up time was 4.9 years. Patients were divided into three groups by age, < 50 years (10 patients), 50–70 years (16 patients), and > 70 years (8 patients). The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) system recorded the motor and sensory scores, of upper and lower limbs, on admission, discharge and during rehabilitation. Patients underwent radiological investigation that included plain film, CT, and MRI of the cervical spine. Results: The mechanism of injury was a fall in 58.8%, road traffic accident in 35.2% and other in 6%. Alcohol was a contributing factor in 32.4% of cases. Seven patients had a spinal fracture. The cervical spine was involved in 5 cases with the remaining 2 cases involving the thoracic spine. Seventy percent of patients received intravenous steroids. Over half (53%) of the patients had some degree of cervical spondylosis while cord changes were seen in almost all of the patients (79.4%). In the majority of cases (70.4%) the affected level was C3/4. Disc herniation was present in one third of cases (33.2%). The mean upper limb ASIA score on admission was 7.6, on discharge was 12.4 and at follow up was 20.2. A similar pattern was also observed in the lower limb with scores of 12.1, 13.7, and 20.5 respectively. Sensory loss also improved with time. 88.2% of those admitted required urinary catheterization, with 23.5% being discharged to the National Rehabilitation Hospital with a catheter in situ. Surgical decompression was performed in 7 cases. The remainder of patients wore a Miami-J cervical collar. Conclusion: As was shown in the original paper by Schneider et al (1954), hyperextension of a degenerative cervical spine was the predominant mechanism of injury. The return of lower limb function precedes that of upper limb, with autonomic function recovering in the majority of cases. Discussion: In this study patients in the younger age groups had better recovery of function and had fewer complications. The original paper by Schneider et al. stated that conservative treatment was most appropriate, however, in this review surgery was performed in specific cases such as those with cord compression secondary to disc herniation. Alcohol was a significant contributing factor

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in spinal imaging characteristics between subjects with or without lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) in a population-based cohort.

Introduction: While anterior cervical decompression and fusion has been shown to be clinically effective in cases of myelopathy or radiculopathy, several studies have suggested an increased risk of development of adjacent segment degeneration. The Bryan Cervical Disc Pros-thesis was developed to address this complication and was fi rst used clinically in Europe in January 2000. The author began to use the device in June of 2001 and since that time has implanted 30 prostheses in 22 patients. The present prospective study was commenced at the time (concurrently with an ASERNIPS study) with a view to examine the clinical efficacy and safety of this device. The results in the author’s first 14 patients are reported, all with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean 20 months). Methods: An observational audit of 14 consecutive patients with cervical radiculopathy (6 patients), myelopathy (6 patients) or discogenic neck pain (2 patients) operated upon between July 2001 and November 2002. Average age was 48 years (range 27 – 61 years). 5 patients underwent two level procedures. Operative / post-op complications and clinical / radiological outcomes were recorded at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months and January 2004. Results: Follow-up data is available at > 12 months on 13 of the 14 patients at an average 23 months post op (Range: 14–30 months). The patient for whom data is not available is known to have had a poor clinical outcome. She developed an unusual symptom complex with complex regional pain syndrome and is very unhappy with the surgery. Of the other 13 patients, 12 consider their outcome to have been excellent and 1 fair. In the two patients who underwent surgery purely for discogenic neck pain, substantial relief was reported. In the 8 patients with pre-operative arm pain, 6 reported complete relief, 1 substantial relief and one partial relief. There were no intra-operative complications. Two patients developed dysphagia which resolved after several months, one has described a clicking sensation in his neck for which no cause has been identified and one experiences persistent ‘neural surges’. One patient required surgery for a disc herniation at an adjacent level, 9 months post-op while in another patient, on routine 12 month follow-up MRI scan, an asymptomatic disc herniation adjacent to the operated segment had resolved spontaneously. One patient underwent foraminotomy for recurrent arm pain, 19 months post-op. All prostheses appear mobile on dynamic x-rays but it is apparent that the Bryan device does not correct any pre-operative degenerative deformity using the current technique. Discussion: The current study appears to indicate satisfactory clinical outcomes at an average of 23 months post surgery in this group of patients. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are required as well as comparative studies

Purpose: Thoracoscopic spinal surgery may be less aggressive than classical open surgery. We relate our experience over the last five years, analysing complications observed. Material and methods: Between 1995 and 2000, 68 patients underwent thoracoscopic spinal surgery. There were 34 men and 34 women, mean age 30.2 years (13–69). We analysed indications, preoperative anaesthesia parameters, peroperative and postoperative parameters and pulmonary, vascular, neurological and instrumental complications. Results: Indications were: metastatic compression in three patients, disc herniation in eight with five calcified discs, fracture in 25, anterior release for scoliosis in 32 with inter-somatic graft in 20. Mean duration of the hospital stay was 19.6 days (7–48). There were three fractures with lung contusion that were excluded from the analysis although thoracoscopic surgery was possible. The analysis thus included 61 right and four left thoracoscopies. Four to nine trocars were used. There were three cases of intercostal nevralgia. Operation time depended on the underlying disease: 18 min for scoliosis, 2 hr 40 min for fractures, 4 hr 15 min for discal herniation (2 h 20–7 h 15). Blood loss was less than 200 cc for scoliosis, a mean 533 cc for fractures, and 800 cc for metastases. There were no pulmonary, vascular or instrumental complications. The image amplifier was used to monitor all osteosyntheses. We had one patient whose neurological situation worsened after resection of a transdural calcified thoracic herniation. Stay in the intensive care unit after surgery was 3.4 days, the drain was removed at 3.26 days and had collected 1240 cc. Postoperative paint was assessed for patients who had undergone thoracoscopy alone and who had no other disease (19 fractures and 8 herniation cases). level three antalgesics were required for 3.2 days. There were no vascular complications or signs of phlebitis. One residual atelectasia of the lower right lobe occurred in a female patient with major traumatic contusion, and pleural effusion was observed in three. One patient developed a contralateral pneumothorax that was punctured after release of major scoliosis (Cobe 92°). Residual pleural effusion after withdrawing the drain was aspirated at 48 hours. There were no infections. Discussion: Thoracoscopy allowed the planned procedure in all patients. Blood loss was much lower than with classical open surgery. Pain was controlled better and the cosmetic effect was exceptional. Function was recovered rapidly by fracture patients. the quality of the anterior release for the scoliosis patients was equivalent to that obtained with classical techniques. Conclusion: The complication rate was lower than that usually observed for similar procedures using classical techniques

Cervical total disc replacement has been in practice for years now as a viable alternative to cervical fusion in suitable cases, aspiring to preserve spinal motion and prevent adjacent segment disease. Reports are rife that neck pain emerges as an annoying feature in the early postoperative period. The facet joint appears to be the most likely source of pain. 50 patients were prospectively followed up through 5 years after having received disc replacement surgery, indicated for symptomatic soft disc herniation of the cervical spine presenting with radiculopathy. • All were skeletally mature and aged between 22 to 50. • All had failed a minimum of 6 months conservative therapy. • Up to 2 disc levels were addressed. C3 till C7 levels. • Single surgeon (first author). • NDI > 30% (15/50). • Deteriorating radicular neurology. We excluded those with degenerative trophic changes of the cervical spine, focal instability, trauma, osteoporosis, previous cervical spine surgery, previous infection, ossifying axial skeletal disease and inflammatory spondyloarthritides. The device used was an unconstrained implant with stabilizing teeth. Over the 5 years, we studied their postoperative comfort level via the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Pre-operative and post-operative analysis of the sagittal axis and of involved facet joints were done. 22 patients suffered postoperative neck pain as reflected by the NDI and VAS scores. Of these, 10 reported of neck pain even 24 months after surgery. However, none were neurologically worse and all patients returned to their pre-morbid functions and were relieved of pain by 28 months. All 22 patients reported of rapid dissolution of neckache after peri-facetal injections of steroids were done under image guidance. We draw attention to the facet joint as the pain generator, triggered by inappropriate implant height, eccentric stresses via hybrid constructs, eccentric loading due to unconstrained devices and unaddressed Luschka joint degeneration. Such factors require careful selection of patients for surgery, necessitate proper pre-operative templating and call for appropriate technical solutions during surgery

Aims

To study the associations of lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) with low back pain (LBP), radicular leg pain, and disability.

Introduction The concept of accelerated degeneration of adjacent disc levels as a consequence of increased stress caused by interbody fusion of the lumbar spine has been widely postulated. Total disc arthroplasty may offer the same clinical benefits as fusion while providing motion that may protect the adjacent level discs from the abnormal and undue stresses associated with fusion. The goal of this study was to prospectively analyse the results of the Maverick Lumbar Disc Prosthesis (Medtronic, USA) at 4 years follow-up. Methods We conducted a prospective analysis of the Maverick Lumbar Disc Prosthesis implanted in the first 50 consecutive patients for the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine resistant to conservative treatment for more than 1 year. 253 Maverick have been implanted in our spine unit and these 50 have the longest follow-up. The outcome data collected included the Oswestry Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) preoperatively and at routine scheduled follow-ups. Radiographic analysis included sagittal balance parameters on standing full length lateral radiographs of the spine and range of motion on flexion/extension dynamic radiographs. 3 European centres were included in the study. The offset on AP x-rays was calculated for all patients and correlated with clinical outcomes. Results There were 32 females and 28 males with an average age of 43, 4 years and average follow-up of 3.1 years (22 to 48 months). The Maverick was implanted at L5S1: 20 cases; L4L5: 17 cases; 3 patients had 2 levels arthroplasty and 10 had a fusion at L5S1 and a prosthesis at L4L5. Clinical success, defined by the FDA as improvement of at least 25% on the Oswestry, was 76% and 81%, at 6 months and 1 year follow-up respectively. The VAS showed an improvement in back pain from 7.1 (+/− 2, 1) pre-operatively to 3.0 (+/− 1.8) post-operatively. Leg pain was significantly higher according to VAS when patients have been previously operated for disc herniation (HD). At the latest follow-up, there was no measurable subsidence of the devices except in one case at L5S1 due to a technical error and no evidence of device migration. The measured range of motion in flexion-extension ranged from 3 to 16 degrees (mean range of motion, 6 +/− 4 degrees). L4–L5 level is more mobile: average 8.4 degrees. With regards to sagittal balance, there was no significant change in any of the variables studied including sacral tilt, pelvic tilt, or overall lordosis after placement of total disc arthroplasty. Only the lordosis at the level above the prosthesis was significantly decreased. The position of the implant on AP and lateral x ray was analyzed and correlated with the clinical results. Less than 19% of offset on AP view had no influence on clinical results. One complication, a ureter injury occurred during the approach in one procedure. One left iliac vein injury occurred per-operatively and treated with vascular clip. One patient with two discs with persistent low back was re-operated for posterior fusion with a significant improvement of pain at two years. This patient had been operated 3 times before for disc herniation and recurrence of HD. Discussion These results of total disc arthroplasty compare favorably with the mid-term clinical outcomes associated with anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion reported in the literature. Unlike fusion however, it appears that the prosthesis has enough freedom of motion to allow the patient to maintain the natural sagittal and spinopelvic balance with radiographic evidence of normal range of motion. However, these early favorable clinical results in addition to the influence on adjacent motion segments can be assessed only after long term follow-up. Previous surgery for HD isn’t the better indication to restore the motion

Aims

Psychoeducative prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes is relatively novel in spinal fusion surgery and, like most rehabilitation treatments, they are rarely well specified. Spinal fusion patients experience anxieties perioperatively about pain and immobility, which might prolong hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine if a Preoperative Spinal Education (POSE) programme, specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and designed to normalize expectations and reduce anxieties, was safe and reduced LOS.

Silicon nitride spinal fusion cages have been successfully used in the treatment or correction of stenosis, disc herniation, trauma, and other deformities of the spinal column since 2008. To date over 14,000 devices have been implanted with perioperative and postoperative complication rates of less than 0.2%. This remarkable achievement is due in part to the material itself. Silicon nitride is an ideal interbody material, possessing high strength and fracture toughness, inherent phase stability, biocompatibility, hydrophilicity, excellent radiographic imaging, and bacterial resistance. These characteristics can lead to implants that aid in prevention of nosocomial infections and achieve rapid osteointegration. In this paper, we will review the various in vitro and in vivo studies that demonstrate silicon nitride's effective bacteriostatic and osteointegration characteristics, and compare these to the two most common cage materials – titanium and poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK). Human case studies will be also reviewed to contrast the clinical performance of these biomaterials. In comparison to the traditional devices, silicon nitride shows lower infection rates, higher bone apposition, and essentially no fibrous tissue growth on or around the implant. To better understand the mechanisms underlying these benefits, surface characterization studies using scanning electron microscopy coupled with XPS chemical analyses, sessile water drop techniques and streaming zeta potential measurements will be reported. Data from these studies will be discussed in relation to the physiochemical reasons for the observed behavior. Silicon nitride is a non-oxide ceramic in its bulk; but possesses a protective Si-N-O transitional layer at its surface. It will be shown that the chemistry and morphology of this layer can be modified in composition, thickness and structure resulting in marked changes in chemical species, surface charge, isoelectric points and wetting behavior. It is postulated that the needle-like grain structure of silicon nitride coupled with its enhanced wettability play important roles in inhibiting biofilm formation, while its surface chemical environment consisting of silicon diimide Si(NH). 2. , silicic acid Si(OH). 4. , and derivatives of ammonia, NH. 3. , NH. 4. OH, lead to improved bone reformation and bacteriostasis, respectively. Few materials have this combination of properties, making silicon nitride a unique biomaterial that provides improved patient care and outcomes with low comorbidities

Purposes of the study and background. The care and cure of patients with low back disorders is of a multidisciplinary nature. Cooperation and communication between the disciplines would improve standardized care delivery to the patient. We engaged to establish a national group of multidisciplinary spine specialists to promote research and education in the field of spinal disorders. Summary of the methods used and results. A multidisciplinary group of spine professionals, opinion leaders and research leaders in spinal disorders in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a national network (“Netwerk Wervelkolomaandoeningen”). The group consists of physiotherapists, family physicians, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, anesthesiologists, as well as clinical researchers and epidemiologists. Group meetings were organized in various locations in the country. Priorities were set and divided in research and education. Communication lines were established with a resource website and a linked-in page. The first educational series of symposia for primary care professionals on multidisciplinary approaches for disc herniation and spinal stenosis is being organized in different regions in the Netherlands. The first meetings on research initiatives are being held on an idea-driven basis. Conclusion. The Dutch Network for Spinal Disorders is a promising initiative that has the potential to align care and cure for spinal disorders across disciplines

Background:. The reported prevalence of sciatica ranges from 1.2% to 43%. Epidural injections are the most commonly performed interventions for sciatica. Setting:. A provincial based spinal unit. Objective:. To evaluate the effectiveness of lumbar epidural injections with local anaesthetic and steroids, in patients with sciatica secondary to disc herniation in providing effective pain relief. Methods:. A retrospective chart review of 25 patients given an epidural with local anaesthetic mixed with non-particulate betamethasone. Patient outcomes were measured at baseline and 6 weeks with the Oswestry Disability Index 2.0 (ODI). Observations of gender, sex, co-morbities and medication intake were made. Decrease of 50% in the Oswestry scores were considered significant. Results:. Significant pain relief was seen at 6 weeks in 80% of patients and medication intake was decreased. Limitations:. The study limitations include the lack of a placebo group and the fact that this is a preliminary report of the 25 patients. Conclusion:. Overall, 80% of patients with sciatica benefited from lumbar epidural injections

Purpose of Study. Discecomy is a common operation peformed for back pain at our hospital. We analysed the theatre register looking at demographic and health data for our patients to shed more light on this cases. Description of Methods. Entries in the spinal unit theatre registers from 2000–2012 were reviewed, and all patients undergoing discectomy for disc herniation recorded analysed regarding demographics and epidemiology. Summary Of Results. A total of 171 patients had operations in our theatres. Of these patients the large majority were females. The age distribution was 45 to 50 years. The lumbar spine was the commonest region operated, especially the lower lumbar spine. We had very low repeat operations from failed surgery or requiring herniation. Conclusion. Surgical registers are an important tool in understanding pathology in the communities we serve. We can track the type of patients treated and then plan appropriate intervention programmes. It also helps to follow-up patients and correlate outcomes, and we can use this data to correlate practices nationally and internationally. NO DISCLOSURES

Introduction. Herniated disc tissue removed at surgery is mostly nucleus pulposus, with varying proportions of annulus fibrosus, cartilage endplate, and bone. Herniated nucleus swells and loses proteoglycans, and herniated annulus is invaded by blood vessels and inflammatory cells. However, little is known about the significance of endplate cartilage and bone within a herniation. Methods. Herniated tissue was removed surgically from 21 patients (10 with sciatica, 11 without). 5-μm sections were examined using H&E, Toluidine blue, Giemsa, and Masson-trichrome stains. Each tissue type in each specimen was scored for tears/fissures, neovascularisation, proteoglycan loss, cell clustering, and inflammatory cell invasion. Proportions of each tissue type were quantified using image analysis software. Results. Herniations from patients with sciatica had greater nerve and blood vessel invasion (P<0.05), and a greater proportion contained cartilage endplate (7/10 vs 3/11, p<0.05). Cartilage fragments were generally small (5–20% of herniated mass) and showed little swelling or proteoglycan loss, or inflammatory cell invasion, although chondrocytes often formed small clusters. Most cartilage endplate fragments had a straight edge where it had been stripped from bone. Two cartilage fragments showed some bone still attached, and three showed small defects that were filled with nucleus tissue, bone, or endothelial cells. Conclusion. More than 50% of disc herniations contained cartilage endplate. The relatively stable nature of cartilage fragments may explain why they are less likely to resorb, and therefore more likely to cause persisting sciatica. Loss of cartilage will increase endplate permeability, increasing the risk of Modic changes, and disc infection

In recent years, machine learning (ML) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), a particular subset of ML, have been adopted by various areas of healthcare. A number of diagnostic and prognostic algorithms have been designed and implemented across a range of orthopaedic sub-specialties to date, with many positive results. However, the methodology of many of these studies is flawed, and few compare the use of ML with the current approach in clinical practice. Spinal surgery has advanced rapidly over the past three decades, particularly in the areas of implant technology, advanced surgical techniques, biologics, and enhanced recovery protocols. It is therefore regarded an innovative field. Inevitably, spinal surgeons will wish to incorporate ML into their practice should models prove effective in diagnostic or prognostic terms. The purpose of this article is to review published studies that describe the application of neural networks to spinal surgery and which actively compare ANN models to contemporary clinical standards allowing evaluation of their efficacy, accuracy, and relatability. It also explores some of the limitations of the technology, which act to constrain the widespread adoption of neural networks for diagnostic and prognostic use in spinal care. Finally, it describes the necessary considerations should institutions wish to incorporate ANNs into their practices. In doing so, the aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for spinal surgeons to understand the relevant aspects of neural networks.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(9):1442–1448.

Aims

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) can be associated with chronic severe lower back pain and long-term autonomic dysfunction. This study assesses the recently defined core outcome set for CES in a cohort of patients using validated questionnaires.

To identify the validity of the Straight leg raise and crossed straight leg raise in the diagnosis of Lumbar disc prolapse. Systematic review of the literature. The Medline database was used (1966-09) using the search terms Lumbar disc prolapse /disc herniation/straight leg raise /crossed straight leg raise. 80 papers were identified from the search after duplicates had been removed. Of these, 6 abstracts were read and the full papers of 5 reviewed. Four papers scored highly on the STARD criteria and were used in the final review. Two systematic reviews (Vroomen et al, 1999; Deville et al, 2000) and two diagnostic studies (Majessi et al,2000; Vroomen et al, 2002). The review by Vroomen in 1999 identified 37 papers. Trials were included that used CT myelography, MRI or surgical findings as the gold standard. Deville identified 15 studies with the gold standard being findings at surgery. The diagnostic trial by Majessi et al (2008) and Vroomen et al (2002) both used MRI as the gold standard. The Diagnostic odds ratio for SLR ranged from 2.3-8.8 and for CSLR from 4.4 to 11.2. The most valid clinical test in the diagnosis of Lumbar disc prolapse is. the crossed straight leg raise. The straight leg raise has not been shown to have high validity