Introduction. The management of
Many authors recommend surgery to remove retropulsed bone fragments from the canal in burst fractures to 'decompress' the spinal canal. We believe, however, that neurological damage occurs at the moment of injury when the anatomy is most distorted, and is not due to impingement in the resting positions observed afterwards. We studied 20 consecutive patients admitted to our spinal injuries unit over a two-year period with a T12 or L1 burst fracture. There was no correlation between bony or canal disruption and the degree of neurological compromise sustained but there was a significant correlation between the energy of the injury (as gauged by the Injury Severity Score) and the neurological status (p <
0.001). This suggests that neurological injury occurs at the time of trauma rather than being a result of pressure from fragments in the canal afterwards and questions the need to operate simply to remove these fragments.
In 139 patients with burst fractures of the thoracic, thoracolumbar or lumbar spine, the least sagittal diameter of the spinal canal at the level of injury was measured by computerised tomography. By multiple logistic regression we investigated the joint correlation of the level of the burst fracture and the percentage of spinal canal stenosis with the probability of an associated neurological deficit. There was a very significant correlation between neurological deficit and the percentage of spinal canal stenosis; the higher the level of injury the greater was the probability. The severity of neurological deficit could not be predicted.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether
patients with a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine treated
by short segment pedicle screw fixation fared better clinically
and radiologically if the affected segment was fused at the same
time. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in a prospective study
and assigned to one of two groups. After the exclusion of three
patients, there were 23 patients in the fusion group and 24 in the
non-fusion group. Follow-up was at a mean of 23.9 months (18 to
30). Functional outcome was evaluated using the Greenough Low Back
Outcome Score. Neurological function was graded using the American
Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale. Peri-operative blood transfusion requirements and duration of
surgery were significantly higher in the fusion group (p = 0.029
and p <
0.001, respectively). There were no clinical or radiological
differences in outcome between the groups (all outcomes p >
0.05).
The results of this study suggest that adjunctive fusion is unnecessary
when managing patients with a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar
spine with short segment pedicle screw fixation.
Decision-making regarding operative versus non-operative treatment of patients with
The progressive kyphosis and pain in patients with acute
Background: It has been reported that there is poor correlation between neurological injury and degree of bony retropulsion in
Introduction: The management of patients with
Purpose of study: There is a controversy in the surgical treatment of unstable
The evaluation of early results of combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty for the management of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures. Between October 2008 and April 2009, 9 patients with
The October 2012 Spine Roundup. 360. looks at: a Japanese questionnaire at work in Iran; curve progression in degenerative lumbar scoliosis; the cause of foot drop; the issue of avoiding the spinal cord at scoliosis surgery; ballistic injuries to the cervical spine; minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion; readmission rates after spinal surgery; clinical complications and the severely injured cervical spine; and stabilising the
We hypothesised whether MIS techniques confer any benefit when treating
Introduction: The optimal treatment for acute
INTRODUCTION: The optimal treatment for acute
Introduction: The poor correlation between neurological injury and degree of retropulsion in
Introduction: The management of thoraco-lumbar burst fractures remains controversial. Different authors have advocated immobilisation, external bracing or internal fixation by either anterior or posterior approaches. Advocates of posterior fixation have in general performed stabilisation one level above and one level below the site of the fracture, resulting in fixation of two motion segments. It is known that multi-segmental spinal fusion produces undesirable biomechanics. To stabilise the site of the fracture and avoid unnecessary fixation of an uninjured segment the senior author (T.S.) for selected patients has been using a novel technique of monosegmental fixation with placement of pedicle screws directly into the fractured vertebral body. Methods: All patients with thoraco-lumbar burst fractures admitted to St Vincents and Concord Hospitals between January 2001 and October 2003 were considered for monosegmental fixation. Patients with severe osteoporosis or complete loss of vertebral body height (“vertebra plana”) were excluded. All patients underwent surgical decompression and fixation within 10 days of injury. Fixation was obtained with 4 titanium pedicle screws and a single transverse connector (Xia System Stryker Spine). Reduction of kyphotic deformity was carried out in selected patients. Average blood loss for the procedure was 250 ml with no patients requiring transfusion. All patients had a minimum of 6 months radiological and clinical follow-up. Results: Since January 2001, 18 patients with
Objective. To evaluate the outcomes of the treatment of acute
We present a series of 14 patients presenting to the senior surgeon’s practice who sustained
Anterior only procedure for stable thoraco-lumbar burst fractures is controversial. Prospective collection of clinical and radiological data in stable burst fractures with neurological deficit undergoing anterior only decompression and stabilisation with 2-year follow-up. 14 consecutive patients (8 females, 6 males) with two-column
Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of expandable titanium cages for vertebral body replacement in a prospective clinical trial. Methods: Since 04/1999 81 patients with
Surgical decompression of the spinal canal is presently accepted worldwide as the method of treatment for
Introduction and Aims: Speculation exists with regard to the exact mechanism of remodelling of
Introduction and Aims: Autologous bone is the preferred method of providing structural support in spinal surgery. The disadvantages are donor site morbidity and limited bone available to reconstitute the anterior column. We evaluated fresh frozen femoral allografts following anterior column reconstruction for lumbar burst fractures with neurological deficit. Method: Twenty-seven patients with neurological deficit ( Frankel grade A(3), B(7), C(16) D (1) due to burst fractures of the dorsolumbar junction were treated with fresh frozen allografts following anterior spinal decompression. The average age was 28 years, and 19 patients sustained the injury following a road traffic accident. The mean pre-operative kyphosis measured 190. A corpectomy was performed in all patients and femoral allografts were positioned by interference fit and the spine stabilised with an anterior rod screw construct. The radiographs were reviewed at three-monthly intervals and the fusion graded by an independent radiologist. Results: The follow-up in 24 patients ranged from 29 to 72 months (mean 43 months) and three patients were excluded due to inadequate follow-up. Allograft incorporation was assessed by criteria of Bridwell et al grade 1 fused with remodelling with cross trabeculae into the adjacent vertebral bodies, grade 11 graft intact, not fully remodelled and incorporated, no lucenies, grade 111 graft intact, but a definite lucency at the top or bottom of the graft, grade 1V not fused with resorption and collapse of graft. The allografts were stable and evidence of graft incorporation and remodelling were observed between eight and 24 months. Grade 1 fusion was seen in 23 patients at two years and subsequent follow-up revealed no fracture, resorption or collapse. The average neurological recovery, which was 1.4 Frankel grades (range 0–2 grades), occurred within seven weeks following surgery (range 11–74 days). Nine patients (37%) made a complete recovery and in four patients (16%) there was no improvement. The mean post-operative kyphosis at two years was 80 (range 2–180). At seven-year follow-up one patient had an asymptomatic grade 11 fusion following secondary infection due to TB which was successfully treated. Conclusion: The indications for the operative treatment of
The authors present the results of a cohort study of 60 adult
patients presenting sequentially over a period of 15 years from
1997 to 2012 to our hospital for treatment of thoracic and/or lumbar
vertebral burst fractures, but without neurological deficit. All patients were treated by early mobilisation within the limits
of pain, early bracing for patient confidence and all progress in
mobilisation was recorded on video. Initial hospital stay was one
week. Subsequent reviews were made on an outpatient basis. Aims
Method
The April 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Hyperostotic spine in injury; App based back pain control; Interspinous process devices should be avoided in claudication; Robot assisted pedicle screws: fad or advance?; Vancomycin antibiotic power in spinal surgery; What to do with that burst fracture?; Increasing complexity of spinal fractures in major trauma pathways; Vitamin D and spinal fractures
The August 2014 Spine Roundup360 looks at: rhBMP complicates cervical spine surgery; posterior longitudinal ligament revisited; thoracolumbar posterior instrumentation without fusion in burst fractures; risk modelling for VTE events in spinal surgery; the consequences of dural tears in microdiscectomy; trends in revision spinal surgery; radiofrequency denervation likely effective in facet joint pain and hooks optimally biomechanically transition posterior instrumentation.
The June 2013 Spine Roundup360 looks at: the benefit of MRI in the follow-up of lumbar disc prolapse; gunshot injury to the spinal cord; the link between depression and back pain; floating dural sack sign; short segment fixation at ten years; whether early return to play is safer than previously thought; infection in diabetic spinal patients; and dynesis.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and
compare the effect of short segment pedicle screw instrumentation and
an intermediate screw (SSPI+IS) on the radiological outcome of type
A thoracolumbar fractures, as judged by the load-sharing classification,
percentage canal area reduction and remodelling. We retrospectively evaluated 39 patients who had undergone hyperlordotic
SSPI+IS for an AO-Magerl Type-A thoracolumbar fracture. Their mean
age was 35.1 (16 to 60) and the mean follow-up was 22.9 months (12
to 36). There were 26 men and 13 women in the study group. In total,
18 patients had a load-sharing classification score of seven and
21 a score of six. All radiographs and CT scans were evaluated for
sagittal index, anterior body height compression (%ABC), spinal
canal area and encroachment. There were no significant differences
between the low and high score groups with respect to age, duration
of follow-up, pre-operative sagittal index or pre-operative anterior
body height compression (p = 0.217, 0.104, 0.104, and 0.109 respectively).
The mean pre-operative sagittal index was 19.6° (12° to 28°) which
was corrected to -1.8° (-5° to 3°) post-operatively and 2.4° (0°
to 8°) at final follow-up (p = 0.835 for sagittal deformity). No
patient needed revision for loss of correction or failure of instrumentation. Hyperlordotic reduction and short segment pedicle screw instrumentation
and an intermediate screw is a safe and effective method of treating
burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. It gives excellent radiological
results with a very low rate of failure regardless of whether the
fractures have a high or low load-sharing classification score. Cite this article
It has been proposed that intervertebral disc degeneration might be caused by low-grade infection. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence of herpes viruses in intervertebral disc specimens from patients with lumbar disc herniation. A polymerase chain reaction based assay was applied to screen for the DNA of eight different herpes viruses in 16 patients and two controls. DNA of at least one herpes virus was detected in 13 specimens (81.25%). Herpes Simplex Virus type-1 (HSV-1) was the most frequently detected virus (56.25%), followed by Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (37.5%). In two patients, co-infection by both HSV-1 and CMV was detected. All samples, including the control specimens, were negative for Herpes Simplex Virus type-2, Varicella Zoster Virus, Epstein Barr Virus, Human Herpes Viruses 6, 7 and 8. The absence of an acute infection was confirmed both at the serological and mRNA level. To our knowledge this is the first unequivocal evidence of the presence of herpes virus DNA in intervertebral disc specimens of patients with lumbar disc herniation suggesting the potential role of herpes viruses as a contributing factor to the pathogenesis of degenerative disc disease.
Impacted bone allograft is often used in revision joint replacement. Hydroxyapatite granules have been suggested as a substitute or to enhance morcellised bone allograft. We hypothesised that adding osteogenic protein-1 to a composite of bone allograft and non-resorbable hydroxyapatite granules (ProOsteon) would improve the incorporation of bone and implant fixation. We also compared the response to using ProOsteon alone against bone allograft used in isolation. We implanted two non-weight-bearing hydroxyapatite-coated implants into each proximal humerus of six dogs, with each implant surrounded by a concentric 3 mm gap. These gaps were randomly allocated to four different procedures in each dog: 1) bone allograft used on its own; 2) ProOsteon used on its own; 3) allograft and ProOsteon used together; or 4) allograft and ProOsteon with the addition of osteogenic protein-1. After three weeks osteogenic protein-1 increased bone formation and the energy absorption of implants grafted with allograft and ProOsteon. A composite of allograft, ProOsteon and osteogenic protein-1 was comparable, but not superior to, allograft used on its own. ProOsteon alone cannot be recommended as a substitute for allograft around non-cemented implants, but should be used to extend the volume of the graft, preferably with the addition of a growth factor.