We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the safety and efficacy of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) compared with bone graft when used specifically for revision spinal fusion surgery secondary to pseudarthrosis. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched using defined search terms. The primary outcome measure was spinal fusion, assessed as success or failure in accordance with radiograph, MRI or CT scan review at 24-month follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was time to fusion.Objectives
Methods
Many operations have been recommended to treat Pars Interarticularis fractures that have separated and are persistently symptomatic, but little other than conservative treatment has been recommended for symptomatic incomplete fractures. 10 consecutive patients aged 15–28 [mean 21.7 years] were treated operatively between 2010–2014. All but one were either professional athletes [3 cricketers, 2 athletics, 1 soccer] or academy cricketers [3 patients]. 8 patients had unilateral fractures, and two had bilateral fractures at the same level. The duration of pre-operative pain and disability with exercise ranged from 4–24 months [mean 15.4 months]. The operation consists of a percutaneous compression screw inserted through a 1.5cm midline skin incision under fluoroscopic guidance: 6 cases were also checked with the O-arm intra-operatively. Post-operation the patients were mobilised with a simple corset and discharged the following day with a customised rehabilitation program. All 12 fractures in 10 patients healed as demonstrated on post-operative CT scans at between 3–6 months. One patient had the screw revised at 24 hours for an asymptomatic breach, and one patient developed a halo around the fracture site without screw loosening, and had a successful revision operation to remove the screw and graft the pars from the screw channel. All patients achieved a full return to asymptomatic activity, within a timescale of 4–12 months post-surgery, depending on the sport. Athletes that have persistent symptoms from incomplete pars interarticularis fractures should consider percutaneous fixation rather than undergoing prolonged or repeated periods of rest.
Several reports showed superior fusion rates, as high as 100%, using rhBMP-2 with ALIF cages. This has led to the widespread off-label use of rhBMP-2 in several other lumbar fusion procedures. There is paucity of reports analysing the clinic-radiological outcome of using rhBMP-2 to promote bone union in cases of symptomatic pseudoarthosis following lumbar spine fusion. 52 consecutive patients who underwent revision spinal surgery for symptomatic pseudoarthosis utilizing rhBMP-2 between 2008 and 2013 were included in the study. Demographic, and surgical data were collected from medical records. Functional outcomes were recorded using the ODI. All patients had preoperative fine-cut CT scan to confirm pseudoarthosis. Postoperative CT-scan at 6 months was routinely done to confirm fusion.Introduction:
Methods:
To assess screw malposition rates and complications associated with pedicle screw insertion using 3D navigation technology. A retrospective study was undertaken for all cases where O-arm® and StealthStation® systems were used over a 2-year period. The primary outcome measure was return to theatre rates for pedicle screw malposition. A total of 938 screws were inserted (934 thoracolumbar and 4 cervical), and 103 patients underwent spinal fixation using O-arm® and StealthStation® navigation. 64 were revision cases and 39 primary cases. Average number of levels was 4.6. There were a total of 10 complications: 3 infections, 1 DVT, 1 PE, 1 fast atrial fibrillation (AF), 1 screw malposition, 1 non-union, 1 undisplaced vertebral body fracture and 1 nerve root compression following osteotomy. The percentage return to theatre for screw malposition using 3D navigation was 1% of patients and 0.1% of pedicle screws. No patients developed permanent neurological compromise. These systems provide accuracy that is comparable to traditional 2D fluoroscopic techniques. We advocate their use in the safe insertion of pedicle screws in complex revision deformity cases where original anatomical landmarks are absent or obscured. We also believe that radiation exposure is considerably less with navigation especially in these complex and revision cases.
