header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 9 - 9
1 Oct 2022
Rahman T Baxan N Murray R Tavana S Schaer T Smith N Bull J Newell N
Full Access

Introduction

Nucleus replacement surgery has the potential to be an early treatment option for chronic lower back pain. The surgery involves removal (nuclectomy) and replacement of the native degenerated nucleus with a material designed to restore the disc's physiological properties. Multiple techniques have been considered to perform a nuclectomy, however the advantages and disadvantages of each are not well understood. The aim of this study was to quantitatively compare three nuclectomy techniques: automated-shaver, rongeurs, and laser.

Methods and results

Fifteen human vertebra-disc-vertebra lumbar specimens were split into three groups. Before and after nuclectomy axial mechanical tests were performed and T2-weighted 9.4T MRIs were acquired for each specimen. Using the automated-shaver and rongeur similar volumes of disc material were removed (2.51±1.10% and 2.76±1.39% of the total disc volume, respectively), whilst considerably less material was removed when using the laser (0.12±0.07%). Using the automated-shaver and rongeur significantly reduced the toe-region stiffness, while the linear region stiffness was significantly reduced only in the rongeur group. From the MRIs, more homogeneous cavities were seen in the center of the disc when using the automated shaver compared to rongeur, whilst laser ablation resulted in small, localized cavities.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Sep 2019
Williams F Palmer M Tsepilov Y Freidin M Boer C Yau M Evans D Gelemanovic A Bartz T Nethander M Arbeeva L Karssen L Neogi T Campbell A Mellstrom D Ohlsson C Marshall L Orwoll E Uitterlinden A Rotter J Lauc G Psaty B Karlsson M Lane N Jarvik G Polasek O Hochberg M Jordan J van Meurs J Jackson R Nielson C Mitchell B Smith B Hayward C Smith N Aulchenko Y Suri P
Full Access

Purpose

Back pain is the primary cause of disability worldwide yet surprisingly little is known of the underlying pathobiology. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of chronic back pain (CBP). Adults of European ancestry from 15 cohorts in the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) consortium, and UK Biobank were studied.

Methods

CBP cases were defined as reporting back pain present for ≥3–6 months; non-cases were included as comparisons (“controls”). Each cohort conducted genotyping followed by imputation. GWAS used logistic regression with additive genetic effects adjusting for age, sex, study-specific covariates, and population substructure. Suggestive (p<5×10–7) & genome-wide significant (p<5×10–8) variants were carried forward for replication in an independent sample of UK Biobank participants. Discovery sample n = 158,025 individuals, including 29,531 CBP cases.