header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_23 | Pages 56 - 56
1 Dec 2016
Kendrick B Grammatopoulos G Philpott A Pandit H Atkins B Bolduc M Alvand A Athanasou N McNally M McLardy-Smith P Murray D Gundle R Taylor A
Full Access

Aim

Advocates of Debridement-Antibiotics-and-Implant-Retention (DAIR) in hip peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead to better survival and functional outcome compared to revision. However, no evidence supports this. This case-control study's aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for infected 1° total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following 1° THA and 2-stage revisions of infected 1° THAs.

Method

We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs, performed for confirmed infected 1° THR (DAIR-Group, n=80), in our unit between 1997–2013. Data recorded included patient demographics, medical history, type of surgery and organism identified. Outcome measures included complications, mortality, implant survivorship and functional outcome using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Outcome was compared with 2 control groups matched for gender and age; a cohort of 1° THA (1°-THA-Group, n=120) and a cohort of 2-stage revisions for infection (2-Stage-Revision-Group, n=66).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 72 - 72
1 Dec 2015
Grammatopoulos G Kendrick B Athanasou N Byren I Atkins B Mcnally M Mclardy-Smith P Gundle R Taylor A
Full Access

Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is a surgical option in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is thought to be most appropriate in the treatment of early (≤6 weeks post-op) PJI. Most studies to-date reporting on DAIRs in hip PJI have been underpowered by reporting on small cohorts (n= <45), or report on registry data with associated biases and limitations. In our, tertiary referral, bone infection unit we consider DAIR to be a suitable option in all cases of PJI with a soundly fixed prosthesis, with early or late presentation, especially in patients who are too elderly or infirm to undergo major surgery.

Aim: To define the 10-year outcome following DAIR in hip PJI and identify factors that influence it.

We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs performed in our unit between 1997 and 2013 for hip PJI. Only infected cases confirmed by histological and microbiological criteria were included. Data recorded included patient demographics and medical history, type of surgery performed (DAIR or DAIR + exchange of modular components), organism identified and type/duration of antibiotic treatment. Outcome measures included complications, mortality rate, implant survivorship and functional outcome.

121 DAIRs were identified with mean age of 71 years (range: 33–97). 67% followed an index procedure of 1° arthroplasty. 53% included exchange of modular components. 60% of DAIRs were for early onset PJI. Isolated staphylococcus was present in 50% of cases and 25% had polymicrobial infection. At follow-up (mean:7 years, range: 0.3 – 18), 83 patients were alive; 5- and 10- year mortality rates were 15% and 35% respectively. 45% had a complication (persistence of infection: 27%, dislocation: 10%) and 40% required further surgery. Twenty hips have been revised to-date (17%). Performing a DAIR and not exchanging the modular components was associated with an almost 3× risk (risk ratio: 2.9) of subsequent implant failure (p=0.04). 10-yr implant survivorship was 80% (95%CI: 70 – 90%). Improved 10-year implant survivorship was associated with DAIR performed for early PJI (85% Vs 68%, p=0.04). Functional outcome will be discussed.

DAIR is a particularly valuable option in the treatment of hip PJI, especially in the early post-operative period. Whenever possible, exchange of modular implants should be undertaken, however DAIRs are associated with increased morbidity even in early PJI. Factors that predict success of DAIR in late PJI need to be identified.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 13 - 13
1 Feb 2012
Steffen R Smith S Gill H Beard D McLardy-Smith P Urban J Murray D
Full Access

This study aims to investigate femoral blood flow during Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing (MMHR) by monitoring oxygen concentration during the operative procedure.

Patients undergoing MMHR using the posterior approach were evaluated. Following division of fascia lata, a calibrated gas-measuring electrode was inserted into the femoral neck, aiming for the supero-lateral quadrant of the head. Baseline oxygen concentration levels were detected after electrode insertion 2-3cm below the femoral head surface and all intra-operative measures were referenced against these. Oxygen levels were continuously monitored throughout the operation. Data from ten patients are presented.

Oxygen concentration dropped most noticeably during the surgical approach and was reduced by 62% (Std.dev +/-26%) following dislocation and capsulectomy. Insertion of implants resulted in a further oxygenation decrease by 18% (Std.dev +/-28%). The last obtained measure before wound closure detected 22% (Std.dev +/-31%) of initial baseline oxygen levels. Variation between subjects was observed and three patients demonstrated a limited recovery of oxygen levels during implant insertion and hip relocation.

Intra-operative measurement of oxygen concentration in blood perfusing the femoral head is feasible. Results in ten patients undergoing MMHR showed a dramatic effect on the oxygenation in the femoral head during surgical approach and implant fixation. This may increase the risk of avascular necrosis and subsequent femoral neck fracture. Future experiments will determine if less invasive procedures or specific positioning of the limb can protect the blood supply to femoral neck and head.