Posterolateral fusion (PLF) is a commonly accepted surgical procedure and overall the most common technique performed to obtain fusion in the lumbar spine. Harvesting autologous bone from the iliac crest is associated with increased operation time, blood loss, and chronic donor site pain. Allograft material has an insufficient osteoinductive potential. Bone marrow concentrate (BMC) could be an option how to promote allograft PLF healing. The purpose of the presented study was to investigate the validity of BMC addition to allografts in instrumented lumbar PLF surgery. The study was prospective, randomised, controlled and blinded. Eighty patients with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine underwent instrumented (S4, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) lumbar or lumbosacral PLF. In forty cases, the PLF was done with spongious allograft chips alone (Group I). In another forty cases, spongious allograft chips were mixed with BMC (Group II), where the mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) concentration was 1.74 × 104/L at average (range, 1.06–1.98 × 104/L). Patients were scheduled for anteroposterior and lateral radiographs at 12 and 24 months after the surgery and for CT scanning at 24 months after the surgery. Fusion status and the degree of mineralization of the fusion mass were evaluated separately by two radiologists blinded to patient group affiliation.Background
Methods
The biomechanical function of the anteromedial
(AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament
(ACL) remains controversial. Some studies report that the AM bundle
stabilises the knee joint in anteroposterior (AP) translation and
rotational movement (both internal and external) to the same extent
as the PL bundle. Others conclude that the PL bundle is more important
than the AM in controlling rotational movement. The objective of this randomised cohort study involving 60 patients
(39 men and 21 women) with a mean age of 32.9 years (18 to 53) was
to evaluate the function of the AM and the PL bundles of the ACL
in both AP and rotational movements of the knee joint after single-bundle
and double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a computer navigation
system. In the double-bundle group the patients were also randomised
to have the AM or the PL bundle tensioned first, with knee laxity
measured after each stage of reconstruction. All patients had isolated
complete ACL tears, and the presence of a meniscal injury was the
only supplementary pathology permitted for inclusion in the trial.
The KT-1000 arthrometer was used to apply a constant load to evaluate
the AP translation and the rolimeter was used to apply a constant
rotational force. For the single-bundle group deviation was measured
before and after ACL reconstruction. In the double-bundle group
deviation was measured for the ACL-deficient, AM- or PL-reconstructed
first conditions and for the total reconstruction. We found that the AM bundle in the double-bundle group controlled
rotation as much as the single-bundle technique, and to a greater
extent than the PL bundle in the double-bundle technique. The double-bundle
technique increases AP translation and rotational stability in internal
rotation more than the single-bundle technique.
