header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 100 - 100
1 Dec 2013
Kessler O
Full Access

INTRODUCTION:

One common surgical treatment of even early OA is the implantation of a Total Joint Arthroplasty. In case of younger patients this procedure is questionable. The present study investigates the behaviour of a new silk derived scaffold supplied by Orthox Ltd. (Abingdon, UK) in an in vivo sheep model. This scaffold allows replacing the damaged areas with a resurfacing technique and will avoid the implantation of a total joint in cases of early OA.

METHODS:

The scaffolds where derived from silk fibres by processing into a composite of an open porous matrix in combination with a fibres mash with the same material and covered with a smooth surface. During the process the fluid silk can be casted in any shape. Eight sheep (4 ± 1 years) underwent a surgery where a large defect (2×1 cm) was created in the weight bearing zone of the medial condylus followed by implantation of a scaffold. The unoperated contra lateral stifle joint served as control.

After six months the animals were sacrificed and the joints inspected for inflammation. The Young's modulus of the cartilage and scaffold was determined by indentation or confined compression tests. All tissues were fixed in formaldehyde for histology. The data were analysed by a Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney-U-test. The roughness of the smooth surface was measured. Synovial fluid was harvested by punction before opening the joint and analysed for particle wear debris and for any signs of inflammation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 370 - 370
1 Dec 2013
Kessler O
Full Access

INTRODUCTION:

To avoid the early onset of osteoarthritis after partial meniscectomy an effective replacement of injured meniscal tissue would be desirable. The present study investigates the behaviour of a new silk derived scaffold supplied by Orthox Ltd. (Abingdon, UK) in an in vivo sheep model.

METHODS:

The scaffolds where derived from silk fibres by processing into an open porous matrix. Nine sheep (4 ± 1 years) underwent partial meniscectomy at the anterior horn of the medial meniscus followed by implantation of a scaffold. The unoperated contralateral stifle joint served as control.

After six months the animals were sacrificed and the joints inspected for inflammation. The Young's modulus of the tibial cartilage, meniscus and scaffold was determined by indentation or confined compression tests. All tissues were fixed in formaldehyde for histology. The data were analysed by a Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney-U-test.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 371 - 371
1 Dec 2013
Wright S Boymans TA Miles T Grimm B Kessler O
Full Access

Introduction

The human body is a complex and continually adapting organism. It is theorised that the morphology of the proximal femur is closely related to that of the distal femur. Patients that have abnormal anatomy in the proximal femur, such as a high femoral neck anteversion angle, may have abnormal anatomy in the distal femur to overcome proximal differences. This phenomenon is of key interest when performing Total Hip Replacement (THR) or Total Knee Replacement (TKR) surgery. The current design and placement of existing hip and knee implants does not account for any correlation between the anatomical parameters of the proximal and distal femur, where bone anatomy may have adapted to compromise for abnormalities.

A preliminary study of 21 patients has been carried out to assess the relationship between the proximal and distal femur. The difficulties in defining and measuring key anatomical parameters on the femur have been widely discussed in the literature [1] due to its complex three dimensional geometry. Using CT scans of healthy octogenarians, it was possible to mark key anatomical landmarks which could be used to define various anatomical axes throughout the femur. Correlation analyses could then be carried out on these parameters to assess the relationship between proximal and distal femur morphology.

Methods

Each femur was initially realigned along the mechanical axis (MA); defined by joining the centre of the femoral head (FHC) to the centre of the intercondylar notch (INC) [2]. All anatomical landmarks were then identified using the Materialise Mimics v12 software (Figure 1 and 2) and exported into Microsoft Excel for analysis. Key anatomical parameters which were derived from these landmarks included the femoral neck axis (FNA), femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA) [1–4], condylar twist angle, clinical transepicondylar axis (TEA), trochlea sulcus angle and medial and lateral trochlea twist.

A correlation analysis was carried out on SPSS Statistics v20 (IBM) to assess the relationship between proximal and distal anatomical parameters.