Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos Overall, 75 patients were included in the study and 71 were available at two years postoperatively. Prior to surgery, they were randomized to one of the three combinations studied: Palacos cement with use of the Optivac mixing system, Refobacin with use of the Optivac system, and Refobacin with use of the Optipac system. Cemented MS30 stems and cemented Exceed acetabular components were used in all hips. Postoperative radiographs were used to assess the quality of the cement mantle according to Barrack et al, and the position and migration of the femoral stem. Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score, Forgotten Joint Score, and University of California, Los Angeles Activity Scale were collected.Aims
Methods
While fixation on the acetabular side in resurfacing implants has been uncemented, the femoral component is usually cemented. The most common causes for early revision in hip resurfacing are femoral head and or neck fractures and aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Later failures appear to be more related to adverse soft-tissue reactions due to metal wear. Little is known about the effect of cementing techniques on the clinical outcome in hip resurfacing, since retrieval analysis of failed hip resurfacing show large variations. Two cementing techniques have dominated. The indirect low viscosity (LV) technique as for the Birmingham Hip resurfacing (BHR) system and the direct high viscosity (HV) technique as for the Articular Surface replacement (ASR) system. The ASR was withdrawn from the market in 2010 due to inferior short and midterm clinical outcome. This study presents an in vitro experiment on the cement mantle parameters and penetration into ASR resurfaced femoral heads comparing both techniques. Five sets of paried frozen cadavar femura (3 male, 2 female) were used in the study. The study was approved by ethics committee. Plastic ASR replicas (DePuy, Leeds, UK), femoral head size 47Ø were used. The LV technique was used for the right femora (Group A, fig. 1 and 3) while the HV technigue was used for the left femora (Group B. Fig 2 and 4). The speciments were cut into quadrants. An initiial visual, qualitative evaluation was followed by CT analysis of cement mantle thickness and cement penetration into bone.Introduction
Methods
The early designs of hip resurfacing implants suffered high rates of early failure, making it impossible to obtain valuable mid-term radiostereophotogrammetric (RSA) results. The metal-on-metal Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty has shown promising mid-term results and we present here the first mid-term RSA analysis of a hip resurfacing implant. The analysis was performed in 19 hips at five years post-operatively. The mean acetabular component translation and rotation, and femoral component translation were compared with the previous RSA measurements at two and six months, and one and two years. There was no statistical significance (
The Birmingham hip resurfacing metal-on-metal arthroplasty was introduced in 1997 and has shown promising short- to mid-term results. We used radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) to study the stability of 20 resurfacing arthroplasties over a follow-up period of 24 months. Radiological examinations for RSA were performed immediately after surgery and at two, six, 12 and 24 months after operation. Precision and detection of migration thresholds (non-zero movement) were calculated. All the results corresponded well to those found in similar experimental arrangements with standard hip prostheses. Migration of the cup and vertical and mediolateral migration of the head were calculated. The values were low at two years compared with those of earlier studies of cemented femoral components in conventional total hip replacements indicating that there was no evidence of excessive early migration or loosening of the components.
