header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 1 | Pages 24 - 30
1 Jan 2014
Haddad B Konan S Haddad FS

We have reviewed the current literature to compare the results of surgery aimed to repair or debride a damaged acetabular labrum. We identified 28 studies to be included in the review containing a total of 1631 hips in 1609 patients. Of these studies 12 reported a mean rate of good results of 82% (from 67% to 100%) for labral debridement. Of the 16 studies that reported a combination of debridement and re-attachment, five reported a comparative outcome for the two methods, four reported better results with re-attachment and one study did not find any significant difference in outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis or draw accurate conclusions. Confounding factors in the studies include selection bias, use of historical controls and high rates of loss of follow-up.

It seems logical to repair an unstable tear in a good quality labrum with good potential to heal in order potentially to preserve its physiological function. A degenerative labrum on the other hand may be the source of discomfort and its preservation may result in persistent pain and the added risk of failure of re-attachment. The results of the present study do not support routine refixation for all labral tears.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:24–30.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLIII | Pages 4 - 4
1 Sep 2012
Makki D Haddad B Shahid M Pathak S Garnham I
Full Access

Background

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the effectiveness of a single ultrasound-guided steroids injection in the treatment of Morton's neuromas and whether the response to injection correlates with the size of neuroma.

Methods

Forty three patients with clinical features of Morton's neuroma underwent ultrasound scan assessment. Once the lesion was confirmed in the relevant web space, a single corticosteroids injection was given using 40 mg Methylprednisolone along with 1% Lidocaine.

All scans and injections were performed by a single musculoskeletal radiologist. Patients were divided into two groups based on the size of the lesion measured on the scan. Group 1 included patients with neuromas of 5mm or less and Group 2 patients had neuromas larger than 5mm. The Visual Analogue Scale (Scale:0 to 10), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) and the Johnson satisfaction scale were used to assess patients prior to injection and then at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months following the injection.