header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 12 - 12
13 Mar 2023
Harding T Dunn J Haddon A Fraser E Sinnerton R Davies P Clift B
Full Access

COVID 19 led to massive disruption of elective services across Scotland. This study was designed to assess the impact on elective service that the COVID-19 pandemic had, to what extent services have been restarted and the associated risks are in doing so.

This is a retrospective observational study. The primary outcomes are the number of operations completed, 30-day mortality, 30-day complication rates and nosocomial infection with COVID-19 compared to previous years. Data was collected from 4 regions across Scotland from 27th March 2020 - 26th March 2021. This was compared to the same time period the previous year.

3431 elective operations were completed in the year post-pandemic compared with 12255, demonstrating a reduction of 72%. Both groups had comparable demographics. Major joint arthroplasty saw a 72% reduction, with TKR seeing a reduction of 82%. Each of the 4 health boards were affected in a similar fashion. Nosocomial COVID-19 infection was 0.4% in the post covid group. 30 day mortality was the same at 0.1%. Total complications rose from 5.7% to 10.1% post covid.

This study shows that there has been a substantial reduction in elective activity across Scotland that is disproportionate to the level of COVID-19. The risk of developing COVID-19 from elective surgery is low at 0.4%, however all complications saw a significant rise. This is likely multifactorial. This study will inform decision makers in future pandemics, that it is safe to continue elective orthopaedic surgery and of the potential impact of cessation of services.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 9 - 9
1 Mar 2020
Gannon M Downie S Aggarwal I Parcell B Davies P
Full Access

Gram staining is used as an initial indicator of synovial joint infection but has widely varied false negative rates in the literature. Clinical decisions are often made on the basis of gram stain results, such as whether a patient requires urgent surgery, and therefore it is important to understand the tests efficacy.

A retrospective review of synovial fluid aspirates in NHS Tayside for the years 2017 and 2018 was performed from the departmental microbiology database. Aspirates of large joints were included (hip, knee, shoulder, wrist, elbow, ankle). Any joints with prosthesis were excluded, including fixation metalwork. Any abscess overlying a joint that was not proven to penetrate the joint was also excluded. Initial gram stain results and formal culture results were reviewed. Final culture results were considered to be the gold standard to compare gram stain results to.

2167 samples were reviewed. Of these 1552 were excluded base on inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 615, 120 (19.5%) were culture positive. There were 33 positive gram stain results, 1 false positive and 32 true positive results. The sensitivity was 26.67% with a specificity of 99.80% (p=0.0001). The negative predictive value is 84.88% (CI 83.44% – 86.21%).

These results show that gram stain tests of native joints have a low sensitivity and poor negative predictive value. This is reflected in the current literature with prosthetic joints. Based on this study caution should be used when interpreting a negative gram stain result with appropriate safety netting and follow up required alongside clinical assessment.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 6 - 6
1 Jun 2016
Davies P Mayne A Faulkner A Mackinnon F Simpson J
Full Access

The availability of seven-day NHS services for patients is currently receiving widespread national attention. Rehabilitation services including physiotherapy and occupational therapy are not routinely available at the weekend. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if seven-day rehabilitation services led to improved outcomes for hip fracture patients.

All proximal femur fractures were included and formed into two cohorts. Data were collected prospectively in each cohort. Cohort one underwent standard five-day rehabilitation (n=79). Cohort two received seven-day rehabilitation (n=338). Both groups were followed up to 120 days.

No significant differences were observed between the cohorts for pre-fracture place of residence, ASA score or age. Combined median length-of-stay in hospital and rehabilitation improved from 28 to 21 days (p=0.054) Combined median length of stay for patients admitted from home improved from 26 to 19 days (p=0.016).

This pilot study suggests that a seven-day physiotherapy and occupational therapy service may result in decreased total length-of-stay in hospital and subsequent rehabilitation. This is a clear benefit for our patients but also for our hospitals and rehabilitation units where beds are at such a premium. A wider study across multiple institutions within NHS Scotland is now needed to investigate this further.