Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine why some TKR patients are satisfied and others are dissatisfied.

Method: 2,481 primary TKR patients who had completed a decision date WOMAC were randomly identified within the Ontario Joint Replacement Registry (OJRR) database. One year post-operatively, these patients were mailed a survey to determine satisfaction/expectations, willingness to undergo surgery again, Jaeschke self-reported clinical improvement, WOMAC scores and complications. The satisfied and not satisfied patient groups were identified, statistical analysis employed to determine variables that individually affect satisfaction and logistic regression used to identify significant factors which might lead to patient dissatisfaction.

Results: Only 70% of primary TKR patients felt that their expectations had been met and 15% reported that they had no expectations. Only 81% of patients reported that they were satisfied with their TKR. When asked whether they would have their surgery again, 96% of the satisfied patients reported that they would do so as compared to only 63% in the dissatisfied group (p< 0.0001). Using the Jaeschke self-reported clinical improvement scale, 87% of TKR patients reported that they were improved, but only 75% reported that they were a good, great or a very great deal improved. There was a high correlation with the WOMAC change score and the Jaeschke self-reported improvement and willingness to undergo surgery again questions. Significant differences were found between the satisfied and dissatisfied TKR patients in terms of a pre-operative WOMAC score of < 20 (p< 0.004), the WOMAC change score (p< 0.0001), expectations (p< 0.0001), complications (p< 0.0001), age (p< 0.002), referral status (p< 0.0005), living alone (p< 0.01) and comorbidities (p< 0.05). Logistic regression suggested that the most important predictive factors were a pre-operative WOMAC < 20 (p< 004), the WOMAC change score (p< 0.0001), expectations met (p< 0.0001) and complications (p< 0.0001).

Conclusion: Only one in five primary TKR patients are satisfied with their operative procedure. Significant risk factors for patient dissatisfaction after primary TKR include a pre-operative WOMAC < 20, a WOMAC change score of less than 33 points, expectations that were not met or a complication.

To examine the effect of gender on outcome of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus gonarthrosis at a minimum two year follow-up

Sixty-five patients (twenty-four female and forty-one male) participated in this investigation. Mean age at the time of surgery was fifty-five years and mean time to follow-up was 54.83 months. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the strength of the association between post-operative WOMAC osteoarthritis index scores and the independent variables of gender, age, BMI, time (months from surgery) and pre and post operative mechanical axis angles (MAA) measured on standing double-leg hip-to-ankle radiographs.

This analysis revealed that none of the independent variables contributed significantly to the WOMAC outcome scores.

The results of this study indicate that gender is not a significant predictor of outome following medial opening wedge HTO. This is contrary to the view held by many.

The purposes of this study were to determine the effect of severity, wait times and patient perspective on outcomes and to create an eivdence-based prioritization tool.

Patients who received a primary hip or knee replacement were followed forward from decision date for surgery to one-year follow-up (N = 4437) and outcomes assessed according to baseline severity. At decision date for surgery, patient baseline severity was captured using the WOMAC disability questionnaire. Twelve to eighteen months after surgery, a questionnaire (WOMAC, satisfaction) was sent to patients to compare pre- and post-operative data.

The chance of a good outcome from TJR surgery gets worse as wait times get longer. Baseline severity affects outcome more than wait times. Patients with a baseline WOMAC less then 30/100 should have surgery within three months (20% patients) If surgery cannot be done within three months, then three priority levels are recommended: Priority I – One month maximum: catastrophic hip or knee joint conditions – complications that are an immediate threat to independence. Priority II – three months maximum: extreme pain and disability because of hip or knee joint condition that will be a threat to role and independence within three months (baseline WOMAC less than or equal to 30/100). Priority III – six months maximum: severe pain or disability because of hip or knee joint condition, but role and independence not threatened (baseline WOMAC over 30/100).

The priority levels and wait time thresholds recommended in this study are the result of an analysis of pre-operative severity scores, the length of the wait and post-operative outcomes and are consistent with data from other sources.