Aim

Septic arthritis of the hip is a rare entity among the adult population, but with a potential severe repercussion. The most accepted treatment is the hip debridement, even though a notorious proportion of the cases need further hip replacement owing to the cartilage destruction. The aim of this study is to analyse all our cases of septic arthritis of the hip treated with a 2-stage strategy using an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer.

Patient safety is a major concern worldwide, but particularly high rates of adverse events are reported in the surgery setting. Orthopaedic and Traumatology is the speciality most frequently involved in claims in Catalonia. The objective of the study is to perform a descriptive study of the claims regarding infection in Orthopaedic and Traumatology in Catalonia.

We performed a retrospective study of the claims regarding infection in Orthopaedic and Traumatology from the prospective claims database of the Service of Professional Liability of The Catalonian Council of Official Colleges of Physicians. The time frame of data collection was from 2003 to 2013. We analyzed both the clinical and legal characteristics of the cases.

During the 10-year period, 638 registered claims were related to the practice of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, and 74 (11,6%) were due to infection. The most frequent surgical procedure involved were arthroplasty (knee, hip or shoulder) (14, 18,9%), traumatic wounds and cellulitis (12, 16,2%), spine procedures (10, 13,5%) and arthroscopy (7, 9,4%). The most frequent anatomical site involved were foot and ankle (17, 22,9%), spine (15, 20,3%), knee (14, 18,9%), wrist and hand (11, 14,8%). The 68,92% of claims was solved by the courts and 29,73% by an “out-of-court” procedure. The average compensation in cases considered to have professional liability was 145.045€.

Orthopaedic and Traumatology seem to be a specialty with a high risk for claims, and infection is one of the most important causes. The study of the claims can lead to improvements in prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of infection in Orthopaedic and Traumatology.

Open debridement, irrigation with implant retention and antibiotic treatment (DAIR) is an accepted approach for early prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Our aim was to design a score to predict patients with a higher risk of failure.

From 1999 to 2014 early (<90 days) PJIs without signs of loosening of the prosthesis were treated with DAIR and were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The primary end-point was early failure defined as: 1) the need of an unscheduled surgery, 2) death-related infection within the first 60 days after debridement or 3) the need for suppressive antibiotic treatment. A score was built-up according to the logistic regression coefficients of variables available before debridement.

A total of 222 patients met the inclusion criteria. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (95 cases, 42.8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (81 cases, 36.5%). Fifty-two (23.4%) cases failed. Independent predictors of failure were: chronic renal failure (OR:5.92, 95%CI:1.47–23.85), liver cirrhosis (OR:4.46, 95%CI:1.15–17.24), revision surgery (OR:4.34, 95%CI:1.34–14.04) or femoral neck fracture (OR:4.39, 95%CI:1.16–16.62) compared to primary arthroplasty, CRP >11.5 mg/dL (OR:12.308, 95%CI:4.56–33.19), cemented prosthesis (OR:8.71, 95%CI:1.95–38.97) and when all intraoperative cultures were positive (OR:6.30, 95%CI:1.84–21.53). Furthermore, CRP showed a direct relationship with the percentage of positive cultures (Linear equation, R2=0,046, P=0.002) and an inverse association with the time between the debridement and failure (Logarithmic equation, R2=0.179, P=0.003). A score for predicting the risk of failure was done using pre-operative factors (KLIC-score, figure 1) and it ranged between 0–9.5 points. Patients with a score ≤2, >2–3.5, 4–5, >5–6.5 and ≥7 had a failure rate of 4.5%, 19.4%, 55%, 71.4% and 100%, respectively.

The KLIC-score was highly predictive of early failure after debridement. In the future, it would be necessary to validate our score using cohorts from other institutions.

Two-stage revision surgery is the current gold standard for treating prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Between the first and the second stage gentamicin-loaded (G) spacers are widely used but the rate of gentamicin resistant staphylococci is increasing. The potential benefit of vancomycin + gentamicin-loaded (V/G) spacers has not yet been evaluated. The aim of our study was to compare the microbiological eradication and infection control rates in PJI treated with G- or V/G-spacers.

147 PJIs treated in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. From 2003 to 2009 G-spacers (Tecres®) were used (group G) and from 2010 to 2013 V/G-spacers (Group V/G). Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, ASA score, type of infection, microorganisms isolated in the first and second stages, time between stages, infection outcome at last visit were collected. The 2 main outcome variables were microbiological eradication in the second stage (≤1 positive culture out of 6) and infection control after the second stage. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using SPSS®.

There were 83 patients in group G and 63 in group V/G. The mean (SD) age was 71.5 (10.3) years and 54% were female. Groups were similar in gender, age, BMI, ASA score, time with spacer, microorganism isolated in the first stage, or type of infection (acute or chronic) (p>0.05). The presence of ≥2 positive cultures in the second stage was significantly higher in group G (23.2%) than in group V/G (6.7%, P<0.05). Logistic regression model identified polymicrobial infections (OR: 4.26, CI95%: 1.44–12.64) and the use of G-spacers (OR: 5.88, CI95%: 1.60–21.74) as independent predictors of failure in microbiological eradication. The global rate of infection control was 75% after a mean (SD) follow-up of 56 (32) months. Infection control was higher in chronic than acute PJI (83.6% vs 59.6%, P<0.05), when cultures during second stage were negative (81.5%) vs positive (61%, P<0.05), and there was a trend towards a higher control rate when V/G-spacers (82%) vs G-spacers (69.5%) were used (P=0.09). Multivariate analysis identified chronic PJI (OR: 5.43, CI95%: 2.20–13.51) and, at the limit of significance, the use of V/G spacers (OR: 2.36, CI95%: 0.97–5.71) as predictors of infection control.

Vancomycin loaded spacers were significantly associated with a higher microbiological eradication and there was a trend towards a higher infection control than gentamicin loaded spacers.

Early prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are managed with debridement, implant retention and antibiotics (DAIR). Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for failure after stopping antibiotic treatment.

From 1999 to 2013 early PJIs managed with DAIR were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. The main variables potentially associated with outcome were gathered and the minimum follow-up was 2 years. Primary endpoint was implant removal or the need of reintroducing antibiotic treatment due to failure.

A total of 143 patients met the inclusion criteria. The failure rate after a median (IQR) duration of oral antibiotic treatment of 69 (45–95) days was 11.8%. In 92 cases PJI was due to gram-positive (GP) microorganisms, in 21 due to gram-negatives (GN) and 30 had a polymicrobial infection. In GP infections, combination of rifampin with linezolid, cotrimoxazole or clindamycin was associated with a higher failure rate (27.8%, P=0.026) in comparison to patients receiving a combination of rifampin with levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin or amoxicillin (8.3%) or monotherapy with linezolid or cotrimoxazole (0%) (Figure 1). Among patients with a GN infection, the use of fluoroquinolones was associated with a lower failure rate (7.1% vs 37.5%, P=0.044). Duration of antibiotic treatment was not associated with failure.

The only factor associated with failure was the oral antibiotic selection, but not the duration of treatment. Linezolid, cotrimoxazole and clindamycin but not levofloxacin serum concentrations are reduced by rifampin; a fact that could explain our findings. Further studies monitoring serum concentration could help to improve the efficacy of these antibiotics when combining with rifampin.

Introduction: The histology of prosthetic tissue is a gold standard for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. However, the specificity and sensitivity of histology has never been 100% and this could be due to several causes. A possible cause for inconsistencies in histological results could be the type of specimen submitted to laboratory. The majority of authors obtain specimens from pseudocapsule, interface membrane and any tissue area suspicious of infection.

Aim: The objective of our study was to elucidate which is the most accurate specimen for histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Methods: Prospective study including all revision arthroplasties performed in Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain) from January 2007 to June of 2009. Specimens from pseudocapsule and from interface membrane were obtained from each patient. Definitive diagnosis of infection was considered when ≥2 cultures were positive for the same microorganism or the presence of pus around the prosthesis. Patients were classified in two groups:

patients submitted to hip revision arthroplasty due to an aseptic loosening in whom cultures (at least 5) obtained during surgery were negative and

Results: A total of 69 revisions were included in the study; 57 were classified in the group A and 12 were classified in the group B. The percentage of positive interface membrane histology in patients with prosthetic joint infection (group B) was significantly higher than the percentage of positive pseudocapsule histology (83.3% vs 41.6%, p=0.04, Fisher exact test).

Conclusion: The results suggest that the best specimen of periprosthetic soft tissue for histological study to diagnose the chronic periprosthetic infection in a revision total hip arthroplasty is the periprosthetic interface membrane.

Introduction: The most important cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the contamination of the wound during the surgery. Nowadays, it doesn’t exist any image or laboratory test for early detection of prosthesis with a higher risk of developing a PJI.

Aim: The primary aim was to evaluate the usefulness of different intraoperative samples during the surgery of implantation of a primary hip arthroplasty (PHA) as a predicting factor of PJI.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed. All patients (n= 278) who underwent a PHA from January ’06 to November ’08 were included. Three samples: a piece of articular capsule (TS), a swab (S) and synovial fluid (SF) inoculated into blood flask were taken in each patient during the first 45 minutes of surgery. Other possible risk factors of PJI like age, sex, ASA, comorbidity and surgical time were registered.

Results: A total of 278 patients were included. 30 cultures (8 SF, 13 TS and 9 S) were positive in 29 patients. The most frequent microorganism isolated was Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) (66.6%). The rate of PJI (early and late) in the subgroup of patients with positive intraoperative cultures for CNS was 25% while in the subgroup with all negative cultures was 5.2% (RR=4.8; p=0.007). Other factors significantly associated with a higher rate of PJI in the univariate analysis were: ASA III (RR=9.12; p=0.02), cardiopathy (RR= 2.82; p=0.04), obstructive pulmonary chronic disease (RR=5; p=0.02) and rheumatoid arthritis (RR=4.16; p=0.04). Multivariate analysis found ASA III (Odds ratio 10.9; CI 95% 1.27–94.6; p=0.02) and a positive intraoperative culture for CNS (Odds ratio 5.92; CI 95%=1.8–19.85; p=0.03) as independent risk factors for PJI.

Conclusion: Positive intraoperative culture for CNS during PHA was independently associated with the development of PJI.

Exchange of infected implant using antibiotic-impregnated cement is the treatment of choice in prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We presented our experience using one or two-stage exchange with uncemented implants.

From January 2000 to June 2006 patients with a PJI that were treated with one or two-stage exchange with uncemented implants, were prospectively followed up. The treatment protocol consisted of radical excision of devitalized tissue and of maintaining a high serum antibiotic concentration during surgery followed by systemic antibiotic administration according to the microbiology results. Only patients with ≥6 months of follow-up were included. Good evolution was considered when symptoms and signs of infection disappeared and the C-Reactive Protein was normal.

Forty-two patients were included in the study, of whom 25 were male. The mean age was 70 years. The most common symptom was pain (100%) and radiological signs of prosthesis loosening were present in 36 cases (85.7%). Histology was positive in 32 patients (76.2%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci was the most common microorganism (23 cases) followed by S. aureus (5 cases). One-stage exchange was performed in 18 patients, and the long stem component was always uncemented. In one case an acute infection after the arthroplasty obligated to perform an open debridément without implant removal. After a mean follow-up of 31 months (range: 6–84) all patients had a good evolution. In 24 cases a 2-stage exchange with a joint spacer with gentamycin (Spacer-G) was performed. In all cases the definitive arthroplasty was performed using an uncemented long stem. Good evolution was documented in all but one case with persistent infection due to S. aureus after a mean follow-up of 19 months (range: 12–48).

Our results suggest that uncemented arthroplasty following a protocol based on radical debridément and systemic antibiotic therapy during and after surgery is a useful approach in PJI.

In primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed under ischemia the antibiotic prophylaxis is administered 15’ before inflating the tourniquet. The infection rate in TKA is higher than in hip arthroplasty. We hypothesise that ischemia could impair the efficacy of the antibiotic. The objective of our study was to compare the effectiveness of two schedules of antibiotic administration.

We conducted a randomised and a double blind study. Patients were assigned to receive placebo 15’ before inflating tourniquet and cefuroxim 1.5 g 10’ before releasing the tourniquet (experimental arm) or cefuroxim 1.5 g 15’ before inflating tourniquet and placebo 15’ before releasing tourniquet (standard arm). In both arms cefuroxime 1.5 g was administered 6 hours after finishing surgery. The variables gathered were: age, sex, indication for TKA, co-morbidity, ASA score, duration of the operation, number of blood transfusions, days of hospitalisation and number of surgical site infections after 3 months of surgery. Categorical variables were compared using the χ² test or the Fisher exact test and quantitative variables using Student-t test.

Nine hundred and eight patients were randomised and 466 and 442 patients were allocated to experimental and standard arms respectively. Both groups were similar and there were no differences in deep and superficial infection rates, 1.39% and 4.18% for experimental arm and 3.39% and 3.17% for standard arm (p> 0.05). The experimental arm had a lower global and deep infection rate than the standard arm when the length of surgery was lower than the 75th percentile (global: 4.03 vs 7.93%, p=0.04, deep: 1.72% vs 4.44%, p=0.07).

The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis 10’ before releasing the tourniquet decreases the surgical site infection rate when the duration of surgery is lower than the 75th percentile.

Intraoperative histology has a high specificity and sensitivity to identify prosthetic joint infection. However, the usefulness of this technique according to the type of microorganism isolated in the periprosthetic tissue has not previously been studied.

Frozen sections and cultures from periprosthetic tissue of 38 revision arthroplasties performed due to prosthetic joint infection were retrospectively reviewed. Frozen sections were evaluated according to Mirras’ criteria (adapted by Feldman). Culture was considered positive when the same microorganism was isolated in at least 2 samples or the presence of pus around the prosthesis.

Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) was the aetiology in 13 cases, Gram-negative bacilli in 8, S. aureus in 7, Candida sp and Peptococcus sp in 2 and Enterococcus sp, S.pneumoniae and in 1 case each one. No microorganism was isolated in 4 cases. Frozen sections revealed more than 5 neuthrophils per high power field (forty times) in at least five fields in all cases except in 2 out of 13 caused by CNS (15.3%). A revision of the articles that provided information on the aetiology and the histology supports the findings of our study.

In conclusion, frozen section using Feldman’s criteria had a 15.3% of false negative cases when CNS was the aetiology of the prosthetic joint infection.