header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 135 - 135
1 May 2012
A. R A. J A. W
Full Access

Background

Ankle fractures represent an increasing workload, particularly in the elderly female population. The posterior tibial tendon is exposed to injury during displaced medial malleolar fractures. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction delays rehabilitation and results in significant morbidity and is most prevalent in women over 40.

Objective

To ascertain whether posterior tibial tendon should be routinely explored in displaced medial malleolar fractures and consequently should post-operative rehabilitation of ankle fractures be modified. Intra-operative assessment of the tendon may help with this diagnosis and consequently alter post-operative rehabilitation.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 164 - 164
1 May 2012
H. C A. W S. J A. M
Full Access

With increased shift working, multiple hand-overs, demand for trauma beds frequently outstripping supply, split-site working, shared care with other specialties and tertiary referrals awaiting transfer, keeping track of trauma patients can be difficult. To solve this problem we developed the Virtual Trauma Orthopaedic Management System (VTOMS) to monitor pre-operative trauma inpatients. VTOMS is a secure, networked system linked to the patient administration system (PAS). It can be accessed by the entire multidisciplinary team from any PC in the Trust. The main information is also displayed on plasma screens in the trauma unit.

The status of patients requiring surgery is displayed (e.g. fit and ready, awaiting investigation, or unfit) with alerts on acutely unwell or unstable patients. Further details can be obtained by ‘drilling down’. The system has an inbuilt patient clock which ‘traffic lights’ patients awaiting theatre, providing a visual warning if waiting time is prolonged. Amber is set at 48 hours and red is 72 hours for most injuries. This facilitates real-time management of the trauma workload, allowing extra resources to be deployed early if it is seen that waiting times are climbing, or the case-mix is particularly complex.

After successful use on trauma inpatients, the VTOMS system was extended to create a ‘virtual trauma ward’ where patients are pre-assessed in hospital and, if clinically appropriate, wait at home until a suitable theatre slot becomes available. The patient is contacted daily to monitor their clinical situation and brought in fasting on the morning of surgery. Using this ‘just in time’ philosophy 195 patients passed through our ‘virtual trauma ward’ in the six months to December 2009. The reduced length of stay saved 514 bed days, equivalent to £115,650 (£231,300 per annum), and minimised the impact of trauma on the elective service.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 175 - 175
1 May 2012
S. J A. L S. G L. S A. W M. R
Full Access

Background

Every trainee in Trauma and Orthopaedics (T&O) in the UK and Ireland records their operative experience via the Faculty of Health Informatics eLogbook. Since August 2009, all doctors were subject to the full European Working Time Directive (EWTD) restrictions of 48 hours of work per week. We have previously shown that the implementation of shift working patterns in some units in preparation for these restrictions reduced training opportunities by 50% (elective surgical exposure). We have now analysed the national data to establish whether operative experience has fallen since August 2009.

Methods

All operative data recorded nationally by trainees (all years, all supervision levels) between the 3 months of August to October 2007, 2008 and 2009 were compared. Data were available for 1091 ‘validated’ training grade surgeons (ST3-8 or equivalent) in 2007, 1103 in 2008 and 767 in 2009. Mean operative figures were calculated per trainee for each of the 3-month time periods.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 38 - 38
1 May 2012
A. H A. W K. B
Full Access

Purpose

To determine, in skeletally immature children with acceptably angulated (< = 15 degrees deformity at presentation) distal radius fractures, if a pre-fabricated wrist splint is at least as effective as a cast.

Methods

A randomised controlled, non-inferiority, single blinded, single-centre trial was performed. The primary outcome was physical function at six weeks. Secondary outcomes included angulation, wrist range of motion, strength, pain, and patient preferences.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXI | Pages 29 - 29
1 May 2012
A. W D. A C. W
Full Access

Antibiotic bone cement as a form of prophylaxis against deep infection for total hip joint replacements is widely used; however its efficacy has not been proven. This study aims to determine if the use of prophylactic antibiotic cement for primary total hip joint replacements in New Zealand reduces the risk of deep infection requiring revision.

Data from January 1999 to December 2007 were recovered from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. Proportional hazards regression analysis was used to study the relative revision risks or failure rates between those THJR which utilised antibiotic bone cement and those using plain bone cement.

Of the 32,646 hips included in the study 1376 were revised. The overall use of antibiotic and plain cement through this time period is relatively equal, with 18,863 (54.7%) receiving ABC compared to 16,295 (46.3%) hips receiving plain cement. The presence of antibiotics in bone cement was not found to affect whether the hip went on to get revised for deep infection (p =0.16). Nor was the type of operating theatre (p=0.13), the use of space suits (p=0.97), and the operative time (p=0.55). Younger age was found to be the most significant indicator for the need for revision for infection (p value 0.00014).

The induction of antibiotic resistance and the significant additional costs associated with antibiotic bone cement cannot be denied. While the literature supports the prophylactic use of antibiotic bone cement for patients at high risk of infection, the routine use in patients who have a low risk of infection may not be justified.