Abstract

In knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients, a focal cartilage defect is commonly found, especially in the medial compartment. In addition, cartilage softening is often observed at the defect rim. Both factors may alter the loading distribution and thereby the contact pressures, previously related to cartilage degeneration. To determine contact pressure in-vivo during motion, computational modelling can be used. The aim of this study was to analyse knee cartilage pressures during walking in healthy and damaged cartilage using a multi-scale modelling approach. Using 3D motion capture and musculoskeletal models, multi-body simulations of the stance phase of gait calculated knee kinematics and muscle, ligament and contact forces. These were subsequently imposed to a finite element (FE) model including tibial and femoral bones and cartilage. FE analyses were performed using intact cartilage as well as including a medial tibial cartilage defect, with and without softening of the defect rim. Specifically during loading response, a medial cartilage defect reduced the contact surface (−28%) and thereby increased the contact pressure (+33%) compared to intact cartilage, particularly on the medial compartment (+75% in contact pressure). Including softening of the cartilage rim increased the contact area (+22%) and decreased contact pressures (−9%) compared to the defect. This indicates that a focal defect increases the cartilage loading. This is partially compensated by softening of the cartilage rim. Therefore, the role of focal defects in altered cartilage loading and consequent OA development always needs to be discussed acknowledging the cartilage status at the defect rim.

Healthy cartilage is essential for optimal joint function. Although, articular cartilage defects are highly prevalent in the active population and might hamper joint function, the effect of articular cartilage defects on knee contact forces and pressures is not yet documented. Therefore, the present study compared knee contact forces and pressures between patients with a tibiofemoral cartilage defect and healthy controls. This might provide additional insights in movement adaptations and the role of altered loading in the progression from defect to OA. Experimental gait data was collected in 15 patients with isolated articular cartilage defects (8 medial-affected, 7 lateral-affected) and 19 healthy asymptomatic controls and was processed using a musculoskeletal model to calculate contact forces and pressures. Differences between medial-affected, lateral-affected and controls were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis tests and individually compared using Mann-Whitney-U tests (alpha <0.05). The lateral-affected group walked significantly slower compared to the healthy controls. No adaptations in the movement pattern that resulted in decreased loading on the injured condyle were observed. Additionally, the location of loading was not significantly affected. The current results suggest that isolated cartilage defects do not induce changes in the knee joint loading pattern. Consequently, the involved condyle will be equally loaded, indicating that a similar amount of force should be distributed over the remaining cartilage surrounding the articular cartilage defect and may cause local degenerative changes in the cartilage. This in combination with inflammatory responses might play a key role in the progression from articular cartilage defect to a more severe OA phenotype.