Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Jun 2016
Chambers S Kumar C Rymaszewski L Madeley N
Full Access

Isolated Weber B fractures usually heal uneventfully but traditionally require regular review due to the possibility of medial ligament injury allowing displacement. Following recent studies suggesting that delayed talar shift is uncommon we introduced a functional treatment protocol and present the early results.

86 patients presenting acutely with Weber B fractures without talar shift between January and July 2015 were included. Patients were splinted in a removable boot and allowed to weight bear. ED notes and radiographs were reviewed by an Orthopaedic consultant. Patients without signs of medial injury were discharged with an information leaflet and advice. If signs of medial ligament injury were noted or the medial findings were not documented the patient was reviewed in fracture clinic at 4 weeks post-injury. If talar shift developed the patient was to be converted to operative treatment. MOXFQ and EDQ5 scores were collected.

50 patients had signs of medial ligament injury or no documented medial findings and of these 43 attended fracture clinic. Of 36 patients without signs of medial ligament injury 28 were discharged according to protocol and 8 patients attended fracture clinic. One discharged patient re-accessed care. Of 52 patients reviewed in the fracture clinic none developed delayed talar shift and all continued with non-operative treatment. The outcome scores were comparable to those in the published literature.

We conclude the risk of delayed talar shift is low and satisfactory outcomes can be safely achieved with our functional protocol. Additional tests/imaging to establish the integrity of the medial ligament may be unnecessary.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Dec 2015
Silverwood R Gupta R Lee P Rymaszewski L Jenkins P
Full Access

There is an increasing trend towards radial head replacement (RHR) or fixation for complex radial head fractures. These injuries are identified by grossly displaced fragments or elbow instability. The aim of this study was to examine the outcome of a surgical protocol that emphasised delayed radial-head excision (RHE) as the procedure of choice. When the humero-ulnar joint was congruent, intervention was delayed 10 to 14 days to allow time for ligamentous healing. RHR was performed if instability was demonstrated on-table.

A retrospective study was performed to identify the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for a radial head fracture between 2008 and 2014. There were 18 Mason Type III and 18 Mason Type IV injuries. There was an associated coronoid fracture in 17 patients. RHE was performed in 28 patients, of which the reoperation rate was 2 (7.1%). RHR was performed in 15 patients, of whom 4 (27%) had reintervention. RHR was most common in the Type III coronoid fractures. The cumulative reoperation rate was 9.3% at six months and 15.4% at two years. The median Oxford Elbow Score (OES) was 85.4 (IQR 73.4 to 99.5). Time from injury was the only predictor of the Oxford Elbow Score (p=0.04).

This surgical protocol resulted in a reduced need for RHR, a low reintervention rate, and satisfactory function. RHR should be reserved for cases where stability cannot be achieved on-table. Stability can be maximised by delaying RHE until early ligamentous healing occurs.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1132 - 1138
1 Aug 2015
Aitken SA Jenkins PJ Rymaszewski L

The best method of managing a fracture of the distal humerus in a frail low-demand patient with osteoporotic bone remains controversial. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been recommended for patients in whom open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is not possible. Conservative methods of treatment, including the ‘bag of bones’ technique (acceptance of displacement of the bony fragments and early mobilisation), are now rarely considered as they are believed to give a poor functional result.

We reviewed 40 elderly and low-demand patients (aged 50 to 93 years, 72% women) with a fracture of the distal humerus who had been treated conservatively at our hospital between March 2008 and December 2013, and assessed their short- and medium-term functional outcome.

In the short-term, the mean Broberg and Morrey score improved from 42 points (poor; 23 to 80) at six weeks after injury to 67 points (fair; 40 to 88) by three months.

In the medium-term, surviving patients (n = 20) had a mean Oxford elbow score of 30 points (7 to 48) at four years and a mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 38 points (0 to 75): 95% reported a functional range of elbow flexion. The cumulative rate of fracture union at one year was 53%. The mortality at five years approached 40%.

Conservative management of a fracture of the distal humerus in a low-demand patient only gives a modest functional result, but avoids the substantial surgical risks associated with primary ORIF or TEA.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1132–8.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 6 - 6
1 May 2015
Aitken S Jenkins P Rymaszewski L
Full Access

The management of distal humeral fractures in low-demand patients with osteoporotic bone remains controversial. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been recommended for cases where achieving stable ORIF can be difficult. The ‘bag of bones’ technique, (early movement with fragments accepted in their displaced position), is now rarely considered as it is commonly believed to confer a poor functional result. The aim of this study was to present the short- and medium-term functional outcomes following the primary conservative treatment of distal humeral fractures in elderly and low-demand patients.

We carried out a retrospective case note and radiograph review of all patients (n=40) aged 50 years or more, with distal humeral fractures treated conservatively at our institution over a six-year period. Short-term function was assessed using the Broberg and Morrey (B&M) score. Medium term function was assessed by telephone interview (n=20) using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), QuickDASH and a pain questionnaire.

The mean post-injury B&M score improved from 42 points at 6 weeks to 67 points by 3 months. By four years, surviving patients had a mean OES of 30 points, a mean QuickDASH of 38 points, and 95% reported a functional range of elbow flexion. Those with fracture non-union experienced greater pain on repetitive elbow activities, but no difference in rest pain, compared with patients whose fractures had united. The cumulative 1-year rate of fracture union was 53%, while the 5-year mortality approached 40%.

Conservative management of distal humeral fractures confers a reasonable functional result to the patient whilst avoiding the substantial surgical risks associated with primary ORIF or TEA.