header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVIII | Pages 145 - 145
1 Sep 2012
Fabbri N Kreshak JL Ruggieri P Sim FH Mercuri M
Full Access

Purpose

Durable fixation may be difficult to achieve when significant bone loss is present, as it occurs in pelvic sarcoma resection and revision surgery of tumor implants. Purpose of this study was to review clinical results of primary and revision surgery of the pelvis and lower extremity in the setting of severe bone loss following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma using modular porous tantalum implants.

Method

Retrospective study of 15 patients (nine females, six males) undergoing primary or revision pelvic reconstruction (five patients) or revision surgery of a tumor implant of the hip (five patients), knee (four patients), and ankle (one patient) using porous tantalum implants was undertaken. Reason for the tumor implant was resection of bone sarcoma in 13 cases and tumor-like massive bone loss in the remaining two cases. Cause for revision was aseptic failure (nine patients) or deep infection (six patients); average age at the time of surgery was 31 years (16–61 yrs). Revision was managed in a staged fashion in all the six infected cases. All patients presented severe combined segmental and cavitary bone defects. Bone loss was managed in all patients using porous tantalum implants as augmentation of residual bone stock and associated with a megaprosthesis in eight cases (five proximal femur, two distal femur, one proximal tibia). Average follow-up was 4.5 years for hip/knee implants and 2.5 yrs for pelvic reconstructions (range 1–6.8 yrs). Minimum follow-up of two years was available in 11 cases.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XL | Pages 155 - 155
1 Sep 2012
Ruggieri P Pala E Mavrogenis AF Romantini M Manfrini M Mercuri M
Full Access

Introduction

Historically, amputation or rotationplasty were the treatment of choice in skeletally immature patients. The introduction of expandable endoprostheses in the late 1980s offered the advantages of limb-salvage and limb length equality at skeletal maturity and a promising alternative with improved cosmetic results and immediate weight bearing.

Objective

to describe the Rizzoli experience in reconstruction with three different types of expandable prostheses in growing children with malignant bone tumors of the femur, assess the outcome of limb salvage in these patients, analyze survival and complications related to these prostheses used over time.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVIII | Pages 143 - 143
1 Sep 2012
Kreshak JL Fabbri N Manfrini M Gebhardt M Mercuri M
Full Access

Purpose

Rotationplasty was first described in 1930 by Borggreve for treatment of limb shortening with knee ankylosis after tuberculosis. In 1948, Van Nes described its use for management of congenital defects of the femur and in the 1980s, Kotz and Salzer reported on patients with malignant bone tumors around the knee treated by rotationplasty as an alternative to above-knee amputation. Currently, rotationplasty is one of the options for surgical management of lower extremity bone sarcomas in skeletally immature patients but alternative limb salvage techniques, such as the use of expandable endoprosthesis, are also available. Despite rather satisfactory functional results have been uniformly associated with rotationplasty, concern still exists about the potential psychological impact of the new body imagerelated to the strange appearance of the rotated limb. Results of rotationplasty for sarcomas of the distal femur over a 20-year period were analyzed, focusing on long-term survival, function, quality of life and mental health.

Method

Retrospective study of 73 children who had a rotationplasty performed at two institutions between 1984 and 2007 for a bone sarcoma of the distal femur; 42 males and 31 females, mean age at surgery 8.7 yrs (range 3–17). Four patients were converted to transfemoral amputation due to early vascular complication; 25 eventually died of their disease (mean survival 34 months, range 4–127). The 46 remaining survivors were evaluated for updated clinical outcome, MSTS score, gait analysis, SF-36 score, quality of life interview and psychological assessment at mean follow-up of 15 yrs (range 3–23).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 196 - 196
1 Jun 2012
Ruggieri P Pala E Mercuri M
Full Access

Objective

was to review the experience of the Rizzoli with megaprosthetic reconstruction of the extremities in musculoskeletal oncology.

Material and methods

Between April 1983 and December 2007, 1036 modular uncemented megaprostheses of the lower limbs were implanted in 605 males and 431 females: 160 KMFTR(r), 633 HMRS(r) prostheses, 68 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge and 175 GMRS(r). Sites: distal femur 659, proximal tibia 198, proximal femur 145, total femur 25, distal femur and proximal tibia 9. Histology showed 612 osteosarcomas, 113 chondrosarcomas, 72 Ewing's sarcoma, 31 metastatic carcinomas, 89 GCT, 36 MFH,68 other diagnoses.

Between 1975 and 2006 at Rizzoli 344 reconstructions of the humerus using prosthetic devices (alone or in association with allografts) were performed: 289 MRS(r), 37 HMRS(r), 2 Osteobridge(r), 4 composite prostheses, 8 Coonrad-Morrey(r), 4 custom made prostheses. Sites of reconstruction were: proximal humerus 311, distal humerus 19, diaphysis 5, total humerus 9. Histology showed 146 osteosarcomas, 56 chondrosarcomas, 23 Ewing's sarcoma, 67 metastatic carcinomas, 14 GCT, 10 MFH, 28 other diagnoses.

Patients were followed periodically in the clinic. Information were obtained from clinical charts and imaging studies with special attention to major complications requiring revision surgery. Major prostheses-related complications were analysed and functional results evaluated according to the MSTS system. Univariate analysis by Kaplan-Meier actuarial curves was used for studying implant survival to major complications.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 197 - 197
1 Jun 2012
Ruggieri P Pala E Mercuri M
Full Access

Objective

of this study was to analyse results of two stage revisions in infected megaprostheses in lower limb.

Material and methods

Between April 1983 and December 2007, 1036 modular uncemented megaprostheses were implanted in 605 males and 431 females with mean age 33.5 yrs: 160 KMFTR(r), 633 HMRS(r) prostheses, 68 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge and 175 GMRS(r). Sites: distal femur 659, proximal tibia 198, proximal femur 145, total femur 25, distal femur and proximal tibia 9. Histology showed 612 osteosarcomas, 113 chondrosarcomas, 72 Ewing's sarcoma, 31 metastatic carcinomas, 89 GCT, 36 MFH,68 other diagnoses.

Infection occurred in 80 cases (7.7%) at mean time of 4 yrs (min 1 month, max 19 yrs) in 18 KMFTR(r), 47 HMRS(r), 5 HMRS(r) Rotating Hinge, 10 GMRS(r). Sites: 51 distal femurs, 21 proximal tibias, 6 proximal femurs, 1 total femur and 1 extrarticular knee resection. Most frequent bacteria causing infection were: Staphilococcus Epidermidis (39 cases), Staphilococcus Aureus (17) and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (5). Infection occurred postoperatively within 4 weeks in 9 cases, early (within 6 months) in 12 cases, late (after 6 months) in 59 cases.

Usual surgical treatment was “two stage” (removal of implant, one or more cement spacers with antibiotics, new implant), with antibiotics according with coltures. One stage treatment was used for immediate postoperative infections, only since 1998.

Functional results after treatment of infection were assessed using the MSTS system.